World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
85
Citations
69071
World Ranking
784
National Ranking
424

Barry Boehm publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry Boehm sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 573 publications — 95th percentile

95% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Barry Boehm D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Barry Boehm sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 85 D-Index — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - ACM Fellow For significant contributions to the technology and discipline of software engineering, including implementation of advanced computer and software systems, environments, architectures, process models, cost models, quality models, and risk models.
  • 1996 - Member of the National Academy of Engineering For contributions to computer and software architectures and to models of cost, quality, and risk for aerospace systems.
  • 1992 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the architecture, modeling, and implementation of software environments.

Overview

Barry Boehm was affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their work primarily focused on the field of Computer Science, with a significant portion of publications related to Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Signal Processing, Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, and Software.

Their research topics included Software Engineering Research, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Mobile and Web Applications, Topic Modeling, Web Data Mining and Analysis, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, and Software Reliability and Analysis Research.

They coauthored several papers with frequent collaborators such as Kamonphop Srisopha, Iordanis Fostiropoulos, Reem Alfayez, Robert Winn, and Daniel Link.

Barry Boehm's recent papers consisted of:

  • Empirical Effort and Schedule Estimation Models for Agile Processes in the US DoD, 2021, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • How SonarQube-identified technical debt is prioritized: An exploratory case study, 2023, Information and Software Technology
  • Histologically validated scoring system for the assessment of hock burn in broilers, 2020, Avian Pathology
  • How Should Developers Respond to App Reviews? Features Predicting the Success of Developer Responses, 2021, Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
  • Validation of histological and visual scoring systems for foot-pad dermatitis in broiler chickens, 2020, Animal Welfare

Their work appeared frequently in venues including Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research), arXiv (Cornell University), Journal of Software Evolution and Process, Information and Software Technology, and IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

Throughout the career, Barry Boehm was recognized with several awards. They were named an ACM Fellow in 1997 for contributions to software engineering technology and discipline, including advanced computer and software systems, environments, architectures, process models, cost models, quality models, and risk models.

They were also a Member of the National Academy of Engineering since 1996 for contributions to architectures and models related to cost, quality, and risk in aerospace systems. In addition, they became an IEEE Fellow in 1992 for contributions to software environment architecture, modeling, and implementation.

Best Publications

  • Software engineering economics

    Barry W. Boehm

  • A spiral model of software development and enhancement

    Barry W. Boehm

  • Software Cost Estimation With Cocomo II

    Barry W. Boehm;Chris Abts;A. Winsor Brown;Sunita Chulani

  • Software Cost Estimation with Cocomo II with Cdrom

    Barry W. Boehm;Clark;Horowitz;Brown

  • Software risk management: principles and practices

    B.W. Boehm

  • Get ready for agile methods, with care

    B. Boehm

  • Characteristics of software quality

    Barry W. Boehm

  • Verifying and validating software requirements and design specifications

    B. W. Boehm

  • Software Risk Management

    B.W. Boehm;T. DeMarco

  • Quantitative evaluation of software quality

    B. W. Boehm;J. R. Brown;M. Lipow

  • Top 10 list [software development]

    B. Boehm;V.R. Basili

  • Understanding and controlling software costs

    B.W. Boehm;P.N. Papaccio

  • Cost models for future software life cycle processes: COCOMO 2.0

    Barry W. Boehm;Bradford Clark;Ellis Horowitz;J. Christopher Westland

  • Management challenges to implementing agile processes in traditional development organizations

    B. Boehm;R. Turner

  • Software development cost estimation approaches – A survey

    Barry Boehm;Chris Abts;Sunita Chulani

  • A view of 20th and 21st century software engineering

    Barry Boehm

  • Value-based software engineering

    Barry Boehm

  • Theory-W software project management principles and examples

    B.W. Boehm;R. Ross

  • Identifying quality-requirement conflicts

    B. Boehm;H. In

  • Using risk to balance agile and plan-driven methods

    B. Boehm;R. Turner

Frequent Co-Authors

Alexander Egyed
Alexander Egyed Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Victor R. Basili
Victor R. Basili University of Maryland, College Park
Tim Menzies
Tim Menzies North Carolina State University
Nenad Medvidovic
Nenad Medvidovic University of Southern California
Leon J. Osterweil
Leon J. Osterweil University of Massachusetts Amherst
Paul Grünbacher
Paul Grünbacher Johannes Kepler University of Linz
Marvin V. Zelkowitz
Marvin V. Zelkowitz University of Maryland, College Park
Kevin Sullivan
Kevin Sullivan University of Virginia
Lori A. Clarke
Lori A. Clarke University of Massachusetts Amherst
Jian Lu
Jian Lu Nanjing University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA opens doors to numerous flexible and rewarding educational options. Many students consider quick online degrees that pay well for a faster route to a lucrative career, especially if they want to enter the workforce sooner.

If you're interested in emerging technology, an ai online degree can prepare you for one of the fastest-growing fields today. These programs cover skills in machine learning, data analysis, and robotics, which are highly valued by employers worldwide.

Deciding on the best degree for your goals is key. Computer science often ranks highly for its strong career outlook and versatile applications across many industries, from healthcare to finance.

For those considering further education, there are also easiest masters degrees that can help you upskill without a lengthy time commitment. Choosing the right online pathway lets you tailor your education to your needs, budget, and schedule, paving the way for a dynamic tech career.

Best Scientists Citing Barry Boehm

Recently Published Articles