World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Mathematics 57 677 573 343 270 199 16875
Computer Science 57 3767 3662 1799 1735 219 17018

Dorit S. Hochbaum publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Dorit S. Hochbaum between 1980 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Dorit S. Hochbaum published across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 12 publications in 2020. 4 of the 229 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1980 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 12. Peak 12 publications in 2020. 1980: 2 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 3 publications 1983: 2 publications 1984: 3 publications 1985: 5 publications 1986: 8 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 2 publications 1989: 4 publications 1990: 5 publications 1991: 2 publications 1992: 6 publications 1993: 5 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 9 publications 1997: 9 publications 1998: 8 publications 1999: 4 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 4 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 1 publication 2006: 5 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 9 publications 2011: 8 publications 2012: 2 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 3 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 8 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 5 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 3 publications 2026: 1 publication
1980 2026

229 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Dorit S. Hochbaum: publications per year, 1980 to 2026
Year Publications
1980 2
1981 0
1982 3
1983 2
1984 3
1985 5
1986 8
1987 4
1988 2
1989 4
1990 5
1991 2
1992 6
1993 5
1994 6
1995 2
1996 9
1997 9
1998 8
1999 4
2000 3
2001 4
2002 4
2003 4
2004 5
2005 1
2006 5
2007 3
2008 7
2009 6
2010 9
2011 8
2012 2
2013 7
2014 2
2015 3
2016 5
2017 3
2018 8
2019 8
2020 12
2021 6
2022 6
2023 5
2024 10
2025 3
2026 1
Total 229
Download as CSV

Dorit S. Hochbaum publications per year - data summary

  • Dorit S. Hochbaum, a Mathematics scholar from University of California, Berkeley, has 229 publications recorded across 47 years, from 1980 to 2026.
  • The oldest publication on record dates to 1980 and the most recent to 2026.
  • The most productive year is 2020, with 12 publications.
  • The least productive years with any output are 2005 and 2026, with 1 publication each.
  • 1 of the 47 years in the span carries no publications at all (1981).
  • The rate of publication averages 4.9 papers per year over the whole span, or 5.0 per year counting only the 46 years with at least one publication.
  • The last 5 years on the chart (2022-2026) hold 25 publications, 11% of the career total.
  • Split into equal eras - 1980-1995: 59 publications (3.7 per year); 1996-2011: 89 publications (5.6 per year); 2012-2026: 81 publications (5.4 per year).
  • Comparing the opening and closing eras, the overall trend of publication is rising.

Dorit S. Hochbaum publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorit S. Hochbaum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
25 50 75 100
Bar chart with 100 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 42–46 to 537+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 112. Most scientists, 112, have 142–146 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 197–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 83 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientist 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientist 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientist 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42–46 publications 537+

This scientist: 199 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
42–46 3
47–51 5
52–56 7
57–61 20
62–66 14
67–71 25
72–76 19
77–81 35
82–86 50
87–91 60
92–96 86
97–101 84
102–106 83
107–111 90
112–116 99
117–121 90
122–126 91
127–131 109
132–136 110
137–141 98
142–146 112
147–151 102
152–156 88
157–161 106
162–166 83
167–171 102
172–176 77
177–181 81
182–186 78
187–191 71
192–196 92
197–201 64 199
202–206 69
207–211 64
212–216 62
217–221 58
222–226 53
227–231 50
232–236 46
237–241 46
242–246 46
247–251 43
252–256 29
257–261 45
262–266 30
267–271 33
272–276 34
277–281 30
282–286 31
287–291 21
292–296 34
297–301 26
302–306 10
307–311 17
312–316 23
317–321 13
322–326 16
327–331 26
332–336 13
337–341 13
342–346 16
347–351 17
352–356 12
357–361 18
362–366 18
367–371 9
372–376 11
377–381 8
382–386 8
387–391 9
392–396 9
397–401 8
402–406 11
407–411 6
412–416 6
417–421 9
422–426 8
427–431 5
432–436 8
437–441 8
442–446 4
447–451 4
452–456 4
457–461 2
462–466 2
467–471 4
472–476 3
477–481 3
482–486 6
487–491 3
492–496 5
497–501 5
502–506 1
507–511 6
512–516 4
517–521 1
522–526 3
527–531 1
532–536 4
537+ 100
Download as CSV

Dorit S. Hochbaum publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the publication count of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 100 ranges running from 42–46 to 537+ publications.
  • Dorit S. Hochbaum, a Mathematics scholar from University of California, Berkeley, records 199 publications - the 62nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 62% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Dorit S. Hochbaum, and about 38% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 172–176 publications range, and Dorit S. Hochbaum ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 142–146 publications, holding 112 scientists (3% of the field).
  • 47% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 162–166 publications), so the distribution leans towards the lower end of the scale.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 537 publications or more, 100 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Dorit S. Hochbaum D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorit S. Hochbaum sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 57 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 86+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 174. Most scientists, 174, have 30 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 57 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 138 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Mathematics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 3,584 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 174
31 151
32 174
33 117
34 136
35 127
36 145
37 153
38 150
39 150
40 138
41 136
42 93
43 108
44 115
45 112
46 103
47 75
48 59
49 67
50 60
51 57
52 59
53 62
54 60
55 50
56 42
57 54 57
58 50
59 42
60 41
61 35
62 40
63 21
64 31
65 27
66 29
67 19
68 25
69 17
70 18
71 12
72 14
73 13
74 18
75 9
76 11
77 10
78 9
79 16
80 12
81 10
82 5
83 5
84 13
85 6
86+ 99
Download as CSV

Dorit S. Hochbaum D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026 - data summary

  • The chart plots the discipline H-index (D-index) of all 3,584 Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026, grouped into 57 ranges running from 30 to 86+ D-Index.
  • Dorit S. Hochbaum, a Mathematics scholar from University of California, Berkeley, records 57 D-Index - the 82nd percentile of the discipline.
  • 82% of ranked Mathematics scientists score the same or lower than Dorit S. Hochbaum, and about 18% score higher.
  • The median of the discipline falls in the 42 D-Index range, and Dorit S. Hochbaum ranks above the median.
  • The most crowded range is 30 D-Index, holding 174 scientists (5% of the field).
  • 58% of the field sits in the lowest quarter of the value range (up to 44 D-Index), so the distribution is heavily right-skewed and high scores are rare.
  • The final bar has no upper bound: it groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more, 99 scientists in all (3% of the field).

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to the design and analysis of approximation algorithms, flow problems, and their innovative use in applications, and in solving NP-hard problems.
  • 2005 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

Dorit S. Hochbaum is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research spans several areas within computer science and engineering, focusing primarily on algorithm design, optimization problems, and applications in various domains including bioinformatics and manufacturing.

Their work covers multiple fields of study and subfields, including:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Optimization and Packing Problems
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization

Some of the recent scientific papers by Dorit S. Hochbaum demonstrate their engagement with both theoretical and applied problems in operational research and related fields:

  • "Network-based approaches elucidate differences within APOBEC and clock-like signatures in breast cancer," 2020, Genome Medicine
  • "Identifying Drug Sensitivity Subnetworks with NETPHIX," 2020, iScience
  • "A unified approach for a 1D generalized total variation problem," 2021, Mathematical Programming
  • "Network flow methods for the minimum covariate imbalance problem," 2021, European Journal of Operational Research
  • "A fast and effective breakpoints heuristic algorithm for the quadratic knapsack problem," 2024, European Journal of Operational Research

Frequent co-authors working alongside Hochbaum include:

  • Xu Rao
  • Olivier Goldschmidt
  • Yoo-Ah Kim
  • Damian Wójtowicz
  • Rebecca Sarto Basso

Their scholarly output is often published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • Networks
  • INFORMS Journal on Computing
  • Operations Research Letters

Dorit S. Hochbaum has received recognition including the SIAM Fellow award in 2014 for contributions to approximation algorithms, flow problems, and their application in solving NP-hard problems. They were also named a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2005.

Best Publications

  • A Best Possible Heuristic for the k-Center Problem

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;David B. Shmoys

  • Using dual approximation algorithms for scheduling problems theoretical and practical results

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;David B. Shmoys

  • Approximation schemes for covering and packing problems in image processing and VLSI

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Wolfgang Maass

  • Approximation Algorithms for the Set Covering and Vertex Cover Problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • A unified approach to approximation algorithms for bottleneck problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;David B. Shmoys

  • A polynomial approximation scheme for scheduling on uniform processors: Using the dual approximation approach

    Dorit s. Hochbaum;David B. Shmoys

  • Heuristics for the fixed cost median problem

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Efficient bounds for the stable set, vertex cover and set packing problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Approximating covering and packing problems: set cover, vertex cover, independent set, and related problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • An efficient algorithm for Co-segmentation

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Vikas Singh

  • A Polynomial Algorithm for the k-cut Problem for Fixed k

    Olivier Goldschmidt;Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • The Pseudoflow Algorithm: A New Algorithm for the Maximum-Flow Problem

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Convex separable optimization is not much harder than linear optimization

    D. S. Hochbaum;J. George Shanthikumar

  • Analysis of the greedy approach in problems of maximum k‐coverage

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Anu Pathria

  • Methodologies and Algorithms for Group-Rankings Decision

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Asaf Levin

  • An efficient algorithm for image segmentation, Markov random fields and related problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Performance Analysis and Best Implementations of Old and New Algorithms for the Open-Pit Mining Problem

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Anna Chen

  • Simple and Fast Algorithms for Linear and Integer Programs with Two Variables Per Inequality

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Database Location in Computer Networks

    Marshall L. Fisher;Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Polynomial algorithm for the k-cut problem

    O. Goldschmidt;D.S. Hochbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Shmoys
David B. Shmoys Cornell University
Ron Shamir
Ron Shamir Tel Aviv University
Ravindra K. Ahuja
Ravindra K. Ahuja University of Florida
J. George Shanthikumar
J. George Shanthikumar Purdue University West Lafayette
Roded Sharan
Roded Sharan Tel Aviv University
Nimrod Megiddo
Nimrod Megiddo IBM (United States)
Wolfgang Maass
Wolfgang Maass Graz University of Technology
Joseph (Seffi) Naor
Joseph (Seffi) Naor Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Bhaskar Krishnamachari
Bhaskar Krishnamachari University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various career pathways, often complemented by advanced degrees in related fields. For those interested in business leadership roles, exploring the easiest mba online programs can provide a flexible and manageable way to earn a valuable business degree alongside mathematical expertise.

If affordability is a priority, candidates might consider online dba programs that focus on advanced business administration with a practical approach. These programs often attract math graduates aiming to sharpen analytical and strategic skills for top executive positions.

For individuals looking to blend finance with mathematics, the option of online masters in finance offers an affordable path to specialize in financial models, risk management, and quantitative analysis — key areas where math graduates excel.

Time-conscious students can explore the fastest online mba programs which allow earning an MBA degree quickly without compromising quality. Combining math skills with business acumen through such programs is a strategic move for accelerated career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Dorit S. Hochbaum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles