World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Social Sciences and Humanities 49 2954 2707 1433 1294 188 9582

Femida Handy publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Femida Handy between 1995 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Femida Handy published across 31 years, from 1995 to 2025, averaging 7.2 papers a year. Output peaked at 24 publications in 2018. 10 of the 222 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1995 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 24. Peak 24 publications in 2018. 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 1 publication 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 3 publications 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 5 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 1 publication 2006: 4 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 11 publications 2010: 13 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 17 publications 2013: 10 publications 2014: 13 publications 2015: 16 publications 2016: 11 publications 2017: 3 publications 2018: 24 publications 2019: 6 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 6 publications 2023: 6 publications 2024: 1 publication 2025: 9 publications
1995 2025

222 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Femida Handy: publications per year, 1995 to 2025
Year Publications
1995 1
1996 1
1997 1
1998 1
1999 0
2000 3
2001 2
2002 1
2003 5
2004 1
2005 1
2006 4
2007 12
2008 9
2009 11
2010 13
2011 13
2012 17
2013 10
2014 13
2015 16
2016 11
2017 3
2018 24
2019 6
2020 11
2021 10
2022 6
2023 6
2024 1
2025 9
Total 222
Download as CSV

Femida Handy publication distribution in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Femida Handy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400
Bar chart with 54 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 44–53 to 570+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 474. Most scientists, 474, have 114–123 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 184–193 publications, is where this scientist sits. 44–53 publications: 28 scientists 54–63 publications: 61 scientists 64–73 publications: 161 scientists 74–83 publications: 225 scientists 84–93 publications: 301 scientists 94–103 publications: 390 scientists 104–113 publications: 406 scientists 114–123 publications: 474 scientists 124–133 publications: 453 scientists 134–143 publications: 434 scientists 144–153 publications: 407 scientists 154–163 publications: 411 scientists 164–173 publications: 391 scientists 174–183 publications: 313 scientists 184–193 publications: 319 scientists 194–203 publications: 304 scientists 204–213 publications: 285 scientists 214–223 publications: 246 scientists 224–233 publications: 213 scientists 234–243 publications: 170 scientists 244–253 publications: 167 scientists 254–263 publications: 162 scientists 264–273 publications: 138 scientists 274–283 publications: 138 scientists 284–293 publications: 113 scientists 294–303 publications: 106 scientists 304–313 publications: 95 scientists 314–323 publications: 101 scientists 324–333 publications: 81 scientists 334–343 publications: 69 scientists 344–353 publications: 56 scientists 354–363 publications: 36 scientists 364–373 publications: 42 scientists 374–383 publications: 41 scientists 384–393 publications: 44 scientists 394–403 publications: 27 scientists 404–413 publications: 30 scientists 414–423 publications: 20 scientists 424–433 publications: 29 scientists 434–443 publications: 29 scientists 444–453 publications: 25 scientists 454–463 publications: 19 scientists 464–473 publications: 21 scientists 474–483 publications: 11 scientists 484–493 publications: 17 scientists 494–503 publications: 7 scientists 504–513 publications: 6 scientists 514–523 publications: 12 scientists 524–533 publications: 10 scientists 534–543 publications: 7 scientists 544–553 publications: 6 scientists 554–563 publications: 12 scientists 564–569 publications: 8 scientists 570+ publications: 100 scientists
44–53 publications 570+

This scientist: 188 publications — 59th percentile

59% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 570 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
44–53 28
54–63 61
64–73 161
74–83 225
84–93 301
94–103 390
104–113 406
114–123 474
124–133 453
134–143 434
144–153 407
154–163 411
164–173 391
174–183 313
184–193 319 188
194–203 304
204–213 285
214–223 246
224–233 213
234–243 170
244–253 167
254–263 162
264–273 138
274–283 138
284–293 113
294–303 106
304–313 95
314–323 101
324–333 81
334–343 69
344–353 56
354–363 36
364–373 42
374–383 41
384–393 44
394–403 27
404–413 30
414–423 20
424–433 29
434–443 29
444–453 25
454–463 19
464–473 21
474–483 11
484–493 17
494–503 7
504–513 6
514–523 12
524–533 10
534–543 7
544–553 6
554–563 12
564–569 8
570+ 100
Download as CSV

Femida Handy D-index placement in Social Sciences and Humanities in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Femida Handy sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 71 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 100+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 313. Most scientists, 313, have 42 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 49 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 177 scientists 31 D-Index: 210 scientists 32 D-Index: 222 scientists 33 D-Index: 188 scientists 34 D-Index: 181 scientists 35 D-Index: 243 scientists 36 D-Index: 261 scientists 37 D-Index: 272 scientists 38 D-Index: 278 scientists 39 D-Index: 300 scientists 40 D-Index: 297 scientists 41 D-Index: 308 scientists 42 D-Index: 313 scientists 43 D-Index: 300 scientists 44 D-Index: 269 scientists 45 D-Index: 260 scientists 46 D-Index: 228 scientists 47 D-Index: 251 scientists 48 D-Index: 203 scientists 49 D-Index: 186 scientists 50 D-Index: 187 scientists 51 D-Index: 166 scientists 52 D-Index: 138 scientists 53 D-Index: 141 scientists 54 D-Index: 131 scientists 55 D-Index: 137 scientists 56 D-Index: 109 scientists 57 D-Index: 129 scientists 58 D-Index: 95 scientists 59 D-Index: 105 scientists 60 D-Index: 106 scientists 61 D-Index: 86 scientists 62 D-Index: 94 scientists 63 D-Index: 77 scientists 64 D-Index: 79 scientists 65 D-Index: 59 scientists 66 D-Index: 68 scientists 67 D-Index: 51 scientists 68 D-Index: 49 scientists 69 D-Index: 40 scientists 70 D-Index: 43 scientists 71 D-Index: 40 scientists 72 D-Index: 50 scientists 73 D-Index: 46 scientists 74 D-Index: 43 scientists 75 D-Index: 45 scientists 76 D-Index: 45 scientists 77 D-Index: 30 scientists 78 D-Index: 25 scientists 79 D-Index: 31 scientists 80 D-Index: 29 scientists 81 D-Index: 18 scientists 82 D-Index: 21 scientists 83 D-Index: 26 scientists 84 D-Index: 15 scientists 85 D-Index: 15 scientists 86 D-Index: 19 scientists 87 D-Index: 19 scientists 88 D-Index: 12 scientists 89 D-Index: 7 scientists 90 D-Index: 19 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 13 scientists 93 D-Index: 9 scientists 94 D-Index: 13 scientists 95 D-Index: 8 scientists 96 D-Index: 7 scientists 97 D-Index: 6 scientists 98 D-Index: 6 scientists 99 D-Index: 6 scientists 100+ D-Index: 97 scientists
30 D-Index 100+

This scientist: 49 D-Index — 64th percentile

64% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 100 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Social Sciences and Humanities scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 7,777 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 177
31 210
32 222
33 188
34 181
35 243
36 261
37 272
38 278
39 300
40 297
41 308
42 313
43 300
44 269
45 260
46 228
47 251
48 203
49 186 49
50 187
51 166
52 138
53 141
54 131
55 137
56 109
57 129
58 95
59 105
60 106
61 86
62 94
63 77
64 79
65 59
66 68
67 51
68 49
69 40
70 43
71 40
72 50
73 46
74 43
75 45
76 45
77 30
78 25
79 31
80 29
81 18
82 21
83 26
84 15
85 15
86 19
87 19
88 12
89 7
90 19
91 20
92 13
93 9
94 13
95 8
96 7
97 6
98 6
99 6
100+ 97
Download as CSV

Overview

Femida Handy is affiliated with the University of Pennsylvania in the United States. Their research primarily spans the social sciences, with a focus on sociology and political science. Their scholarly output reflects engagement with various interdisciplinary subfields, including demography, health, finance, and areas related to management, monitoring, policy, and law.

The scientist's work frequently addresses topics within the nonprofit sector and volunteering, as well as tourism, volunteerism, and development. Additional areas of interest include religion, society, and development, health disparities and outcomes, social capital and networks, community development and social impact, and environmental education and sustainability.

Femida Handy has published notably in the following venues:

  • Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
  • Nonprofit Policy Forum
  • Voluntary Sector Review
  • SSRN Electronic Journal
  • International Journal of Community Well-Being

Among recent papers authored or coauthored by Handy are:

  • "Global Philanthropy: Does Institutional Context Matter for Charitable Giving?" (2021) in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
  • "The Good-looking Giver Effect: The Relationship Between Doing Good and Looking Good" (2020) in Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly
  • "Volunteer Retirement and Well-being: Evidence from Older Adult Volunteers" (2022) in International Journal of Community Well-Being
  • "Intergenerational disenchantment? Environmental behaviors and motivations across generations in South Korea" (2021) in Geoforum
  • "'Because we all love K-Pop': How young adults reshape symbolic boundaries in Paris, Manchester, and Philadelphia" (2022) in British Journal of Sociology

Frequent coauthors of Handy include:

  • Allison R. Russell
  • Tiana Marrese
  • Tally Katz-Gerro
  • Daniel Choi
  • A. Stefanie Ruiz

Best Publications

  • Defining Who is a Volunteer: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations

    Ram A. Cnaan;Femida Handy;Margaret Wadsworth

  • Navigating Theories of Volunteering: A Hybrid Map for a Complex Phenomenon

    Lesley Hustinx;Ram A. Cnaan;Femida Handy

  • The Wage Differential between Nonprofit Institutions and Corporations: Getting More by Paying Less?

    Femida Handy;Eliakim Katz

  • Public Perception of "Who is a Volunteer": An Examination of the Net-Cost Approach from a Cross-Cultural Perspective

    Femida Handy;Ram A. Cnaan;Jeffrey L. Brudney;Ugo Ascoli

  • A Cross-cultural Examination of Student Volunteering: is it all about Resume building?

    Femida Handy;Ram A. Cnaan;Lesley Hustinx;Chulhee Kang

  • Valuing Volunteers: An Economic Evaluation of the Net Benefits of Hospital Volunteers

    Femida Handy;Narasimhan Srinivasan

  • Immigrant Volunteering: A Stepping Stone to Integration?

    Femida Handy;Itay Greenspan

  • Motivations and benefits of student volunteering: comparing regular, occasional, and non-volunteers in five countries

    Karen Smith;Kirsten Holmes;Debbie Haski-Leventhal;Ram A Cnaan

  • Social and Cultural Origins of Motivations to Volunteer A Comparison of University Students in Six Countries

    Lesley Hustinx;Femida Handy;Ram A. Cnaan;Jeffrey L. Brudney

  • The Interchangeability of Paid Staff and Volunteers in Nonprofit Organizations

    Femida Handy;Laurie Mook;Jack Quarter

  • Generation green: understanding the motivations and mechanisms influencing young adults' environmental volunteering

    Lindsey M. McDougle;Itay Greenspan;Femida Handy

  • Keeping up with the Joneses: The relationship of perceived descriptive social norms, social information, and charitable giving

    Rachel Croson;Femida Handy;Jen Shang

  • Volunteering and Volunteers: Benefit-Cost Analyses

    Femida Handy;Laurie Mook

  • Financial Inclusion: Lessons from Rural South India

    Ram A. Cnaan;M. S. Moodithaya;Femida Handy

  • Summer on the Island: Episodic Volunteering

    Femida Handy;Nadine Brodeur;Ram A Cnaan

  • Understanding online donor behavior: the role of donor characteristics, perceptions of the internet, website and program, and influence from social networks

    Micheal L. Shier;Femida Handy

  • Cultural values and volunteering: a cross-cultural comparison of students' motivation to volunteer in 13 countries

    Henrietta Grönlund;Kirsten Holmes;Chulhee Kang;Ram A. Cnaan

  • The Demand for Volunteer Labor: A Study of Hospital Volunteers

    Femida Handy;Narasimhan Srinivasan

  • The Palgrave Handbook of Global Philanthropy

    Pamala Wiepking;Femida Handy

  • Factors Influencing Women Entrepreneurs of NGOs in India

    Femida Handy;Meenaz Kassam;Shree Renade

  • Review essay: The Why and How of volunteering

    Femida Handy;Lesley Hustinx

Frequent Co-Authors

Ram A. Cnaan
Ram A. Cnaan University of Pennsylvania
Jeffrey L. Brudney
Jeffrey L. Brudney University of North Carolina Wilmington
Tally Katz-Gerro
Tally Katz-Gerro University of Haifa
Rachel Croson
Rachel Croson University of Minnesota
Ale Smidts
Ale Smidts Erasmus University Rotterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The fields of Social Sciences and Humanities offer a diverse range of academic and professional opportunities. For those interested in advancing their studies, there are many flexible online degree options that cater to varying career ambitions and schedules.

Mental health and counseling professions are especially popular. Prospective psychologists can explore the shortest online psyd programs for a faster path to clinical practice. If marriage and family therapy appeals to you, the best online mft programs provide reputable curricula and strong licensure outcomes.

For those seeking affordability and flexibility, psychology masters programs are available online and often focus on key applied areas such as counseling, research, or organizational psychology.

Professionals aiming for leadership or academic roles in education will find the easiest edd programs promising, as they offer streamlined coursework designed for working adults.

By choosing the right online degree, students can align their education with their career goals while maintaining work-life balance.

Best Scientists Citing Femida Handy

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles