World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
41
Citations
10876
World Ranking
4917
National Ranking
2330

Philip M. Sadler publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Sadler sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 175 publications — 54th percentile

54% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Philip M. Sadler D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Philip M. Sadler sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 41 D-Index — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Philip M. Sadler is affiliated with Harvard University in the United States and has produced a significant body of research primarily situated within social sciences, with a focus on education, safety research, experimental and cognitive psychology, computer science applications, and gender studies. Their extensive work encompasses several interconnected subfields and themes, highlighting multifaceted aspects of education and identity in STEM contexts.

Their research contributions include numerous publications addressing topics such as career development and diversity, education achievement and giftedness, science education and pedagogy, teaching and learning programming, gender and technology in education, online learning and analytics, and higher education research studies.

Frequent collaborators of Philip M. Sadler include Gerhard Sonnert, Chen Chen, Susan Sunbury, Zahra Hazari, and David J. Malan, reflecting interdisciplinary partnerships and long-term scholarly engagement.

Prominent publication venues where their work has appeared multiple times comprise:

  • ACM Transactions on Computing Education
  • International Journal of STEM Education
  • Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education
  • Journal of Research in Science Teaching
  • International Journal of Science Education

Key papers authored or co-authored by Philip M. Sadler include:

  • The Intersection of Being Black and Being a Woman, 2020, ACM Transactions on Computing Education
  • Examining the effect of early STEM experiences as a form of STEM capital and identity capital on STEM identity: A gender study, 2021, Science Education
  • The Impact of High School Life Science Teachers' Subject Matter Knowledge and Knowledge of Student Misconceptions on Students' Learning, 2020, CBE-Life Sciences Education
  • Going over the cliff: MOOC dropout behavior at chapter transition, 2020, Distance Education
  • The role of media in influencing students' STEM career interest, 2023, International Journal of STEM Education

Best Publications

  • Connecting High School Physics Experiences, Outcome Expectations, Physics Identity, and Physics Career Choice: A Gender Study.

    Zahra Hazari;Gerhard Sonnert;Philip M. Sadler;Marie-Claire Shanahan

  • Stability and volatility of STEM career interest in high school: a gender study

    Philip M. Sadler;Gerhard Sonnert;Zahra Hazari;Robert Tai

  • The Impact of Self- and Peer-Grading on Student Learning

    Philip M. Sadler;Eddie Good

  • The Influence of Teachers’ Knowledge on Student Learning in Middle School Physical Science Classrooms

    Philip M. Sadler;Gerhard Sonnert;Harold P. Coyle;Nancy Cook-Smith

  • Out-of-School Time Science Activities and Their Association with Career Interest in STEM

    Katherine P. Dabney;Robert H. Tai;John T. Almarode;Jaimie L. L. Miller-Friedmann

  • Psychometric models of student conceptions in science: Reconciling qualitative studies and distractor-driven assessment instruments

    Philip M. Sadler

  • Engineering Competitions in the Middle School Classroom: Key Elements in Developing Effective Design Challenges

    Philip M. Sadler;Harold P. Coyle;Marc Schwartz

  • Gender differences in introductory university physics performance: The influence of high school physics preparation and affective factors

    Zahra Hazari;Robert H. Tai;Philip M. Sadler

  • Success in introductory college physics: The role of high school preparation

    Philip M. Sadler;Robert H. Tai

  • Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science

    Remy Dou;Zahra Hazari;Katherine Dabney;Gerhard Sonnert

  • Depth versus Breadth: How Content Coverage in High School Science Courses Relates to Later Success in College Science Coursework.

    Marc S. Schwartz;Philip M. Sadler;Gerhard Sonnert;Robert H. Tai

  • Factors Influencing Success in Introductory College Chemistry

    Robert H. Tai;Philip M. Sadler;John F. Loehr

  • The Two High-School Pillars Supporting College Science

    Philip M. Sadler;Robert H. Tai

  • Establishing an Explanatory Model for Mathematics Identity

    Jennifer D. Cribbs;Zahra Hazari;Gerhard Sonnert;Philip M. Sadler

  • The Science Identity of College Students: Exploring the Intersection of Gender, Race, and Ethnicity

    Zahra Hazari;Philip M. Sadler;Gerhard Sonnert

  • The impact of college- and university-run high school summer programs on students’ end of high school STEM career aspirations

    Joseph A. Kitchen;Gerhard Sonnert;Philip M. Sadler

  • Teacher predictions versus actual student gains

    Alan Lightman;Philip M. Sadler

  • The influence of students’ participation in STEM competitions on their interest in STEM careers

    Kelly Miller;Gerhard Sonnert;Philip Sadler

  • The Astronomy and Space Science Concept Inventory: Development and Validation of Assessment Instruments Aligned with the K-12 National Science Standards

    Philip M. Sadler;Harold Coyle;Jaimie L. Miller;Nancy Cook-Smith

  • The initial knowledge state of high school astronomy students

    Philip Michael Sadler

Frequent Co-Authors

Gerhard Sonnert
Gerhard Sonnert Harvard University
Robert H. Tai
Robert H. Tai University of Virginia
Alyssa A. Goodman
Alyssa A. Goodman Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics
James M. Jackson
James M. Jackson Ames Research Center
Kimberly D. Tanner
Kimberly D. Tanner San Francisco State University
Curtis G. Wong
Curtis G. Wong Microsoft (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees in the Social Sciences and Humanities opens up a wide range of career opportunities in counseling, education, research, and leadership. Flexible learning options allow you to pursue advanced credentials without pausing your career or relocating.

For those interested in advanced psychology practice, psy d programs online provide intensive training in clinical skills. Another popular pathway is marriage and family therapy. Many students opt for online mft programs that offer a convenient route to licensure in this in-demand field.

Affordability is a significant consideration for many learners. There are options for a masters in psychology online cheap, helping reduce financial barriers while still providing robust academic content. Meanwhile, aspiring educational leaders can accelerate their career with accelerated edd programs, which offer fast-track options for earning a Doctor of Education degree.

Whether you seek licensure, research roles, or advanced leadership, today’s online degrees provide flexible and affordable pathways to diverse careers in social sciences and humanities.

Best Scientists Citing Philip M. Sadler

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles