World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Yoav Goldberg

Yoav Goldberg

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
69
Citations
29643
World Ranking
1929
National Ranking
36

Yoav Goldberg publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoav Goldberg sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 216 publications — 52nd percentile

52% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Yoav Goldberg D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Yoav Goldberg sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 69 D-Index — 87th percentile

87% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Yoav Goldberg is affiliated with Bar-Ilan University in Israel and specializes in computer science with a focus on artificial intelligence. Their work extends into several subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, molecular biology, computational theory and mathematics, and information systems.

Their research concentrates on a diverse range of topics related to machine learning and natural language processing. Key topics include:

  • Topic Modeling
  • Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
  • Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)
  • Text Readability and Simplification
  • Adversarial Robustness in Machine Learning
  • Speech and Dialogue Systems

Yoav Goldberg has published extensively, with recent notable papers showcasing a range of interests within AI and computational linguistics:

  • Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Tasks, 2024, arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Measuring and Improving Consistency in Pretrained Language Models, 2021, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Universal Dependencies, 2025, Elsevier eBooks
  • oLMpics-On What Language Model Pre-training Captures, 2020, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Amnesic Probing: Behavioral Explanation with Amnesic Counterfactuals, 2021, Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Their collaborations feature several frequent co-authors, highlighting ongoing research partnerships. Prominent collaborators include:

  • Shauli Ravfogel
  • Yanai Elazar
  • Reut Tsarfaty
  • Alon Jacovi
  • Hillel Taub-Tabib

Publications appear regularly in respected venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics
  • Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing
  • Machine Learning
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)

Best Publications

  • Neural Word Embedding as Implicit Matrix Factorization

    Omer Levy;Yoav Goldberg

  • Improving Distributional Similarity with Lessons Learned from Word Embeddings

    Omer Levy;Yoav Goldberg;Ido Dagan

  • word2vec Explained: deriving Mikolov et al.'s negative-sampling word-embedding method.

    Yoav Goldberg;Omer Levy

  • Dependency-Based Word Embeddings

    Omer Levy;Yoav Goldberg

  • A primer on neural network models for natural language processing

    Yoav Goldberg

  • Universal Dependencies v1: A Multilingual Treebank Collection

    Joakim Nivre;Marie-Catherine de Marneffe;Filip Ginter;Yoav Goldberg

  • Neural Network Methods in Natural Language Processing

    Yoav Goldberg;Graeme Hirst

  • Assessing the Ability of LSTMs to Learn Syntax-Sensitive Dependencies

    Tal Linzen;Emmanuel Dupoux;Yoav Goldberg

  • Linguistic Regularities in Sparse and Explicit Word Representations

    Omer Levy;Yoav Goldberg

  • Simple and Accurate Dependency Parsing Using Bidirectional LSTM Feature Representations

    Eliyahu Kiperwasser;Yoav Goldberg

  • Universal Dependency Annotation for Multilingual Parsing

    Ryan McDonald;Joakim Nivre;Yvonne Quirmbach-Brundage;Yoav Goldberg

  • BitFit: Simple Parameter-efficient Fine-tuning for Transformer-based Masked Language-models

    Elad Ben Zaken;Shauli Ravfogel;Yoav Goldberg

  • DyNet: The Dynamic Neural Network Toolkit

    Graham Neubig;Chris Dyer;Yoav Goldberg;Austin Matthews

  • Assessing BERT's Syntactic Abilities.

    Yoav Goldberg

  • Breaking NLI Systems with Sentences that Require Simple Lexical Inferences

    Max Glockner;Vered Shwartz;Yoav Goldberg

  • Deep multi-task learning with low level tasks supervised at lower layers

    Anders Søgaard;Yoav Goldberg

  • Lipstick on a Pig: Debiasing Methods Cover up Systematic Gender Biases in Word Embeddings But do not Remove Them

    Hila Gonen;Yoav Goldberg

  • Fine-grained Analysis of Sentence Embeddings Using Auxiliary Prediction Tasks

    Yossi Adi;Einat Kermany;Yonatan Belinkov;Ofer Lavi

  • Multilingual Part-of-Speech Tagging with Bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory Models and Auxiliary Loss

    Barbara Plank;Anders Søgaard;Yoav Goldberg

  • Formalizing Trust in Artificial Intelligence: Prerequisites, Causes and Goals of Human Trust in AI

    Alon Jacovi;Ana Marasović;Tim Miller;Yoav Goldberg

  • Universal Dependencies 2.7

    Daniel Zeman;Joakim Nivre;Mitchell Abrams;Elia Ackermann

Frequent Co-Authors

Ido Dagan
Ido Dagan Bar-Ilan University
Joakim Nivre
Joakim Nivre Uppsala University
Anders Søgaard
Anders Søgaard University of Copenhagen
Eran Yahav
Eran Yahav Technion – Israel Institute of Technology
Omer Levy
Omer Levy Deep Mind
Jonathan Berant
Jonathan Berant Tel Aviv University
Noah A. Smith
Noah A. Smith University of Washington
Chris Dyer
Chris Dyer Google (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The field of Computer Science offers a wealth of online education options for students with varying backgrounds and goals. Many learners start by exploring an associates degree online, which provides a flexible and budget-friendly introduction to the field. This foundational step helps open doors to entry-level technology roles or further academic pursuits.

For those considering advanced studies, it’s important to note which master's degree is most in demand in usa. Computer Science consistently ranks as a top choice, offering strong career prospects and higher earning potential. However, entry requirements and tuition costs can vary widely across institutions.

Affordability remains a concern for many students. Fortunately, there are opportunities to enroll in the most affordable online colleges, making quality education accessible regardless of budget. Additionally, some online graduate schools with low gpa requirements provide alternative pathways for students who may not meet traditional academic criteria but possess the drive to succeed in technology careers.

Best Scientists Citing Yoav Goldberg

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles