World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Julian Edbrooke-Childs

Julian Edbrooke-Childs

D-Index & Metrics

Psychology

D-Index
32
Citations
3773
World Ranking
10973
National Ranking
1074

Julian Edbrooke-Childs publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian Edbrooke-Childs sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 705+

This scientist: 131 publications — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

Julian Edbrooke-Childs D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julian Edbrooke-Childs sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 32 D-Index — 6th percentile

6% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Best Publications

  • Engaging children and young people in digital mental health interventions: Systematic review of modes of delivery, facilitators, and barriers

    Shaun Liverpool;Catarina Pinheiro Mota;Catarina Pinheiro Mota;Célia M.D. Sales;Anja Čuš

  • Systematic review of approaches to using patient experience data for quality improvement in healthcare settings

    Helen Gleeson;Ana Calderon;Viren Swami;Jessica Deighton

  • Early impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on mental health care and on people with mental health conditions: framework synthesis of international experiences and responses.

    Luke Sheridan Rains;Sonia Johnson;Sonia Johnson;Phoebe Barnett;Thomas Steare

  • Feedback from Outcome Measures and Treatment Effectiveness, Treatment Efficiency, and Collaborative Practice: A Systematic Review

    Dawid Gondek;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Elian Fink;Jessica Deighton

  • Effectiveness of current psychological interventions to improve emotion regulation in youth: a meta-analysis

    Bettina Moltrecht;Jessica Deighton;Praveetha Patalay;Julian Edbrooke-Childs

  • Facilitators and Barriers to Person-centred Care in Child and Young People Mental Health Services: A Systematic Review.

    Dawid Gondek;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Tjasa Velikonja;Louise Chapman

  • `I make up a silly name': Understanding Children's Perception of Privacy Risks Online

    Jun Zhao;Ge Wang;Carys Dally;Petr Slovak

  • Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis: Outcomes of Routine Specialist Mental Health Care for Young People With Depression and/or Anxiety

    Holly Alice Bear;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Sam Norton;Karolin Rose Krause

  • The psychometric properties of the Ages & Stages Questionnaires for ages 2-2.5: a systematic review

    Tjasa Velikonja;Julian H. Edbrooke-Childs;Ana Calderon;Michelle Sleed

  • Affect-Focused Psychodynamic Internet-Based Therapy for Adolescent Depression: Randomized Controlled Trial

    Karin Lindqvist;Jakob Mechler;Per Carlbring;Peter Lilliengren

  • The relationship between child- and parent-reported shared decision making and child-, parent-, and clinician-reported treatment outcome in routinely collected child mental health services data.

    Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Jenna Jacob;Rachel Argent;Praveetha Patalay

  • Generalized linear mixed-model (GLMM) trees: A flexible decision-tree method for multilevel and longitudinal data.

    Marjolein Fokkema;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Miranda Wolpert

  • Review: What Outcomes Count? A Review of Outcomes Measured for Adolescent Depression Between 2007 and 2017.

    Karolin Rose Krause;Holly Alice Bear;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Miranda Wolpert

  • Ethnic Differences in Referral Routes to Youth Mental Health Services

    Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Praveetha Patalay

  • Problem severity and waiting times for young people accessing mental health services.

    Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Jessica Deighton

  • Barriers and facilitators to shared decision making in child and youth mental health: clinician perspectives using the Theoretical Domains Framework.

    D. Hayes;J. Edbrooke-Childs;R. Town;M. Wolpert

  • A Qualitative Exploration of Patient and Clinician Views on Patient Reported Outcome Measures in Child Mental Health and Diabetes Services

    Miranda Wolpert;Katherine Curtis-Tyler;Julian Edbrooke-Childs

  • Interpreting standardized and idiographic outcome measures in CAMHS: what does change mean and how does it relate to functioning and experience?

    Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Jenna Jacob;Duncan Law;Duncan Law;Jessica Deighton

  • What approaches for promoting shared decision‐making are used in child mental health? A scoping review

    Helen Cheng;Daniel Hayes;Daniel Hayes;Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Kate Martin

  • Development of the Huddle Observation Tool for structured case management discussions to improve situation awareness on inpatient clinical wards.

    Julian Edbrooke-Childs;Jacqueline Hayes;Evelyn Sharples;Dawid Gondek

Frequent Co-Authors

Miranda Wolpert
Miranda Wolpert University College London
Jessica Deighton
Jessica Deighton University College London
Nick Midgley
Nick Midgley University College London
Sonia Johnson
Sonia Johnson University College London
Peter Fonagy
Peter Fonagy University College London
Gerhard Andersson
Gerhard Andersson Linköping University
Paul L. Plener
Paul L. Plener Medical University of Vienna
Per Carlbring
Per Carlbring Stockholm University
Ann Blandford
Ann Blandford University College London
Giada Pietrabissa
Giada Pietrabissa Catholic University of the Sacred Heart

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Julian Edbrooke-Childs

Recently Published Articles