World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Genetics

D-Index
59
Citations
21433
World Ranking
3200
National Ranking
393

David J. Studholme publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Studholme sits on this spectrum.

45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45 publications 703+

This scientist: 191 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

David J. Studholme D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where David J. Studholme sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 59 D-Index — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

Overview

David J. Studholme is affiliated with the University of Exeter in the United Kingdom. Their research primarily spans the fields of Agricultural and Biological Sciences as well as Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology.

The subfields they focus on include Plant Science, Molecular Biology, Insect Science, Cell Biology, and Endocrinology. These areas relate closely to their main topics of work, which cover Plant Pathogenic Bacteria Studies, Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity, Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis, Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases, Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies, Plant Virus Research Studies, and Banana Cultivation and Research.

Notable recent publications by Studholme include:

  • Common bacterial blight of bean: a model of seed transmission and pathological convergence (2021, Molecular Plant Pathology)
  • Guidelines for the reliable use of high throughput sequencing technologies to detect plant pathogens and pests (2022, Peer Community Journal)
  • Endophytic Bacterial Isolates From Halophytes Demonstrate Phytopathogen Biocontrol and Plant Growth Promotion Under High Salinity (2021, Frontiers in Microbiology)
  • Facilitating the adoption of high-throughput sequencing technologies as a plant pest diagnostic test in laboratories: A step-by-step description (2022, EPPO Bulletin)
  • Two-speed genome evolution drives pathogenicity in fungal pathogens of animals (2023, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Studholme include Murray Grant, Theresa Wacker, Mahmut Tör, Jamie Harrison, and Rhys A. Farrer.

The venues where Studholme publishes often include bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory), Molecular Plant Pathology, Access Microbiology, Scientific Reports, and Plant Disease.

Best Publications

  • Genome sequence and analysis of the Irish potato famine pathogen Phytophthora infestans.

    Brian J Haas;Sophien Kamoun;Sophien Kamoun;Michael C Zody;Michael C Zody;Rays H Y Jiang;Rays H Y Jiang

  • Assessing transmissibility of SARS-CoV-2 lineage B.1.1.7 in England.

    Erik Volz;Swapnil Mishra;Meera Chand;Jeffrey C. Barrett

  • SARS-CoV-2 evolution during treatment of chronic infection.

    Steven A. Kemp;Dami A. Collier;Dami A. Collier;Rawlings P. Datir;Isabella A. T. M. Ferreira

  • InterPro, progress and status in 2005

    Nicola J. Mulder;Rolf Apweiler;Teresa K. Attwood;Amos Bairoch

  • Sensitivity of SARS-CoV-2 B.1.1.7 to mRNA vaccine-elicited antibodies.

    Dami A. Collier;Dami A. Collier;Anna De Marco;Isabella A. T. M. Ferreira;Bo Meng

  • miRNAs control gene expression in the single-cell alga Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

    Attila Molnár;Frank Schwach;Frank Schwach;David J. Studholme;Eva C. Thuenemann

  • The bacterial enhancer-dependent sigma(54) (sigma(N)) transcription factor.

    Martin Buck;María-Trinidad Gallegos;David J. Studholme;Yuli Guo

  • Assessing the performance of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies MinION.

    T Laver;J Harrison;PA O'Neill;K Moore

  • Signatures of adaptation to obligate biotrophy in the Hyaloperonospora arabidopsidis genome

    Laura Baxter;Sucheta Tripathy;Naveed Ishaque;Nico Boot

  • Hospital admission and emergency care attendance risk for SARS-CoV-2 delta (B.1.617.2) compared with alpha (B.1.1.7) variants of concern: a cohort study.

    Katherine A Twohig;Tommy Nyberg;Asad Zaidi;Simon Thelwall

  • Application of 'next-generation' sequencing technologies to microbial genetics.

    Daniel MacLean;Jonathan D. G. Jones;David J. Studholme

  • Genome evolution following host jumps in the Irish potato famine pathogen lineage

    Sylvain Raffaele;Rhys A. Farrer;Liliana M. Cano;David J. Studholme

  • Recurrent emergence of SARS-CoV-2 spike deletion H69/V70 and its role in the Alpha variant B.1.1.7.

    Bo Meng;Steven A Kemp;Steven A Kemp;Guido Papa;Rawlings Datir

  • Domain architectures of σ54-dependent transcriptional activators

    David J. Studholme;Ray Dixon

  • Uniparental expression of PolIV-dependent siRNAs in developing endosperm of Arabidopsis

    Rebecca A. Mosher;Charles W. Melnyk;Krystyna A. Kelly;Ruth M. Dunn

  • Genome Sequence of Azotobacter vinelandii, an Obligate Aerobe Specialized To Support Diverse Anaerobic Metabolic Processes

    João C. Setubal;Patricia dos Santos;Barry S. Goldman;Helga Ertesvåg

  • PolIVb influences RNA-directed DNA methylation independently of its role in siRNA biogenesis.

    Rebecca A. Mosher;Frank Schwach;Frank Schwach;David J. Studholme;David C. Baulcombe;David C. Baulcombe

  • A toolkit for analysing large-scale plant small RNA datasets

    Simon Moxon;Frank Schwach;Tamas Dalmay;Dan MacLean

  • Assessing the performance of the Oxford Nanopore Technologies

    T. Laver;J. Harrison;P. A. O'Neill;K. Moore

  • UniparentalexpressionofPolIV-dependentsiRNAsin developing endosperm of Arabidopsis

    Rebecca A. Mosher;Charles W. Melnyk;Krystyna A. Kelly;Ruth M. Dunn

Frequent Co-Authors

Murray Grant
Murray Grant University of Warwick
Jonathan D. G. Jones
Jonathan D. G. Jones University of East Anglia
Richard W. Titball
Richard W. Titball University of Exeter
Martin Buck
Martin Buck Imperial College London
David C. Baulcombe
David C. Baulcombe University of Cambridge
Marco Thines
Marco Thines Goethe University Frankfurt
Nicholas J. Talbot
Nicholas J. Talbot University of East Anglia
Sophien Kamoun
Sophien Kamoun University of East Anglia
Mahmut Tör
Mahmut Tör University of Worcester
Eric B. Holub
Eric B. Holub University of Warwick

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Students interested in Genetics often explore a variety of online degree and certificate options that can open doors to diverse healthcare and science careers. Specialized programs like those offered by online schools for medical billing and coding are increasingly popular for those seeking entry-level roles in the medical field, taking advantage of job growth and flexibility.

For those looking to enter the workforce quickly or pivot to a new specialty, fast track degree options make it possible to earn a credential in less time. Meanwhile, students juggling jobs or family responsibilities benefit from self paced college courses, which allow them to shape their studies around their schedule.

It’s essential to choose reputable programs, and many accredited online universities now offer the added benefit of no application fee, helping keep costs manageable. Whether you're pursuing genetics or a related discipline, exploring these flexible online pathways can expand your options in both education and career development.

Best Scientists Citing David J. Studholme

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles