World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Social Sciences and Humanities

D-Index
55
Citations
12304
World Ranking
2020
National Ranking
972

Lisa M. Klesges publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Klesges sits on this spectrum.

44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44 publications 570+

This scientist: 161 publications — 47th percentile

47% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

Lisa M. Klesges D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Lisa M. Klesges sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

Overview

Lisa M. Klesges is affiliated with Washington University in St. Louis in the United States. Their research focuses primarily within the field of Medicine, encompassing subfields such as General Health Professions, Genetics, Oncology, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, and Infectious Diseases.

The scientist has contributed extensively to topics including Hemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders, HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions, Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues, Global Cancer Incidence and Screening, Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life, Iron Metabolism and Disorders, and Blood Donation and Transfusion Practices.

Frequent collaborators with Lisa M. Klesges include Jane S. Hankins, Allison A. King, Sherif M. Badawy, Chinonyelum Nwosu, and Nirmish Shah.

Publications by Lisa M. Klesges have appeared repeatedly in several venues, including the European Journal of Public Health, JCO Oncology Practice, Blood, BMJ Open, and JMIR Research Protocols.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by this scientist include:

  • Development of the InCharge Health Mobile App to Improve Adherence to Hydroxyurea in Patients With Sickle Cell Disease: User-Centered Design Approach (2020, JMIR mhealth and uhealth)
  • Identifying barriers to evidence-based care for sickle cell disease: results from the Sickle Cell Disease Implementation Consortium cross-sectional survey of healthcare providers in the USA (2021, BMJ Open)
  • Cancer disparities in the context of rurality: risk factors and screening across various U.S. rural classification codes (2022, Cancer Causes & Control)
  • Integration of Mobile Health Into Sickle Cell Disease Care to Increase Hydroxyurea Utilization: Protocol for an Efficacy and Implementation Study (2020, JMIR Research Protocols)
  • Outcomes After Use of a Lymph Node Collection Kit for Lung Cancer Surgery: A Pragmatic, Population-Based, Multi-Institutional, Staggered Implementation Study (2021, Journal of Thoracic Oncology)

Best Publications

  • SMOKING, BODY WEIGHT, AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SMOKING BEHAVIOR: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

    Robert C. Klesges;Andrew W. Meyers;Lisa M. Klesges;Marie E. LaVasque

  • The future of health behavior change research: what is needed to improve translation of research into health promotion practice?

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges;David A. Dzewaltowski;Sheana S. Bull

  • Evaluating the impact of health promotion programs: using the RE-AIM framework to form summary measures for decision making involving complex issues

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges;David A. Dzewaltowski;Paul A. Estabrooks

  • Effects of Television on Metabolic Rate: Potential Implications For Childhood Obesity

    Robert C. Klesges;Mary Lee Shelton;Lisa M. Klesges

  • Parental influence on food selection in young children and its relationships to childhood obesity.

    R C Klesges;R J Stein;L H Eck;T R Isbell

  • A Longitudinal Analysis of Accelerated Weight Gain in Preschool Children

    Robert C. Klesges;Lisa M. Klesges;Linda H. Eck;Mary Lee Shelton

  • Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical environment on physical activity in preschoolers

    R C Klesges;L H Eck;C L Hanson;C K Haddock

  • Social desirability bias in self-reported dietary, physical activity and weight concerns measures in 8- to 10-year-old African-American girls: results from the Girls Health Enrichment Multisite Studies (GEMS).

    Lisa M Klesges;Tom Baranowski;Bettina Beech;Karen Cullen

  • Beginning with the application in mind: Designing and planning health behavior change interventions to enhance dissemination

    Lisa M. Klesges;Paul A. Estabrooks;David A. Dzewaltowski;Sheana S. Bull

  • What does it mean to "employ" the RE-AIM model?

    Rodger S. Kessler;E. Peyton Purcell;Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges

  • A longitudinal analysis of the impact of dietary intake and physical activity on weight change in adults

    R C Klesges;L M Klesges;C K Haddock;L H Eck

  • External validity: we need to do more

    Russell E. Glasgow;Lawrence W. Green;Lisa M. Klesges;David B. Abrams

  • Child- and parent-targeted interventions: the Memphis GEMS pilot study.

    Bettina M. Beech;Robert C. Klesges;Shiriki K. Kumanyika;David M. Murray

  • RE-AIM: evidence-based standards and a Web resource to improve translation of research into practice.

    David A. Dzewaltowski;Russell E. Glasgow;Lisa M. Klesges;Paul A. Estabrooks

  • Behavior change intervention research in healthcare settings: a review of recent reports with emphasis on external validity.

    Russell E Glasgow;Sheana S Bull;Cynthia Gillette;Lisa M Klesges

  • Behavior change intervention research in community settings: how generalizable are the results?

    David A. Dzewaltowski;Paula A. Estabrooks;Lisa M. Klesges;Sheana Bull

  • Relationship between dietary restraint, energy intake, physical activity, and body weight: a prospective analysis.

    Robert C. Klesges;Terry R. Isbell;Lisa M. Klesges

  • Financial difficulty in acquiring food among elderly disabled women: results from the Women's Health and Aging Study.

    Lisa M. Klesges;Marco Pahor;Ronald I. Shorr;Jim Y. Wan

  • Review of External Validity Reporting in Childhood Obesity Prevention Research

    Lisa M. Klesges;David A. Dzewaltowski;Russell E. Glasgow

  • Practical and relevant self-report measures of patient health behaviors for primary care research.

    Russell E. Glasgow;Marcia G. Ory;Lisa M. Klesges;Maribel Cifuentes

Frequent Co-Authors

Robert C. Klesges
Robert C. Klesges University of Virginia
Russell E. Glasgow
Russell E. Glasgow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
David A. Dzewaltowski
David A. Dzewaltowski University of Nebraska Medical Center
Paul A. Estabrooks
Paul A. Estabrooks University of Nebraska Medical Center
Bettina M. Beech
Bettina M. Beech University of Houston
Karen C. Johnson
Karen C. Johnson University of Tennessee Health Science Center
David M. Murray
David M. Murray National Institutes of Health
Sheana Bull
Sheana Bull University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Tom Baranowski
Tom Baranowski Baylor College of Medicine
Andrew W. Meyers
Andrew W. Meyers University of Memphis

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Social Sciences and Humanities in the USA opens doors to a wide array of online degrees and flexible career pathways. If you’re interested in psychology, an online masters in psychology can prepare you for roles in counseling, education, or research—often at a lower cost.

For those focusing on leadership or educational administration, the fastest edd program online allows professionals to advance quickly into senior positions.

Looking for efficient study options? Many institutions now offer 1 year master's programs online, letting motivated students earn valuable credentials in just 12 months.

Even at the undergraduate level, you’ll find online accelerated programs that help you complete your degree faster, setting you on the path to a rewarding career sooner.

As the landscape of online education evolves, students can access diverse subjects, faster timelines, and cost-effective pathways—tailored to their professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Lisa M. Klesges

Trending Scientists