World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
W. Pieter Medendorp

W. Pieter Medendorp

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
47
Citations
7125
World Ranking
6505
National Ranking
182

W. Pieter Medendorp publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Pieter Medendorp sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 170 publications — 51st percentile

51% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

W. Pieter Medendorp D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where W. Pieter Medendorp sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 35th percentile

35% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Overview

W. Pieter Medendorp is affiliated with Radboud University in the Netherlands and has contributed extensively to the field of neuroscience, with a focus on cognitive neuroscience. Their research portfolio encompasses a range of topics centered on motor control and sensory processing.

Medendorp's main field of study is Neuroscience, with a significant emphasis on Cognitive Neuroscience. Additional subfields include Social Psychology, Biomedical Engineering, Neurology, and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology.

The primary research topics covered by Medendorp's work include:

  • Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Muscle activation and electromyography studies
  • Action Observation and Synchronization
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Vestibular and auditory disorders

Medendorp has been published in several scientific venues, with the most frequent contributors being:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Neurophysiology
  • eNeuro
  • Nature Communications
  • iScience

Some of the recent papers authored or co-authored by Medendorp include:

  • "Selective postnatal excitation of neocortical pyramidal neurons results in distinctive behavioral and circuit deficits in adulthood" (2021), published in iScience
  • "Movement preparation time determines movement variability" (2021), published in Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "External location of touch is constructed post-hoc based on limb choice" (2020), published in eLife
  • "Sensitivity to error during visuomotor adaptation is similarly modulated by abrupt, gradual, and random perturbation schedules" (2021), published in Journal of Neurophysiology
  • "A neural surveyor to map touch on the body" (2021), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

Frequent collaborators in Medendorp's research include:

  • Luc P. J. Selen
  • Robert J. van Beers
  • Leonie Oostwoud Wijdenes
  • Luke E. Miller
  • Milou J. L. van Helvert

Best Publications

  • Gaze-Centered Updating of Visual Space in Human Parietal Cortex

    W. Pieter Medendorp;Herbert C. Goltz;Tutis Vilis;J. Douglas Crawford

  • Spatial Transformations for Eye–Hand Coordination

    Unknown

  • Integration of target and effector information in the human brain during reach planning.

    S. M. Beurze;F. P. de Lange;I. Toni;W. P. Medendorp

  • Integration of Target and Effector Information in Human Posterior Parietal Cortex for the Planning of Action

    W. Pieter Medendorp;Herbert C. Goltz;J. Douglas Crawford;Tutis Vilis

  • Oscillatory Activity in Human Parietal and Occipital Cortex Shows Hemispheric Lateralization and Memory Effects in a Delayed Double-Step Saccade Task

    W. Pieter Medendorp;W. Pieter Medendorp;Geerten F.I. Kramer;Geerten F.I. Kramer;Ole Jensen;Robert Oostenveld

  • Three-Dimensional Transformations for Goal-Directed Action

    J. Douglas Crawford;Denise Y. P. Henriques;W. Pieter Medendorp

  • Modulations in oscillatory activity with amplitude asymmetry can produce cognitively relevant event-related responses

    Hanneke van Dijk;Jurrian van der Werf;Ali Mazaheri;W. Pieter Medendorp

  • Multisensory Processing in Spatial Orientation: An Inverse Probabilistic Approach

    I.A.H. Clemens;M. de Vrijer;L.P.J. Selen;J.A.M. van Gisbergen

  • Gamma-Band Activity in Human Posterior Parietal Cortex Encodes the Motor Goal during Delayed Prosaccades and Antisaccades

    J. van der Werf;O. Jensen;P. Fries;W.P. Medendorp

  • Spatial and Effector Processing in the Human Parietofrontal Network for Reaches and Saccades

    S. M. Beurze;F. P. de Lange;I. Toni;W. P. Medendorp

  • Remapping the remembered target location for anti-saccades in human posterior parietal cortex.

    W. Pieter Medendorp;Herbert C. Goltz;Tutis Vilis

  • Theta oscillations locked to intended actions rhythmically modulate perception

    Alice Tomassini;Luca Ambrogioni;W Pieter Medendorp;Eric Maris

  • Shared computational mechanism for tilt compensation accounts for biased verticality percepts in motion and pattern vision.

    M. De Vrijer;W. P. Medendorp;J.A.M. Van Gisbergen

  • Functional rather than effector-specific organization of human posterior parietal cortex.

    Tobias Heed;S. M. Beurze;I. Toni;B. Roder

  • Accuracy-precision trade-off in visual orientation constancy.

    M. De Vrijer;W. P. Medendorp;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen

  • Behavioral reference frames for planning human reaching movements.

    Sabine M. Beurze;Stan Van Pelt;W. Pieter Medendorp

  • Fusion of Visual and Vestibular Tilt Cues in the Perception of Visual Vertical

    R. A. A. Vingerhoets;M. De Vrijer;J. A. M. Van Gisbergen;W. P. Medendorp

  • Rotational Remapping in Human Spatial Memory during Eye and Head Motion

    W. Pieter Medendorp;Michael A. Smith;Douglas B. Tweed;J. Douglas Crawford

  • Motion parallax is computed in the updating of human spatial memory.

    W. Pieter Medendorp;Douglas B. Tweed;J. Douglas Crawford

  • Frames of Reference for Eye-Head Gaze Commands in Primate Supplementary Eye Fields

    Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo;Julio C. Martinez-Trujillo;W.Pieter Medendorp;W.Pieter Medendorp;Hongying Wang;J.Douglas Crawford

  • The subjective vertical and the sense of self orientation during active body tilt

    A.D. Van Beuzekom;W.P. Medendorp;J.A.M. Van Gisbergen

Frequent Co-Authors

J. Douglas Crawford
J. Douglas Crawford York University
Ivan Toni
Ivan Toni Radboud University
Peter Praamstra
Peter Praamstra Radboud University
Ole Jensen
Ole Jensen University of Oxford
Brian D. Corneil
Brian D. Corneil University of Western Ontario
Tutis Vilis
Tutis Vilis University of Western Ontario
Robert Oostenveld
Robert Oostenveld Radboud University
Jeroen B. J. Smeets
Jeroen B. J. Smeets Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
Patrick Cavanagh
Patrick Cavanagh York University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring neuroscience opens doors to a variety of rewarding careers and flexible study options. Many students and professionals in this field seek out online certificates to boost their credentials quickly and affordably. These programs can focus on specialized neuroscience skills or related fields, often leading to higher salary potential.

For those looking for entry-level routes, choosing one of the easiest online bachelor's degree programs in psychology or biology can be a practical way to start. These degrees may provide foundational knowledge necessary for graduate study or roles in research, healthcare, and education.

Career changers or professionals seeking advanced roles might consider affordable options like cheap msw programs online. A Master of Social Work with a focus on neurological or mental health issues can complement a neuroscience background, broadening your career possibilities.

For those interested in behavioral analysis within neuroscience or psychology, bcba online programs provide a cost-effective pathway to Board Certified Behavior Analyst credentials. These programs often accommodate flexible schedules, making them ideal for working professionals.

Best Scientists Citing W. Pieter Medendorp

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles