World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
81
Citations
27172
World Ranking
16523
National Ranking
8300

Mark F. Newman publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark F. Newman sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 300 publications — 17th percentile

17% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Mark F. Newman D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Mark F. Newman sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 81 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Mark F. Newman is affiliated with Duke University in the United States. Their research spans diverse areas within medicine, with a focus on molecular biology, pharmacology, ecology, evolution, behavior and systematics, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, as well as critical care and intensive care medicine.

The main topics of their work include plant and fungal species descriptions, research on ginger and the Zingiberaceae family, broader plant and animal studies, plant diversity and evolution, intensive care unit cognitive disorders, cardiac, anesthesia and surgical outcomes, and anesthesia and neurotoxicity research.

The scientist has contributed to several peer-reviewed publications, with frequent appearances in these venues:

  • JAMA Psychiatry (8 publications)
  • JAMA Cardiology (7 publications)
  • Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution (3 publications)
  • Fertility and Sterility (3 publications)
  • Kew Bulletin (2 publications)

Notable recent papers include:

  • New Guinea has the world's richest island flora, 2020, Nature
  • Himalayan orogeny and monsoon intensification explain species diversification in an endemic ginger (Hedychium: Zingiberaceae) from the Indo-Malayan Realm, 2022, Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution
  • Perioperative neurocognitive and functional neuroimaging trajectories in older APOE4 carriers compared with non-carriers: secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study, 2021, British Journal of Anaesthesia
  • Two new species of Eriocaulon (Eriocaulaceae) from Laos, 2020, Kew Bulletin
  • Ancient hybridization in Curcuma (Zingiberaceae)-Accelerator or brake in lineage diversifications?, 2023, The Plant Journal

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Mark F. Newman encompass:

  • Phil Fontanarosa
  • Annette Flanagin
  • Tracy Frey
  • Iris Lo
  • Juliet Orellana

Their work covers detailed studies of molecular biology within medical contexts, including research on pharmacological interventions and the underlying biological mechanisms. A significant portion of their research relates to ecological and evolutionary studies, particularly involving plant species diversity and taxonomy. The focus on intensive care and cardiology overlaps with clinical concerns regarding anesthesia, neurocognitive function, and surgical outcomes.

Best Publications

  • Longitudinal Assessment of Neurocognitive Function after Coronary-Artery Bypass Surgery.

    M F Newman;J L Kirchner;B Phillips-Bute;V Gaver

  • Adverse Cerebral Outcomes after Coronary Bypass Surgery

    G W Roach;M Kanchuger;C M Mangano;M Newman

  • Depression as a risk factor for coronary artery disease: evidence, mechanisms, and treatment.

    Heather S Lett;James A Blumenthal;Michael A Babyak;Andrew Sherwood

  • Depression as a risk factor for mortality after coronary artery bypass surgery.

    James A Blumenthal;Heather S Lett;Michael A Babyak;William White

  • Acute renal failure following cardiac surgery.

    Peter J. Conlon;Mark Stafford-Smith;William D. White;Mark F. Newman

  • Central Nervous System Complications of Cardiac Surgery

    J E Arrowsmith;H P Grocott;J G Reves;M F Newman

  • Report of the Substudy Assessing the Impact of Neurocognitive Function on Quality of Life 5 Years After Cardiac Surgery

    Mark F. Newman;Hilary P. Grocott;Joseph P. Mathew;William D. White

  • Central nervous system injury associated with cardiac surgery

    Mark F Newman;Joseph P Mathew;Hilary P Grocott;G Burkhard Mackensen

  • Cerebral Injury After Cardiac Surgery: Identification of a Group at Extraordinary Risk

    Richard L. Wolman;Nancy A. Nussmeier;Anil Aggarwal;Marc S. Kanchuger

  • Defining neuropsychological dysfunction after coronary artery bypass grafting

    E P Mahanna;J A Blumenthal;W D White;N D Croughwell

  • Long-term survival benefits of coronary artery bypass grafting and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty in patients with coronary artery disease

    Robert H. Jones;Karen Kesler;Harry R. Phillips;Daniel B. Mark

  • Periventricular leukomalacia is common after neonatal cardiac surgery.

    Kristen K Galli;Robert A Zimmerman;Gail P Jarvik;Gil Wernovsky

  • The association of lowest hematocrit during cardiopulmonary bypass with acute renal injury after coronary artery bypass surgery

    Madhav Swaminathan;Barbara G Phillips-Bute;Peter J Conlon;Peter K Smith

  • Novel diagnostic test for acute stroke.

    John R. Lynch;Robert Blessing;William D. White;Hilary P. Grocott

  • Preliminary Report of a Genetic Basis for Cognitive Decline After Cardiac Operations

    B. E. Tardiff;M. F. Newman;A. M. Saunders;W. J. Strittmatter

  • The use of a postoperative morbidity survey to evaluate patients with prolonged hospitalization after routine, moderate-risk, elective surgery.

    E. Bennett-Guerrero;I. Welsby;T. J. Dunn;L. R. Young

  • The rewarming rate and increased peak temperature alter neurocognitive outcome after cardiac surgery.

    Alina M. Grigore;Hilary P. Grocott;Joseph P. Mathew;Barbara Phillips-Bute

  • Jugular bulb saturation and cognitive dysfunction after cardiopulmonary bypass

    Narda D. Croughwell;Mark F. Newman;James A. Blumenthal;William D. White

  • Predictors of cognitive decline after cardiac operation.

    Mark F. Newman;Narda D. Croughwell;James A. Blumenthal;Edward Lowry

  • Association of neurocognitive function and quality of life 1 year after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

    Barbara Phillips-Bute;Joseph P Mathew;James A Blumenthal;Hilary P Grocott

Frequent Co-Authors

James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
Peter K. Smith
Peter K. Smith Duke University
Daniel T. Laskowitz
Daniel T. Laskowitz Duke University
Daniel B. Mark
Daniel B. Mark Duke University
Carmelo A. Milano
Carmelo A. Milano Duke University
Jerrold H. Levy
Jerrold H. Levy Duke University
John H. Alexander
John H. Alexander Duke University
Richard W Morris
Richard W Morris University of Bristol
Ann M. Saunders
Ann M. Saunders Durham University
David S. Warner
David S. Warner Duke University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a career in medicine opens doors to a wide range of healthcare professions beyond traditional physician roles. Many students are now considering flexible online programs that can help launch or advance their careers within the health sector.

For registered nurses looking to become leaders in clinical practice, the easiest dnp program online options make it feasible to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice degree while balancing job and family commitments. Those interested in a quicker entry into nursing can explore a fast lpn program to become a Licensed Practical Nurse in less time.

Mental health is another growing field. Choosing an online psych np programs pathway can prepare you for advanced practice roles with a focus on psychiatric and mental health care.

Finally, if you're drawn to the administration side of healthcare, a health administration degree online can give you the business and management skills needed for leadership positions in hospitals and clinics.

Each of these online programs provides accessible avenues to rewarding healthcare careers—making it easier than ever to find a path that matches your personal goals and lifestyle.

Best Scientists Citing Mark F. Newman

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles