World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
110
Citations
38654
World Ranking
5621
National Ranking
3025

Richard A. Jonas publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Jonas sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 607 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Richard A. Jonas D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard A. Jonas sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 110 D-Index — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard A. Jonas is affiliated with the Children's National Health System in the United States. The primary focus of their research lies within the field of Medicine, with a particular concentration on Epidemiology, Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, Biomedical Engineering, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their scientific contributions predominantly address topics related to Congenital Heart Disease Studies, Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair, Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices, Coronary Artery Anomalies, Tracheal and Airway Disorders, Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches, and Mesenchymal Stem Cell Research.

Richard A. Jonas has published extensively, with notable papers including:

  • Neurodevelopmental Outcomes for Individuals With Congenital Heart Disease: Updates in Neuroprotection, Risk-Stratification, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2024, Circulation)
  • Impact of Different Cardiopulmonary Bypass Strategies on Renal Injury After Pediatric Heart Surgery (2020, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery)
  • Hybrid strategy in neonates with ductal-dependent systemic circulation and multiple risk factors (2022, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery)
  • Current Status of Training and Certification for Congenital Heart Surgery Around the World: Proceedings of the Meetings of the Global Council on Education for Congenital Heart Surgery of the World Society for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery (2021, World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery)
  • Impact of Cardiopulmonary Bypass on Neurogenesis and Cortical Maturation (2021, Annals of Neurology)

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Richard A. Jonas include:

  • Manan Desai
  • Karthik Ramakrishnan
  • Pranava Sinha
  • David Zurakowski
  • Can Yerebakan

Their work has appeared regularly in several specialized publication venues such as:

  • World Journal for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Surgery
  • The Annals of Thoracic Surgery
  • Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • JTCVS Open

Best Publications

  • Diagnosis and Treatment of Fetal Cardiac Disease A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association

    Mary T. Donofrio;Anita J. Moon-Grady;Lisa K. Hornberger;Joshua A. Copel

  • Postoperative Course and Hemodynamic Profile After the Arterial Switch Operation in Neonates and Infants A Comparison of Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass and Circulatory Arrest

    Gil Wernovsky;David Wypij;Richard A. Jonas;John E. Mayer

  • Developmental and Neurologic Status of Children after Heart Surgery with Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest or Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    D C Bellinger;R A Jonas;L A Rappaport;D Wypij

  • A Comparison of the Perioperative Neurologic Effects of Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest versus Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass in Infant Heart Surgery

    Jane W. Newburger;Richard A. Jonas;Gil Wernovsky;David Wypij

  • Neurodevelopmental status at eight years in children with dextro-transposition of the great arteries: the Boston Circulatory Arrest Trial.

    David C Bellinger;David C Bellinger;David Wypij;Adre J duPlessis;Adre J duPlessis;Leonard A Rappaport;Leonard A Rappaport

  • Fontan operation in five hundred consecutive patients: Factors influencing early and late outcome ☆ ☆☆ ★ ★★ ♢ ♢♢ ♦

    Thomas L. Gentles;John E. Mayer;Kimberlee Gauvreau;Jane W. Newburger

  • Developmental and Neurological Status of Children at 4 Years of Age After Heart Surgery With Hypothermic Circulatory Arrest or Low-Flow Cardiopulmonary Bypass

    David C. Bellinger;David Wypij;Karl C. K. Kuban;Leonard A. Rappaport

  • Adolescents With d-Transposition of the Great Arteries Corrected With the Arterial Switch Procedure Neuropsychological Assessment and Structural Brain Imaging

    David C. Bellinger;David Wypij;Michael J. Rivkin;David R. DeMaso

  • The influence of hemodilution on outcome after hypothermic cardiopulmonary bypass: results of a randomized trial in infants.

    Richard A Jonas;Richard A Jonas;David Wypij;David Wypij;Stephen J Roth;David C Bellinger;David C Bellinger

  • The effect of duration of deep hypothermic circulatory arrest in infant heart surgery on late neurodevelopment: The Boston Circulatory Arrest Trial

    David Wypij;Jane W Newburger;Jane W Newburger;Leonard A Rappaport;Leonard A Rappaport;Adre J duPlessis;Adre J duPlessis

  • Predictors of survival in neonates with critical aortic stenosis.

    L A Rhodes;S D Colan;S B Perry;R A Jonas

  • Effect of baffle fenestration on outcome of the modified Fontan operation.

    N D Bridges;J E Mayer;J E Lock;R A Jonas

  • Transposition of the great arteries and intact ventricular septum: anatomical repair in the neonate.

    Aldo R. Castaneda;William I. Norwood;Richard A. Jonas;Steve D. Colon

  • Long-term results of the lateral tunnel Fontan operation

    Christof Stamm;Ingeborg Friehs;John E. Mayer;David Zurakowski

  • Factors influencing early and late outcome of the arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries

    Gil Wernovsky;John E. Mayer;Richard A. Jonas;Frank L. Hanley

  • Bidirectional cavopulmonary anastomosis as interim palliation for high-risk Fontan candidates. Early results.

    N D Bridges;R A Jonas;J E Mayer;M F Flanagan

  • Critical aortic stenosis in the neonate: A multi-institutional study of management, outcomes, and risk factors

    Gary K. Lofland;Brian W. McCrindle;William G. Williams;Eugene H. Blackstone

  • Long-term results after early primary repair of tetralogy of Fallot.

    Emile A. Bacha;Albertus M. Scheule;David Zurakowski;Lars C. Erickson

  • Extending the limits for modified Fontan procedures.

    John E. Mayer;Hrodmar Helgason;Richard A. Jonas;Peter Lang

  • Repair of Tetralogy of Fallot in Neonates and Young Infants

    F A Pigula;P N Khalil;J E Mayer;P J del Nido

Frequent Co-Authors

John E. Mayer
John E. Mayer Boston Children's Hospital
Aldo R. Castaneda
Aldo R. Castaneda Boston Children's Hospital
Jane W. Newburger
Jane W. Newburger Boston Children's Hospital
Gil Wernovsky
Gil Wernovsky Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
David C. Bellinger
David C. Bellinger Boston Children's Hospital
David L. Wessel
David L. Wessel George Washington University
David Wypij
David Wypij Boston Children's Hospital
David Zurakowski
David Zurakowski Boston Children's Hospital
John F. Keane
John F. Keane Boston Children's Hospital
Pedro J. del Nido
Pedro J. del Nido Boston Children's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you’re considering a career in medicine but want flexible study options, exploring related healthcare fields through online programs is a smart step. Many institutions now offer accessible and accredited online pathways designed to fit your schedule and career goals.

For registered nurses seeking to advance, asn to nurse practitioner programs provide a fast-track route to higher qualifications and expanded clinical roles. Those interested in nutritional health can consider earning an online nutritionist degree to prepare for careers in dietary consulting, wellness, or public health.

Aspiring healthcare leaders can benefit from online mha programs cahme accredited, ensuring you receive quality preparation for healthcare administration roles. Finally, there are rn to bsn online programs without clinicals for nurses looking to earn a bachelor’s degree efficiently and without additional onsite training.

Whether you aim to become a clinical practitioner, work in healthcare administration, or focus on nutrition, these online degrees can open the door to varied and rewarding career paths in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing Richard A. Jonas

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles