World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
37
Citations
7314
World Ranking
8792
National Ranking
3143

Ivan Csiszar publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Csiszar sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 111 publications — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Ivan Csiszar D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ivan Csiszar sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Overview

Ivan Csiszar is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science, with a particular emphasis on global and planetary change. The scientist's work extends into several subfields, including atmospheric science, ecology, management, monitoring, policy and law, as well as renewable energy, sustainability, and the environment.

Their main topics of study include fire effects on ecosystems, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, remote sensing in agriculture, atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, meteorological phenomena and simulations, and landslides and related hazards.

Ivan Csiszar has contributed to multiple research papers published in notable venues. These include:

  • Satellite remote sensing of active fires: History and current status, applications and future requirements, 2021, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • Hourly biomass burning emissions product from blended geostationary and polar-orbiting satellites for air quality forecasting applications, 2022, Remote Sensing of Environment
  • High-Resolution Smoke Forecasting for the 2018 Camp Fire in California, 2021, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society
  • Quantifying burned area of wildfires in the western United States from polar-orbiting and geostationary satellite active-fire detections, 2023, International Journal of Wildland Fire
  • Geostationary active fire products validation: GOES-17 ABI, GOES-16 ABI, and Himawari AHI, 2023, International Journal of Remote Sensing

Their frequent coauthors include Louis Giglio, Christopher C. Schmidt, Ravan Ahmadov, Martin J. Wooster, and Wilfrid Schroeder. Ivan Csiszar regularly publishes in journals such as Remote Sensing of Environment, Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, International Journal of Wildland Fire, International Journal of Remote Sensing, and Weather and Forecasting.

Best Publications

  • The New VIIRS 375 m active fire detection data product: Algorithm description and initial assessment

    Wilfrid Schroeder;Patricia Oliva;Louis Giglio;Ivan A. Csiszar

  • Global distribution and seasonality of active fires as observed with the Terra and Aqua Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) sensors

    Louis Giglio;Ivan Csiszar;Christopher O. Justice

  • Validation of GOES and MODIS active fire detection products using ASTER and ETM+ data

    Wilfrid Schroeder;Elaine Prins;Louis Giglio;Ivan Csiszar

  • AVHRR-based mapping of fires in Russia: New products for fire management and carbon cycle studies

    Anatoly I. Sukhinin;Nancy H.F. French;Eric S. Kasischke;Jenny H. Hewson

  • Regionally adaptable dNBR-based algorithm for burned area mapping from MODIS data

    T. Loboda;K.J. O'Neal;I. Csiszar

  • Satellite remote sensing of active fires: History and current status, applications and future requirements

    Martin J. Wooster;Gareth J. Roberts;Louis Giglio;David Roy

  • Land and cryosphere products from Suomi NPP VIIRS: Overview and status

    Christopher O. Justice;Miguel O. Román;Ivan Csiszar;Eric F. Vermote

  • Automated Monitoring of Snow Cover over North America with Multispectral Satellite Data

    Peter Romanov;Garik Gutman;Ivan Csiszar

  • Active fires from the Suomi NPP Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite: Product status and first evaluation results

    Ivan Csiszar;Wilfrid Schroeder;Louis Giglio;Evan Ellicott

  • Active fire detection and characterization with the advanced spaceborne thermal emission and reflection radiometer (ASTER)

    Louis Giglio;Ivan Csiszar;Ágoston Restás;Jeffrey T. Morisette

  • Validation of the MODIS active fire product over Southern Africa with ASTER data

    Jeffrey T. Morisette;Louis Giglio;Ivan Csiszar;Christopher O. Justice

  • Mapping global land surface albedo from NOAA AVHRR

    I. Csiszar;G. Gutman

  • Validation of active fire detection from moderate-resolution satellite sensors: the MODIS example in northern eurasia

    I.A. Csiszar;J.T. Morisette;L. Giglio

  • Validation of Land Surface Temperature products derived from the Visible Infrared Imaging Radiometer Suite (VIIRS) using ground-based and heritage satellite measurements

    Pierre C. Guillevic;James C. Biard;James C. Biard;Glynn C. Hulley;Jeffrey L. Privette

  • GLOBAL BURNED-LAND ESTIMATION IN LATIN AMERICA USING MODIS COMPOSITE DATA

    Emilio Chuvieco;Sergio Opazo;Walter Sione;Héctor del Valle

  • Hotspot Analysis of Vegetation Fires and Intensity in the Indian Region

    Krishna Prasad Vadrevu;Ivan Csiszar;Evan Ellicott;Louis Giglio

  • Comparison of Fire Radiative Power Estimates From VIIRS and MODIS Observations

    Fangjun Li;Xiaoyang Zhang;Shobha Kondragunta;Ivan Csiszar

  • A sourcebook of methods and procedures for monitoring and reporting anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions and removals associated with deforestation, gains and losses of carbon stocks in forests remaining forests, and forestation.: GOFC-GOLD Report version COP18-1

    Frederic Achard;Sandra Brown;Michael Brady;Ruth DeFries

  • Global fire activity from two years of MODIS data

    Ivan Csiszar;Lynn Denis;Louis Giglio;Christopher O. Justice

  • Quantifying the impact of cloud obscuration on remote sensing of active fires in the Brazilian Amazon

    Wilfrid Schroeder;Ivan Csiszar;Jeffrey Morisette

Frequent Co-Authors

Christopher O. Justice
Christopher O. Justice University of Maryland, College Park
Louis Giglio
Louis Giglio University of Maryland, College Park
Shobha Kondragunta
Shobha Kondragunta National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Ravan Ahmadov
Ravan Ahmadov National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeffrey T. Morisette
Jeffrey T. Morisette United States Geological Survey
Stuart A. McKeen
Stuart A. McKeen National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Miguel O. Román
Miguel O. Román Goddard Space Flight Center
Georg A. Grell
Georg A. Grell National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Eric Vermote
Eric Vermote Goddard Space Flight Center
David P. Roy
David P. Roy Michigan State University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career opportunities. Many begin with an affordable online general studies degree to build foundational skills while keeping education costs manageable. This approach allows flexibility and can lead to specialized study later.

Those looking for a quicker academic route might consider programs listed among the easy bachelor's degree options. While "easy" is subjective, these degrees typically require less technical intensity, making them suitable for learners balancing other commitments.

Specialized online degrees such as a geology degree online are ideal for students passionate about earth sciences and environmental systems. These programs often provide hands-on experience through virtual labs and fieldwork simulations.

Another rapidly growing field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS). The best gis programs offer training in spatial data analysis, a skill increasingly valuable in environmental management, urban planning, and conservation careers.

Best Scientists Citing Ivan Csiszar

Trending Scientists