World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carol A. Pollock

Carol A. Pollock

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
90
Citations
30655
World Ranking
12181
National Ranking
389

Carol A. Pollock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol A. Pollock sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 471 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Carol A. Pollock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol A. Pollock sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Carol A. Pollock is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with particular specialization in the subfields of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Nephrology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work covers a range of topics related to diabetes and kidney health management. These topics include:

  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Potassium and Related Disorders

Carol A. Pollock has contributed to a number of scientific papers, with recent publications including:

  • Blood pressure and volume management in dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference, 2020, Kidney International
  • Sparsentan in patients with IgA nephropathy: a prespecified interim analysis from a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial, 2023, The Lancet
  • Renal, Cardiovascular, and Safety Outcomes of Canagliflozin by Baseline Kidney Function: A Secondary Analysis of the CREDENCE Randomized Trial, 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Early Change in Albuminuria with Canagliflozin Predicts Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Post Hoc Analysis from the CREDENCE Trial, 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Diabetes and Obesity-Related Kidney Disease, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Carol A. Pollock encompass:

  • Hiddo J.L. Heerspink
  • Meg Jardine
  • David C. Wheeler
  • Kenneth W. Mahaffey
  • Vlado Perkovic

Their work is often published in notable venues including:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Best Publications

  • Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy

    Vlado Perkovic;Vlado Perkovic;Meg J. Jardine;Meg J. Jardine;Bruce Neal;Bruce Neal;Bruce Neal;Severine Bompoint

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis

    Bruce A Cooper;Pauline Branley;Liliana Bulfone;John F Collins

  • Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: a roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy

    Adeera Levin;Marcello Tonelli;Joseph Bonventre;Josef Coresh

  • The influence of dialysis treatment modality on the decline of remaining renal function.

    Michael J. Lysaght;Edward F. Vonesh;Frank Gotch;Lloyd Ibels

  • Glucose handling by the kidney.

    Amanda Mather;Carol Pollock

  • Iron management in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Iain C. Macdougall;Andreas J. Bircher;Kai Uwe Eckardt;Gregorio T. Obrador

  • Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Christopher T. Chan;Peter J. Blankestijn;Laura M. Dember;Maurizio Gallieni

  • Effects of SGLT2 Inhibition in Human Kidney Proximal Tubular Cells-Renoprotection in Diabetic Nephropathy?

    Usha Panchapakesan;Kate Pegg;Simon Gross;Muralikrishna Gangadharan Komala

  • Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention Groups Results From the Randomized CREDENCE Trial

    Kenneth W. Mahaffey;Meg J. Jardine;Meg J. Jardine;Severine Bompoint;Christopher P. Cannon

  • Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey.

    Nicole Evangelidis;Nicole Evangelidis;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Braden Manns;Brenda Hemmelgarn

  • Study rationale and design of ADVANCE: Action in diabetes and vascular disease - Preterax and diamicron MR controlled evaluation

    J. Chalmers;M. Cooper;E. Ferrannini;P. Glasziou

  • Guideline on targets for solute and fluid removal in adult patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis.

    Wai-Kei Lo;Joanne M. Bargman;John Burkart;Raymond T. Krediet

  • The Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) Study Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics.

    Meg J. Jardine;Meg J. Jardine;Kenneth W. Mahaffey;Bruce Neal;Rajiv Agarwal

  • Protein malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of vascular events and mortality in ESRD

    Bruce A Cooper;Erik L Penne;Louise H Bartlett;Carol A Pollock

  • Validity of subjective global assessment as a nutritional marker in end-stage renal disease

    Bruce A. Cooper;Louise H. Bartlett;Alireza Aslani;Barry J. Allen

  • Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness

    David W Johnson;Carol A Pollock;Iain C Macdougall

  • Intravenous amino acid therapy for kidney function in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.

    Gordon S Doig;Gordon S Doig;Fiona Simpson;Rinaldo Bellomo;Philippa T Heighes

  • Establishing Core Outcome Domains in Hemodialysis: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology–Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Braden Manns;Brenda Hemmelgarn;David C. Wheeler

  • Intermittent high glucose enhances cell growth and collagen synthesis in cultured human tubulointerstitial cells.

    S. C. Jones;H. J. Saunders;W. Qi;C. A. Pollock

  • Developing a set of core outcomes for trials in haemodialysis: an international Delphi survey

    N. Evangelidis;A. Tong;B. Manns;B. Hemmelgarn

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Wheeler
David C. Wheeler University College London
Jonathan C. Craig
Jonathan C. Craig Flinders University
Bruce Neal
Bruce Neal George Institute for Global Health
Allison Tong
Allison Tong University of Sydney
Vlado Perkovic
Vlado Perkovic George Institute for Global Health
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink University of Groningen
David Harris
David Harris University of Sydney
Adeera Levin
Adeera Levin University of British Columbia
Carmel M. Hawley
Carmel M. Hawley University of Queensland
Richard E. Gilbert
Richard E. Gilbert St. Michael's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring health careers beyond a traditional MD, many flexible and accessible online options are available. Nursing is one of the most popular paths, and there are easy nursing programs to get into for those seeking a quicker entry into the field. Certain schools even offer LPN programs where you can become a nurse without taking standardized entrance exams; learn more about choosing an lpn school without teas test.

If you’re interested in administrative roles, healthcare administration degrees can be completed online, often in an accelerated format. These programs prepare you for leadership positions within hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

For those looking for non-clinical healthcare roles, reputable medical billing and coding schools with financial aid provide a pathway to fast-growing careers that support the healthcare industry behind the scenes.

Each of these online degree options offers flexibility, diverse career opportunities, and the potential to make a real impact in healthcare, even if you don’t take the traditional path to become a physician.

Best Scientists Citing Carol A. Pollock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles