What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
Paul S. Herrnson mainly investigates Public relations, Public administration, Voting, Politics and Disapproval voting.
The Public relations study combines topics in areas such as Strengths and weaknesses, Women's history, Campaign finance, Social issues and Convergence.
His studies deal with areas such as Political corruption, Representation and Split-ticket voting as well as Public administration.
His study in the fields of Electronic voting under the domain of Voting overlaps with other disciplines such as Work, Usability and Internet privacy.
The various areas that Paul S. Herrnson examines in his Politics study include State and Race.
He has included themes like First-past-the-post voting and Ballot in his Disapproval voting study.
His most cited work include:
- Congressional Elections: Campaigning at Home and in Washington (267 citations)
- Women Running "as Women": Candidate Gender, Campaign Issues, and Voter-Targeting Strategies (228 citations)
- Scantegrity II municipal election at Takoma Park: the first E2E binding governmental election with ballot privacy (102 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Paul S. Herrnson mainly focuses on Public administration, Politics, Voting, Public relations and State.
The concepts of his Public administration study are interwoven with issues in Representation, Split-ticket voting, Presidency, Legislature and Congressional elections.
His work deals with themes such as Government and Scholarship, which intersect with Politics.
His work on Ballot, Disapproval voting and Cardinal voting systems as part of general Voting research is frequently linked to Usability and Internet privacy, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Public relations research integrates issues from Presidential election, Public office and Set.
He combines subjects such as Campaign finance and Law and economics with his study of State.
He most often published in these fields:
- Public administration (46.07%)
- Politics (35.96%)
- Voting (28.09%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2020)?
- Public administration (46.07%)
- Voting (28.09%)
- State (17.98%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
His primary areas of investigation include Public administration, Voting, State, Ballot and Political economy.
His research investigates the connection with Public administration and areas like Legislature which intersect with concerns in Test.
His research in the fields of Turnout overlaps with other disciplines such as Usability.
His research integrates issues of Government, Disapproval voting, Voting behavior and Public relations in his study of Turnout.
His study in Disapproval voting is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both First-past-the-post voting, Weighted voting and Split-ticket voting.
His Political economy study combines topics in areas such as Disadvantage, Advertising and Politics, Politics of the United States.
Between 2011 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- The Impact of Ballot Type on Voter Errors (27 citations)
- Mobilization Around New Convenience Voting Methods: A Field Experiment to Encourage Voting by Mail with a Downloadable Ballot and Early Voting (7 citations)
- Exceeding Expectations? Determinants of Satisfaction with the Voting Process in the 2008 U.S. Presidential Election (6 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
Paul S. Herrnson spends much of his time researching Voting, Ballot, Turnout, Disapproval voting and Public relations.
His Ballot study combines topics from a wide range of disciplines, such as Early voting and Actuarial science.
His Turnout study is concerned with Politics in general.
His Disapproval voting research is multidisciplinary, relying on both Secret ballot, First-past-the-post voting, Military personnel and Weighted voting.
His Public relations research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Public economics, Presidential election, Split-ticket voting and Group voting ticket.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
