World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Daniel T. Laskowitz

Daniel T. Laskowitz

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
77
Citations
19541
World Ranking
18510
National Ranking
9225

Daniel T. Laskowitz publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel T. Laskowitz sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 321 publications — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Daniel T. Laskowitz D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Daniel T. Laskowitz sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 77 D-Index — 10th percentile

10% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Daniel T. Laskowitz is affiliated with Duke University in the United States and has an extensive publication record primarily focused on medical research. Their work is situated within the field of Medicine, with significant contributions to Neurology, Epidemiology, Emergency Medicine, Molecular Biology, and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine.

The scientist has concentrated on several key research topics, including:

  • Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research
  • Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders
  • Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research
  • Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment

Laskowitz's recent papers illustrate a focus on neurological injury and critical care challenges. Among these are:

  • Multiorgan Dysfunction After Severe Traumatic Brain Injury, 2021, published in CHEST Journal
  • Acoustofluidic separation enables early diagnosis of traumatic brain injury based on circulating exosomes, 2021, published in Microsystems & Nanoengineering
  • ApoE mimetic improves pathology and memory in a model of Alzheimer's disease, 2020, published in Brain Research
  • COVID-19-Associated Guillain-Barre Syndrome: Atypical Para-infectious Profile, Symptom Overlap, and Increased Risk of Severe Neurological Complications, 2020, published in SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine
  • Postoperative changes in cognition and cerebrospinal fluid neurodegenerative disease biomarkers, 2022, published in Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology

Their collaborative work involves frequent partnerships with several researchers, most notably:

  • Michael L. James
  • Jordan Komisarow
  • Joseph P. Mathew
  • Monica S. Vavilala
  • Adrian F. Hernandez

Publication venues for Laskowitz's work are diverse, with multiple contributions to journals and platforms including:

  • Neurocritical Care
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Stroke
  • Journal of Intensive Care Medicine
  • UNC Libraries

Best Publications

  • Discovery and validation of cell cycle arrest biomarkers in human acute kidney injury.

    Kianoush B Kashani;Ali Al-Khafaji;Thomas Ardiles;Antonio Artigas

  • APOE Genotype and an ApoE-mimetic Peptide Modify the Systemic and Central Nervous System Inflammatory Response *

    John R. Lynch;Wen Tang;Haichen Wang;Michael P. Vitek

  • Report of the Substudy Assessing the Impact of Neurocognitive Function on Quality of Life 5 Years After Cardiac Surgery

    Mark F. Newman;Hilary P. Grocott;Joseph P. Mathew;William D. White

  • Central nervous system injury associated with cardiac surgery

    Mark F Newman;Joseph P Mathew;Hilary P Grocott;G Burkhard Mackensen

  • Early Biomarkers of Stroke

    Mark A. Reynolds;Howard J. Kirchick;Jeffrey R. Dahlen;Joseph M. Anderberg

  • Simvastatin Reduces Vasospasm After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Results of a Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial

    John R. Lynch;Haichen Wang;Haichen Wang;Matthew J. McGirt;James Floyd

  • Novel diagnostic test for acute stroke.

    John R. Lynch;Robert Blessing;William D. White;Hilary P. Grocott

  • Clinical Usefulness of a Biomarker-Based Diagnostic Test for Acute Stroke. The Biomarker Rapid Assessment in Ischemic Injury (BRAIN) Study

    Daniel T. Laskowitz;Scott E. Kasner;Jeffrey Saver;Kerri S. Remmel

  • Translational Research in Traumatic Brain Injury

    Daniel Laskowitz;Gerald Grant

  • Simvastatin Increases Endothelial Nitric Oxide Synthase and Ameliorates Cerebral Vasospasm Resulting From Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

    Matthew J. McGirt;John R. Lynch;Augusto Parra;Huaxin Sheng

  • Association of neurocognitive function and quality of life 1 year after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery.

    Barbara Phillips-Bute;Joseph P Mathew;James A Blumenthal;Hilary P Grocott

  • Facet joint prosthesis

    Michael L Boyer;Daniel Laskowitz;David C Paul;William S Rhoda

  • Apolipoprotein E4 polymorphism as a genetic predisposition to delirium in critically ill patients

    E. Wesley Ely;Timothy D. Girard;Ayumi K. Shintani;James C. Jackson

  • Downregulation of microglial activation by apolipoprotein E and apoE-mimetic peptides.

    D.T. Laskowitz;A.D. Thekdi;S.D. Thekdi;S.K.D. Han

  • Apolipoprotein E and the CNS response to injury

    Daniel T. Laskowitz;Karen Horsburgh;Allen D. Roses;Allen D. Roses

  • The syndrome of frontal lobe epilepsy Characteristics and surgical management

    Daniel T. Laskowitz;Michael R. Sperling;Jacqueline A. French;Michael J. O'Connor

  • Correlation of serum brain natriuretic peptide with hyponatremia and delayed ischemic neurological deficits after subarachnoid hemorrhage.

    Matthew J McGirt;Robert Blessing;Shahid M Nimjee;Allan H Friedman

  • Simvastatin and atorvastatin improve behavioral outcome, reduce hippocampal degeneration, and improve cerebral blood flow after experimental traumatic brain injury.

    Haichen Wang;John R. Lynch;John R. Lynch;Pingping Song;Pingping Song;Hyuk-Jun Yang

  • Apolipoprotein E modulates glial activation and the endogenous central nervous system inflammatory response.

    J.R. Lynch;D. Morgan;J. Mance;W.D. Matthew

  • Apolipoprotein E Isoform-Specific Differences in Outcome from Focal Ischemia in Transgenic Mice

    Huaxin Sheng;Daniel T. Laskowitz;Ellen Bennett;Donald E. Schmechel

Frequent Co-Authors

David S. Warner
David S. Warner Duke University
Michael P. Vitek
Michael P. Vitek Duke University
Mark F. Newman
Mark F. Newman Duke University
Adrian F. Hernandez
Adrian F. Hernandez Duke University
Stephen W. Smith
Stephen W. Smith Duke University
Larry B. Goldstein
Larry B. Goldstein University of Kentucky
Allan H. Friedman
Allan H. Friedman Duke University
James A. Blumenthal
James A. Blumenthal Duke University
Deepak L. Bhatt
Deepak L. Bhatt Mount Sinai Hospital
Michael K. McMillian
Michael K. McMillian Johnson & Johnson (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a medical career in the USA doesn’t always mean following a traditional pathway. Many students are now opting for online degrees to fast-track or diversify their medical careers. For instance, those ready to advance their nursing education can look into the quickest DNP program options, which allow experienced nurses to earn a Doctor of Nursing Practice in less time.

If you’re seeking a flexible route, DNP online programs offer various ease-of-completion options tailored to your previous experience and career goals. Meanwhile, aspiring nurses can take advantage of a LPN program completed online, providing a fast, affordable entry point into nursing.

Looking to specialize? Consider the PMHNP online programs, perfect for those passionate about psychiatric and mental health care. These innovative online pathways offer flexibility, quicker graduation times, and a variety of specialties—making medical education more accessible than ever.

Best Scientists Citing Daniel T. Laskowitz

Trending Scientists