World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Mathias W. Seeliger

Mathias W. Seeliger

D-Index & Metrics

Biology and Biochemistry

D-Index
72
Citations
16306
World Ranking
6391
National Ranking
449

Mathias W. Seeliger publication distribution in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Biology and Biochemistry in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias W. Seeliger sits on this spectrum.

47–56 publications: 8 scientists 57–66 publications: 35 scientists 67–76 publications: 106 scientists 77–86 publications: 231 scientists 87–96 publications: 414 scientists 97–106 publications: 546 scientists 107–116 publications: 704 scientists 117–126 publications: 849 scientists 127–136 publications: 980 scientists 137–146 publications: 942 scientists 147–156 publications: 969 scientists 157–166 publications: 950 scientists 167–176 publications: 951 scientists 177–186 publications: 915 scientists 187–196 publications: 787 scientists 197–206 publications: 841 scientists 207–216 publications: 735 scientists 217–226 publications: 709 scientists 227–236 publications: 651 scientists 237–246 publications: 605 scientists 247–256 publications: 510 scientists 257–266 publications: 524 scientists 267–276 publications: 434 scientists 277–286 publications: 418 scientists 287–296 publications: 350 scientists 297–306 publications: 363 scientists 307–316 publications: 315 scientists 317–326 publications: 296 scientists 327–336 publications: 261 scientists 337–346 publications: 240 scientists 347–356 publications: 219 scientists 357–366 publications: 197 scientists 367–376 publications: 154 scientists 377–386 publications: 161 scientists 387–396 publications: 155 scientists 397–406 publications: 145 scientists 407–416 publications: 124 scientists 417–426 publications: 112 scientists 427–436 publications: 132 scientists 437–446 publications: 116 scientists 447–456 publications: 99 scientists 457–466 publications: 81 scientists 467–476 publications: 91 scientists 477–486 publications: 80 scientists 487–496 publications: 80 scientists 497–506 publications: 60 scientists 507–516 publications: 36 scientists 517–526 publications: 46 scientists 527–536 publications: 54 scientists 537–546 publications: 44 scientists 547–556 publications: 43 scientists 557–566 publications: 43 scientists 567–576 publications: 42 scientists 577–586 publications: 25 scientists 587–596 publications: 34 scientists 597–606 publications: 23 scientists 607–616 publications: 33 scientists 617–626 publications: 31 scientists 627–636 publications: 27 scientists 637–646 publications: 25 scientists 647–656 publications: 28 scientists 657–666 publications: 34 scientists 667–676 publications: 18 scientists 677–686 publications: 16 scientists 687–696 publications: 10 scientists 697–706 publications: 12 scientists 707–716 publications: 21 scientists 717–726 publications: 12 scientists 727–736 publications: 12 scientists 737–746 publications: 10 scientists 747–756 publications: 7 scientists 757–766 publications: 13 scientists 767–776 publications: 15 scientists 777–786 publications: 13 scientists 787–796 publications: 9 scientists 797–806 publications: 9 scientists 807–816 publications: 7 scientists 817–826 publications: 4 scientists 827–836 publications: 9 scientists 837–846 publications: 7 scientists 847–856 publications: 3 scientists 857–866 publications: 5 scientists 867–876 publications: 5 scientists 877–886 publications: 11 scientists 887–896 publications: 3 scientists 897–906 publications: 4 scientists 907–916 publications: 7 scientists 917–926 publications: 5 scientists 927–936 publications: 6 scientists 937–946 publications: 6 scientists 947–956 publications: 3 scientists 957–966 publications: 7 scientists 967–976 publications: 2 scientists 977–986 publications: 2 scientists 987–996 publications: 1 scientists 997–1,006 publications: 5 scientists 1,007–1,016 publications: 2 scientists 1,017–1,026 publications: 2 scientists 1,027 publications: 1 scientists 1,028+ publications: 100 scientists
47 publications 1,028+

This scientist: 221 publications — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,028 publications or more.

Mathias W. Seeliger D-index placement in Biology and Biochemistry in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Biology and Biochemistry scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mathias W. Seeliger sits on this spectrum.

40–41 D-Index: 80 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 183 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 317 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 504 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 718 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 900 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 1,026 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 1,150 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 1,236 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 1,253 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 1,163 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 1,131 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 1,032 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 897 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 814 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 715 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 709 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 596 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 512 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 473 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 412 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 373 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 358 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 285 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 273 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 227 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 208 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 193 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 153 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 157 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 148 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 120 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 113 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 100 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 86 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 67 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 72 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 73 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 64 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 53 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 60 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 54 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 43 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 38 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 49 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 26 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 18 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 23 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 32 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 32 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 27 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 19 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 22 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 12 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 16 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 14 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 10 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 13 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 10 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 7 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 9 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 13 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 4 scientists 166 D-Index: 4 scientists 167+ D-Index: 98 scientists
40 D-Index 167+

This scientist: 72 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 167 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mathias W. Seeliger is affiliated with the University of Tübingen in Germany. Their research spans multiple fields with a focus on biochemistry, genetics, molecular biology, medicine, and neuroscience.

The main subfields of study in their work include:

  • Molecular Biology
  • Ophthalmology
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
  • Neurology
  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

Seeliger's primary research topics cover a range of areas related to vision and retinal conditions:

  • Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Connexins and lens biology
  • Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Photoreceptor and optogenetics research
  • Retinal and Optic Conditions
  • Cell Adhesion Molecules Research

Recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Seeliger include:

  • "Safety and Vision Outcomes of Subretinal Gene Therapy Targeting Cone Photoreceptors in Achromatopsia," 2020, JAMA Ophthalmology
  • "Three-year results of phase I retinal gene therapy trial for CNGA3-mutated achromatopsia: results of a non randomised controlled trial," 2021, British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • "Mural Cell SRF Controls Pericyte Migration, Vessel Patterning and Blood Flow," 2022, Circulation Research
  • "Inherited Retinal Degeneration: PARP-Dependent Activation of Calpain Requires CNG Channel Activity," 2022, Biomolecules
  • "T-type voltage-gated channels, Na+/Ca2+-exchanger, and calpain-2 promote photoreceptor cell death in inherited retinal degeneration," 2024, Cell Communication and Signaling

Frequent co-authors in their publications include:

  • Regine Mühlfriedel
  • François Paquet-Durand
  • Alexander Günter
  • Vithiyanjali Sothilingam
  • Regine Muehlfriedel

Seeliger has published regularly in the following venues:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • British Journal of Ophthalmology
  • JAMA Ophthalmology
  • Circulation Research
  • Biomolecules

Best Publications

  • Genetic Reactivation of Cone Photoreceptors Restores Visual Responses in Retinitis Pigmentosa

    Volker Busskamp;Jens Duebel;David Balya;Mathias Fradot;Mathias Fradot;Mathias Fradot

  • HIF-1-induced erythropoietin in the hypoxic retina protects against light-induced retinal degeneration

    Christian Grimm;Andreas Wenzel;Matthias Groszer;Helmut Mayser

  • Mutation of CDH23, encoding a new member of the cadherin gene family, causes Usher syndrome type 1D

    Bolz H;von Brederlow B;Ramírez A;Bryda Ec

  • Genetic disorders of vision revealed by a behavioral screen of 400 essential loci in zebrafish.

    Stephan C. F. Neuhauss;Oliver Biehlmaier;Mathias W. Seeliger;Tilak Das

  • Selective loss of cone function in mice lacking the cyclic nucleotide-gated channel CNG3

    Martin Biel;Mathias Seeliger;Alexander Pfeifer;Konrad Kohler

  • Guidelines for basic multifocal electroretinography (mfERG)

    Michael F Marmor;Donald C Hood;David Keating;Mineo Kondo

  • Disruption of the taurine transporter gene (taut) leads to retinal degeneration in mice

    Birgit Heller-Stilb;Claudia van Roeyen;Kristina Rascher;Hans-Georg Hartwig

  • Functional and structural recovery of the retina after gene therapy in the RPE65 null mutation dog.

    Kristina Narfström;Martin L Katz;Ragnheidur Bragadottir;Mathias Seeliger

  • Crumbs homologue 1 is required for maintenance of photoreceptor cell polarization and adhesion during light exposure.

    Serge A. van de Pavert;Albena Kantardzhieva;Anna Malysheva;Jan Meuleman

  • Detection of behavioral alterations and learning deficits in mice lacking synaptophysin.

    U. Schmitt;N. Tanimoto;M. Seeliger;F. Schaeffel

  • New views on RPE65 deficiency: the rod system is the source of vision in a mouse model of Leber congenital amaurosis.

    Mathias W. Seeliger;Christian Grimm;Fredrik Ståhlberg;Fredrik Ståhlberg;Christoph Friedburg

  • Noninvasive, In Vivo Assessment of Mouse Retinal Structure Using Optical Coherence Tomography

    M. Dominik Fischer;Gesine Huber;Gesine Huber;Susanne C. Beck;Naoyuki Tanimoto

  • Prolonged Recovery of Retinal Structure/Function after Gene Therapy in an Rs1h-Deficient Mouse Model of X-Linked Juvenile Retinoschisis

    Seok H. Min;Laurie L. Molday;Mathias W. Seeliger;Astra Dinculescu

  • Inactivation of the murine X-linked juvenile retinoschisis gene, Rs1h, suggests a role of retinoschisin in retinal cell layer organization and synaptic structure.

    Bernhard H. F. Weber;Heinrich Schrewe;Laurie L. Molday;Andrea Gehrig

  • A portable albumin binder from a DNA-encoded chemical library

    Christoph E. Dumelin;Sabrina Trüssel;Fabian Buller;Eveline Trachsel

  • Mutations in the unfolded protein response regulator ATF6 cause the cone dysfunction disorder achromatopsia

    Susanne Kohl;Ditta Zobor;Wei-Chieh Chiang;Nicole Weisschuh

  • Spectral Domain Optical Coherence Tomography in Mouse Models of Retinal Degeneration

    Gesine Huber;Susanne C. Beck;Christian Grimm;Ayse Sahaboglu-Tekgoz

  • Restoration of Cone Vision in the CNGA3−/− Mouse Model of Congenital Complete Lack of Cone Photoreceptor Function

    Stylianos Michalakis;Regine Mühlfriedel;Naoyuki Tanimoto;Vidhyasankar Krishnamoorthy

  • Loss of the Cholesterol-Binding Protein Prominin-1/CD133 Causes Disk Dysmorphogenesis and Photoreceptor Degeneration

    Serena Zacchigna;Hideyasu Oh;Michaela Wilsch-Bräuninger;Ewa Missol-Kolka

  • In vivo confocal imaging of the retina in animal models using scanning laser ophthalmoscopy

    Mathias W. Seeliger;Susanne C. Beck;Naira Pereyra-Muñoz;Susann Dangel

Frequent Co-Authors

Martin Biel
Martin Biel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Eberhart Zrenner
Eberhart Zrenner University of Tübingen
Jan Wijnholds
Jan Wijnholds Leiden University Medical Center
Christian Grimm
Christian Grimm University of Zurich
Bernd Wissinger
Bernd Wissinger University of Tübingen
Andreas Wenzel
Andreas Wenzel Novartis (Switzerland)
Peter Humphries
Peter Humphries Trinity College Dublin
Bernhard H. F. Weber
Bernhard H. F. Weber University of Regensburg
Susanne Kohl
Susanne Kohl University of Tübingen
Charlotte E. Remé
Charlotte E. Remé University of Zurich

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Mathias W. Seeliger

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles