World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Timothy C. Lethbridge

Timothy C. Lethbridge

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
36
Citations
7917
World Ranking
11048
National Ranking
438

Timothy C. Lethbridge publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy C. Lethbridge sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 188 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Timothy C. Lethbridge D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Timothy C. Lethbridge sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 23rd percentile

23% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2019 - ACM Senior Member

Overview

Timothy C. Lethbridge is affiliated with the University of Ottawa in Canada. Their research spans primarily the field of Computer Science, with additional work in Decision Sciences and Engineering. The subfields of Lethbridge's expertise include Software, Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence, Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality, and Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty.

The main topics of their research encompass Software Engineering Research, Safety Systems Engineering in Autonomy, Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies, Risk and Safety Analysis, Model-Driven Software Engineering Techniques, Software Reliability and Analysis Research, and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices.

Frequent coauthors in their body of work include:

  • Alvine Boaye Belle
  • Oluwafemi Odu
  • Song Wang
  • Sègla Kpodjedo
  • Kimya Khakzad Shahandashti

Lethbridge has published in various venues, notably:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Science of Computer Programming
  • Information and Software Technology
  • Software & Systems Modeling
  • IEEE Access

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Lethbridge and associates include:

  • Umple: Model-driven development for open source and education, 2021, Science of Computer Programming
  • Characterizing UX Evaluation in Software Modeling Tools: A Literature Review, 2022, IEEE Access
  • A PRISMA-driven systematic mapping study on system assurance weakeners, 2024, Information and Software Technology
  • Requirements for modelling tools for teaching, 2024, Software & Systems Modeling
  • The Evolution of Software Design Practices Over a Decade: A Long Term Study of Practitioners, 2021, The Journal of Object Technology

Lethbridge was awarded ACM Senior Member status in 2019.

Best Publications

  • Studying Software Engineers: Data Collection Techniques for Software Field Studies

    Timothy C. Lethbridge;Susan Elliott Sim;Janice Singer

  • How software engineers use documentation: the state of the practice

    T.C. Lethbridge;J. Singer;A. Forward

  • Experiments with clustering as a software remodularization method

    N. Anquetil;T.C. Lethbridge

  • Object-oriented Software Engineering

    Timothy Lethbridge;Robert Laganiere

  • An examination of software engineering work practices

    Janice Singer;Timothy Lethbridge;Norman Vinson;Nicolas Anquetil

  • What knowledge is important to a software professional

    T.C. Lethbridge

  • The relevance of software documentation, tools and technologies: a survey

    Andrew Forward;Timothy C. Lethbridge

  • Improving software practice through education: Challenges and future trends

    T.C. Lethbridge;J. Diaz-Herrera;R.J. LeBlanc;J.B. Thompson

  • Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Practical Software Development Using UML and Java

    Timothy Lethbridge;Robert Laganiere

  • A survey of trace exploration tools and techniques

    Abdelwahab Hamou-Lhadj;Timothy C. Lethbridge

  • Summarizing the Content of Large Traces to Facilitate the Understanding of the Behaviour of a Software System

    A. Hamou-Lhadj;T. Lethbridge

  • Software Engineering Data Collection for Field Studies

    Janice Singer;Susan Elliott Sim;Timothy C. Lethbridge

  • Recovering software architecture from the names of source files

    Nicolas Anquetil;Timothy C. Lethbridge;Timothy C. Lethbridge

  • Extracting concepts from file names: a new file clustering criterion

    Nicolas Anquetil;Timothy Lethbridge

  • Assessing the relevance of identifier names in a legacy software system

    Nicolas Anquetil;Timothy Lethbridge

  • Problems and opportunities for model-centric versus code-centric software development: a survey of software professionals

    Andrew Forward;Timothy C. Lethbridge

  • Evaluating individual contribution toward group software engineering projects

    Jane Huffman Hayes;Timothy C. Lethbridge;Daniel Port

  • A survey of the relevance of computer science and software engineering education

    T.C. Lethbridge

  • Recovering behavioral design models from execution traces

    A. Hamou-Lhadj;E. Braun;D. Amyot;T. Lethbridge

  • Mining the maintenance history of a legacy software system

    Jelber Sayyad Shirabad;T.C. Lethbridge;S. Matwin

  • Priorities for the education and training of software engineers

    Timothy C. Lethbridge

Frequent Co-Authors

Stan Matwin
Stan Matwin Dalhousie University
Daniel Amyot
Daniel Amyot University of Ottawa
Colin Ware
Colin Ware University of New Hampshire
Holger Giese
Holger Giese Hasso Plattner Institute
Robert Laganiere
Robert Laganiere University of Ottawa
Margaret-Anne Storey
Margaret-Anne Storey University of Victoria
Betty H. C. Cheng
Betty H. C. Cheng Michigan State University
Jane Huffman Hayes
Jane Huffman Hayes University of Kentucky
Pradip K. Srimani
Pradip K. Srimani Clemson University
Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite
Julio Cesar Sampaio do Prado Leite Pontifical Catholic University of Rio de Janeiro

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online education can offer flexibility and affordability for students interested in computer science and other STEM fields. For those mindful of expenses, choosing the cheapest online colleges can help minimize tuition costs while still providing quality education and recognized credentials.

Many students may worry about past academic performance. Fortunately, there are also online graduate schools with low gpa requirements, making advanced study more accessible to a wider pool of applicants.

Computer science graduates have versatile career options. If you’re interested in broader environmental and technical career paths, a environmental science degree also offers diverse employment possibilities in research, sustainability, and technology sectors.

For those looking to fast-track their careers, consider enrolling in one of the best computer science degree online programs with accelerated pathways. These programs are designed to help you graduate quickly, enabling a faster transition into the workforce.

Best Scientists Citing Timothy C. Lethbridge

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles