World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Omid Bozorg Haddad

Omid Bozorg Haddad

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Engineering and Technology 69 1174 1110 17 17 314 12046

Omid Bozorg Haddad publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Omid Bozorg Haddad between 2005 and 2021, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Omid Bozorg Haddad published across 17 years, from 2005 to 2021, averaging 20.1 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2021. 90 of the 341 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2005 to 2021. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2021. 2005: 9 publications 2006: 1 publication 2007: 3 publications 2008: 5 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 7 publications 2013: 23 publications 2014: 19 publications 2015: 34 publications 2016: 41 publications 2017: 34 publications 2018: 34 publications 2019: 19 publications 2020: 25 publications 2021: 65 publications
2005 2021

341 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Omid Bozorg Haddad: publications per year, 2005 to 2021
Year Publications
2005 9
2006 1
2007 3
2008 5
2009 4
2010 7
2011 11
2012 7
2013 23
2014 19
2015 34
2016 41
2017 34
2018 34
2019 19
2020 25
2021 65
Total 341
Download as CSV

Omid Bozorg Haddad publication distribution in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Engineering and Technology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Omid Bozorg Haddad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 804+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 457. Most scientists, 457, have 148–157 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 308–317 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 20 scientists 48–57 publications: 35 scientists 58–67 publications: 96 scientists 68–77 publications: 135 scientists 78–87 publications: 190 scientists 88–97 publications: 259 scientists 98–107 publications: 283 scientists 108–117 publications: 369 scientists 118–127 publications: 341 scientists 128–137 publications: 386 scientists 138–147 publications: 372 scientists 148–157 publications: 457 scientists 158–167 publications: 415 scientists 168–177 publications: 407 scientists 178–187 publications: 421 scientists 188–197 publications: 378 scientists 198–207 publications: 403 scientists 208–217 publications: 317 scientists 218–227 publications: 346 scientists 228–237 publications: 321 scientists 238–247 publications: 260 scientists 248–257 publications: 280 scientists 258–267 publications: 240 scientists 268–277 publications: 214 scientists 278–287 publications: 242 scientists 288–297 publications: 203 scientists 298–307 publications: 166 scientists 308–317 publications: 154 scientists 318–327 publications: 175 scientists 328–337 publications: 159 scientists 338–347 publications: 99 scientists 348–357 publications: 131 scientists 358–367 publications: 106 scientists 368–377 publications: 118 scientists 378–387 publications: 97 scientists 388–397 publications: 108 scientists 398–407 publications: 82 scientists 408–417 publications: 71 scientists 418–427 publications: 64 scientists 428–437 publications: 55 scientists 438–447 publications: 54 scientists 448–457 publications: 60 scientists 458–467 publications: 47 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 30 scientists 488–497 publications: 29 scientists 498–507 publications: 38 scientists 508–517 publications: 40 scientists 518–527 publications: 32 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 28 scientists 548–557 publications: 23 scientists 558–567 publications: 19 scientists 568–577 publications: 16 scientists 578–587 publications: 17 scientists 588–597 publications: 18 scientists 598–607 publications: 22 scientists 608–617 publications: 15 scientists 618–627 publications: 9 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 21 scientists 648–657 publications: 12 scientists 658–667 publications: 9 scientists 668–677 publications: 11 scientists 678–687 publications: 9 scientists 688–697 publications: 6 scientists 698–707 publications: 14 scientists 708–717 publications: 7 scientists 718–727 publications: 8 scientists 728–737 publications: 10 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 5 scientists 758–767 publications: 5 scientists 768–777 publications: 11 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 2 scientists 798–803 publications: 4 scientists 804+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 804+

This scientist: 314 publications — 78th percentile

78% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 804 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 20
48–57 35
58–67 96
68–77 135
78–87 190
88–97 259
98–107 283
108–117 369
118–127 341
128–137 386
138–147 372
148–157 457
158–167 415
168–177 407
178–187 421
188–197 378
198–207 403
208–217 317
218–227 346
228–237 321
238–247 260
248–257 280
258–267 240
268–277 214
278–287 242
288–297 203
298–307 166
308–317 154 314
318–327 175
328–337 159
338–347 99
348–357 131
358–367 106
368–377 118
378–387 97
388–397 108
398–407 82
408–417 71
418–427 64
428–437 55
438–447 54
448–457 60
458–467 47
468–477 40
478–487 30
488–497 29
498–507 38
508–517 40
518–527 32
528–537 23
538–547 28
548–557 23
558–567 19
568–577 16
578–587 17
588–597 18
598–607 22
608–617 15
618–627 9
628–637 11
638–647 21
648–657 12
658–667 9
668–677 11
678–687 9
688–697 6
698–707 14
708–717 7
718–727 8
728–737 10
738–747 9
748–757 5
758–767 5
768–777 11
778–787 7
788–797 2
798–803 4
804+ 100
Download as CSV

Omid Bozorg Haddad D-index placement in Engineering and Technology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Engineering and Technology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Omid Bozorg Haddad sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 78 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 107+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 426. Most scientists, 426, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 69 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 59 scientists 31 D-Index: 114 scientists 32 D-Index: 129 scientists 33 D-Index: 189 scientists 34 D-Index: 200 scientists 35 D-Index: 262 scientists 36 D-Index: 311 scientists 37 D-Index: 312 scientists 38 D-Index: 350 scientists 39 D-Index: 385 scientists 40 D-Index: 348 scientists 41 D-Index: 362 scientists 42 D-Index: 426 scientists 43 D-Index: 380 scientists 44 D-Index: 310 scientists 45 D-Index: 341 scientists 46 D-Index: 301 scientists 47 D-Index: 306 scientists 48 D-Index: 271 scientists 49 D-Index: 246 scientists 50 D-Index: 210 scientists 51 D-Index: 253 scientists 52 D-Index: 213 scientists 53 D-Index: 221 scientists 54 D-Index: 195 scientists 55 D-Index: 186 scientists 56 D-Index: 170 scientists 57 D-Index: 167 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 144 scientists 60 D-Index: 152 scientists 61 D-Index: 141 scientists 62 D-Index: 138 scientists 63 D-Index: 131 scientists 64 D-Index: 118 scientists 65 D-Index: 114 scientists 66 D-Index: 119 scientists 67 D-Index: 95 scientists 68 D-Index: 87 scientists 69 D-Index: 77 scientists 70 D-Index: 89 scientists 71 D-Index: 69 scientists 72 D-Index: 54 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 55 scientists 75 D-Index: 54 scientists 76 D-Index: 49 scientists 77 D-Index: 53 scientists 78 D-Index: 46 scientists 79 D-Index: 28 scientists 80 D-Index: 39 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 24 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 36 scientists 85 D-Index: 18 scientists 86 D-Index: 25 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 26 scientists 89 D-Index: 27 scientists 90 D-Index: 23 scientists 91 D-Index: 15 scientists 92 D-Index: 12 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 15 scientists 95 D-Index: 10 scientists 96 D-Index: 13 scientists 97 D-Index: 13 scientists 98 D-Index: 9 scientists 99 D-Index: 7 scientists 100 D-Index: 7 scientists 101 D-Index: 8 scientists 102 D-Index: 7 scientists 103 D-Index: 7 scientists 104 D-Index: 9 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106 D-Index: 9 scientists 107+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 107+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 89th percentile

89% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 107 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Engineering and Technology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,796 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 59
31 114
32 129
33 189
34 200
35 262
36 311
37 312
38 350
39 385
40 348
41 362
42 426
43 380
44 310
45 341
46 301
47 306
48 271
49 246
50 210
51 253
52 213
53 221
54 195
55 186
56 170
57 167
58 166
59 144
60 152
61 141
62 138
63 131
64 118
65 114
66 119
67 95
68 87
69 77 69
70 89
71 69
72 54
73 46
74 55
75 54
76 49
77 53
78 46
79 28
80 39
81 36
82 24
83 26
84 36
85 18
86 25
87 19
88 26
89 27
90 23
91 15
92 12
93 9
94 15
95 10
96 13
97 13
98 9
99 7
100 7
101 8
102 7
103 7
104 9
105 6
106 9
107+ 99
Download as CSV

Overview

What is he best known for?

The fields of study he is best known for:

  • Mathematical optimization
  • Statistics
  • Algorithm

His primary areas of investigation include Mathematical optimization, Algorithm, Genetic algorithm, Hydrology and Inflow. His multidisciplinary approach integrates Mathematical optimization and Nameplate capacity in his work. Omid Bozorg Haddad has researched Algorithm in several fields, including Hydrograph, Outflow and Benchmark.

His work deals with themes such as Evolutionary algorithm and Pareto principle, which intersect with Genetic algorithm. Omid Bozorg Haddad has included themes like Genetic programming and Minification in his Hydrology study. His Swarm behaviour research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Mathematical model, Process, Heuristic and Search algorithm.

His most cited work include:

  • Honey-Bees Mating Optimization (HBMO) Algorithm: A New Heuristic Approach for Water Resources Optimization (282 citations)
  • Optimizing Irrigation Water Allocation and Multicrop Planning Using Discrete PSO Algorithm (92 citations)
  • Application of the Water Cycle Algorithm to the Optimal Operation of Reservoir Systems (86 citations)

What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?

Omid Bozorg Haddad mostly deals with Mathematical optimization, Hydrology, Genetic algorithm, Environmental engineering and Algorithm. His work in Mathematical optimization tackles topics such as Nonlinear system which are related to areas like Estimation theory and Routing. As a member of one scientific family, he mostly works in the field of Hydrology, focusing on Genetic programming and, on occasion, Irrigation.

His Genetic algorithm research incorporates elements of Nonlinear programming, Pareto principle, Sorting, Evolutionary algorithm and Optimization algorithm. His Environmental engineering research integrates issues from Water quality, Inflow and Water resources. His Algorithm course of study focuses on Benchmark and Optimal design.

He most often published in these fields:

  • Mathematical optimization (30.69%)
  • Hydrology (18.81%)
  • Genetic algorithm (18.81%)

What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2015-2020)?

  • Genetic algorithm (18.81%)
  • Mathematical optimization (30.69%)
  • Aquifer (5.94%)

In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:

His primary scientific interests are in Genetic algorithm, Mathematical optimization, Aquifer, Algorithm and Environmental engineering. His Genetic algorithm research also works with subjects such as

  • Sorting which is related to area like Pareto principle and Evolutionary algorithm,
  • Nonlinear programming which is related to area like Meta-optimization, Global optimal and Reservoir operation. Mathematical optimization and Simulation are commonly linked in his work.

His study brings together the fields of Dynamic design and Algorithm. Many of his research projects under Environmental engineering are closely connected to Pollution and Thermal stratification with Pollution and Thermal stratification, tying the diverse disciplines of science together. The Optimization problem study combines topics in areas such as Minification, Benchmark and Nonlinear system.

Between 2015 and 2020, his most popular works were:

  • Biogeography-Based Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Operation of Reservoir Systems (55 citations)
  • Weed Optimization Algorithm for Optimal Reservoir Operation (51 citations)
  • Application of the SVR-NSGAII to Hydrograph Routing in Open Channels (11 citations)

In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:

  • Mathematical optimization
  • Statistics
  • Algorithm

Omid Bozorg Haddad mostly deals with Genetic algorithm, Algorithm, Mathematical optimization, Nonlinear programming and Aquifer. His Genetic algorithm research incorporates themes from Linear programming, Flow routing, Routing and Reservoir operation. He interconnects Hydrology, Communication channel, Support vector machine and Hydrograph in the investigation of issues within Algorithm.

Mathematical optimization is closely attributed to Benchmark in his study. His Nonlinear programming research includes themes of Biogeography-based optimization and Global optimal. His research in Aquifer intersects with topics in Waste management, Contamination, In situ bioremediation and Environmental engineering.

Best Publications

  • Gradient-based optimizer: A new metaheuristic optimization algorithm

    Iman Ahmadianfar;Omid Bozorg-Haddad;Xuefeng Chu

  • Honey-Bees Mating Optimization (HBMO) Algorithm: A New Heuristic Approach for Water Resources Optimization

    Omid Bozorg Haddad;Abbas Afshar;Miguel A. Mariño

  • HONEY-BEE MATING OPTIMIZATION (HBMO) ALGORITHM FOR OPTIMAL RESERVOIR OPERATION

    A. Afshar;O. Bozorg Haddad;M.A. Mariño;B.J. Adams

  • Meta-Heuristic and Evolutionary Algorithms for Engineering Optimization

    Omid Bozorg-Haddad;Mohammad Solgi;Hugo A Loaiciga

  • Advanced Optimization by Nature-Inspired Algorithms

    Omid Bozorg-Haddad

  • Prediction and simulation of monthly groundwater levels by genetic programming

    E. Fallah-Mehdipour;O. Bozorg Haddad;M.A. Mariño

  • Application of the Water Cycle Algorithm to the Optimal Operation of Reservoir Systems

    Omid Bozorg Haddad;Mojtaba Moravej;Hugo A. Loáiciga

  • Climate Change Impact on Reservoir Performance Indexes in Agricultural Water Supply

    Parisa Sadat Ashofteh;Omid Bozorg Haddad;Miguel A. Mariño

  • Extraction of decision alternatives in construction management projects

    Elahe Fallah-Mehdipour;Omid Bozorg Haddad;Mahmoud M. Rezapour Tabari;Miguel A. Mariño

  • Real-Time Operation of Reservoir System by Genetic Programming

    E. Fallah-Mehdipour;O. Bozorg Haddad;M. A. Mariño

  • Evaluation of Climatic-Change Impacts on Multiobjective Reservoir Operation with Multiobjective Genetic Programming

    Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh;Omid Bozorg Haddad;Hugo A. Loáiciga

  • Optimizing Irrigation Water Allocation and Multicrop Planning Using Discrete PSO Algorithm

    Hamideh Noory;Abdol Majid Liaghat;Masoud Parsinejad;Omid Bozorg Haddad

  • Development and Application of the Bat Algorithm for Optimizing the Operation of Reservoir Systems

    Omid Bozorg-Haddad;Iman Karimirad;Samaneh Seifollahi-Aghmiuni;Hugo A. Loáiciga

  • Soil moisture simulation using hybrid artificial intelligent model: Hybridization of adaptive neuro fuzzy inference system with grey wolf optimizer algorithm

    Saman Maroufpoor;Eisa Maroufpoor;Omid Bozorg-Haddad;Jalal Shiri

  • MOPSO algorithm and its application in multipurpose multireservoir operations

    E. Fallah-Mehdipour;O. Bozorg Haddad;M. A. Mariño

  • Determination of Irrigation Allocation Policy under Climate Change by Genetic Programming

    Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh;Omid Bozorg Haddad;Habib Akbari-Alashti;Miguel A. Mariño

  • Application of particle swarm optimization to water management: an introduction and overview.

    Mahsa Jahandideh-Tehrani;Omid Bozorg-Haddad;Hugo A Loáiciga

  • Multi-objective optimization for allocation of surface water and groundwater resources

    Saeid Naghdi;Omid Bozorg-Haddad;Mostafa Khorsandi;Xuefeng Chu

  • Multireservoir optimisation in discrete and continuous domains

    Omid Bozorg Haddad;Abbas Afshar;Miguel A. Mariño

  • Adaptive Reservoir Operation Rules Under Climatic Change

    Mohsen Ahmadi;Omid Bozorg Haddad;Hugo A. Loáiciga

  • Evaluation of Real-Time Operation Rules in Reservoir Systems Operation

    Y. Bolouri-Yazdeli;O. Bozorg Haddad;E. Fallah-Mehdipour;M. A. Mariño

  • Reservoir operation in assigning optimal multi-crop irrigation areas

    Mahdi Moradi-Jalal;Omid Bozorg Haddad;Bryan W. Karney;Miguel A. Mariño

  • Estimation of Muskingum parameter by meta-heuristic algorithms

    Hossein Orouji;Omid Bozorg Haddad;Elahe Fallah-Mehdipour;Miguel A. Mariño

Frequent Co-Authors

Miguel A. Mariño
Miguel A. Mariño University of California, Davis
Hugo A. Loáiciga
Hugo A. Loáiciga University of California, Santa Barbara
Abbas Afshar
Abbas Afshar Iran University of Science and Technology
Bryan W. Karney
Bryan W. Karney University of Toronto

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Omid Bozorg Haddad

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles