World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 40 9222 8955 40 38 199 7732

Ali Bou Nassif publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Ali Bou Nassif between 2010 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Ali Bou Nassif published across 16 years, from 2010 to 2025, averaging 14.4 papers a year. Output peaked at 40 publications in 2022. 33 of the 231 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2010 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 40. Peak 40 publications in 2022. 2010: 2 publications 2011: 4 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 2 publications 2015: 6 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 7 publications 2018: 11 publications 2019: 13 publications 2020: 23 publications 2021: 30 publications 2022: 40 publications 2023: 36 publications 2024: 24 publications 2025: 9 publications
2010 2025

231 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Ali Bou Nassif: publications per year, 2010 to 2025
Year Publications
2010 2
2011 4
2012 6
2013 7
2014 2
2015 6
2016 11
2017 7
2018 11
2019 13
2020 23
2021 30
2022 40
2023 36
2024 24
2025 9
Total 231
Download as CSV

Ali Bou Nassif publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali Bou Nassif sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 192–201 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 199 publications — 46th percentile

46% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519 199
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Ali Bou Nassif D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Ali Bou Nassif sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 40–41 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 40 D-Index — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907 40
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Ali Bou Nassif is affiliated with the University of Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates. Their research primarily focuses on computer science, with a significant number of publications in artificial intelligence and subfields such as signal processing, information systems, computer vision and pattern recognition, and computer networks and communications.

The main research topics covered by Ali Bou Nassif include:

  • Speech and Audio Processing
  • Speech Recognition and Synthesis
  • Software Engineering Research
  • Music and Audio Processing
  • Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications
  • Software Reliability and Analysis Research
  • Network Security and Intrusion Detection

Notable recent papers by Ali Bou Nassif are:

  • "Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review," 2021, IEEE Access
  • "Breast cancer detection using artificial intelligence techniques: A systematic literature review," 2022, Artificial Intelligence in Medicine

Ali Bou Nassif has also collaborated frequently with several co-authors. The most frequent collaborators include:

  • Ismail Shahin
  • Ashraf Elnagar
  • Mohammad Azzeh
  • Manar Abu Talib
  • Qassim Nasir

The scientist's publications have appeared in a variety of venues, with multiple contributions to the following sources:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Neural Computing and Applications
  • 2022 Advances in Science and Engineering Technology International Conferences (ASET)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • IEEE Access

Ali Bou Nassif has contributed to book publications, including a title published by Springer Science+Business Media:

  • "Information, Communication and Computing Technology," 2023

The body of work exemplifies contributions to fields such as artificial intelligence, signal processing, and network security, with research spanning various established publishing platforms and collaborative networks. The emphasis on topics such as anomaly detection and machine learning further indicates a focus on contemporary challenges in computer science.

Best Publications

  • Speech Recognition Using Deep Neural Networks: A Systematic Review

    Ali Bou Nassif;Ismail Shahin;Imtinan Basem Attili;Mohammad Azzeh

  • Machine Learning for Anomaly Detection: A Systematic Review

    Ali Bou Nassif;Manar Abu Talib;Qassim Nasir;Fatima Mohamad Dakalbab

  • Performance Analysis of Hyperledger Fabric Platforms

    Qassim Nasir;Ilham A. Qasse;Manar Abu Talib;Ali Bou Nassif

  • Dimensionality reduction with IG-PCA and ensemble classifier for network intrusion detection

    Fadi Salo;Ali Bou Nassif;Ali Bou Nassif;Aleksander Essex

  • Multi-Stage Optimized Machine Learning Framework for Network Intrusion Detection

    MohammadNoor Injadat;Abdallah Moubayed;Ali Bou Nassif;Abdallah Shami

  • Towards an early software estimation using log-linear regression and a multilayer perceptron model

    Ali Bou Nassif;Danny Ho;Luiz Fernando Capretz

  • Multi-Stage Optimized Machine Learning Framework for Network Intrusion Detection

    MohammadNoor Injadat;Abdallah Moubayed;Ali Bou Nassif;Abdallah Shami

  • Bayesian Optimization with Machine Learning Algorithms Towards Anomaly Detection

    MohammadNoor Injadat;Fadi Salo;Ali Bou Nassif;Aleksander Essex

  • Data mining techniques in social media

    MohammadNoor Injadat;Fadi Salo;Ali Bou Nassif

  • Software Development Effort Estimation Using Regression Fuzzy Models

    Ali Bou Nassif;Ali Bou Nassif;Mohammad Azzeh;Ali Idri;Alain Abran

  • E-Learning: Challenges and Research Opportunities Using Machine Learning & Data Analytics

    Abdallah Moubayed;Mohammadnoor Injadat;Ali Bou Nassif;Hanan Lutfiyya

  • Systematic ensemble model selection approach for educational data mining

    MohammadNoor Injadat;Abdallah Moubayed;Ali Bou Nassif;Ali Bou Nassif;Abdallah Shami

  • Emotion Recognition Using Hybrid Gaussian Mixture Model and Deep Neural Network

    Ismail Shahin;Ali Bou Nassif;Shibani Hamsa

  • Machine Learning for Cloud Security: A Systematic Review

    Ali Bou Nassif;Manar Abu Talib;Qassim Nasir;Halah Albadani

  • Neural network models for software development effort estimation: a comparative study

    Ali Bou Nassif;Mohammad Azzeh;Luiz Fernando Capretz;Danny Ho

  • Data Mining Techniques in Intrusion Detection Systems: A Systematic Literature Review

    Fadi Salo;Mohammadnoor Injadat;Ali Bou Nassif;Abdallah Shami

  • An empirical evaluation of ensemble adjustment methods for analogy-based effort estimation

    Mohammad Azzeh;Ali Bou Nassif;Leandro L. Minku

  • A hybrid model for estimating software project effort from Use Case Points

    Mohammad Azzeh;Ali Bou Nassif

  • Deep learning for Arabic subjective sentiment analysis: Challenges and research opportunities

    Ali Bou Nassif;Ashraf Elnagar;Ismail Shahin;Safaa Henno

  • Machine learning towards intelligent systems: applications, challenges, and opportunities

    MohammadNoor Injadat;Abdallah Moubayed;Ali Bou Nassif;Ali Bou Nassif;Abdallah Shami

  • Estimating Software Effort Based on Use Case Point Model Using Sugeno Fuzzy Inference System

    Ali Bou Nassif;Luiz Fernando Capretz;Danny Ho

  • Estimating Software Effort Using an ANN Model Based on Use Case Points

    Ali Bou Nassif;Luiz Fernando Capretz;Danny Ho

  • A Treeboost Model for Software Effort Estimation Based on Use Case Points

    Ali Bou Nassif;Luiz Fernando Capretz;Danny Ho;Mohammad Azzeh

  • Multi-split Optimized Bagging Ensemble Model Selection for Multi-class Educational Data Mining

    MohammadNoor Injadat;Abdallah Moubayed;Ali Bou Nassif;Ali Bou Nassif;Abdallah Shami

Frequent Co-Authors

Luiz Fernando Capretz
Luiz Fernando Capretz University of Western Ontario
Abdallah Shami
Abdallah Shami Western University Canada
Alain Abran
Alain Abran École de Technologie Supérieure
Ali Idri
Ali Idri Mohammed V University
Said A. Salloum
Said A. Salloum University of Sharjah
Kemal Polat
Kemal Polat Abant Izzet Baysal University
Leandro L. Minku
Leandro L. Minku University of Birmingham
Cagatay Catal
Cagatay Catal Qatar University
Khaled Shaalan
Khaled Shaalan British University in Dubai
Rifat Hamoudi
Rifat Hamoudi University of Sharjah

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a Computer Science degree, there are several related online programs worth exploring. Online learning makes it easier to pursue specialized degrees while balancing work and personal commitments. Computer Science skills are increasingly crossing into multiple fields, opening the door to a range of exciting and in-demand career pathways.

For those interested in environmental problem-solving, an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering can be a smart choice. Mechanical engineering is another closely related field. Many students seek the cheapest online master's mechanical engineering options to expand technical expertise without excessive cost.

Physics also underpins much of computer science and engineering. The best online physics degree options can offer strong analytical and problem-solving skills, crucial for tech-oriented careers. Additionally, the data science boom means there’s high demand for graduates. Choosing the cheapest data science degree can help you build practical skills and land jobs in analytics, machine learning, or AI.

Each pathway offers unique opportunities for growth and career advancement—explore the options that best align with your interests and professional goals.

Best Scientists Citing Ali Bou Nassif

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles