World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 37 8865 8506 3177 2954 132 5863

Ravan Ahmadov publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ravan Ahmadov between 2007 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ravan Ahmadov published across 20 years, from 2007 to 2026, averaging 9 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2020. 15 of the 180 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2007 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2020. 2007: 2 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 1 publication 2010: 6 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 5 publications 2014: 7 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 7 publications 2017: 14 publications 2018: 8 publications 2019: 11 publications 2020: 26 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 23 publications 2023: 15 publications 2024: 12 publications 2025: 12 publications 2026: 3 publications
2007 2026

180 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ravan Ahmadov: publications per year, 2007 to 2026
Year Publications
2007 2
2008 2
2009 1
2010 6
2011 4
2012 6
2013 5
2014 7
2015 6
2016 7
2017 14
2018 8
2019 11
2020 26
2021 10
2022 23
2023 15
2024 12
2025 12
2026 3
Total 180
Download as CSV

Ravan Ahmadov publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ravan Ahmadov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 132 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544 132
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Ravan Ahmadov D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ravan Ahmadov sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 37 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267 37
38 265
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Ravan Ahmadov is affiliated with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences, with a large body of work contributing to the understanding of atmospheric processes and global environmental changes.

Their main areas of study include Global and Planetary Change and Atmospheric Science. Additionally, they have explored subfields such as Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, and Ecology.

Key topics covered in their research are atmospheric chemistry and aerosols, fire effects on ecosystems, atmospheric aerosols and clouds, meteorological phenomena and simulations, atmospheric and environmental gas dynamics, atmospheric ozone and climate, and air quality and health impacts.

Ravan Ahmadov has published extensively in several scientific journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Geoscientific model development
  • Weather and Forecasting

Some of their recent papers are:

  • The High-Resolution Rapid Refresh (HRRR): An Hourly Updating Convection-Allowing Forecast Model. Part I: Motivation and System Description, 2022, Weather and Forecasting
  • Evaluation and intercomparison of wildfire smoke forecasts from multiple modeling systems for the 2019 Williams Flats fire, 2021, Atmospheric chemistry and physics
  • Improving dust simulations in WRF-Chem v4.1.3 coupled with the GOCART aerosol module, 2021, Geoscientific model development
  • How Does a Pinatubo-Size Volcanic Cloud Reach the Middle Stratosphere?, 2021, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres
  • The impacts of transported wildfire smoke aerosols on surface air quality in New York State: A case study in summer 2018, 2020, Atmospheric Environment

Throughout their career, Ahmadov has collaborated frequently with co-authors such as Eric James, Georg Grell, Jordan Schnell, Shobha Kondragunta, and Gabriel Pereira. These collaborations have resulted in numerous joint publications advancing the understanding of atmospheric sciences and environmental phenomena.

Best Publications

  • The Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Overview, System Efforts, and Future Directions

    Jordan G. Powers;Joseph B. Klemp;William C. Skamarock;Christopher A. Davis

  • High winter ozone pollution from carbonyl photolysis in an oil and gas basin

    Peter M. Edwards;Steven S. Brown;James M. Roberts;Ravan Ahmadov

  • A volatility basis set model for summertime secondary organic aerosols over the eastern United States in 2006

    R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov;S. A. McKeen;S. A. McKeen;A. L. Robinson;R. Bahreini;R. Bahreini

  • Organic aerosol formation downwind from the Deepwater Horizon oil spill.

    J. A. de Gouw;J. A. de Gouw;A. M. Middlebrook;C. Warneke;C. Warneke;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov

  • Modeling the formation and aging of secondary organic aerosols in Los Angeles during CalNex 2010

    P. L. Hayes;P. L. Hayes;P. L. Hayes;A. G. Carlton;K. R. Baker;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov

  • Top-down estimate of surface flux in the Los Angeles Basin using a mesoscale inverse modeling technique: assessing anthropogenic emissions of CO, NO x and CO 2 and their impacts

    J. Brioude;J. Brioude;W. M. Angevine;W. M. Angevine;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov;S.-W. Kim;S.-W. Kim

  • Understanding high wintertime ozone pollution events in an oil- and natural gas-producing region of the western US

    Ravan Ahmadov;Ravan Ahmadov;S. McKeen;S. McKeen;M. Trainer;R Banta

  • Mesoscale covariance of transport and CO2 fluxes: Evidence from observations and simulations using the WRF‐VPRM coupled atmosphere‐biosphere model

    R. Ahmadov;C. Gerbig;R. Kretschmer;S. Koerner

  • Modeling the formation and aging of secondary organic aerosols during CalNex 2010

    P. L. Hayes;A. G. Carlton;K. R. Baker;R. Ahmadov

  • Los Angeles megacity: A high-resolution land-atmosphere modelling system for urban CO2 emissions

    Sha Feng;Sha Feng;Sha Feng;Thomas Lauvaux;Thomas Lauvaux;Sally Newman;Preeti Rao

  • Comparing high resolution WRF-VPRM simulations and two global CO 2 transport models with coastal tower measurements of CO 2

    R. Ahmadov;C. Gerbig;R. Kretschmer;S. Körner

  • WRF-Chem version 3.8.1 user's guide

    Steven E. Peckham;Georg Grell;Stuart A. McKeen;Ravan Ahmadov

  • Air quality implications of the Deepwater Horizon oil spill

    Ann M. Middlebrook;Daniel M. Murphy;Ravan Ahmadov;Ravan Ahmadov;Elliot L. Atlas

  • Modeling Ozone in the Eastern U.S. using a Fuel-Based Mobile Source Emissions Inventory.

    Brian C. McDonald;Brian C. McDonald;Stuart A. McKeen;Stuart A. McKeen;Yu Yan Cui;Yu Yan Cui;Ravan Ahmadov;Ravan Ahmadov

  • Impacts of heterogeneous uptake of dinitrogen pentoxide and chlorine activation on ozone and reactive nitrogen partitioning: improvement and application of the WRF-Chem model in southern China

    Qinyi Li;Li Zhang;Tao Wang;Yee Jun Tham

  • High-resolution simulations of atmospheric CO 2 over complex terrain – representing the Ochsenkopf mountain tall tower

    D. Pillai;C. Gerbig;R. Ahmadov;R. Ahmadov;C. Rödenbeck

  • Instrumentation and measurement strategy for the NOAA SENEX aircraft campaign as part of the Southeast Atmosphere Study 2013

    Carsten Warneke;Carsten Warneke;Michael Trainer;Joost A. de Gouw;Joost A. de Gouw;David D. Parrish;David D. Parrish

  • Evaluation and intercomparison of wildfire smoke forecasts from multiple modeling systems for the 2019 Williams Flats fire

    Xinxin Ye;Pargoal Arab;Ravan Ahmadov;Ravan Ahmadov;Eric James;Eric James

  • Using VIIRS fire radiative power data to simulate biomass burning emissions, plume rise and smoke transport in a real-time air quality modeling system

    R. Ahmadov;G. Grell;E. James;I. Csiszar

  • Improving dust simulations in WRF-Chem v4.1.3 coupled with the GOCART aerosol module

    Alexander Ukhov;Ravan Ahmadov;Ravan Ahmadov;Georg Grell;Georgiy L. Stenchikov

  • Atmospheric CO2 modeling at the regional scale: an intercomparison of 5 meso-scale atmospheric models.

    C. Sarrat;J. Noilhan;A. J. Dolman;C. Gerbig

  • How Does a Pinatubo-Size Volcanic Cloud Reach the Middle Stratosphere?

    Georgiy L. Stenchikov;Alexander Ukhov;Sergey Osipov;Sergey Osipov;Ravan Ahmadov;Ravan Ahmadov

Frequent Co-Authors

Stuart A. McKeen
Stuart A. McKeen National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Georg A. Grell
Georg A. Grell National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Carsten Warneke
Carsten Warneke National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Gregory J. Frost
Gregory J. Frost National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jeff Peischl
Jeff Peischl Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences
Michael Trainer
Michael Trainer National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
Jessica B. Gilman
Jessica B. Gilman National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration
J. A. de Gouw
J. A. de Gouw University of Colorado Boulder
Ilana B. Pollack
Ilana B. Pollack Colorado State University
Wayne M. Angevine
Wayne M. Angevine University of Colorado Boulder

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students interested in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open diverse career opportunities. Many look for programs that balance academic rigor and flexibility, sometimes considering what is the easiest bachelor's degree to get to find a manageable pathway into environmental fields. This helps in building foundational knowledge with less pressure, which can be ideal for working professionals or those transitioning careers.

One popular option is an online geology degree, which complements environmental studies by focusing on earth processes and natural resources. This degree equips students with critical skills in analyzing soil, rocks, and minerals, which are essential for environmental consulting and resource management careers.

Another relevant field is Geographic Information Systems (GIS), where earning a gis degree allows students to specialize in spatial data analysis and mapping technology. These skills are highly sought after in environmental monitoring, urban planning, and natural disaster management roles.

For those aiming to advance their careers quickly, specialized programs like 1 year mpa programs offer leadership training in public administration with an environmental focus. These accelerated degrees prepare graduates for impactful roles in government or nonprofit sectors that address environmental policy and management challenges.

Best Scientists Citing Ravan Ahmadov

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles