World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
57
Citations
17018
World Ranking
3767
National Ranking
1798

Mathematics

D-Index
57
Citations
16875
World Ranking
677
National Ranking
342

Dorit S. Hochbaum publication distribution in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Mathematics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorit S. Hochbaum sits on this spectrum.

42–46 publications: 3 scientists 47–51 publications: 5 scientists 52–56 publications: 7 scientists 57–61 publications: 20 scientists 62–66 publications: 14 scientists 67–71 publications: 25 scientists 72–76 publications: 19 scientists 77–81 publications: 35 scientists 82–86 publications: 50 scientists 87–91 publications: 60 scientists 92–96 publications: 86 scientists 97–101 publications: 84 scientists 102–106 publications: 83 scientists 107–111 publications: 90 scientists 112–116 publications: 99 scientists 117–121 publications: 90 scientists 122–126 publications: 91 scientists 127–131 publications: 109 scientists 132–136 publications: 110 scientists 137–141 publications: 98 scientists 142–146 publications: 112 scientists 147–151 publications: 102 scientists 152–156 publications: 88 scientists 157–161 publications: 106 scientists 162–166 publications: 82 scientists 167–171 publications: 102 scientists 172–176 publications: 77 scientists 177–181 publications: 81 scientists 182–186 publications: 78 scientists 187–191 publications: 71 scientists 192–196 publications: 92 scientists 197–201 publications: 64 scientists 202–206 publications: 69 scientists 207–211 publications: 64 scientists 212–216 publications: 62 scientists 217–221 publications: 58 scientists 222–226 publications: 53 scientists 227–231 publications: 50 scientists 232–236 publications: 46 scientists 237–241 publications: 46 scientists 242–246 publications: 46 scientists 247–251 publications: 43 scientists 252–256 publications: 29 scientists 257–261 publications: 45 scientists 262–266 publications: 30 scientists 267–271 publications: 33 scientists 272–276 publications: 34 scientists 277–281 publications: 30 scientists 282–286 publications: 31 scientists 287–291 publications: 21 scientists 292–296 publications: 34 scientists 297–301 publications: 26 scientists 302–306 publications: 10 scientists 307–311 publications: 17 scientists 312–316 publications: 23 scientists 317–321 publications: 13 scientists 322–326 publications: 16 scientists 327–331 publications: 26 scientists 332–336 publications: 13 scientists 337–341 publications: 13 scientists 342–346 publications: 16 scientists 347–351 publications: 17 scientists 352–356 publications: 12 scientists 357–361 publications: 18 scientists 362–366 publications: 18 scientists 367–371 publications: 9 scientists 372–376 publications: 11 scientists 377–381 publications: 8 scientists 382–386 publications: 8 scientists 387–391 publications: 9 scientists 392–396 publications: 9 scientists 397–401 publications: 8 scientists 402–406 publications: 11 scientists 407–411 publications: 6 scientists 412–416 publications: 6 scientists 417–421 publications: 9 scientists 422–426 publications: 8 scientists 427–431 publications: 5 scientists 432–436 publications: 8 scientists 437–441 publications: 8 scientists 442–446 publications: 4 scientists 447–451 publications: 4 scientists 452–456 publications: 4 scientists 457–461 publications: 2 scientists 462–466 publications: 2 scientists 467–471 publications: 4 scientists 472–476 publications: 3 scientists 477–481 publications: 3 scientists 482–486 publications: 6 scientists 487–491 publications: 3 scientists 492–496 publications: 5 scientists 497–501 publications: 5 scientists 502–506 publications: 1 scientists 507–511 publications: 6 scientists 512–516 publications: 4 scientists 517–521 publications: 1 scientists 522–526 publications: 3 scientists 527–531 publications: 1 scientists 532–536 publications: 4 scientists 537+ publications: 100 scientists
42 publications 537+

This scientist: 199 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 537 publications or more.

Dorit S. Hochbaum D-index placement in Mathematics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Mathematics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Dorit S. Hochbaum sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 174 scientists 31 D-Index: 151 scientists 32 D-Index: 174 scientists 33 D-Index: 117 scientists 34 D-Index: 136 scientists 35 D-Index: 127 scientists 36 D-Index: 145 scientists 37 D-Index: 153 scientists 38 D-Index: 150 scientists 39 D-Index: 150 scientists 40 D-Index: 137 scientists 41 D-Index: 136 scientists 42 D-Index: 93 scientists 43 D-Index: 108 scientists 44 D-Index: 115 scientists 45 D-Index: 112 scientists 46 D-Index: 103 scientists 47 D-Index: 75 scientists 48 D-Index: 59 scientists 49 D-Index: 67 scientists 50 D-Index: 60 scientists 51 D-Index: 57 scientists 52 D-Index: 59 scientists 53 D-Index: 62 scientists 54 D-Index: 60 scientists 55 D-Index: 50 scientists 56 D-Index: 42 scientists 57 D-Index: 54 scientists 58 D-Index: 50 scientists 59 D-Index: 42 scientists 60 D-Index: 41 scientists 61 D-Index: 35 scientists 62 D-Index: 40 scientists 63 D-Index: 21 scientists 64 D-Index: 31 scientists 65 D-Index: 27 scientists 66 D-Index: 29 scientists 67 D-Index: 19 scientists 68 D-Index: 25 scientists 69 D-Index: 17 scientists 70 D-Index: 18 scientists 71 D-Index: 12 scientists 72 D-Index: 14 scientists 73 D-Index: 13 scientists 74 D-Index: 18 scientists 75 D-Index: 9 scientists 76 D-Index: 11 scientists 77 D-Index: 10 scientists 78 D-Index: 9 scientists 79 D-Index: 16 scientists 80 D-Index: 12 scientists 81 D-Index: 10 scientists 82 D-Index: 5 scientists 83 D-Index: 5 scientists 84 D-Index: 13 scientists 85 D-Index: 6 scientists 86+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 86+

This scientist: 57 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 86 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2014 - SIAM Fellow For contributions to the design and analysis of approximation algorithms, flow problems, and their innovative use in applications, and in solving NP-hard problems.
  • 2005 - Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS)

Overview

Dorit S. Hochbaum is affiliated with the University of California, Berkeley in the United States. Their research spans several areas within computer science and engineering, focusing primarily on algorithm design, optimization problems, and applications in various domains including bioinformatics and manufacturing.

Their work covers multiple fields of study and subfields, including:

  • Computer Science
  • Engineering
  • Artificial Intelligence
  • Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics
  • Statistics and Probability
  • Management Science and Operations Research

Main topics addressed in their research include:

  • Multi-Criteria Decision Making
  • Optimization and Packing Problems
  • Advanced Causal Inference Techniques
  • Statistical Methods and Inference
  • Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Advanced Manufacturing and Logistics Optimization

Some of the recent scientific papers by Dorit S. Hochbaum demonstrate their engagement with both theoretical and applied problems in operational research and related fields:

  • "Network-based approaches elucidate differences within APOBEC and clock-like signatures in breast cancer," 2020, Genome Medicine
  • "Identifying Drug Sensitivity Subnetworks with NETPHIX," 2020, iScience
  • "A unified approach for a 1D generalized total variation problem," 2021, Mathematical Programming
  • "Network flow methods for the minimum covariate imbalance problem," 2021, European Journal of Operational Research
  • "A fast and effective breakpoints heuristic algorithm for the quadratic knapsack problem," 2024, European Journal of Operational Research

Frequent co-authors working alongside Hochbaum include:

  • Xu Rao
  • Olivier Goldschmidt
  • Yoo-Ah Kim
  • Damian Wójtowicz
  • Rebecca Sarto Basso

Their scholarly output is often published in venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • European Journal of Operational Research
  • Networks
  • INFORMS Journal on Computing
  • Operations Research Letters

Dorit S. Hochbaum has received recognition including the SIAM Fellow award in 2014 for contributions to approximation algorithms, flow problems, and their application in solving NP-hard problems. They were also named a Fellow of the Institute for Operations Research and the Management Sciences (INFORMS) in 2005.

Best Publications

  • A Best Possible Heuristic for the k-Center Problem

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;David B. Shmoys

  • Using dual approximation algorithms for scheduling problems theoretical and practical results

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;David B. Shmoys

  • Approximation schemes for covering and packing problems in image processing and VLSI

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Wolfgang Maass

  • Approximation Algorithms for the Set Covering and Vertex Cover Problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • A unified approach to approximation algorithms for bottleneck problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;David B. Shmoys

  • A polynomial approximation scheme for scheduling on uniform processors: Using the dual approximation approach

    Dorit s. Hochbaum;David B. Shmoys

  • Heuristics for the fixed cost median problem

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Efficient bounds for the stable set, vertex cover and set packing problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Approximating covering and packing problems: set cover, vertex cover, independent set, and related problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • An efficient algorithm for Co-segmentation

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Vikas Singh

  • A Polynomial Algorithm for the k-cut Problem for Fixed k

    Olivier Goldschmidt;Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • The Pseudoflow Algorithm: A New Algorithm for the Maximum-Flow Problem

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Convex separable optimization is not much harder than linear optimization

    D. S. Hochbaum;J. George Shanthikumar

  • Analysis of the greedy approach in problems of maximum k‐coverage

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Anu Pathria

  • Methodologies and Algorithms for Group-Rankings Decision

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Asaf Levin

  • An efficient algorithm for image segmentation, Markov random fields and related problems

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Performance Analysis and Best Implementations of Old and New Algorithms for the Open-Pit Mining Problem

    Dorit S. Hochbaum;Anna Chen

  • Simple and Fast Algorithms for Linear and Integer Programs with Two Variables Per Inequality

    Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Database Location in Computer Networks

    Marshall L. Fisher;Dorit S. Hochbaum

  • Polynomial algorithm for the k-cut problem

    O. Goldschmidt;D.S. Hochbaum

Frequent Co-Authors

David B. Shmoys
David B. Shmoys Cornell University
Ron Shamir
Ron Shamir Tel Aviv University
Ravindra K. Ahuja
Ravindra K. Ahuja University of Florida
J. George Shanthikumar
J. George Shanthikumar Purdue University West Lafayette
Roded Sharan
Roded Sharan Tel Aviv University
Nimrod Megiddo
Nimrod Megiddo IBM (United States)
Wolfgang Maass
Wolfgang Maass Graz University of Technology
Joseph (Seffi) Naor
Joseph (Seffi) Naor Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Bhaskar Krishnamachari
Bhaskar Krishnamachari University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Mathematics in the USA opens doors to various career pathways, often complemented by advanced degrees in related fields. For those interested in business leadership roles, exploring the easiest mba online programs can provide a flexible and manageable way to earn a valuable business degree alongside mathematical expertise.

If affordability is a priority, candidates might consider online dba programs that focus on advanced business administration with a practical approach. These programs often attract math graduates aiming to sharpen analytical and strategic skills for top executive positions.

For individuals looking to blend finance with mathematics, the option of online masters in finance offers an affordable path to specialize in financial models, risk management, and quantitative analysis — key areas where math graduates excel.

Time-conscious students can explore the fastest online mba programs which allow earning an MBA degree quickly without compromising quality. Combining math skills with business acumen through such programs is a strategic move for accelerated career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Dorit S. Hochbaum

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles