World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
7660
World Ranking
6116
National Ranking
2214

Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 169 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs is affiliated with the Virginia Institute of Marine Science in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on fields within Earth and Planetary Sciences as well as Environmental Science, with significant contributions spanning oceanography, global and planetary change, ecology, environmental chemistry, and atmospheric science.

Their work engages deeply with the study of marine and coastal ecosystems, oceanographic and atmospheric processes, marine biology and ecology research, marine and fisheries research, ocean acidification effects and responses, coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics, and climate variability and models.

Frequent coauthors in their publications include Pierre St-Laurent, Raymond G. Najjar, Fei Da, Hanqin Tian, and Elizabeth H. Shadwick, reflecting ongoing collaborative research efforts.

Marjorie Friedrichs has published multiple papers in well-recognized scientific venues. Frequent publication outlets include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Oceans
  • Frontiers in Marine Science
  • Goldschmidt Abstracts
  • Estuaries and Coasts
  • Biogeosciences

Some of the recent papers authored or coauthored by Friedrichs include:

  • The Chesapeake Bay program modeling system: Overview and recommendations for future development, 2021, Ecological Modelling
  • Extent and Causes of Chesapeake Bay Warming, 2021, JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
  • Nitrogen reductions have decreased hypoxia in the Chesapeake Bay: Evidence from empirical and numerical modeling, 2021, The Science of The Total Environment
  • Impacts of Multiple Environmental Changes on Long-Term Nitrogen Loading From the Chesapeake Bay Watershed, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences
  • Estuaries as Filters for Riverine Microplastics: Simulations in a Large, Coastal-Plain Estuary, 2021, Frontiers in Marine Science

Best Publications

  • A comparison of global estimates of marine primary production from ocean color

    Mary-Elena Carr;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Marjorie Schmeltz;Maki Noguchi Aita

  • Skill assessment for coupled biological/physical models of marine systems

    Craig A. Stow;Jason Jolliff;Dennis J. McGillicuddy;Scott C. Doney

  • Summary diagrams for coupled hydrodynamic-ecosystem model skill assessment

    Jason K Jolliff;John C Kindle;Igor G Shulman;Bradley Penta

  • Assessment of skill and portability in regional marine biogeochemical models : Role of multiple planktonic groups

    Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Jeffrey A. Dusenberry;Laurence A. Anderson;Robert A. Armstrong

  • Pelagic functional group modeling: Progress, challenges and prospects

    Raleigh R. Hood;Edward A. Laws;Robert A. Armstrong;Nicholas R. Bates

  • Assessing the uncertainties of model estimates of primary productivity in the tropical Pacific Ocean

    Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Mary-Elena Carr;Richard T. Barber;Michele Scardi

  • An evaluation of ocean color model estimates of marine primary productivity in coastal and pelagic regions across the globe

    V. S. Saba;V. S. Saba;M. A. M. Friedrichs;D. Antoine;R. A. Armstrong

  • Carbon budget of tidal wetlands, estuaries, and shelf waters of Eastern North America

    R. G. Najjar;M. Herrmann;R. Alexander;E. W. Boyer

  • Challenges of modeling depth-integrated marine primary productivity over multiple decades: A case study at BATS and HOT

    Vincent S. Saba;Vincent S. Saba;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Mary-Elena Carr;David Antoine

  • Ecosystem model complexity versus physical forcing: Quantification of their relative impact with assimilated Arabian Sea data

    Marjorie A.M. Friedrichs;Marjorie A.M. Friedrichs;Raleigh R. Hood;Jerry D. Wiggert

  • Parameter optimisation techniques and the problem of underdetermination in marine biogeochemical models

    Ben A. Ward;Marjorie A.M. Friedrichs;Thomas R. Anderson;Andreas Oschlies

  • An assessment of phytoplankton primary productivity in the Arctic Ocean from satellite ocean color/in situ chlorophyll‐a based models

    Younjoo J. Lee;Patricia A. Matrai;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Vincent S. Saba

  • Anthropogenic and climatic influences on carbon fluxes from eastern North America to the Atlantic Ocean: A process-based modeling study

    Hanqin Tian;Qichun Yang;Raymond G. Najjar;Wei Ren

  • The competing impacts of climate change and nutrient reductions on dissolved oxygen in Chesapeake Bay

    Isaac D. Irby;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Fei Da;Kyle E. Hinson

  • Chesapeake Bay Nitrogen Fluxes Derived From a Land-Estuarine Ocean Biogeochemical Modeling System: Model Description, Evaluation, and Nitrogen Budgets

    Yang Feng;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;John Wilkin;Hanqin Tian

  • Advancing marine biogeochemical and ecosystem reanalyses and forecasts as tools for monitoring and managing ecosystem health

    Katja Fennel;Marion Gehlen;Pierre Brasseur;Christopher Brown

  • Surface Ocean pCO2 Seasonality and Sea-Air CO2 Flux Estimates for the North American East Coast

    Sergio R. Signorini;Antonio Mannino;Raymond G. Najjar;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs

  • Assimilation of JGOFS EqPac and SeaWiFS data into a marine ecosystem model of the Central Equatorial Pacific Ocean

    Marjorie A.M Friedrichs

  • Challenges associated with modeling low-oxygen waters in Chesapeake Bay: a multiple model comparison

    Isaac D. Irby;Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Carl T. Friedrichs;Aaron J. Bever

  • Deep circulation in the tropical north Atlantic

    Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs;Melinda M. Hall

  • Modeling the Dynamics of Continental Shelf Carbon

    Eileen E. Hofmann;Bronwyn Cahill;Katja Fennel;Marjorie A.M. Friedrichs

Frequent Co-Authors

Raymond G. Najjar
Raymond G. Najjar Pennsylvania State University
Carl T. Friedrichs
Carl T. Friedrichs Virginia Institute of Marine Science
Hanqin Tian
Hanqin Tian Auburn University
Eileen E. Hofmann
Eileen E. Hofmann Old Dominion University
Raleigh R. Hood
Raleigh R. Hood University of Maryland Center For Environmental Sciences
Katja Fennel
Katja Fennel Dalhousie University
John Wilkin
John Wilkin Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey
Wei-Jun Cai
Wei-Jun Cai University of Delaware
Scott C. Doney
Scott C. Doney University of Virginia
Vincent S. Saba
Vincent S. Saba National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences opens doors to diverse career paths that often benefit from supplementary knowledge areas. For example, Geographic Information Systems (GIS) skills are invaluable for analyzing environmental data, making gis degree programs a strong complement to environmental studies.

Leadership and policy-making play critical roles in environmental management. Pursuing a 1 year mpa online program can enhance your administrative expertise, enabling you to drive impactful environmental policies efficiently.

Understanding social dynamics is equally important for addressing environmental challenges. Many professionals explore the social implications of environmental issues by enrolling in high-quality online bachelor degrees, such as the best online bachelors in sociology programs, which provide insights into human behavior and societal structures.

For those aiming to advance into educational leadership or policy advocacy without the lengthy commitment of a dissertation, online ed d programs without dissertation requirement offer a practical route. These programs provide advanced skills to influence environmental education and community engagement effectively.

Best Scientists Citing Marjorie A. M. Friedrichs

Trending Scientists