World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
33
Citations
4040
World Ranking
9566
National Ranking
81

Lionel Mabit publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lionel Mabit sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 690+

This scientist: 122 publications — 25th percentile

25% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

Lionel Mabit D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lionel Mabit sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lionel Mabit is affiliated with the International Atomic Energy Agency in Austria. Their research spans several disciplines within environmental science, agricultural and biological sciences, and earth and planetary sciences. The subfields of their scholarly activity include soil science, earth-surface processes, atmospheric science, environmental engineering, and ecology.

The main topics covered by Mabit's work focus on soil erosion and sediment transport, aeolian processes and effects, soil geostatistics and mapping, as well as studies related to radioactive contamination and transfer, radioactivity and radon measurements, and nuclear and radioactivity studies. Hydrology and watershed management studies also form part of their research interests.

Recent publications by Lionel Mabit include:

  • Plutonium aided reconstruction of caesium atmospheric fallout in European topsoils, 2020, Scientific Reports
  • Antecedent soil moisture and rain intensity control pathways and quality of organic carbon exports from arable land, 2021, CATENA
  • Lateral mobilization of soil carbon induced by runoff along karstic slopes, 2020, Journal of Environmental Management
  • Variation of soil organic carbon, stable isotopes, and soil quality indicators across an erosion-deposition catena in a historical Spanish olive orchard, 2020, SOIL
  • Use of geochemical fingerprints to trace sediment sources in an agricultural catchment of Argentina, 2020, International Soil and Water Conservation Research

Mabit has published in various academic venues including:

  • Scientific Reports
  • CATENA
  • Journal of Environmental Management
  • SOIL
  • International Soil and Water Conservation Research

Frequent collaborators in Mabit's research are:

  • Gema Guzmán
  • Arsenio Toloza
  • Christian Resch
  • Katrin Meusburger
  • Olivier Evrard

Best Publications

  • Comparative advantages and limitations of the fallout radionuclides 137Cs, 210Pbex and 7Be for assessing soil erosion and sedimentation

    Lionel Mabit;M. Benmansour;Desmond E. Walling

  • Fallout 210Pb as a soil and sediment tracer in catchment sediment budget investigations: A review

    L. Mabit;M. Benmansour;J.M. Abril;D.E. Walling

  • The usefulness of 137Cs as a tracer for soil erosion assessment: A critical reply to Parsons and Foster (2011)

    L. Mabit;K. Meusburger;E. Fulajtar;C. Alewell

  • Sediment tracers in water erosion studies: current approaches and challenges

    Gema Guzmán;John N. Quinton;Mark A. Nearing;Lionel Mabit

  • Assessment of spatial distribution of fallout radionuclides through geostatistics concept.

    L. Mabit;C. Bernard

  • Spatial Distribution of Soil Organic Matter Using Geostatistics: A Key Indicator to Assess Soil Degradation Status in Central Italy

    A. Marchetti;C. Piccini;R. Francaviglia;L. Mabit

  • Spatial variability of erosion and soil organic matter content estimated from 137Cs measurements and geostatistics

    L. Mabit;C. Bernard;M. Makhlouf;M.R. Laverdière

  • Suitability of 239+240Pu and 137Cs as tracers for soil erosion assessment in mountain grasslands.

    Christine Alewell;Katrin Meusburger;Gregor Juretzko;Lionel Mabit

  • Assessment of soil erosion and deposition rates in a Moroccan agricultural field using fallout 137Cs and 210Pbex

    M. Benmansour;L. Mabit;A. Nouira;R. Moussadek

  • Results of an IAEA inter-comparison exercise to assess 137Cs and total 210Pb analytical performance in soil.

    A. Shakhashiro;L. Mabit

  • Quantitative sediment source attribution with compound-specific isotope analysis in a C3 plant-dominated catchment (central Switzerland)

    Christine Alewell;Axel Birkholz;Katrin Meusburger;Yael Schindler Wildhaber

  • Assumptions and challenges in the use of fallout beryllium-7 as a soil and sediment tracer in river basins

    A. Taylor;W.H. Blake;H.G. Smith;L. Mabit

  • 239 + 240Pu from “contaminant” to soil erosion tracer: Where do we stand?

    C. Alewell;A. Pitois;K. Meusburger;M. Ketterer

  • A deconvolutional Bayesian mixing model approach for river basin sediment source apportionment.

    William H. Blake;Pascal Boeckx;Brian C. Stock;Hugh G. Smith

  • Fallout radionuclide-based techniques for assessing the impact of soil conservation measures on erosion control and soil quality: an overview of the main lessons learnt under an FAO/IAEA Coordinated Research Project

    G. Dercon;L. Mabit;G. Hancock;M.L. Nguyen

  • Assessment of erosion and deposition rates within an Austrian agricultural watershed by combining 137Cs, 210Pbex and conventional measurements

    L. Mabit;A. Klik;M. Benmansour;A. Toloza

  • Use of a 137Cs re-sampling technique to investigate temporal changes in soil erosion and sediment mobilisation for a small forested catchment in southern Italy

    Paolo Porto;Des E. Walling;Christine Alewell;Giovanni Callegari

  • Assessment of erosion in the Boyer River watershed (Canada) using a GIS oriented sampling strategy and 137Cs measurements

    Lionel Mabit;Claude Bernard;Marc R. Laverdière

  • Relationship between soil 137Cs inventories and chemical properties in a small intensively cropped watershed

    Lionel Mabit;Claude Bernard

  • Plutonium aided reconstruction of caesium atmospheric fallout in European topsoils

    Katrin Meusburger;Olivier Evrard;Christine Alewell;Pasquale Borrelli

  • Modelling Deposition and Erosion rates with RadioNuclides (MODERN) – Part 1: A new conversion model to derive soil redistribution rates from inventories of fallout radionuclides

    Laura Arata;Katrin Meusburger;Elena Frenkel;Annette A'Campo-Neuen

  • Suitability of 239+240Pu and 137Cs as tracers for soil erosion assessment in Swiss mountain grasslands

    Christine Alewell;Katrin Meusburger;Gregor Juretzko;Lionel Mabit

Frequent Co-Authors

Katrin Meusburger
Katrin Meusburger Swiss Federal Institute for Forest, Snow and Landscape Research
Christine Alewell
Christine Alewell University of Basel
William H. Blake
William H. Blake Plymouth University
Andreas Klik
Andreas Klik BOKU University
José A. Gómez
José A. Gómez Spanish National Research Council
Desmond E. Walling
Desmond E. Walling University of Exeter
Philip N. Owens
Philip N. Owens University of Northern British Columbia
Hugh G. Smith
Hugh G. Smith Landcare Research
Ana Navas
Ana Navas Spanish National Research Council
John N. Quinton
John N. Quinton Lancaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Environmental Sciences can open doors to various interdisciplinary career paths. For students interested in blending social research with ecological studies, pursuing an online sociology degree bachelors offers valuable insights into human-environment interactions. This degree complements environmental knowledge with social perspectives, essential for community-based sustainability projects.

Educators aiming to specialize in environmental education can benefit from advanced degrees tailored for leadership roles. An online edd no dissertation option provides a flexible path without the traditional dissertation hurdle. Transitioning through online eds to edd programs allows educators to advance professionally while maintaining their focus on environmental curriculum development.

For those interested in social work linked to environmental justice, fully funded doctoral opportunities such as fully funded dsw programs provide crucial training. These programs emphasize advocacy and systemic change, preparing graduates to address environmental disparities through informed social policies.

Best Scientists Citing Lionel Mabit

Trending Scientists