World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 55 2020 1831 972 869 161 12304

Lisa M. Klesges publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Lisa M. Klesges between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Lisa M. Klesges published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 4.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 17 publications in 2023. 12 of the 200 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 17. Peak 17 publications in 2023. 1985: 2 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 4 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 2 publications 1991: 7 publications 1992: 9 publications 1993: 3 publications 1994: 2 publications 1995: 5 publications 1996: 2 publications 1997: 2 publications 1998: 1 publication 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 4 publications 2003: 5 publications 2004: 15 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 14 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 6 publications 2010: 2 publications 2011: 3 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 1 publication 2014: 2 publications 2015: 4 publications 2016: 5 publications 2017: 2 publications 2018: 6 publications 2019: 1 publication 2020: 8 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 8 publications 2023: 17 publications 2024: 5 publications 2025: 7 publications
1985 2025

200 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Lisa M. Klesges: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 2
1986 0
1987 4
1988 4
1989 1
1990 2
1991 7
1992 9
1993 3
1994 2
1995 5
1996 2
1997 2
1998 1
1999 1
2000 1
2001 2
2002 4
2003 5
2004 15
2005 4
2006 14
2007 6
2008 7
2009 6
2010 2
2011 3
2012 5
2013 1
2014 2
2015 4
2016 5
2017 2
2018 6
2019 1
2020 8
2021 15
2022 8
2023 17
2024 5
2025 7
Total 200
Download as CSV

Lisa M. Klesges publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Klesges sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 154–163 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 161 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411 161
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Lisa M. Klesges D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Klesges sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137 55
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Lisa M. Klesges is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research focuses primarily within the field of Medicine, encompassing subfields such as General Health Professions, Genetics, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders, HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Iron Metabolism and Disorders, and Blood Donation and Transfusion Practices.

Frequent collaborators with Lisa M. Klesges include Jane S. Hankins, Allison A. King, Sherif M. Badawy, Chinonyelum Nwosu, and Nirmish Shah.

Publications by Lisa M. Klesges have appeared repeatedly in several venues, including the European Journal of Public Health, JCO Oncology Practice, Blood, BMJ Open, and JMIR Research Protocols.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by this scientist include:

  • Development of the InCharge Health Mobile App to Improve Adherence to Hydroxyurea in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: User-Centered Design Approach (2020, JMIR mhealth and uhealth)
  • Identifying barriers to evidence-based care for sickle cell disease: results from the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers in the USA (2021, BMJ Open)
  • Cancer disparities in the context of rurality: risk factors and screening across various U.S. rural classification codes (2022, Cancer Causes & Control)
  • Integration of Mobile Health Into Sickle Cell Disease Care to Increase Hydroxyurea Utilization: Protocol for an Efficacy and Implementation Study (2020, JMIR Research Protocols)
  • Outcomes After Use of a Lymph Node Collection Kit for Lung Cancer Surgery: A Pragmatic, Population-Based, Multi-Institutional, Staggered Implementation Study (2021, Journal of Thoracic Oncology)

Best Publications

  • SMOKING, BODY WEIGHT, AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SMOKING BEHAVIOR: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

    Robert C. Klesges;Andrew W. Meyers;Lisa M. Klesges;Marie E. LaVasque

  • The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges;David A. Dzewaltowski;Sheana S. Bull

  • Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges;David A. Dzewaltowski;Paul A. Estabrooks

  • Effects of Television on Metabolic Rate: Potential Implications For Childhood Obesity

    Robert C. Klesges;Mary Lee Shelton;Lisa M. Klesges

  • Parental influence on food selection in young children and its relationships to childhood obesity.

    R C Klesges;R J Stein;L H Eck;T R Isbell

  • A Longitudinal Analysis of Accelerated Weight Gain in Preschool Children

    Robert C. Klesges;Lisa M. Klesges;Linda H. Eck;Mary Lee Shelton

  • Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical environment on physical activity in preschoolers

    R C Klesges;L H Eck;C L Hanson;C K Haddock

  • Social desirability bias in self-reported dietary, physical activity and weight concerns measures in 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls: results from the Girls Health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS).

    Lisa M Klesges;Tom Baranowski;Bettina Beech;Karen Cullen

  • Beginning with the application in mind: Designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination

    Lisa M. Klesges;Paul A. Estabrooks;David A. Dzewaltowski;Sheana S. Bull

  • What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model?

    Rodger S. Kessler;E. Peyton Purcell;Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges

  • A longitudinal analysis of the impact of dietary intake and physical activity on weight change in adults

    R C Klesges;L M Klesges;C K Haddock;L H Eck

  • External validity: we need to do more

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lawrence W. Green;Lisa M. Klesges;David B. Abrams

  • Child- and parent-targeted interventions: the Memphis GEMS pilot study.

    Bettina M. Beech;Robert C. Klesges;Shiriki K. Kumanyika;David M. Murray

  • RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice.

    David A. Dzewaltowski;Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges;Paul A. Estabrooks

  • Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity.

    Russell E Glasgow;Sheana S Bull;Cynthia Gillette;Lisa M Klesges

  • Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?

    David A. Dzewaltowski;Paula A. Estabrooks;Lisa M. Klesges;Sheana Bull

  • Relationship between dietary restraint, energy intake, physical activity, and body weight: a prospective analysis.

    Robert C. Klesges;Terry R. Isbell;Lisa M. Klesges

  • Financial difficulty in acquiring food among elderly disabled women: results from the Women's Health and Aging Study.

    Lisa M. Klesges;Marco Pahor;Ronald I. Shorr;Jim Y. Wan

  • Review of External Validity Reporting in Childhood Obesity Prevention Research

    Lisa M. Klesges;David A. Dzewaltowski;Russell E. Glasgow

  • Practical and relevant self-report measures of patient health behaviors for primary care research.

    Russell E. Glasgow;Marcia G. Ory;Lisa M. Klesges;Maribel Cifuentes

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert C. Klesges
Robert C. Klesges University of Virginia
Russell E. Glasgow
Russell E. Glasgow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
David A. Dzewaltowski
David A. Dzewaltowski University of Nebraska Medical Center
Paul A. Estabrooks
Paul A. Estabrooks University of Nebraska Medical Center
Bettina M. Beech
Bettina M. Beech University of Houston
Karen C. Johnson
Karen C. Johnson University of Tennessee Health Science Center
David M. Murray
David M. Murray National Institutes of Health
Sheana Bull
Sheana Bull University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Tom Baranowski
Tom Baranowski Baylor College of Medicine
Andrew W. Meyers
Andrew W. Meyers University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and flexible career pathways. If you’re interested in psychology, an online masters in psychology can prepare you for roles in counseling, education, or research—often at a lower cost.

For those focusing on leadership or educational administration, the fastest edd program online allows professionals to advance quickly into senior positions.

Looking for efficient study options? Many institutions now offer 1 year master's programs online, letting motivated students earn valuable credentials in just 12 months.

Even at the undergraduate level, you’ll find online accelerated programs that help you complete your degree faster, setting you on the path to a rewarding career sooner.

As the landscape of online education evolves, students can access diverse subjects, faster timelines, and cost-effective pathways—tailored to their professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Klesges

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles