World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
76
Citations
20731
World Ranking
18797
National Ranking
9370

Robert C. Klesges publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert C. Klesges sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 349 publications — 27th percentile

27% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Robert C. Klesges D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Robert C. Klesges sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 8th percentile

8% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Robert C. Klesges is affiliated with the University of Virginia in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields related to health and behavioral sciences, with a particular focus on smoking behavior, cessation, and associated health outcomes.

The main fields of study for Robert C. Klesges include:

  • Medicine
  • Health Professions
  • Psychology

Within these fields, the scientist has contributed to several subfields:

  • Physiology
  • Applied Psychology
  • Speech and Hearing
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
  • Occupational Therapy

The research topics most frequently covered by Robert C. Klesges include:

  • Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • School Health and Nursing Education
  • Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Occupational Health and Performance
  • Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Digital Mental Health Interventions

Frequent co-authors who have collaborated with Robert C. Klesges include:

  • G. Wayne Talcott
  • Melissa A. Little
  • Margaret C. Fahey
  • Indika Mallawaarachchi
  • Xin-Qun Wang

The scientist has published numerous articles in various journals. Common publication venues are:

  • Substance Use & Misuse
  • International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • JMIR Formative Research
  • Military Medicine
  • Nicotine & Tobacco Research

Recent papers by Robert C. Klesges include:

  • Trends in Tobacco Use among Young Adults Presenting for Military Service in the United States Air Force between 2013 and 2018, 2021, Substance Use & Misuse
  • An Evaluation of the Process and Quality Improvement Measures of the University of Virginia Cancer Center Tobacco Treatment Program, 2020, International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
  • Assessing the Contribution of Self-Monitoring Through a Commercial Weight Loss App: Mediation and Predictive Modeling Study, 2021, JMIR mhealth and uhealth
  • A randomized controlled trial to reduce post-cessation weight gain, 2023, International Journal of Obesity
  • When, How, & Where Tobacco Initiation and Relapse Occur During U.S. Air Force Technical Training, 2020, Military Medicine

Best Publications

  • Determinants of physical activity and interventions in youth.

    James F. Sallis;Bruce G. Simons-Morton;Elaine J. Stone;Charles B. Corbin

  • SMOKING, BODY WEIGHT, AND THEIR EFFECTS ON SMOKING BEHAVIOR: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE

    Robert C. Klesges;Andrew W. Meyers;Lisa M. Klesges;Marie E. LaVasque

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of cigarette smoking on bone mineral density.

    Kenneth D. Ward;Robert C. Klesges

  • Effects of Television on Metabolic Rate: Potential Implications For Childhood Obesity

    Robert C. Klesges;Mary Lee Shelton;Lisa M. Klesges

  • Parental influence on food selection in young children and its relationships to childhood obesity.

    R C Klesges;R J Stein;L H Eck;T R Isbell

  • A Longitudinal Analysis of Accelerated Weight Gain in Preschool Children

    Robert C. Klesges;Lisa M. Klesges;Linda H. Eck;Mary Lee Shelton

  • Effects of obesity, social interactions, and physical environment on physical activity in preschoolers

    R C Klesges;L H Eck;C L Hanson;C K Haddock

  • PARENTAL INFLUENCES ON CHILDREN'S EATING BEHAVIOR AND RELATIVE WEIGHT

    Robert C. Klesges;Robert C. Klesges;Thomas J. Coates;Thomas J. Coates;Guendoline Brown;Guendoline Brown;Janet Sturgeon‐Tillisch;Janet Sturgeon‐Tillisch

  • The accuracy of self-reports of physical activity.

    Robert C. Klesges;Linda H. Eck;Michael W. Mellon;William Fulliton

  • The relationship between body weight concerns and adolescent smoking.

    Diane E. Camp;Robert C. Klesges;George Relyea

  • A longitudinal analysis of the impact of dietary intake and physical activity on weight change in adults

    R C Klesges;L M Klesges;C K Haddock;L H Eck

  • Non-Exercise Activity Thermogenesis The Crouching Tiger Hidden Dragon of Societal Weight Gain

    James A. Levine;Mark W. Vander Weg;James O. Hill;Robert C. Klesges

  • Who underreports dietary intake in a dietary recall? Evidence from the Second National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey.

    Robert C. Klesges;Linda H. Eck;JoAnne W. Ray

  • Cigarette smoking as a dieting strategy in a university population

    Robert C. Klesges;M B A Lisa Klesges

  • Are weight concerns predictive of smoking cessation? A prospective analysis

    Andrew W. Meyers;Robert C. Klesges;Suzan E. Winders;Kenneth D. Ward

  • Child- and parent-targeted interventions: the Memphis GEMS pilot study.

    Bettina M. Beech;Robert C. Klesges;Shiriki K. Kumanyika;David M. Murray

  • The effects of parental influences on children's food intake, physical activity, and relative weight

    Robert C. Klesges;Robert C. Klesges;James M. Malott;James M. Malott;Pamela F. Boschee;Pamela F. Boschee;Jill M. Weber;Jill M. Weber

  • Gender differences in the outcome of an unaided smoking cessation attempt.

    Kenneth D. Ward;Robert C. Klesges;Susan M. Zbikowski;Ryan E. Bliss

  • How much weight gain occurs following smoking cessation? A comparison of weight gain using both continuous and point prevalence abstinence.

    Robert C. Klesges;Suzan E. Winders;Andrew W. Meyers;Linda H. Eck

  • A study of the psychometric and predictive properties of the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence in a population of young smokers.

    C. Keith Haddock;Harry A Lando;Robert C. Klesges;G. Wayne Talcott

Frequent Co-Authors

Lisa M. Klesges
Lisa M. Klesges Washington University in St. Louis
Andrew W. Meyers
Andrew W. Meyers University of Memphis
David M. Murray
David M. Murray National Institutes of Health
Russell E. Glasgow
Russell E. Glasgow University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus
Alan L. Peterson
Alan L. Peterson The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Karen C. Johnson
Karen C. Johnson University of Tennessee Health Science Center
Melissa M. Hudson
Melissa M. Hudson St. Jude Children's Research Hospital
Isabel C. Scarinci
Isabel C. Scarinci University of Alabama at Birmingham
Bettina M. Beech
Bettina M. Beech University of Houston
Leslie L. Robison
Leslie L. Robison St. Jude Children's Research Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring alternative pathways in healthcare is increasingly popular, especially via online and flexible learning. Many aspiring nurses begin with adn programs, which are among the easiest nursing credentials to start and can lead to in-demand positions in hospitals and clinics. For existing registered nurses, the rn to bsn online cost is a critical factor when choosing where to advance qualifications affordably and conveniently.

Those considering a direct move into advanced nursing roles may consider online direct entry msn programs, designed for non-nurses seeking to enter the field with a master’s degree. Alternatively, those interested in supportive medical roles can pursue certifications such as medical billing and coding. There are many accredited medical billing and coding schools with financial aid available, reducing barriers for students.

Each of these online routes offers flexible scheduling and financial options, making healthcare careers more accessible and allowing you to tailor your academic journey to your individual needs.

Best Scientists Citing Robert C. Klesges

Trending Scientists