World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 98 8750 8213 851 811 419 54204
Genetics 92 986 932 139 133 350 51937

Julie Williams publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Julie Williams between 1982 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Julie Williams published across 44 years, from 1982 to 2025, averaging 10.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 26 publications in 2011. 23 of the 474 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1982 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 26. Peak 26 publications in 2011. 1982: 1 publication 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 1 publication 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 7 publications 1994: 6 publications 1995: 2 publications 1996: 14 publications 1997: 3 publications 1998: 6 publications 1999: 8 publications 2000: 11 publications 2001: 6 publications 2002: 11 publications 2003: 7 publications 2004: 24 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 23 publications 2007: 8 publications 2008: 13 publications 2009: 18 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 26 publications 2012: 19 publications 2013: 16 publications 2014: 24 publications 2015: 23 publications 2016: 23 publications 2017: 19 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 21 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 13 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 11 publications 2025: 12 publications
1982 2025

474 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Julie Williams: publications per year, 1982 to 2025
Year Publications
1982 1
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 1
1990 0
1991 0
1992 3
1993 7
1994 6
1995 2
1996 14
1997 3
1998 6
1999 8
2000 11
2001 6
2002 11
2003 7
2004 24
2005 8
2006 23
2007 8
2008 13
2009 18
2010 13
2011 26
2012 19
2013 16
2014 24
2015 23
2016 23
2017 19
2018 19
2019 21
2020 21
2021 22
2022 13
2023 12
2024 11
2025 12
Total 474
Download as CSV

Julie Williams publication distribution in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Genetics in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200
Bar chart with 67 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 45–54 to 703+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 217. Most scientists, 217, have 125–134 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 345–354 publications, is where this scientist sits. 45–54 publications: 6 scientists 55–64 publications: 10 scientists 65–74 publications: 35 scientists 75–84 publications: 84 scientists 85–94 publications: 102 scientists 95–104 publications: 151 scientists 105–114 publications: 175 scientists 115–124 publications: 203 scientists 125–134 publications: 217 scientists 135–144 publications: 205 scientists 145–154 publications: 193 scientists 155–164 publications: 188 scientists 165–174 publications: 170 scientists 175–184 publications: 178 scientists 185–194 publications: 164 scientists 195–204 publications: 173 scientists 205–214 publications: 159 scientists 215–224 publications: 134 scientists 225–234 publications: 143 scientists 235–244 publications: 105 scientists 245–254 publications: 114 scientists 255–264 publications: 92 scientists 265–274 publications: 88 scientists 275–284 publications: 87 scientists 285–294 publications: 80 scientists 295–304 publications: 62 scientists 305–314 publications: 75 scientists 315–324 publications: 67 scientists 325–334 publications: 60 scientists 335–344 publications: 52 scientists 345–354 publications: 40 scientists 355–364 publications: 48 scientists 365–374 publications: 47 scientists 375–384 publications: 46 scientists 385–394 publications: 31 scientists 395–404 publications: 27 scientists 405–414 publications: 40 scientists 415–424 publications: 30 scientists 425–434 publications: 43 scientists 435–444 publications: 29 scientists 445–454 publications: 14 scientists 455–464 publications: 28 scientists 465–474 publications: 21 scientists 475–484 publications: 21 scientists 485–494 publications: 22 scientists 495–504 publications: 17 scientists 505–514 publications: 12 scientists 515–524 publications: 11 scientists 525–534 publications: 8 scientists 535–544 publications: 8 scientists 545–554 publications: 14 scientists 555–564 publications: 4 scientists 565–574 publications: 11 scientists 575–584 publications: 5 scientists 585–594 publications: 11 scientists 595–604 publications: 12 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 6 scientists 625–634 publications: 10 scientists 635–644 publications: 9 scientists 645–654 publications: 10 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 6 scientists 675–684 publications: 6 scientists 685–694 publications: 4 scientists 695–702 publications: 6 scientists 703+ publications: 100 scientists
45–54 publications 703+

This scientist: 350 publications — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 703 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
45–54 6
55–64 10
65–74 35
75–84 84
85–94 102
95–104 151
105–114 175
115–124 203
125–134 217
135–144 205
145–154 193
155–164 188
165–174 170
175–184 178
185–194 164
195–204 173
205–214 159
215–224 134
225–234 143
235–244 105
245–254 114
255–264 92
265–274 88
275–284 87
285–294 80
295–304 62
305–314 75
315–324 67
325–334 60
335–344 52
345–354 40 350
355–364 48
365–374 47
375–384 46
385–394 31
395–404 27
405–414 40
415–424 30
425–434 43
435–444 29
445–454 14
455–464 28
465–474 21
475–484 21
485–494 22
495–504 17
505–514 12
515–524 11
525–534 8
535–544 8
545–554 14
555–564 4
565–574 11
575–584 5
585–594 11
595–604 12
605–614 7
615–624 6
625–634 10
635–644 9
645–654 10
655–664 6
665–674 6
675–684 6
685–694 4
695–702 6
703+ 100
Download as CSV

Julie Williams D-index placement in Genetics in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Genetics scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Julie Williams sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 61 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40–41 to 160+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 191. Most scientists, 191, have 62–63 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 92–93 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40–41 D-Index: 24 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 52 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 84 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 112 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 118 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 141 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 143 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 145 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 179 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 162 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 175 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 191 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 172 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 184 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 164 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 158 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 150 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 136 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 127 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 127 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 111 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 110 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 110 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 102 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 66 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 72 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 70 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 54 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 60 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 55 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 45 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 42 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 28 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 39 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 25 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 31 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 34 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 29 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 29 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 27 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 22 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 16 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 11 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 21 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 4 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 9 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 14 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 6 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 10 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 7 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 9 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 8 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 8 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 9 scientists 160+ D-Index: 96 scientists
40–41 D-Index 160+

This scientist: 92 D-Index — 77th percentile

77% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 160 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Genetics scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 4,342 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40–41 24
42–43 52
44–45 84
46–47 112
48–49 118
50–51 141
52–53 143
54–55 145
56–57 179
58–59 162
60–61 175
62–63 191
64–65 172
66–67 184
68–69 164
70–71 158
72–73 150
74–75 136
76–77 127
78–79 127
80–81 111
82–83 110
84–85 110
86–87 84
88–89 102
90–91 66
92–93 72 92
94–95 70
96–97 54
98–99 60
100–101 49
102–103 55
104–105 45
106–107 42
108–109 28
110–111 39
112–113 25
114–115 31
116–117 29
118–119 34
120–121 29
122–123 29
124–125 18
126–127 27
128–129 22
130–131 16
132–133 11
134–135 17
136–137 12
138–139 21
140–141 4
142–143 9
144–145 14
146–147 6
148–149 10
150–151 7
152–153 9
154–155 8
156–157 8
158–159 9
160+ 96
Download as CSV

Overview

Julie Williams is affiliated with Cardiff University in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to research spanning medicine and health professions. Their work focuses on several subfields, including general health professions, public health, environmental and occupational health, clinical psychology, psychiatry and mental health, and epidemiology.

Their main research topics cover:

  • Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Urban Transport and Accessibility
  • Physical Activity and Health
  • Schizophrenia Research and Treatment
  • Health Disparities and Outcomes
  • Chronic Disease Management Strategies

Williams has published in a range of journals, with frequent contributions to:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • Health Promotion Journal of Australia
  • Pilot and Feasibility Studies
  • Frontiers in Health Services

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Williams include:

  • "Implementation, Adoption, and Perceptions of Telemental Health During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Systematic Review," 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Implementation of Telemental Health Services Before COVID-19: Rapid Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews," 2021, Journal of Medical Internet Research
  • "Barriers and Facilitators of Clinician and Researcher Collaborations: A Qualitative Study," 2020, BMC Health Services Research
  • "Effect of Vitamin D Supplementation on Outcomes in People With Early Psychosis," 2021, JAMA Network Open
  • "Characteristics Associated with Willingness to Walk Further Than Necessary to the Bus Stop: Insights for Public Transport-Related Physical Activity," 2021, Journal of Transport & Health

Williams has collaborated frequently with a number of researchers, including:

  • Fiona Gaughran
  • Nick Sevdalis
  • Kim Jose
  • Andrew Palmer
  • Melanie J. Sharman

Their research contributions integrate clinical and public health perspectives with an emphasis on mental health and telehealth services. The exploration of urban transport and accessibility also reflects an interdisciplinary approach linking physical activity and health outcomes. The combination of these topics aligns with broader efforts to understand and improve health disparities, chronic disease management, and patient involvement in mental health care.

Best Publications

  • Meta-analysis of 74,046 individuals identifies 11 new susceptibility loci for Alzheimer's disease

    Jean-Charles Lambert;Jean-Charles Lambert;Jean-Charles Lambert;Carla A Ibrahim-Verbaas;Denise Harold;Adam C Naj

  • Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer's disease

    Denise Harold;Richard Abraham;Paul Hollingworth;Rebecca Sims

  • TREM2 Variants in Alzheimer's Disease

    Rita Guerreiro;Rita Guerreiro;Aleksandra Wojtas;Jose Bras;Minerva Carrasquillo

  • Conceptual framework for personal recovery in mental health: systematic review and narrative synthesis.

    Mary Leamy;Victoria Bird;Clair Le Boutillier;Julie Williams

  • Erratum: Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimer's disease (Nature Genetics (2009) 41 (1088-1093))

    D Harold;R Abraham;P Hollingworth;R Sims

  • Common variants at ABCA7, MS4A6A/MS4A4E, EPHA1, CD33 and CD2AP are associated with Alzheimer's disease.

    Paul Hollingworth;Denise Harold;Rebecca Sims;Amy Gerrish

  • Analysis of shared heritability in common disorders of the brain

    Verneri Anttila;Verneri Anttila;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Brendan Bulik-Sullivan;Hilary K. Finucane;Raymond K. Walters;Raymond K. Walters

  • Genome-wide analysis of genetic loci associated with Alzheimer disease.

    Sudha Seshadri;Annette L. Fitzpatrick;M Arfan Ikram;Anita L. DeStefano

  • Gene-wide analysis detects two new susceptibility genes for Alzheimer's disease.

    Valentina Escott-Price;Céline Bellenguez;Li-San Wang;Seung-Hoan Choi

  • An outbreak of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis among hospitalized patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome.

    Brian R. Edlin;Jerome I. Tokars;Michael H. Grieco;Jack T. Crawford

  • Rare coding variants in PLCG2, ABI3, and TREM2 implicate microglial-mediated innate immunity in Alzheimer's disease

    Rebecca Sims;Sven J. Van Der Lee;Adam C. Naj;Céline Bellenguez;Céline Bellenguez

  • Genetic evidence implicates the immune system and cholesterol metabolism in the aetiology of Alzheimer's disease.

    Lesley Jones;Peter A. Holmans;Marian L. Hamshere;Denise Harold

  • Physical, cognitive, and mental health impacts of COVID-19 after hospitalisation (PHOSP-COVID): a UK multicentre, prospective cohort study.

    Rachael A Evans;Hamish McAuley;Ewen M Harrison;Aarti Shikotra

  • Candidate single-nucleotide polymorphisms from a genomewide association study of Alzheimer disease

    Hao Li;Sally Wetten;Li Li;Pamela L. St. Jean

  • What Does Recovery Mean in Practice? A Qualitative Analysis of International Recovery-Oriented Practice Guidance

    Clair Le Boutillier;Mary Leamy;Victoria J Bird;Larry Davidson

  • Predictors of developmental dyslexia in European orthographies with varying complexity

    Karin Landerl;Karin Landerl;Franck Ramus;Kristina Moll;Kristina Moll;Heikki Lyytinen

  • Susceptibility Locus for Alzheimer's Disease on Chromosome 10

    Amanda Myers;Peter Holmans;Helen Marshall;Jennifer Kwon

  • Cognitive mechanisms underlying reading and spelling development in five European orthographies

    Kristina Moll;Franck Ramus;Juergen Bartling;Jennifer Bruder

  • A full genome scan for late onset Alzheimer's disease

    Patrick Kehoe;Fabienne Wavrant-De Vrieze;Richard Crook;William S. Wu

  • Genome-wide association study identifies variants at CLU and PICALM associated with Alzheimertextquotesingles disease

    Denise Harold;Richard Abraham;Paul Hollingworth;Rebecca Sims

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael John Owen
Michael John Owen Cardiff University
Simon Lovestone
Simon Lovestone University of Oxford
Michael Conlon O'Donovan
Michael Conlon O'Donovan Cardiff University
Peter Holmans
Peter Holmans Cardiff University
Denise Harold
Denise Harold Dublin City University
Alison Goate
Alison Goate Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
John Hardy
John Hardy University College London
Carol Brayne
Carol Brayne University of Cambridge
Lesley Jones
Lesley Jones Cardiff University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in genetics opens the door to multiple opportunities in healthcare, research, and biotechnology. However, not everyone takes a direct route into genetics. Many students start by building foundational skills through related programs you can study online.

For those looking for entry-level roles in healthcare, cheapest medical billing and coding online courses offer a quick, affordable pathway. These certificates can lead to secure administrative positions in clinics or hospitals.

If you prefer working with patients, you might consider high acceptance rate nursing programs. These programs can help prospective nurses enter the field swiftly, thanks to flexible requirements and greater availability.

For those interested in leadership or operations, pursuing an online healthcare administration degree meets demand for managers in hospitals, biotech firms, and public health agencies. To get the best value, review the cheapest online healthcare management degree programs to minimize costs while gaining essential management skills.

Best Scientists Citing Julie Williams

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles