World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
58
Citations
18832
World Ranking
3801
National Ranking
2128

Joseph L. Fava publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph L. Fava sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 144 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Joseph L. Fava D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joseph L. Fava sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 67th percentile

67% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Joseph L. Fava is affiliated with Brown University in the United States. Their research spans the fields of Medicine and Psychology, with specific contributions to Clinical Psychology, General Health Professions, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and Health.

The main topics covered in Joseph L. Fava's work include:

  • Resilience and Mental Health
  • HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions
  • Health disparities and outcomes
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Cardiac Health and Mental Health
  • Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Cardiovascular Health and Risk Factors

Joseph L. Fava has published multiple recent papers across various journals. These include:

  • "Multilevel resilience resources and cardiovascular disease in the United States: A systematic review and meta-analysis." (2021) in Health Psychology
  • "A Concept Mapping Study to Understand Multilevel Resilience Resources Among African American/Black Adults Living with HIV in the Southern United States" (2020) in AIDS and Behavior
  • "Implementation, feasibility, and acceptability of quality of life therapy to improve positive emotions among patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators" (2020) in Journal of Behavioral Medicine
  • "A survey of syphilis knowledge among medical providers and students in Rhode Island" (2020) in SAGE Open Medicine
  • "Effect of a Lifestyle Intervention on Cardiometabolic Health Among Emerging Adults" (2022) in JAMA Network Open

Frequent collaborators in Joseph L. Fava's research include:

  • Akilah Dulin-Keita
  • Chanelle J. Howe
  • Jee Won Park
  • Valerie A. Earnshaw
  • Sannisha K. Dale

Their publications often appear in specific venues, indicating recurring participation in these outlets:

  • UNC Libraries
  • AIDS and Behavior
  • AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
  • American Journal of Epidemiology
  • Journal of Racial and Ethnic Health Disparities

Best Publications

  • Measuring processes of change: applications to the cessation of smoking.

    James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer;Carlo C. DiClemente;Joseph Fava

  • Randomized Controlled Trial Testing the Effects of Weight Loss on Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

    Kittichai Promrat;Kittichai Promrat;David E. Kleiner;Heather M. Niemeier;Heather M. Niemeier;Elizabeth Jackvony

  • Affects of variable and subject sampling on factor pattern recovery.

    Wayne F. Velicer;Joseph L. Fava

  • Construct Explication through Factor or Component Analysis: A Review and Evaluation of Alternative Procedures for Determining the Number of Factors or Components

    Wayne F. Velicer;Cheryl A. Eaton;Joseph L. Fava

  • A Self-Regulation Program for Maintenance of Weight Loss

    Rena R. Wing;Deborah F. Tate;Amy A. Gorin;Hollie A. Raynor

  • Distribution of smokers by stage in three representative samples.

    Wayne F. Velicer;Joseph L. Fava;James O. Prochaska;David B. Abrams

  • Stage-based expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms.

    James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer;Colleen Redding;Joseph S. Rossi

  • SMOKING CESSATION AND STRESS MANAGEMENT : APPLICATIONS OF THE TRANSTHEORETICAL MODEL OF BEHAVIOR CHANGE

    Wayne F. Velicer;James O. Prochaska;Joseph L. Fava;Gregory J. Norman

  • An expert system intervention for smoking cessation

    Wayne F. Velicer;James O. Prochaska;Jeffrey M. Bellis;Carlo C. DiClemente

  • Evaluating a population-based recruitment approach and a stage-based expert system intervention for smoking cessation.

    James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer;Joseph L. Fava;Joseph S. Rossi

  • Applying the transtheoretical model to a representative sample of smokers

    Joseph L. Fava;Wayne F. Velicer;James O. Prochaska

  • Measuring nicotine dependence among high-risk adolescent smokers☆

    Alexander V. Prokhorov;Unto E. Pallonen;Joseph L. Fava;Lin Ding

  • Dietary applications of the stages of change model.

    Geoffrey W Greene;Susan R Rossi;Joseph S Rossi;Wayne F Velicer

  • Changes in Children’s Sleep Duration on Food Intake, Weight, and Leptin

    Chantelle N. Hart;Mary A. Carskadon;Robert V. Considine;Joseph L. Fava;Joseph L. Fava

  • A prospective study of weight gain during the college freshman and sophomore years.

    Elizabeth E. Lloyd-Richardson;Steffani Bailey;Joseph L. Fava;Rena Wing

  • A randomized trial to reduce passive smoke exposure in low-income households with young children.

    Karen M. Emmons;S. Katharine Hammond;Joseph L. Fava;Wayne F. Velicer

  • Interactive versus noninteractive interventions and dose–response relationships for stage-matched smoking cessation programs in a managed care setting.

    Wayne F. Velicer;James O. Prochaska;Joseph L. Fava;Robert G. Laforge

  • An empirical typology of subjects within stage of change

    Wayne F. Velicer;Stanley L. Hughes;Joseph L. Fava;James O. Prochaska

  • Multiple risk expert systems interventions: impact of simultaneous stage-matched expert system interventions for smoking, high-fat diet, and sun exposure in a population of parents.

    James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer;Joseph S. Rossi;Colleen A. Redding

  • Testing 40 predictions from the transtheoretical model.

    Wayne F. Velicer;Gregory J. Norman;Joseph L. Fava;James O. Prochaska

  • An expert system intervention for smoking cessation

    James O. Prochaska;Wayne F. Velicer

Frequent Co-Authors

Wayne F. Velicer
Wayne F. Velicer University of Rhode Island
Rena R. Wing
Rena R. Wing Brown University
James O. Prochaska
James O. Prochaska University of Rhode Island
Beth C. Bock
Beth C. Bock Brown University
Joseph S. Rossi
Joseph S. Rossi University of Rhode Island
Bess H. Marcus
Bess H. Marcus Brown University
Amy A. Gorin
Amy A. Gorin University of Connecticut
Shira Dunsiger
Shira Dunsiger Brown University
Karen M. Emmons
Karen M. Emmons Harvard University
Tricia M. Leahey
Tricia M. Leahey University of Connecticut

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a degree in psychology opens up a variety of online education options and career paths in counseling and mental health. Many students are looking for the fastest route to launch their careers, and several states offer accelerated programs tailored to this need.

For those interested in becoming licensed counselors, it's crucial to understand each state's specific requirements and opportunities for accelerated study. For example, the quickest path to becoming a counselor in Missouri can differ from the shortest path to becoming a counselor in Montana or opportunities in other states.

Students can also explore Nebraska fastest counseling programs or look into Nevada accelerated counseling programs to find flexible options that provide quality training in less time.

By reviewing these state-specific resources, aspiring professionals can choose the educational path that best fits their career goals and schedules, helping them sooner make a meaningful impact in the field of psychology and counseling.

Best Scientists Citing Joseph L. Fava

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles