World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
104
Citations
39097
World Ranking
7063
National Ranking
689

Gianni D. Angelini publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gianni D. Angelini sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 937 publications — 93rd percentile

93% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Gianni D. Angelini D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Gianni D. Angelini sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 104 D-Index — 66th percentile

66% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Gianni D. Angelini is affiliated with the University of Bristol in the United Kingdom and has contributed extensively to the field of medicine, particularly within cardiology and cardiovascular medicine. Their research output includes a substantial number of publications focusing on surgical and cardiological outcomes.

The scientist's main fields of study encompass:

  • Medicine

Their subfields of study highlight specialization in:

  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
  • Surgery
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Epidemiology
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine

Angelini's research covers significant topics such as:

  • Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments
  • Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
  • Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques
  • Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches
  • Infective Endocarditis Diagnosis and Management
  • Cardiac Structural Anomalies and Repair
  • Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics

The scientist has published frequently in the following venues:

  • Journal of Cardiac Surgery
  • European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery
  • Perfusion
  • International Journal of Cardiology
  • BMJ Open

Some of their recent papers include:

  • "Machine learning improves mortality risk prediction after cardiac surgery: Systematic review and meta-analysis," 2020, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
  • "Bioinspired artificial exosomes based on lipid nanoparticles carrying let-7b-5p promote angiogenesis in vitro and in vivo," 2021, Molecular Therapy
  • "Determinants of outcomes following surgery for type A acute aortic dissection: the UK National Adult Cardiac Surgical Audit," 2021, European Heart Journal
  • "Females have an increased risk of short-term mortality after cardiac surgery compared to males: Insights from a national database," 2022, Journal of Cardiac Surgery
  • "Impact of sex on outcomes after cardiac surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis," 2021, International Journal of Cardiology

Frequent collaborators in their research include:

  • Daniel Fudulu
  • Arnaldo Dimagli
  • Shubhra Sinha
  • Massimo Caputo
  • Umberto Benedetto

Best Publications

  • Increased Mortality, Postoperative Morbidity, and Cost After Red Blood Cell Transfusion in Patients Having Cardiac Surgery

    Gavin J. Murphy;Barnaby C. Reeves;Chris A. Rogers;Syed I.A. Rizvi

  • Early and midterm outcome after off-pump and on-pump surgery in Beating Heart Against Cardioplegic Arrest Studies (BHACAS 1 and 2): a pooled analysis of two randomised controlled trials.

    Gianni D Angelini;Fiona C Taylor;Barnaby C Reeves;Raimondo Ascione

  • Liberal or Restrictive Transfusion after Cardiac Surgery.

    Gavin J. Murphy;Katie Pike;Chris A. Rogers;Sarah Wordsworth

  • Inflammatory response after coronary revascularization with or without cardiopulmonary bypass

    Raimondo Ascione;Clinton T Lloyd;Malcolm J Underwood;Attilio A Lotto

  • Randomized Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Diabetic Patients: 1-Year Results of the CARDia (Coronary Artery Revascularization in Diabetes) Trial

    Akhil Kapur;Roger J. Hall;Roger J. Hall;Iqbal S. Malik;Ayesha C. Qureshi

  • On-pump versus off-pump coronary revascularization: evaluation of renal function

    Raimondo Ascione;Clinton T Lloyd;Malcom J Underwood;Walter J Gomes

  • Radial-artery or saphenous-vein grafts in coronary-artery bypass surgery

    Mario Gaudino;Umberto Benedetto;Stephen Fremes;Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai

  • Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives.

    Umberto Benedetto;Stuart J Head;Gianni D Angelini;Eugene H Blackstone

  • Predictors of atrial fibrillation after conventional and beating heart coronary surgery: A prospective, randomized study.

    Raimondo Ascione;Massimo Caputo;Giliola Calori;Clinton T. Lloyd

  • Transplantation of Human Pericyte Progenitor Cells Improves the Repair of Infarcted Heart Through Activation of an Angiogenic Program Involving Micro-RNA-132

    Rajesh Katare;Federica Riu;Kathryn Mitchell;Miriam Gubernator

  • Human adult vena saphena contains perivascular progenitor cells endowed with clonogenic and proangiogenic potential.

    Paola Campagnolo;Daniela Cesselli;Ayman Al Haj Zen;Antonio Paolo Beltrami

  • Activation of Matrix-Degrading Metalloproteinases by Mast Cell Proteases in Atherosclerotic Plaques

    Jason L. Johnson;Christopher L. Jackson;Gianni D. Angelini;Sarah J. George

  • Effect of body mass index on early outcomes in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery.

    Barnaby C Reeves;Raimondo Ascione;Martin H Chamberlain;Gianni D Angelini

  • Effects of sildenafil, a type‐5 cGMP phosphodiesterase inhibitor, and papaverine on cyclic GMP and cyclic AMP levels in the rabbit corpus cavernosum in vitro

    J.Y. Jeremy;S.A. Ballard;A.M. Naylor;M.A.W. Miller

  • Protection of hearts from reperfusion injury by propofol is associated with inhibition of the mitochondrial permeability transition

    S. A. Javadov;K. H. H. Lim;P. M. Kerr;M.-S. Suleiman

  • Beating versus arrested heart revascularization: evaluation of myocardial function in a prospective randomized study

    Raimondo Ascione;Clinton T. Lloyd;Walter J. Gomes;Massimo Caputo

  • Plaque Rupture After Short Periods of Fat Feeding in the Apolipoprotein E–Knockout Mouse Model Characterization and Effects of Pravastatin Treatment

    Jason Johnson;Kevin Carson;Helen Williams;Sharada Karanam

  • Exosomes and exosomal miRNAs in cardiovascular protection and repair.

    Costanza Emanueli;Andrew I U Shearn;Gianni D Angelini;Susmita Sahoo

  • Economic outcome of off-pump coronary artery bypass surgery: a prospective randomized study

    Raimondo Ascione;Clinton T Lloyd;Malcolm J Underwood;Attilio A Lotto

  • Reduced postoperative blood loss and transfusion requirement after beating-heart coronary operations: A prospective randomized study ☆ ☆☆

    Raimondo Ascione;Simon Williams;Clinton T. Lloyd;Thiagarajamirthy Sundaramoorthi

Frequent Co-Authors

Barnaby C Reeves
Barnaby C Reeves University of Bristol
Costanza Emanueli
Costanza Emanueli Imperial College London
Stafford L. Lightman
Stafford L. Lightman University of Bristol
Sheila E. Francis
Sheila E. Francis University of Sheffield
Enrico Petretto
Enrico Petretto Duke NUS Graduate Medical School
David P. Taggart
David P. Taggart University of Oxford
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai
Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai Sapienza University of Rome
Paul C. Evans
Paul C. Evans Queen Mary University of London
Andrew P. Halestrap
Andrew P. Halestrap University of Bristol
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis
Dimitri P. Mikhailidis University College London

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring your options for advancing in medicine or healthcare? There are several flexible online degrees and alternative career paths to consider. Many students who begin their journey in clinical care or related fields benefit from pursuing management or specialized programs.

If you’re interested in leadership positions, look into healthcare administration degree programs. These courses equip students with business and organizational skills tailored to medical settings.

Registered nurses looking to advance quickly can explore adn to np bridge programs. These fast-track pathways allow ADN-trained nurses to earn a master's degree and become nurse practitioners.

For those passionate about dietetics or preventative care, an online degree in nutrition provides a science-based route to meaningful roles in health promotion, wellness, or clinical nutrition.

When considering any advanced online degree, it’s crucial to understand how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs to ensure you select an accredited and reputable institution. Carefully compare curriculum, accreditation, and career outcomes before making your decision.

Best Scientists Citing Gianni D. Angelini

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles