World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
64
Citations
19793
World Ranking
2560
National Ranking
1282

Nenad Medvidovic publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nenad Medvidovic sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 288 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Nenad Medvidovic D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Nenad Medvidovic sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 64 D-Index — 82nd percentile

82% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2016 - IEEE Fellow For contributions to the architecture of complex software systems
  • 2015 - ACM Distinguished Member

Overview

Nenad Medvidovic is affiliated with the University of Southern California in the United States. Their research primarily spans the field of Computer Science, with a focus on several subfields including Information Systems, Computer Networks and Communications, Software, Signal Processing, and Artificial Intelligence.

The scientist's scholarly output includes numerous publications in areas such as Software Engineering Research, Software Testing and Debugging Techniques, Advanced Malware Detection Techniques, Software System Performance and Reliability, Software Engineering Techniques and Practices, Web Data Mining and Analysis, and Scientific Computing and Data Management.

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Nenad Medvidovic are:

  • UI Test Migration Across Mobile Platforms, 2021, 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE)
  • Avgust: automating usage-based test generation from videos of app executions, 2022, Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering
  • Software Architecture Description Revisited, 2025, IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
  • Automated Test Transfer across Android Apps using Large Language Models, 2025, Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering.
  • Assessing the Feasibility of Web-Request Prediction Models on Mobile Platforms, 2020, arXiv (Cornell University)

The scientist's frequent co-authors include Saghar Talebipour, Yixue Zhao, Benyamin Beyzaei, Ghazal Rafiei, and Sam Malek.

Key publication venues for Medvidovic's work are arXiv (Cornell University), IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Proceedings of the ACM on software engineering., 2021 36th IEEE/ACM International Conference on Automated Software Engineering (ASE), and Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering.

Awards received by Nenad Medvidovic include recognition as an IEEE Fellow in 2016 for contributions to the architecture of complex software systems and designation as an ACM Distinguished Member in 2015.

Best Publications

  • A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages

    N. Medvidovic;R.N. Taylor

  • An architecture-based approach to self-adaptive software

    P. Oreizy;M.M. Gorlick;R.N. Taylor;D. Heimhigner

  • Software Architecture: Foundations, Theory, and Practice

    Nenad Medvidovic;Richard N. Taylor

  • Architecture-based runtime software evolution

    Peyman Oreizy;Nenad Medvidovic;Richard N. Taylor

  • A component- and message-based architectural style for GUI software

    Richard N. Taylor;Nenad Medvidovic;Kenneth M. Anderson;E. James Whitehead

  • Towards a taxonomy of software connectors

    Nikunj R. Mehta;Nenad Medvidovic;Sandeep Phadke

  • Modeling software architectures in the Unified Modeling Language

    Nenad Medvidovic;David S. Rosenblum;David F. Redmiles;Jason E. Robbins

  • A framework for classifying and comparing architecture description languages

    Nenad Medvidovic;Richard N. Taylor

  • A language and environment for architecture-based software development and evolution

    Nenad Medvidovic;David S. Rosenblum;Richard N. Taylor

  • Using object-oriented typing to support architectural design in the C2 style

    Nenad Medvidovic;Peyman Oreizy;Jason E. Robbins;Richard N. Taylor

  • Identifying Architectural Bad Smells

    Joshua Garcia;Daniel Popescu;George Edwards;Nenad Medvidovic

  • Runtime software adaptation: framework, approaches, and styles

    Peyman Oreizy;Nenad Medvidovic;Richard N. Taylor

  • Early prediction of software component reliability

    Leslie Cheung;Roshanak Roshandel;Nenad Medvidovic;Leana Golubchik

  • ADLs and dynamic architecture changes

    Nenad Medvidovic

  • A comparative analysis of software architecture recovery techniques

    Joshua Garcia;Igor Ivkovic;Nenad Medvidovic

  • Integrating architecture description languages with a standard design method

    Jason E. Robbins;Nenad Medvidovic;David F. Redmiles;David S. Rosenblum

  • A style-aware architectural middleware for resource-constrained, distributed systems

    S. Malek;M. Mikic-Rakic;N. Medvidovic

  • Toward a Catalogue of Architectural Bad Smells

    Joshua Garcia;Daniel Popescu;George Edwards;Nenad Medvidovic

  • Moving architectural description from under the technology lamppost

    Nenad Medvidovic;Eric M. Dashofy;Richard N. Taylor

  • Reuse of off-the-shelf components in C2-style architectures

    Nenad Medvidovic;Peyman Oreizy;Richard N. Taylor

Frequent Co-Authors

Sam Malek
Sam Malek University of California, Irvine
Richard N. Taylor
Richard N. Taylor University of California, Irvine
Yuriy Brun
Yuriy Brun University of Massachusetts Amherst
Alexander Egyed
Alexander Egyed Johannes Kepler University of Linz
David S. Rosenblum
David S. Rosenblum George Mason University
Leana Golubchik
Leana Golubchik University of Southern California
Barry Boehm
Barry Boehm University of Southern California
Paul Grünbacher
Paul Grünbacher Johannes Kepler University of Linz
André van der Hoek
André van der Hoek University of California, Irvine
Gaurav S. Sukhatme
Gaurav S. Sukhatme University of Southern California

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring computer science goes beyond traditional degree routes. Many students and professionals now look to flexible online programs to expand their expertise or switch careers. Choosing the online masters pathway can fast-track your advancement, especially if you seek specialized credentials while working.

There are also best online degrees that emphasize speed and strong earning potential. These quick programs cater to high-demand tech, business, and engineering roles. For those focused on business leadership, an online mba cheap offers vital management skills without the high cost or time commitment of in-person study.

Emerging fields like artificial intelligence are also accessible through digital platforms. Students wanting to gain expertise in this cutting-edge area can consider ai degrees online, which combine affordability with impactful career pathways.

Best Scientists Citing Nenad Medvidovic

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles