World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Marco Ranucci

Marco Ranucci

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 82 16186 15229 640 613 450 23264

Marco Ranucci publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Marco Ranucci between 1987 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Marco Ranucci published across 39 years, from 1987 to 2025, averaging 13.8 papers a year. Output peaked at 42 publications in 2023. 61 of the 540 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1987 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 42. Peak 42 publications in 2023. 1987: 2 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 1 publication 1993: 0 publications 1994: 7 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 1 publication 1997: 4 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 6 publications 2000: 2 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 8 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 8 publications 2005: 4 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 12 publications 2008: 20 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 28 publications 2011: 15 publications 2012: 12 publications 2013: 25 publications 2014: 31 publications 2015: 26 publications 2016: 36 publications 2017: 23 publications 2018: 18 publications 2019: 27 publications 2020: 34 publications 2021: 22 publications 2022: 36 publications 2023: 42 publications 2024: 35 publications 2025: 26 publications
1987 2025

540 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Marco Ranucci: publications per year, 1987 to 2025
Year Publications
1987 2
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 1
1993 0
1994 7
1995 0
1996 1
1997 4
1998 0
1999 6
2000 2
2001 3
2002 8
2003 2
2004 8
2005 4
2006 6
2007 12
2008 20
2009 17
2010 28
2011 15
2012 12
2013 25
2014 31
2015 26
2016 36
2017 23
2018 18
2019 27
2020 34
2021 22
2022 36
2023 42
2024 35
2025 26
Total 540
Download as CSV

Marco Ranucci publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Ranucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 441–460 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 450 publications — 49th percentile

49% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771 450
461–480 751
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Marco Ranucci D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Marco Ranucci sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 82–83 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027 82
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Marco Ranucci is affiliated with the University of Milan in Italy and has contributed extensively to medical research, particularly in the fields of cardiology and critical care. Their research predominantly focuses on aspects of cardiac anesthesia, surgery, and patient outcomes, often in high-risk or emergency medical contexts.

Their scholarly work is mainly situated within the broader field of Medicine, with particular emphasis on subfields such as Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Surgery, Emergency Medicine, Infectious Diseases, and Neurology.

Key topics frequently addressed in their research include:

  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
  • Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices
  • COVID-19 Clinical Research Studies
  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Antiplatelet Therapy and Cardiovascular Diseases

Some of the recent significant papers authored or co-authored by Marco Ranucci include:

  • "Baseline Characteristics and Outcomes of 1591 Patients Infected With SARS-CoV-2 Admitted to ICUs of the Lombardy Region, Italy," 2020, published in JAMA
  • "The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome," 2020, Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis
  • "ELSO Interim Guidelines for Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Adult Cardiac Patients," 2021, ASAIO Journal
  • "COVID-19 and ECMO: the interplay between coagulation and inflammation-a narrative review," 2020, Critical Care
  • "A Randomized Trial of Intravenous Amino Acids for Kidney Protection," 2024, New England Journal of Medicine

Frequent collaborators have included:

  • Ekaterina Baryshnikova
  • Umberto Di Dedda
  • Vlasta Bari
  • Beatrice Cairo
  • Alberto Porta

Marco Ranucci has published across multiple venues, with a concentration in:

  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
  • Journal of Cardiothoracic and Vascular Anesthesia
  • Journal of Clinical Medicine
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Anesthesia & Analgesia

Best Publications

  • The procoagulant pattern of patients with COVID-19 acute respiratory distress syndrome.

    Marco Ranucci;Andrea Ballotta;Umberto Di Dedda;Ekaterina Bayshnikova

  • Surgical Reexploration After Cardiac Operations: Why a Worse Outcome?

    Marco Ranucci;Giuseppe Bozzetti;Antonio Ditta;Mauro Cotza

  • Risk of Assessing Mortality Risk in Elective Cardiac Operations Age, Creatinine, Ejection Fraction, and the Law of Parsimony

    Marco Ranucci;Serenella Castelvecchio;Lorenzo Menicanti;Alessandro Frigiola

  • Universal definition of perioperative bleeding in adult cardiac surgery.

    Cornelius Dyke;Solomon Aronson;Wulf Dietrich;Axel Hofmann

  • 2017 EACTS/EACTA Guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery.

    Domenico Pagano;Milan Milojevic;Michael I Meesters;Umberto Benedetto

  • Oxygen delivery during cardiopulmonary bypass and acute renal failure after coronary operations.

    Marco Ranucci;Federica Romitti;Giuseppe Isgrò;Mauro Cotza

  • 2017 EACTS/EACTA Guidelines on patient blood management for adult cardiac surgery.

    Christa Boer;Michael I Meesters

  • Major Bleeding, Transfusions, and Anemia: The Deadly Triad of Cardiac Surgery

    Marco Ranucci;Ekaterina Baryshnikova;Serenella Castelvecchio;Gabriele Pelissero

  • Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Clinical Practice Improvement Advisory for Management of Perioperative Bleeding and Hemostasis in Cardiac Surgery Patients.

    Jacob Raphael;C. David Mazer;Sudhakar Subramani;Andrew Schroeder

  • Hyperlactatemia during cardiopulmonary bypass: determinants and impact on postoperative outcome

    Marco Ranucci;Barbara De Toffol;Giuseppe Isgrò;Federica Romitti

  • Clinical review: Practical recommendations on the management of perioperative heart failure in cardiac surgery

    Alexandre Mebazaa;Antonis A. Pitsis;Alain Rudiger;Wolfgang Toller

  • Multiple Electrode Whole-Blood Aggregometry and Bleeding in Cardiac Surgery Patients Receiving Thienopyridines

    Marco Ranucci;Ekaterina Baryshnikova;Giorgio Soro;Andrea Ballotta

  • Beneficial impact of fenoldopam in critically ill patients with or at risk for acute renal failure: a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials.

    Giovanni Landoni;Giuseppe G.L. Biondi-Zoccai;James A. Tumlin;Tiziana Bove

  • Surgical therapy for ischemic heart failure: Single-center experience with surgical anterior ventricular restoration

    Lorenzo Menicanti;Serenella Castelvecchio;Marco Ranucci;Alessandro Frigiola

  • Bivalirudin-based versus conventional heparin anticoagulation for postcardiotomy extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

    Marco Ranucci;Andrea Ballotta;Hassan Kandil;Giuseppe Isgrò

  • A Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

    Giuseppe Crescenzi;Giovanni Landoni;Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai;Federico Pappalardo

  • Ischemic mitral regurgitation : intraventricular papillary muscle imbrication without mitral ring during left ventricular restoration

    L. Menicanti;M. Di Donato;A. Frigiola;G. Buckberg

  • O2 delivery and CO2 production during cardiopulmonary bypass as determinants of acute kidney injury: time for a goal-directed perfusion management?

    Filip de Somer;John W Mulholland;Megan R Bryan;Tommaso Aloisio

Frequent Co-Authors

Corrado Tamburino
Corrado Tamburino University of Catania
Marco Barbanti
Marco Barbanti Kore University of Enna
Giovanni Landoni
Giovanni Landoni Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Eduardo Bossone
Eduardo Bossone University of Naples Federico II
Rajendra H. Mehta
Rajendra H. Mehta Duke University
Alberto Zangrillo
Alberto Zangrillo Vita-Salute San Raffaele University
Jerrold H. Levy
Jerrold H. Levy Duke University
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai Sapienza University of Rome
Frank W. Sellke
Frank W. Sellke Brown University
Marcel Levi
Marcel Levi University of Amsterdam

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Medicine in the USA opens doors to a wide range of health-related careers. For those interested in leadership roles, earning an accelerated healthcare administration degree online is an efficient way to gain the skills needed in hospital and clinic management.

Registered nurses seeking career advancement can consider rn to fnp bridge programs. These online bridge degrees help nurses progress to becoming Family Nurse Practitioners, expanding their clinical responsibilities and earning potential.

For those passionate about diet, wellness, and preventive health, pursuing an online degree in nutrition is a flexible way to enter or advance in nutritional science careers. This path enables graduates to work in schools, clinics, or public health organizations.

Working adults aiming for executive roles in healthcare may find value in whats the best online mha program for working adults. CAHME-accredited MHA programs equip students with advanced expertise in healthcare management—often with flexible online schedules to fit busy lives.

Best Scientists Citing Marco Ranucci

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles