World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
102
Citations
45384
World Ranking
7569
National Ranking
3947

Judd E. Hollander publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judd E. Hollander sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 611 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Judd E. Hollander D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Judd E. Hollander sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 102 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Judd E. Hollander is affiliated with Thomas Jefferson University in the United States. The research conducted centers primarily on medicine, with a focus on several specialized subfields including cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, public health, environmental and occupational health, epidemiology, endocrinology, diabetes and metabolism, and general health professions.

Their work addresses multiple main topics within medical research:

  • Telemedicine and telehealth implementation
  • Acute myocardial infarction research
  • Diabetes management and education
  • Emergency and acute care studies
  • Patient satisfaction in healthcare
  • Chronic disease management strategies
  • Healthcare systems and technology

Judd E. Hollander has published extensively in various venues, often appearing in journals such as Academic Emergency Medicine, Population Health Management, Annals of Emergency Medicine, Circulation, and BMC Endocrine Disorders.

Selected recent papers authored or co-authored by Hollander include:

  • Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19, 2020, New England Journal of Medicine
  • Quality Frameworks for Virtual Care: Expert Panel Recommendations, 2022, Mayo Clinic Proceedings Innovations Quality & Outcomes
  • Biomarkers Enhance Discrimination and Prognosis of Type 2 Myocardial Infarction, 2020, Circulation
  • Echocardiographic assessment of insulin-like growth factor binding protein-7 and early identification of acute heart failure, 2020, ESC Heart Failure
  • Mistrust, Neighborhood Deprivation, and Telehealth Use in African Americans with Diabetes, 2021, Population Health Management

The scientist collaborates frequently with other researchers in the field. Notable frequent co-authors include:

  • Kristin L. Rising
  • Anna Marie Chang
  • Robert H. Christenson
  • W. Frank Peacock
  • Richard M. Nowak

Judd E. Hollander's academic output spans a broad range of topics combining clinical care research, chronic disease management, and telehealth implementation strategies, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to contemporary medical challenges.

Best Publications

  • Rapid measurement of B-type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure.

    Alan S. Maisel;Padma Krishnaswamy;Richard M. Nowak;James McCord

  • Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19.

    Judd E. Hollander;Brendan G. Carr

  • Effect of nesiritide in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.

    C. M. O'Connor;R. C. Starling;A. F. Hernandez;P. W. Armstrong

  • B-type natriuretic peptide and clinical judgment in emergency diagnosis of heart failure: analysis from Breathing Not Properly (BNP) Multinational Study.

    Peter A. McCullough;Richard M. Nowak;James McCord;Judd E. Hollander

  • Cognitive therapy for the prevention of suicide attempts: a randomized controlled trial.

    Gregory K. Brown;Thomas Ten Have;Gregg R. Henriques;Sharon X. Xie

  • CT Angiography for Safe Discharge of Patients with Possible Acute Coronary Syndromes

    Harold I. Litt;Constantine Gatsonis;Brad Snyder;Harjit Singh

  • B-type natriuretic peptide and renal function in the diagnosis of heart failure: an analysis from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study.

    Peter A. McCullough;Philippe Duc;Torbjørn Omland;James McCord

  • Bedside B-Type natriuretic peptide in the emergency diagnosis of heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction: Results from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study☆

    Alan S Maisel;James McCord;Richard M Nowak;Judd E Hollander

  • Emergency Department Crowding Is Associated With Poor Care for Patients With Severe Pain

    Jesse M. Pines;Judd E. Hollander

  • Primary results of the Rapid Emergency Department Heart Failure Outpatient Trial (REDHOT). A multicenter study of B-type natriuretic peptide levels, emergency department decision making, and outcomes in patients presenting with shortness of breath.

    Alan Maisel;Judd E. Hollander;David Guss;Peter McCullough

  • Sexual Dysfunction and Cardiac Risk (the Second Princeton Consensus Conference)

    J. B. Kostis;G. Jackson;R. Rosen;E. Barrett-Connor

  • BNP Consensus Panel 2004: A Clinical Approach for the Diagnostic, Prognostic, Screening, Treatment Monitoring, and Therapeutic Roles of Natriuretic Peptides in Cardiovascular Diseases

    Marc A. Silver;Alan Maisel;Clyde W. Yancy;Peter A. McCullough

  • Diagnosis of Acute Aortic Dissection by D-Dimer The International Registry of Acute Aortic Dissection Substudy on Biomarkers (IRAD-Bio) Experience

    Toru Suzuki;Alessandro Distante;Antonella Zizza;Santi Trimarchi

  • Patient Perceptions of Telehealth Primary Care Video Visits

    Rhea E. Powell;Jeffrey M. Henstenburg;Grace Cooper;Judd E. Hollander

  • The effect of emergency department crowding on patient satisfaction for admitted patients.

    Jesse M. Pines;Sanjay Iyer;Maureen Disbot;Judd E. Hollander

  • What is an acceptable risk of major adverse cardiac event in chest pain patients soon after discharge from the Emergency Department? A clinical survey

    Martin Than;Mel Herbert;Dylan Flaws;Louise Cullen;Louise Cullen

  • The cyanoacrylate topical skin adhesives.

    Adam J. Singer;James V. Quinn;Judd E. Hollander

  • How obesity affects the cut-points for B-type natriuretic peptide in the diagnosis of acute heart failure. Results from the Breathing Not Properly Multinational Study.

    Lori B. Daniels;Lori B. Daniels;Paul Clopton;Paul Clopton;Vikas Bhalla;Vikas Bhalla;Padma Krishnaswamy;Padma Krishnaswamy

  • Gender disparity in analgesic treatment of emergency department patients with acute abdominal pain.

    Esther H. Chen;Frances S. Shofer;Anthony J. Dean;Judd E. Hollander

  • Cognitive Therapy for the Prevention of Suicide Attempts

    Gregory K. Brown;Gregg R. Henriques;Sharon X. Xie;Judd E. Hollander

Frequent Co-Authors

Frances S. Shofer
Frances S. Shofer University of Pennsylvania
Alan S. Maisel
Alan S. Maisel University of California, San Diego
Charles V. Pollack
Charles V. Pollack Thomas Jefferson University
Alan H.B. Wu
Alan H.B. Wu University of California, San Francisco
William T. Abraham
William T. Abraham The Ohio State University
Paul Clopton
Paul Clopton Stanford University
Christopher J. Lindsell
Christopher J. Lindsell Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Torbjørn Omland
Torbjørn Omland Akershus University Hospital
W. Brian Gibler
W. Brian Gibler University of Cincinnati
Sean P. Collins
Sean P. Collins Vanderbilt University Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

As you consider studying Medicine in the USA, it’s important to be aware of related online degree options and pathways. For many aspiring healthcare professionals, nursing serves as both a fulfilling career and a stepping stone within the medical field. Exploring how much does online nursing school cost can help you plan for a more affordable entry into healthcare education, especially when compared to traditional, on-campus programs.

Registered Nurses (RNs) looking to advance their qualifications may be interested in the most affordable accredited online rn to bsn programs. These flexible programs allow RNs to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing (BSN) while continuing to work in their field. For those aiming even higher, there are also online phd programs in nursing, a top choice for future nurse educators and research leaders.

If you’re considering switching careers to nursing from a non-nursing background, look into direct entry msn programs for non-nurses online. These accelerated Master of Science in Nursing programs provide a direct route for non-nurses to join the healthcare workforce quickly and efficiently.

Best Scientists Citing Judd E. Hollander

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles