World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Benjamin P. Howden

Benjamin P. Howden

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Microbiology 76 1413 1277 42 42 382 21689

Benjamin P. Howden publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Benjamin P. Howden between 1985 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Benjamin P. Howden published across 41 years, from 1985 to 2025, averaging 13.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 65 publications in 2025. 115 of the 544 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
20 40 60
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1985 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 65. Peak 65 publications in 2025. 1985: 1 publication 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 3 publications 2004: 4 publications 2005: 8 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 4 publications 2008: 6 publications 2009: 7 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 12 publications 2012: 9 publications 2013: 15 publications 2014: 17 publications 2015: 15 publications 2016: 27 publications 2017: 27 publications 2018: 33 publications 2019: 44 publications 2020: 39 publications 2021: 49 publications 2022: 38 publications 2023: 59 publications 2024: 50 publications 2025: 65 publications
1985 2025

544 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Benjamin P. Howden: publications per year, 1985 to 2025
Year Publications
1985 1
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 0
1991 0
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 0
2001 1
2002 1
2003 3
2004 4
2005 8
2006 4
2007 4
2008 6
2009 7
2010 6
2011 12
2012 9
2013 15
2014 17
2015 15
2016 27
2017 27
2018 33
2019 44
2020 39
2021 49
2022 38
2023 59
2024 50
2025 65
Total 544
Download as CSV

Benjamin P. Howden publication distribution in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Microbiology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin P. Howden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150 200 250
Bar chart with 64 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 55–64 to 679+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 288. Most scientists, 288, have 135–144 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 375–384 publications, is where this scientist sits. 55–64 publications: 8 scientists 65–74 publications: 29 scientists 75–84 publications: 55 scientists 85–94 publications: 112 scientists 95–104 publications: 137 scientists 105–114 publications: 190 scientists 115–124 publications: 235 scientists 125–134 publications: 234 scientists 135–144 publications: 288 scientists 145–154 publications: 265 scientists 155–164 publications: 264 scientists 165–174 publications: 253 scientists 175–184 publications: 276 scientists 185–194 publications: 190 scientists 195–204 publications: 234 scientists 205–214 publications: 208 scientists 215–224 publications: 198 scientists 225–234 publications: 155 scientists 235–244 publications: 161 scientists 245–254 publications: 160 scientists 255–264 publications: 146 scientists 265–274 publications: 139 scientists 275–284 publications: 148 scientists 285–294 publications: 115 scientists 295–304 publications: 96 scientists 305–314 publications: 88 scientists 315–324 publications: 106 scientists 325–334 publications: 65 scientists 335–344 publications: 76 scientists 345–354 publications: 64 scientists 355–364 publications: 62 scientists 365–374 publications: 65 scientists 375–384 publications: 61 scientists 385–394 publications: 34 scientists 395–404 publications: 44 scientists 405–414 publications: 36 scientists 415–424 publications: 35 scientists 425–434 publications: 29 scientists 435–444 publications: 33 scientists 445–454 publications: 34 scientists 455–464 publications: 25 scientists 465–474 publications: 26 scientists 475–484 publications: 20 scientists 485–494 publications: 19 scientists 495–504 publications: 16 scientists 505–514 publications: 17 scientists 515–524 publications: 23 scientists 525–534 publications: 14 scientists 535–544 publications: 14 scientists 545–554 publications: 18 scientists 555–564 publications: 12 scientists 565–574 publications: 7 scientists 575–584 publications: 9 scientists 585–594 publications: 9 scientists 595–604 publications: 9 scientists 605–614 publications: 7 scientists 615–624 publications: 9 scientists 625–634 publications: 7 scientists 635–644 publications: 4 scientists 645–654 publications: 5 scientists 655–664 publications: 6 scientists 665–674 publications: 7 scientists 675–678 publications: 3 scientists 679+ publications: 99 scientists
55–64 publications 679+

This scientist: 382 publications — 88th percentile

88% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 679 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
55–64 8
65–74 29
75–84 55
85–94 112
95–104 137
105–114 190
115–124 235
125–134 234
135–144 288
145–154 265
155–164 264
165–174 253
175–184 276
185–194 190
195–204 234
205–214 208
215–224 198
225–234 155
235–244 161
245–254 160
255–264 146
265–274 139
275–284 148
285–294 115
295–304 96
305–314 88
315–324 106
325–334 65
335–344 76
345–354 64
355–364 62
365–374 65
375–384 61 382
385–394 34
395–404 44
405–414 36
415–424 35
425–434 29
435–444 33
445–454 34
455–464 25
465–474 26
475–484 20
485–494 19
495–504 16
505–514 17
515–524 23
525–534 14
535–544 14
545–554 18
555–564 12
565–574 7
575–584 9
585–594 9
595–604 9
605–614 7
615–624 9
625–634 7
635–644 4
645–654 5
655–664 6
665–674 7
675–678 3
679+ 99
Download as CSV

Benjamin P. Howden D-index placement in Microbiology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Microbiology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Benjamin P. Howden sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
50 100 150
Bar chart with 88 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 40 to 127+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 162. Most scientists, 162, have 58 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 76 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 40 D-Index: 30 scientists 41 D-Index: 86 scientists 42 D-Index: 90 scientists 43 D-Index: 117 scientists 44 D-Index: 122 scientists 45 D-Index: 123 scientists 46 D-Index: 108 scientists 47 D-Index: 110 scientists 48 D-Index: 106 scientists 49 D-Index: 109 scientists 50 D-Index: 129 scientists 51 D-Index: 111 scientists 52 D-Index: 116 scientists 53 D-Index: 127 scientists 54 D-Index: 134 scientists 55 D-Index: 134 scientists 56 D-Index: 112 scientists 57 D-Index: 136 scientists 58 D-Index: 162 scientists 59 D-Index: 151 scientists 60 D-Index: 139 scientists 61 D-Index: 123 scientists 62 D-Index: 126 scientists 63 D-Index: 144 scientists 64 D-Index: 109 scientists 65 D-Index: 103 scientists 66 D-Index: 124 scientists 67 D-Index: 112 scientists 68 D-Index: 103 scientists 69 D-Index: 131 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 93 scientists 72 D-Index: 96 scientists 73 D-Index: 92 scientists 74 D-Index: 80 scientists 75 D-Index: 66 scientists 76 D-Index: 87 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 73 scientists 79 D-Index: 59 scientists 80 D-Index: 57 scientists 81 D-Index: 55 scientists 82 D-Index: 47 scientists 83 D-Index: 77 scientists 84 D-Index: 50 scientists 85 D-Index: 45 scientists 86 D-Index: 42 scientists 87 D-Index: 41 scientists 88 D-Index: 32 scientists 89 D-Index: 38 scientists 90 D-Index: 35 scientists 91 D-Index: 34 scientists 92 D-Index: 27 scientists 93 D-Index: 26 scientists 94 D-Index: 33 scientists 95 D-Index: 22 scientists 96 D-Index: 37 scientists 97 D-Index: 22 scientists 98 D-Index: 21 scientists 99 D-Index: 22 scientists 100 D-Index: 30 scientists 101 D-Index: 16 scientists 102 D-Index: 20 scientists 103 D-Index: 17 scientists 104 D-Index: 19 scientists 105 D-Index: 16 scientists 106 D-Index: 19 scientists 107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108 D-Index: 14 scientists 109 D-Index: 10 scientists 110 D-Index: 9 scientists 111 D-Index: 7 scientists 112 D-Index: 11 scientists 113 D-Index: 6 scientists 114 D-Index: 15 scientists 115 D-Index: 10 scientists 116 D-Index: 12 scientists 117 D-Index: 7 scientists 118 D-Index: 10 scientists 119 D-Index: 10 scientists 120 D-Index: 11 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 7 scientists 123 D-Index: 12 scientists 124 D-Index: 5 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126 D-Index: 6 scientists 127+ D-Index: 95 scientists
40 D-Index 127+

This scientist: 76 D-Index — 75th percentile

75% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 127 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Microbiology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 5,513 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
40 30
41 86
42 90
43 117
44 122
45 123
46 108
47 110
48 106
49 109
50 129
51 111
52 116
53 127
54 134
55 134
56 112
57 136
58 162
59 151
60 139
61 123
62 126
63 144
64 109
65 103
66 124
67 112
68 103
69 131
70 94
71 93
72 96
73 92
74 80
75 66
76 87 76
77 60
78 73
79 59
80 57
81 55
82 47
83 77
84 50
85 45
86 42
87 41
88 32
89 38
90 35
91 34
92 27
93 26
94 33
95 22
96 37
97 22
98 21
99 22
100 30
101 16
102 20
103 17
104 19
105 16
106 19
107 18
108 14
109 10
110 9
111 7
112 11
113 6
114 15
115 10
116 12
117 7
118 10
119 10
120 11
121 2
122 7
123 12
124 5
125 9
126 6
127+ 95
Download as CSV

Overview

Benjamin P. Howden is affiliated with the University of Melbourne in Australia. Their research spans multiple domains within medical and biological sciences, with a significant focus on infectious diseases and antimicrobial resistance.

The scientist has contributed extensively to the fields of Medicine and Biochemistry, Genetics, and Molecular Biology. Within these broader areas, their work delves into subfields such as Infectious Diseases, Epidemiology, Molecular Biology, Molecular Medicine, and Clinical Biochemistry.

Key topics in their research include antibiotic resistance in bacteria, antimicrobial resistance in Staphylococcus species, bacterial identification and susceptibility testing, SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 research, as well as epidemiology related to Salmonella and Campylobacter and studies on Vibrio bacteria.

Recent notable publications by Benjamin P. Howden reflect these interests:

  • Staphylococcus aureus host interactions and adaptation, 2023, Nature Reviews Microbiology

The scientist has collaborated frequently with researchers such as Timothy P. Stinear, Norelle L. Sherry, Torsten Seemann, Deborah A. Williamson, and Susan A. Ballard. These collaborations indicate interdisciplinary work involving microbiology, infectious diseases, and genomics.

Their publication record includes numerous contributions to prominent scientific outlets, with frequent publications in:

  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Nature Communications
  • Microbial Genomics
  • The Lancet Regional Health - Western Pacific
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Several of their papers have attracted a significant number of citations, indicative of their influence in the field. For example:

  • Staphylococcus aureus host interactions and adaptation (2023) in Nature Reviews Microbiology, cited 547 times

Benjamin P. Howden's research covers a blend of clinical and molecular approaches aimed at understanding bacterial pathogens and resistance mechanisms, with recent work also addressing the genomic surveillance of viral pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2. This breadth of research contributes to ongoing global efforts in disease control and antimicrobial stewardship.

Best Publications

  • Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility in Staphylococcus aureus, Including Vancomycin-Intermediate and Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Strains: Resistance Mechanisms, Laboratory Detection, and Clinical Implications

    Benjamin Peter Howden;John Keith Davies;Paul Donald Russell Johnson;Paul Donald Russell Johnson;Timothy Paul Stinear;Timothy Paul Stinear

  • Staphylococcus aureus host interactions and adaptation

    Unknown

  • Treatment Outcomes for Serious Infections Caused by Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus with Reduced Vancomycin Susceptibility

    Benjamin P. Howden;Peter B. Ward;Patrick G. P. Charles;Tony M. Korman

  • Clinical Features Associated with Bacteremia Due to Heterogeneous Vancomycin-Intermediate Staphylococcus aureus

    Patrick G. P. Charles;Peter B. Ward;Paul D. R. Johnson;Benjamin P. Howden

  • Current and Emerging Topical Antibacterials and Antiseptics: Agents, Action, and Resistance Patterns

    Deborah A. Williamson;Glen P. Carter;Benjamin P. Howden

  • Evolution of multidrug resistance during Staphylococcus aureus infection involves mutation of the essential two component regulator WalKR.

    Benjamin P Howden;Christopher R E McEvoy;David L Allen;Kyra Y L Chua;Kyra Y L Chua

  • Whole genome sequencing in clinical and public health microbiology

    Jason C Kwong;N McCallum;N McCallum;Vitali Sintchenko;Vitali Sintchenko;Benjamin P Howden;Benjamin P Howden

  • Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia: a major cause of mortality in Australia and New Zealand

    John D Turnidge;Despina Kotsanas;Wendy Munckhof;Sally Roberts

  • Global spread of three multidrug-resistant lineages of Staphylococcus epidermidis

    Jean J.Y.H. Lee;Ian I.R. Monk;Anders Gonçalves da Silva;Torsten Seemann

  • Global disparities in SARS-CoV-2 genomic surveillance

    Unknown

  • Effect of Vancomycin or Daptomycin With vs Without an Antistaphylococcal β-Lactam on Mortality, Bacteremia, Relapse, or Treatment Failure in Patients With MRSA Bacteremia: A Randomized Clinical Trial

    Steven Y.C. Tong;Steven Y.C. Tong;David C. Lye;Dafna Yahav;Dafna Yahav;Archana Sud;Archana Sud

  • Isolates with low-level vancomycin resistance associated with persistent methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia

    Benjamin Peter Howden;Paul D R Johnson;Peter Ward;Timothy Paul Stinear

  • Antibiotic Choice May Not Explain Poorer Outcomes in Patients With Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia and High Vancomycin Minimum Inhibitory Concentrations

    Natasha E. Holmes;John D. Turnidge;John D. Turnidge;Wendy J. Munckhof;Wendy J. Munckhof;James O. Robinson

  • Intercontinental dissemination of azithromycin-resistant shigellosis through sexual transmission: a cross-sectional study

    Kate Susan Baker;Timothy J Dallman;Philip M Ashton;Martin Day

  • Two novel point mutations in clinical Staphylococcus aureus reduce linezolid susceptibility and switch on the stringent response to promote persistent infection.

    Wei Gao;Kyra Chua;Kyra Chua;John Keith Davies;Hayley J Newton

  • Evolution of virulence in Enterococcus faecium, a hospital-adapted opportunistic pathogen.

    Wei Gao;Benjamin P Howden;Timothy P Stinear

  • Vancomycin AUC/MIC Ratio and 30-Day Mortality in Patients with Staphylococcus aureus Bacteremia

    Natasha E Holmes;John D Turnidge;John D Turnidge;Wendy J Munckhof;Wendy J Munckhof;Owen Robinson

  • Prospective Whole-Genome Sequencing Enhances National Surveillance of Listeria monocytogenes

    Jason C. Kwong;Karolina Mercoulia;Takehiro Tomita;Marion Easton

  • Increasing tolerance of hospital Enterococcus faecium to handwash alcohols

    Sacha J. Pidot;Wei Gao;Andrew H. Buultjens;Ian R. Monk

  • Successful control of disseminated Scedosporium prolificans infection with a combination of voriconazole and terbinafine.

    B. P. Howden;M. A. Slavin;A. P. Schwarer;A. M. Mijch

  • Dumb and Dumber—The Potential Waste of a Useful Antistaphylococcal Agent: Emerging Fusidic Acid Resistance in Staphylococcus aureus

    Benjamin Peter Howden;M Lindsay L Grayson;M Lindsay L Grayson

  • In vitro pharmacodynamics of colistin against multidrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

    Anima Poudyal;Benjamin P. Howden;Jan M. Bell;Jan M. Bell;Wei Gao

  • Not Community-Associated Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA)! A Clinician's Guide to Community MRSA - Its Evolving Antimicrobial Resistance and Implications for Therapy

    Kyra Chua;Frederic Laurent;Geoffrey Coombs;M Lindsay Lindsay Grayson

Frequent Co-Authors

Timothy P. Stinear
Timothy P. Stinear University of Melbourne
Torsten Seemann
Torsten Seemann University of Melbourne
Paul D R Johnson
Paul D R Johnson Austin Health
Geoffrey W. Coombs
Geoffrey W. Coombs Fiona Stanley Hospital
Eric P F Chow
Eric P F Chow Monash University
Christopher K. Fairley
Christopher K. Fairley Monash University
Anton Y. Peleg
Anton Y. Peleg Monash University
Catriona S. Bradshaw
Catriona S. Bradshaw Monash University
John D. Turnidge
John D. Turnidge University of Adelaide
Allen C. Cheng
Allen C. Cheng Monash University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Microbiology in the USA can open doors to diverse career options, many of which intersect with the healthcare and information management sectors. For example, professionals interested in patient care and holistic health might consider becoming a functional medicine np, blending traditional microbiology knowledge with integrative medical practices.

On the administrative side, the demand for accurate health data management is increasing. Earning a certified professional coder certification can lead to roles where detailed microbiological and clinical data are coded and analyzed to improve healthcare outcomes.

Advanced degrees in Health Information Management offer a pathway to leadership. Understanding the salary and career growth of a health information management salary can help students align their career goals with financial expectations.

For those planning to pursue this avenue, selecting a quality program is crucial. Enrolling in a cahiim accredited health information management degree online ensures relevant, recognized training that supports professional advancement in healthcare and microbiology-related fields.

Best Scientists Citing Benjamin P. Howden

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles