World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
56
Citations
12483
World Ranking
4493
National Ranking
2034

Psychology

D-Index
55
Citations
12327
World Ranking
4383
National Ranking
2438

Bruce Bridgeman publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Bridgeman sits on this spectrum.

31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 344 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 34 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–705 publications: 5 scientists 706+ publications: 100 scientists
31 publications 706+

This scientist: 214 publications — 73rd percentile

73% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 706 publications or more.

Bruce Bridgeman D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Bruce Bridgeman sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 559 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 87 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 79 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 55 D-Index — 63rd percentile

63% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

Overview

Bruce Bridgeman was affiliated with the University of California, Santa Cruz in the United States. The record indicates that they were a researcher whose contributions were situated within that academic institution.

While there is no detailed information on specific research papers, co-authors, publication venues, or areas of study available for Bridgeman, it is noted that the scientist did not have documented publications in the typical scholarly databases from which this data derives.

The absence of recorded publications, topics of work, main fields, subfields, and book publications implies that their research profile, as indexed, remains minimal or was not captured in the accessible data sources.

Bridgeman is deceased. Therefore, all references to their work are presented in past tense.

Best Publications

  • Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements.

    Bruce Bridgeman;Derek Hendry;Lawrence Stark

  • Relation between cognitive and motor-oriented systems of visual position perception.

    Bruce Bridgeman;Stephen Lewis;Gary Heit;Martha Nagle

  • Segregation of cognitive and motor aspects of visual function using induced motion

    Bruce Bridgeman;Marc Kirch;Alan Sperling

  • Interaction of cognitive and sensorimotor maps of visual space.

    Bruce Bridgeman;Shelley Peery;Sulekha Anand

  • Metacontrast and lateral inhibition.

    Bruce Bridgeman

  • Postsaccadic target blanking prevents saccadic suppression of image displacement.

    Heiner Deubel;Werner X. Schneider;Bruce Bridgeman

  • A theory of visual stability across saccadic eye movements

    Bruce Bridgeman;A. H. C. Van der Heijden;Boris M. Velichkovsky

  • Immediate post-saccadic information mediates space constancy

    Heiner Deubel;Bruce Bridgeman;Werner X Schneider

  • Ocular proprioception and efference copy in registering visual direction.

    Bruce Bridgeman;Lawrence Stark

  • Role of corollary discharge in space constancy.

    Lawrence Stark;Bruce Bridgeman

  • Temporal response characteristics of cells in monkey striate cortex measured with metacontrast masking and brightness discrimination.

    Bruce Bridgeman

  • Distributed sensory coding applied to simulations of iconic storage and metacontrast

    Bruce Bridgeman

  • Alternating prism exposure causes dual adaptation and generalization to a novel displacement

    Robert B. Welch;Bruce Bridgeman;Sulekha Anand;Kaitlin E. Browman

  • Omnidirectional increase in threshold for image shifts during saccadic eye movements.

    Bruce Bridgeman;Lawrence Stark

  • Conscious vs Unconscious Processes: The Case of Vision

    Bruce Bridgeman

  • The theory of binocular vision

    Ewald Hering;Bruce Bridgeman;Lawrence A. Stark

  • A review of the role of efference copy in sensory and oculomotor control systems.

    Bruce Bridgeman

  • Functions of the Right Cerebral Hemisphere

    Bruce Bridgeman;Andrew W. Young

  • Failure to integrate visual information from successive fixations

    Bruce Bridgeman;Melanie Mayer

  • Fourth Purkinje image signals reveal eye-lens deviations and retinal image distortions during saccades

    Heiner Deubel;Bruce Bridgeman

  • Transsaccadic memory of position and form

    Heiner Deubel;Werner X. Schneider;Bruce Bridgeman

Frequent Co-Authors

Heiner Deubel
Heiner Deubel Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München
Werner X. Schneider
Werner X. Schneider Bielefeld University
Boris M. Velichkovsky
Boris M. Velichkovsky Kurchatov Institute
Carlo Umiltà
Carlo Umiltà University of Padua
James T. Enns
James T. Enns University of British Columbia
Jean Blouin
Jean Blouin Aix-Marseille University
Stephen L. Macknik
Stephen L. Macknik SUNY Downstate Medical Center
Michelle Fleury
Michelle Fleury Université Laval
Vincent Di Lollo
Vincent Di Lollo Simon Fraser University
Marco Bertamini
Marco Bertamini University of Padua

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring psychology can open a wide array of educational and professional opportunities across the U.S. For those considering an online degree, it's helpful to examine how different regions stack up. Check out the best psychology program rankings in Houston to see options in one of Texas’s key metro areas, or explore the top psychology programs in the Midwest for students seeking opportunities in central states.

If you’re interested in pursuing studies in more specific locations, review the best psychology degree rankings in Nebraska or delve into the best psychology degree programs ranking in New York City. Each region offers unique program strengths, specializations, and career connections, from clinical practice to research roles.

As online study grows in popularity, prospective students can access top programs from almost anywhere. Carefully compare curriculums, faculty expertise, and professional outcomes as you decide which pathway best fits your goals in psychology.

Best Scientists Citing Bruce Bridgeman

Recently Published Articles