World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Connie A. Woodhouse

Connie A. Woodhouse

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Earth Science 44 4599 4233 1753 1557 135 12493

Connie A. Woodhouse publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Connie A. Woodhouse between 1960 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Connie A. Woodhouse published across 66 years, from 1960 to 2025, averaging 2.5 papers a year. Output peaked at 16 publications in 2017. 4 of the 166 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1960 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 16. Peak 16 publications in 2017. 1960: 1 publication 1961: 0 publications 1962: 0 publications 1963: 0 publications 1964: 0 publications 1965: 0 publications 1966: 0 publications 1967: 0 publications 1968: 0 publications 1969: 0 publications 1970: 0 publications 1971: 0 publications 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 0 publications 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 0 publications 1987: 0 publications 1988: 0 publications 1989: 0 publications 1990: 1 publication 1991: 0 publications 1992: 0 publications 1993: 1 publication 1994: 0 publications 1995: 1 publication 1996: 1 publication 1997: 3 publications 1998: 2 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 0 publications 2001: 3 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 6 publications 2007: 6 publications 2008: 4 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 5 publications 2011: 13 publications 2012: 11 publications 2013: 14 publications 2014: 3 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 16 publications 2018: 3 publications 2019: 7 publications 2020: 11 publications 2021: 6 publications 2022: 10 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 2 publications 2025: 2 publications
1960 2025

166 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Connie A. Woodhouse: publications per year, 1960 to 2025
Year Publications
1960 1
1961 0
1962 0
1963 0
1964 0
1965 0
1966 0
1967 0
1968 0
1969 0
1970 0
1971 0
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 0
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 0
1987 0
1988 0
1989 0
1990 1
1991 0
1992 0
1993 1
1994 0
1995 1
1996 1
1997 3
1998 2
1999 1
2000 0
2001 3
2002 3
2003 2
2004 3
2005 5
2006 6
2007 6
2008 4
2009 5
2010 5
2011 13
2012 11
2013 14
2014 3
2015 5
2016 10
2017 16
2018 3
2019 7
2020 11
2021 6
2022 10
2023 0
2024 2
2025 2
Total 166
Download as CSV

Connie A. Woodhouse publication distribution in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Earth Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Connie A. Woodhouse sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 603+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 557. Most scientists, 557, have 128–137 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 128–137 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 5 scientists 48–57 publications: 33 scientists 58–67 publications: 94 scientists 68–77 publications: 161 scientists 78–87 publications: 278 scientists 88–97 publications: 376 scientists 98–107 publications: 404 scientists 108–117 publications: 484 scientists 118–127 publications: 540 scientists 128–137 publications: 557 scientists 138–147 publications: 491 scientists 148–157 publications: 495 scientists 158–167 publications: 458 scientists 168–177 publications: 490 scientists 178–187 publications: 414 scientists 188–197 publications: 401 scientists 198–207 publications: 333 scientists 208–217 publications: 292 scientists 218–227 publications: 290 scientists 228–237 publications: 262 scientists 238–247 publications: 243 scientists 248–257 publications: 208 scientists 258–267 publications: 185 scientists 268–277 publications: 147 scientists 278–287 publications: 128 scientists 288–297 publications: 119 scientists 298–307 publications: 120 scientists 308–317 publications: 107 scientists 318–327 publications: 93 scientists 328–337 publications: 87 scientists 338–347 publications: 64 scientists 348–357 publications: 87 scientists 358–367 publications: 60 scientists 368–377 publications: 60 scientists 378–387 publications: 34 scientists 388–397 publications: 50 scientists 398–407 publications: 44 scientists 408–417 publications: 31 scientists 418–427 publications: 39 scientists 428–437 publications: 27 scientists 438–447 publications: 36 scientists 448–457 publications: 27 scientists 458–467 publications: 29 scientists 468–477 publications: 30 scientists 478–487 publications: 19 scientists 488–497 publications: 15 scientists 498–507 publications: 18 scientists 508–517 publications: 19 scientists 518–527 publications: 16 scientists 528–537 publications: 10 scientists 538–547 publications: 11 scientists 548–557 publications: 14 scientists 558–567 publications: 11 scientists 568–577 publications: 7 scientists 578–587 publications: 14 scientists 588–597 publications: 5 scientists 598–602 publications: 4 scientists 603+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 603+

This scientist: 135 publications — 31st percentile

31% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 603 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 5
48–57 33
58–67 94
68–77 161
78–87 278
88–97 376
98–107 404
108–117 484
118–127 540
128–137 557 135
138–147 491
148–157 495
158–167 458
168–177 490
178–187 414
188–197 401
198–207 333
208–217 292
218–227 290
228–237 262
238–247 243
248–257 208
258–267 185
268–277 147
278–287 128
288–297 119
298–307 120
308–317 107
318–327 93
328–337 87
338–347 64
348–357 87
358–367 60
368–377 60
378–387 34
388–397 50
398–407 44
408–417 31
418–427 39
428–437 27
438–447 36
448–457 27
458–467 29
468–477 30
478–487 19
488–497 15
498–507 18
508–517 19
518–527 16
528–537 10
538–547 11
548–557 14
558–567 11
568–577 7
578–587 14
588–597 5
598–602 4
603+ 100
Download as CSV

Connie A. Woodhouse D-index placement in Earth Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Earth Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Connie A. Woodhouse sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 77 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 106+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 389. Most scientists, 389, have 36 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 44 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 144 scientists 31 D-Index: 215 scientists 32 D-Index: 278 scientists 33 D-Index: 379 scientists 34 D-Index: 366 scientists 35 D-Index: 372 scientists 36 D-Index: 389 scientists 37 D-Index: 366 scientists 38 D-Index: 344 scientists 39 D-Index: 349 scientists 40 D-Index: 296 scientists 41 D-Index: 289 scientists 42 D-Index: 277 scientists 43 D-Index: 279 scientists 44 D-Index: 248 scientists 45 D-Index: 257 scientists 46 D-Index: 212 scientists 47 D-Index: 202 scientists 48 D-Index: 207 scientists 49 D-Index: 204 scientists 50 D-Index: 183 scientists 51 D-Index: 178 scientists 52 D-Index: 182 scientists 53 D-Index: 178 scientists 54 D-Index: 163 scientists 55 D-Index: 117 scientists 56 D-Index: 163 scientists 57 D-Index: 120 scientists 58 D-Index: 113 scientists 59 D-Index: 136 scientists 60 D-Index: 135 scientists 61 D-Index: 96 scientists 62 D-Index: 103 scientists 63 D-Index: 83 scientists 64 D-Index: 103 scientists 65 D-Index: 83 scientists 66 D-Index: 89 scientists 67 D-Index: 92 scientists 68 D-Index: 89 scientists 69 D-Index: 78 scientists 70 D-Index: 75 scientists 71 D-Index: 53 scientists 72 D-Index: 62 scientists 73 D-Index: 54 scientists 74 D-Index: 35 scientists 75 D-Index: 52 scientists 76 D-Index: 50 scientists 77 D-Index: 32 scientists 78 D-Index: 37 scientists 79 D-Index: 20 scientists 80 D-Index: 33 scientists 81 D-Index: 36 scientists 82 D-Index: 34 scientists 83 D-Index: 34 scientists 84 D-Index: 24 scientists 85 D-Index: 19 scientists 86 D-Index: 18 scientists 87 D-Index: 26 scientists 88 D-Index: 30 scientists 89 D-Index: 17 scientists 90 D-Index: 21 scientists 91 D-Index: 19 scientists 92 D-Index: 15 scientists 93 D-Index: 14 scientists 94 D-Index: 20 scientists 95 D-Index: 9 scientists 96 D-Index: 10 scientists 97 D-Index: 15 scientists 98 D-Index: 13 scientists 99 D-Index: 3 scientists 100 D-Index: 13 scientists 101 D-Index: 3 scientists 102 D-Index: 9 scientists 103 D-Index: 4 scientists 104 D-Index: 6 scientists 105 D-Index: 6 scientists 106+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 106+

This scientist: 44 D-Index — 50th percentile

50% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 106 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Earth Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,176 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 144
31 215
32 278
33 379
34 366
35 372
36 389
37 366
38 344
39 349
40 296
41 289
42 277
43 279
44 248 44
45 257
46 212
47 202
48 207
49 204
50 183
51 178
52 182
53 178
54 163
55 117
56 163
57 120
58 113
59 136
60 135
61 96
62 103
63 83
64 103
65 83
66 89
67 92
68 89
69 78
70 75
71 53
72 62
73 54
74 35
75 52
76 50
77 32
78 37
79 20
80 33
81 36
82 34
83 34
84 24
85 19
86 18
87 26
88 30
89 17
90 21
91 19
92 15
93 14
94 20
95 9
96 10
97 15
98 13
99 3
100 13
101 3
102 9
103 4
104 6
105 6
106+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Connie A. Woodhouse is affiliated with the University of Arizona in the United States and conducts research primarily in Environmental Science and Earth and Planetary Sciences. Their work focuses on key areas such as Global and Planetary Change, Atmospheric Science, and Water Science and Technology.

Woodhouse's research addresses several main topics, including:

  • Hydrology and Drought Analysis
  • Tree-ring climate responses
  • Plant Water Relations and Carbon Dynamics
  • Climate variability and models
  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Meteorological Phenomena and Simulations
  • Water resources management and optimization

The scientist has contributed regularly to various academic journals. Frequent publication venues include:

  • JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association
  • Water Resources Research
  • Geophysical Research Letters
  • Climate Services
  • International Journal of Climatology

Woodhouse has collaborated with several researchers across multiple publications. Notable frequent co-authors are:

  • David M. Meko
  • Gregory T. Pederson
  • Gregory J. McCabe
  • Stephanie A. McAfee
  • Edward R. Cook

Recent papers authored or co-authored by Woodhouse provide insight into the range of topics covered:

  • "Flash droughts present a new challenge for subseasonal-to-seasonal prediction" (2020), published in Nature Climate Change
  • "Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States' largest river basin" (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • "Seven centuries of reconstructed Brahmaputra River discharge demonstrate underestimated high discharge and flood hazard frequency" (2020), published in Nature Communications
  • "Dynamics, Variability, and Change in Seasonal Precipitation Reconstructions for North America" (2020), published in Journal of Climate
  • "Tree Rings Reveal Unmatched 2nd Century Drought in the Colorado River Basin" (2022), published in Geophysical Research Letters

These publications collectively reflect a focus on drought analysis, river basin hydrology, climate variability, and long-term climate reconstructions using tree-ring data and other methodologies.

Best Publications

  • Temperature as a potent driver of regional forest drought stress and tree mortality

    A. Park Williams;Craig D. Allen;Alison K. Macalady;Daniel Griffin

  • Long-Term Aridity Changes in the Western United States

    Edward R. Cook;Connie A. Woodhouse;C. Mark Eakin;David M. Meko

  • 2000 Years of Drought Variability in the Central United States

    Connie A. Woodhouse;Connie A. Woodhouse;Jonathan T. Overpeck;Jonathan T. Overpeck

  • Megadroughts in North America: placing IPCC projections of hydroclimatic change in a long-term palaeoclimate context

    Edward R. Cook;Richard Seager;Richard R. Heim;Russell S. Vose

  • Monitoring and Understanding Changes in Heat Waves, Cold Waves, Floods, and Droughts in the United States: State of Knowledge

    Thomas C. Peterson;Richard R. Heim;Robert Hirsch;Dale P. Kaiser

  • Updated streamflow reconstructions for the Upper Colorado River Basin

    Connie A. Woodhouse;Stephen T. Gray;David M. Meko

  • Medieval drought in the upper Colorado River Basin

    David M. Meko;Connie A. Woodhouse;Christopher A. Baisan;Troy Knight

  • A 1,200-year perspective of 21st century drought in southwestern North America

    Connie A. Woodhouse;David M. Meko;Glen M. MacDonald;Dave W. Stahle

  • The Unusual Nature of Recent Snowpack Declines in the North American Cordillera

    Gregory T. Pederson;Gregory T. Pederson;Stephen T. Gray;Stephen T. Gray;Connie A. Woodhouse;Julio L. Betancourt

  • North American monsoon precipitation reconstructed from tree-ring latewood

    Daniel Griffin;Connie A. Woodhouse;David M. Meko;David W. Stahle

  • Increasing influence of air temperature on upper Colorado River streamflow

    Connie A. Woodhouse;Gregory T. Pederson;Kiyomi Morino;Stephanie A. McAfee

  • Multi-Century Tree-Ring Reconstructions of Colorado Streamflow for Water Resource Planning

    Connie A. Woodhouse;Jeffrey J. Lukas

  • Climatic Controls on the Snowmelt Hydrology of the Northern Rocky Mountains

    Gregory T. Pederson;Gregory T. Pederson;Stephen T. Gray;Toby Ault;Wendy Marsh

  • A Tree-Ring Reconstruction of Streamflow for the Colorado Front Range

    Connie A. Woodhouse

  • Five centuries of Upper Indus River flow from tree rings

    Edward R. Cook;Jonathan G. Palmer;Moinuddin Ahmed;Connie A. Woodhouse

  • A 431-Yr Reconstruction of Western Colorado Snowpack from Tree Rings

    Connie A. Woodhouse

  • Latewood chronology development for summer-moisture reconstruction in the US Southwest

    Daniel Griffin;David M. Meko;Ramzi Touchan;Steven W. Leavitt

  • The Continuum of Hydroclimate Variability in Western North America during the Last Millennium

    Toby R. Ault;Julia E. Cole;Jonathan T. Overpeck;Gregory T. Pederson

  • Increased drought severity tracks warming in the United States’ largest river basin

    Justin T. Martin;Gregory T. Pederson;Connie A. Woodhouse;Edward R. Cook

  • Tree-ring footprint of joint hydrologic drought in Sacramento and Upper Colorado river basins, western USA

    David M. Meko;Connie A. Woodhouse

  • Seven centuries of reconstructed Brahmaputra River discharge demonstrate underestimated high discharge and flood hazard frequency.

    Mukund Palat Rao;Mukund Palat Rao;Edward R. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook;Benjamin I. Cook;Rosanne Dorothy D’Arrigo

  • Drought 2002 in Colorado: An unprecedented drought or a routine drought?

    Roger A. Pielke;Nolan Doesken;Odilia Bliss;Tara Green

Frequent Co-Authors

David M. Meko
David M. Meko University of Arizona
Edward R. Cook
Edward R. Cook Lamont-Doherty Earth Observatory
Gregory J. McCabe
Gregory J. McCabe United States Geological Survey
Steven W. Leavitt
Steven W. Leavitt University of Arizona
Benjamin I. Cook
Benjamin I. Cook Goddard Institute for Space Studies
Jonathan T. Overpeck
Jonathan T. Overpeck University of Michigan–Ann Arbor
Upmanu Lall
Upmanu Lall Columbia University
Thomas W. Swetnam
Thomas W. Swetnam University of Arizona
David W. Stahle
David W. Stahle University of Arkansas at Fayetteville
María Uriarte
María Uriarte Columbia University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Earth Science opens doors to diverse career pathways, often enhanced by complementary degrees pursued online. For example, those interested in creative communication or environmental advocacy might explore a master of fine arts online to hone skills in visual storytelling and design related to natural sciences.

Management and organizational skills are equally valuable, making an online masters degree in human resource management a strategic choice for Earth Science professionals aiming for leadership roles in sustainability-focused companies or research institutions.

Moreover, online education offers flexible options for learners of all ages. Seniors considering a career pivot or lifelong learning can find suitable programs quite accessible, as highlighted by the benefits listed under degrees for seniors.

Additionally, Earth Science graduates interested in organizing scientific information may pursue specialized credentials like mlis ala accredited programs. These prepare professionals for key roles in managing environmental data and libraries.

Best Scientists Citing Connie A. Woodhouse

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles