What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Law
- Statistics
- Social science
His primary scientific interests are in Politics, Legislature, Voting, Social psychology and Public relations.
In general Politics study, his work on Political efficacy, Elite and Cardinal voting systems often relates to the realm of Order, thereby connecting several areas of interest.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Public economics and State.
His work on Electronic voting as part of general Voting study is frequently linked to Work, therefore connecting diverse disciplines of science.
As a part of the same scientific study, Richard G. Niemi usually deals with the Social psychology, concentrating on National election and frequently concerns with Salience, Variety and Coding.
His Public relations research incorporates elements of Service and Public policy.
His most cited work include:
- Measuring Internal Political Efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. (582 citations)
- Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items (543 citations)
- A cross-national analysis of economic voting: taking account of the political context across time and nations (167 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
His scientific interests lie mostly in Politics, Voting, Social psychology, Political economy and State.
His Politics research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Government, Civics and Public relations.
His Voting study incorporates themes from Internet privacy and Law and economics.
His Social psychology research is multidisciplinary, relying on both National election, Mode, Political efficacy, Positive economics and Political socialization.
Richard G. Niemi has included themes like Political culture and Presidential system in his Political economy study.
His State research focuses on Legislature and how it relates to Public administration and Public economics.
He most often published in these fields:
- Politics (33.93%)
- Voting (30.95%)
- Social psychology (17.26%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2008-2020)?
- Voting (30.95%)
- Politics (33.93%)
- Political economy (16.67%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
Richard G. Niemi spends much of his time researching Voting, Politics, Political economy, Social psychology and Political socialization.
His Voting study combines topics in areas such as Presidential election, Public relations and Public administration.
His Public relations research incorporates themes from Test and Scrutiny.
Richard G. Niemi studies Politics, focusing on Political system in particular.
His study in Political economy is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Political process, Political culture and Democracy.
His work in Social psychology tackles topics such as Distrust which are related to areas like Political efficacy and Diversity.
Between 2008 and 2020, his most popular works were:
- Beyond political socialization: New approaches to age, period, cohort analysis (49 citations)
- The compensation effect of civic education on political engagement: how civics classes make up for missing parental socialization (43 citations)
- Electronic voting eliminates hanging chads but introduces new usability challenges (34 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Law
- Statistics
- Social science
His primary areas of investigation include Social psychology, Voting, Politics, Political socialization and Disengagement theory.
Richard G. Niemi merges Social psychology with Construct in his research.
His Ballot study in the realm of Voting connects with subjects such as Order and Software development.
His study ties his expertise on Civics together with the subject of Politics.
His research investigates the link between Political socialization and topics such as Young adult that cross with problems in Curriculum and Socialization.
His Disengagement theory research includes themes of Political economy, Political process, Diversity, Political efficacy and Distrust.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
