World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
100
Citations
31655
World Ranking
8355
National Ranking
4317

Gil Wernovsky publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gil Wernovsky sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 295 publications — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gil Wernovsky D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gil Wernovsky sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 100 D-Index — 60th percentile

60% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gil Wernovsky is affiliated with Children's Hospital of Philadelphia in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on medicine with significant contributions in epidemiology, surgery, pulmonary and respiratory medicine, cardiology and cardiovascular medicine, and emergency medicine.

The main topics covered in Wernovsky's work include congenital heart disease studies, congenital diaphragmatic hernia studies, cardiac arrest and resuscitation, cardiac structural anomalies and repair, mechanical circulatory support devices, infant development and preterm care, and coronary artery anomalies.

Wernovsky has contributed to multiple publication venues, with the most frequent being:

  • Cardiology in the Young
  • World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
  • Journal of the American Heart Association
  • The Journal of Pediatrics
  • Quality of Life Research

The following recent papers represent some of Wernovsky's output, showing a range of topics and publication years:

  • Neurodevelopmental evaluation strategies for children with congenital heart disease aged birth through 5 years: recommendations from the cardiac neurodevelopmental outcome collaborative, 2020, Cardiology in the Young
  • Mechanical Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke, 2020, Stroke
  • Hybrid strategy in neonates with ductal-dependent systemic circulation and multiple risk factors, 2022, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • The Evolution of Pediatric Cardiac Critical Care, 2021, Critical Care Medicine
  • The Perinatal Transition and Early Neonatal Period in Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Is Associated With Reduced Systemic and Cerebral Perfusion, 2021, Canadian Journal of Cardiology

The scientist often collaborates with several frequent coauthors, including:

  • Yves d'Udekem
  • Amy Cassedy
  • Jo Wray
  • Bradley S. Marino
  • Mary T. Donofrio

Best Publications

  • Postoperative Course and Hemodynamic Profile After the Arterial Switch Operation in Neonates and Infants A Comparison of Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Circulatory Arrest

    Gil Wernovsky;David Wypij;Richard A. Jonas;John E. Mayer

  • Efficacy and Safety of Milrinone in Preventing Low Cardiac Output Syndrome in Infants and Children After Corrective Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease

    Timothy M. Hoffman;Gil Wernovsky;Andrew M. Atz;Thomas J. Kulik

  • Developmental and Neurologic Status of Children after Heart Surgery with Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest or Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    D C Bellinger;R A Jonas;L A Rappaport;D Wypij

  • A Comparison of the Perioperative Neurologic Effects of Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest versus Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Infant Heart Surgery

    Jane W. Newburger;Richard A. Jonas;Gil Wernovsky;David Wypij

  • Neurodevelopmental status at eight years in children with dextro-transposition of the great arteries: the Boston Circulatory Arrest Trial.

    David C Bellinger;David C Bellinger;David Wypij;Adre J duPlessis;Adre J duPlessis;Leonard A Rappaport;Leonard A Rappaport

  • Fontan operation in five hundred consecutive patients: Factors influencing early and late outcome ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★ ♢ ♢♢ ♦

    Thomas L. Gentles;John E. Mayer;Kimberlee Gauvreau;Jane W. Newburger

  • Developmental and Neurological Status of Children at 4 Years of Age After Heart Surgery With Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest or Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    David C. Bellinger;David Wypij;Karl C. K. Kuban;Leonard A. Rappaport

  • Brain maturation is delayed in infants with complex congenital heart defects

    Daniel J. Licht;David M. Shera;Robert R. Clancy;Gil Wernovsky

  • An MRI study of neurological injury before and after congenital heart surgery.

    William T. Mahle;Federica Tavani;Robert A. Zimmerman;Susan C. Nicolson

  • Neurodevelopmental outcome and lifestyle assessment in school-aged and adolescent children with hypoplastic left heart syndrome.

    William T. Mahle;Robert R. Clancy;Edward M. Moss;Marsha Gerdes

  • Survival after reconstructive surgery for hypoplastic left heart syndrome: A 15-year experience from a single institution.

    William T. Mahle;Thomas L. Spray;Gil Wernovsky;J. William Gaynor

  • Adolescents With d-Transposition of the Great Arteries Corrected With the Arterial Switch Procedure Neuropsychological Assessment and Structural Brain Imaging

    David C. Bellinger;David Wypij;Michael J. Rivkin;David R. DeMaso

  • Necrotizing enterocolitis in neonates with congenital heart disease: risk factors and outcomes.

    Doff B. McElhinney;Holly L. Hedrick;David M. Bush;Gilberto R. Pereira

  • Current insights regarding neurological and developmental abnormalities in children and young adults with complex congenital cardiac disease.

    Gil Wernovsky

  • The effect of duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in infant heart surgery on late neurodevelopment: The Boston Circulatory Arrest Trial

    David Wypij;Jane W Newburger;Jane W Newburger;Leonard A Rappaport;Leonard A Rappaport;Adre J duPlessis;Adre J duPlessis

  • Inattention, hyperactivity, and school performance in a population of school-age children with complex congenital heart disease.

    Amanda J Shillingford;Marianne M Glanzman;Richard F Ittenbach;Robert R Clancy

  • Survival outcomes after extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation instituted during active chest compressions following refractory in-hospital pediatric cardiac arrest.

    Marilyn C. Morris;Gil Wernovsky;Vinay M. Nadkarni

  • Periventricular leukomalacia is common after neonatal cardiac surgery.

    Kristen K Galli;Robert A Zimmerman;Gail P Jarvik;Gil Wernovsky

  • Preoperative cerebral blood flow is diminished in neonates with severe congenital heart defects.

    Daniel J. Licht;Jiongjiong Wang;David W. Silvestre;Susan C. Nicolson

  • Factors influencing early and late outcome of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries

    Gil Wernovsky;John E. Mayer;Richard A. Jonas;Frank L. Hanley

Frequent Co-Authors

Thomas L. Spray
Thomas L. Spray Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
J. William Gaynor
J. William Gaynor Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Robert R. Clancy
Robert R. Clancy New York University
Richard A. Jonas
Richard A. Jonas Children’s National Health System
Jane W. Newburger
Jane W. Newburger Boston Children's Hospital
John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
David L. Wessel
David L. Wessel George Washington University
Jack Rychik
Jack Rychik Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Steven D. Colan
Steven D. Colan Boston Children's Hospital
Gail P. Jarvik
Gail P. Jarvik University of Washington

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring medicine in the USA opens doors to numerous online degrees and healthcare career pathways. If you’re looking for a cost-effective bridge to nursing, consider the cheapest online rn to bsn programs. These programs, designed for registered nurses seeking a bachelor’s degree, offer flexibility and affordability for working professionals.

For those without a nursing background who want to move directly into advanced roles, there are online msn programs for non nurses. These accelerated options allow you to pivot your career and gain a master’s in nursing more quickly than traditional pathways.

Students seeking straightforward entry into the field can also consider direct admit nursing programs. These programs make the admissions process less competitive and provide more direct access to hands-on nurse training.

Alternatively, if you’re interested in healthcare support roles, medical billing and coding is a rapidly growing area. There are many financial aid for medical billing and coding options available, making this a viable and accessible career for many aspiring healthcare professionals.

Best Scientists Citing Gil Wernovsky

Trending Scientists