World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
47
Citations
9499
World Ranking
6462
National Ranking
21

Anders Søgaard publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anders Søgaard sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 290 publications — 72nd percentile

72% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Anders Søgaard D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Anders Søgaard sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 47 D-Index — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Anders Søgaard is affiliated with the University of Copenhagen in Denmark and has an extensive publication record primarily in the field of Computer Science. Their research focuses notably on subfields such as Artificial Intelligence, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Safety Research, and General Health Professions.

Their scholarly work has addressed a range of topics, with significant contributions related to:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Ethics and Social Impacts of AI

Their recent papers include:

  • "Challenges and Strategies in Cross-Cultural NLP," 2022, Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • "Grounding the Vector Space of an Octopus: Word Meaning from Raw Text," 2023, Minds and Machines
  • "Parsing as Pretraining," 2020, Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • "Word Order Does Matter and Shuffled Language Models Know It," 2022, Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • "Does injecting linguistic structure into language models lead to better alignment with brain recordings?," 2021, arXiv (Cornell University)

Søgaard has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers in the field, including:

  • Daniel Hershcovich
  • Mostafa Abdou
  • Constanza Fierro
  • Stephanie Brandl
  • Heather Lent

Their publications have appeared in a variety of venues with a notable presence in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Proceedings of the 60th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers)
  • AI and Ethics

In addition to journal and conference publications, Søgaard has contributed to book publications, including:

  • "Explainable Natural Language Processing," 2021, Morgan & Claypool Publishers
  • "Kunstig intelligens bagfra," 2022, Aarhus University Press

Best Publications

  • Using millions of emoji occurrences to learn any-domain representations for detecting sentiment, emotion and sarcasm

    Bjarke Felbo;Alan Mislove;Anders Søgaard;Iyad Rahwan

  • A Survey Of Cross-lingual Word Embedding Models

    Sebastian Ruder;Ivan Vulić;Anders Søgaard

  • Deep multi-task learning with low level tasks supervised at lower layers

    Anders Søgaard;Yoav Goldberg

  • Multilingual Part-of-Speech Tagging with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Models and Auxiliary Loss

    Barbara Plank;Anders Søgaard;Yoav Goldberg

  • On the Limitations of Unsupervised Bilingual Dictionary Induction

    Anders Søgaard;Sebastian Ruder;Ivan Vulić

  • Latent Multi-Task Architecture Learning

    Sebastian Ruder;Joachim Bingel;Isabelle Augenstein;Anders Søgaard

  • Identifying beneficial task relations for multi-task learning in deep neural networks

    Joachim Bingel;Anders Søgaard

  • Sluice networks: Learning what to share between loosely related tasks.

    Sebastian Ruder;Joachim Bingel;Isabelle Augenstein;Anders Søgaard

  • Learning what to share between loosely related tasks

    Sebastian Ruder;Joachim Bingel;Isabelle Augenstein;Anders Søgaard

  • Simple task-specific bilingual word embeddings

    Stephan Gouws;Anders Søgaard

  • Multilingual Projection for Parsing Truly Low-Resource Languages

    Željko Agić;Anders Johannsen;Barbara Plank;Barbara Plank;Héctor Martínez Alonso;Héctor Martínez Alonso

  • Data point selection for cross-language adaptation of dependency parsers

    Anders Sogaard

  • Tagging Performance Correlates with Author Age

    Dirk Hovy;Anders Sogaard

  • Improving sentence compression by learning to predict gaze

    Sigrid Klerke;Yoav Goldberg;Anders Søgaard

  • User Review Sites as a Resource for Large-Scale Sociolinguistic Studies

    Dirk Hovy;Anders Johannsen;Anders Søgaard

  • Learning part-of-speech taggers with inter-annotator agreement loss

    Barbara Plank;Dirk Hovy;Anders Sogaard

  • Cross-lingual syntactic variation over age and gender

    Anders Johannsen;Dirk Hovy;Anders Sogaard

  • Sequence Classification with Human Attention

    Maria Barrett;Joachim Bingel;Nora Hollenstein;Marek Rei

  • Linguistically debatable or just plain wrong

    Barbara Plank;Dirk Hovy;Anders Sogaard

  • Semi-supervised condensed nearest neighbor for part-of-speech tagging

    Anders Sogaard

  • Unsupervised Cross-Lingual Representation Learning

    Sebastian Ruder;Anders Søgaard;Ivan Vulić

  • Patrick Blackburn and Johan Bos , Representation and Inference for Natural Language

    Anders Søgaard

  • Proceedings of the 54th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

    Maria Barrett;Joachim Bingel;Frank Keller;Anders Søgaard

Frequent Co-Authors

Barbara Plank
Barbara Plank Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Isabelle Augenstein
Isabelle Augenstein University of Copenhagen
Dirk Hovy
Dirk Hovy Bocconi University
Sebastian Ruder
Sebastian Ruder Google (United States)
Yoav Goldberg
Yoav Goldberg Bar-Ilan University
Ivan Vulić
Ivan Vulić University of Cambridge
Ryan Cotterell
Ryan Cotterell ETH Zurich
Frank Keller
Frank Keller University of Edinburgh
Omer Levy
Omer Levy Deep Mind
Felix Hill
Felix Hill Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education in Computer Science opens up numerous opportunities for both newcomers and professionals seeking to advance their careers. Many online programs that pay well allow students to quickly gain in-demand skills while still balancing work or other responsibilities.

With technology rapidly evolving, specializations such as artificial intelligence are more accessible than ever. If you're interested in this cutting-edge field, consider enrolling in an artificial intelligence degree online to build expertise from anywhere in the world.

Not sure which direction to take? Reviewing the best majors can help you align your academic interests with lucrative and stable job prospects. For graduate-level study, students looking for options that fit a busy lifestyle may benefit from exploring the easiest online master's degree programs, which provide flexibility without sacrificing quality.

Whether you're just starting or upskilling, online study offers clear pathways to exciting and rewarding tech careers.

Best Scientists Citing Anders Søgaard

Trending Scientists