World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Regina M. Sullivan

Regina M. Sullivan

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
73
Citations
15752
World Ranking
2242
National Ranking
1065

Regina M. Sullivan publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina M. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 202 publications — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Regina M. Sullivan D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Regina M. Sullivan sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 73 D-Index — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

Regina M. Sullivan is affiliated with New York University in the United States and has a research focus spanning multiple fields including psychology, neuroscience, and medicine. Their work intersects with several subfields such as social psychology, clinical psychology, pediatrics, perinatology, child health, endocrine and autonomic systems, as well as public health, environmental, and occupational health.

The scientist's research covers a broad array of topics including neuroendocrine regulation and behavior, child and adolescent psychosocial and emotional development, maternal mental health during pregnancy and postpartum, stress responses and cortisol, prenatal substance exposure effects, neuroscience of respiration and sleep, and olfactory and sensory function studies.

Key recent publications include:

  • "Oxytocin neurons enable social transmission of maternal behaviour," 2021, Nature
  • "Outcomes at least 90 days since onset of myocarditis after mRNA COVID-19 vaccination in adolescents and young adults in the USA: a follow-up surveillance study," 2022, The Lancet Child & Adolescent Health
  • "Antagonistic circuits mediating infanticide and maternal care in female mice," 2023, Nature
  • "Bidirectional control of infant rat social behavior via dopaminergic innervation of the basolateral amygdala," 2021, Neuron
  • "Neurobiology of Infant Fear and Anxiety: Impacts of Delayed Amygdala Development and Attachment Figure Quality," 2020, Biological Psychiatry

The scientist frequently publishes in a range of venues, with multiple contributions to Biological Psychiatry, bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Nature, Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, and Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience.

Collaboration has been an important aspect of their work, with frequent coauthors including Maya Opendak, Donald A. Wilson, Charlis Raineki, Roseanna M. Zanca, and Rosemarie E. Perry.

Best Publications

  • Psychobiological Mechanisms Underlying the Social Buffering of the Hypothalamic-Pituitary-Adrenocortical Axis: A Review of Animal Models and Human Studies Across Development

    Camelia E. Hostinar;Regina M. Sullivan;Megan R. Gunnar

  • Cortical processing of odor objects.

    Donald A. Wilson;Regina M. Sullivan;Regina M. Sullivan;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Fear Erasure in Mice Requires Synergy Between Antidepressant Drugs and Extinction Training

    Nina N. Karpova;Anouchka Pickenhagen;Jesse Lindholm;Ettore Tiraboschi

  • Maternal presence serves as a switch between learning fear and attraction in infancy

    Stephanie Moriceau;Regina M Sullivan

  • Chronic early life stress induced by limited bedding and nesting (LBN) material in rodents: critical considerations of methodology, outcomes and translational potential

    Claire-Dominique Walker;Kevin G. Bath;Marian Joels;Aniko Korosi

  • Good memories of bad events in infancy.

    Regina M. Sullivan;Margo Landers;Brian Yeaman;Donald A. Wilson

  • Norepinephrine and Learning-Induced Plasticity in Infant Rat Olfactory System

    Regina M. Sullivan;Donald A. Wilson;Michael Leon

  • Neurobiology of associative learning in the neonate: early olfactory learning.

    Donald A. Wilson;Regina M. Sullivan

  • The development and neurobiology of infant attachment and fear.

    Margo S. Landers;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Dual circuitry for odor-shock conditioning during infancy: corticosterone switches between fear and attraction via amygdala.

    Stephanie Moriceau;Donald A. Wilson;Seymour Levine;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Effects of Early-Life Abuse Differ across Development: Infant Social Behavior Deficits Are Followed by Adolescent Depressive-Like Behaviors Mediated by the Amygdala

    Charlis Raineki;Millie Rincón Cortés;Laure Belnoue;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Oxytocin neurons enable social transmission of maternal behaviour

    Ioana Carcea;Naomi López Caraballo;Bianca J. Marlin;Rumi Ooyama

  • Neurobiology of Infant Attachment

    Stephanie Moriceau;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Association of an Odor with Activation of Olfactory Bulb Noradrenergic β-Receptors or Locus Coeruleus Stimulation is Sufficient to Produce Learned Approach Responses to that Odor in Neonatal Rats

    R. M. Sullivan;G. Stackenwalt;F. Nasr;C. Lemon

  • Plasticity in the Olfactory System: Lessons for the Neurobiology of Memory:

    D. A. Wilson;A. R. Best;R. M. Sullivan

  • Early-Life Stress Disrupts Attachment Learning: The Role of Amygdala Corticosterone, Locus Ceruleus Corticotropin Releasing Hormone, and Olfactory Bulb Norepinephrine

    Stephanie Moriceau;Kiseko Shionoya;Katherine Jakubs;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Memory of early maltreatment: neonatal behavioral and neural correlates of maternal maltreatment within the context of classical conditioning.

    Tania L. Roth;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Developing a neurobehavioral animal model of infant attachment to an abusive caregiver

    Charlis Raineki;Stephanie Moriceau;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Olfactory Classical Conditioning in Neonates

    Regina M. Sullivan;Suzanne Taborsky-Barba;Raffael Mendoza;Alison Itano

  • Unique neural circuitry for neonatal olfactory learning.

    Stephanie Moriceau;Regina M. Sullivan

  • Infant Bonding and Attachment to the Caregiver: Insights from Basic and Clinical Science

    Regina Sullivan;Rosemarie Perry;Aliza Sloan;Karine Kleinhaus

Frequent Co-Authors

Donald A. Wilson
Donald A. Wilson Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research
Michael Leon
Michael Leon University of California, Irvine
Nim Tottenham
Nim Tottenham Columbia University
Valérie Doyère
Valérie Doyère Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Johan N. Lundström
Johan N. Lundström Karolinska Institute
Clancy Blair
Clancy Blair New York University
Joseph E. LeDoux
Joseph E. LeDoux New York University
Chiye Aoki
Chiye Aoki New York University
Mary Dozier
Mary Dozier University of Delaware
Megan R. Gunnar
Megan R. Gunnar University of Minnesota

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Regina M. Sullivan

Trending Scientists