World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Carol A. Pollock

Carol A. Pollock

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Medicine 90 12180 11458 389 381 471 30655

Carol A. Pollock publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Carol A. Pollock between 1971 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Carol A. Pollock published across 56 years, from 1971 to 2026, averaging 10.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 47 publications in 2021. 34 of the 595 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1971 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 47. Peak 47 publications in 2021. 1971: 1 publication 1972: 0 publications 1973: 0 publications 1974: 0 publications 1975: 1 publication 1976: 0 publications 1977: 0 publications 1978: 0 publications 1979: 0 publications 1980: 0 publications 1981: 0 publications 1982: 0 publications 1983: 0 publications 1984: 0 publications 1985: 0 publications 1986: 3 publications 1987: 4 publications 1988: 5 publications 1989: 14 publications 1990: 4 publications 1991: 4 publications 1992: 3 publications 1993: 2 publications 1994: 4 publications 1995: 6 publications 1996: 8 publications 1997: 6 publications 1998: 7 publications 1999: 7 publications 2000: 6 publications 2001: 4 publications 2002: 10 publications 2003: 10 publications 2004: 12 publications 2005: 11 publications 2006: 11 publications 2007: 11 publications 2008: 11 publications 2009: 10 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 10 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 22 publications 2014: 26 publications 2015: 22 publications 2016: 26 publications 2017: 17 publications 2018: 19 publications 2019: 25 publications 2020: 41 publications 2021: 47 publications 2022: 35 publications 2023: 43 publications 2024: 41 publications 2025: 33 publications 2026: 1 publication
1971 2026

595 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Carol A. Pollock: publications per year, 1971 to 2026
Year Publications
1971 1
1972 0
1973 0
1974 0
1975 1
1976 0
1977 0
1978 0
1979 0
1980 0
1981 0
1982 0
1983 0
1984 0
1985 0
1986 3
1987 4
1988 5
1989 14
1990 4
1991 4
1992 3
1993 2
1994 4
1995 6
1996 8
1997 6
1998 7
1999 7
2000 6
2001 4
2002 10
2003 10
2004 12
2005 11
2006 11
2007 11
2008 11
2009 10
2010 7
2011 10
2012 5
2013 22
2014 26
2015 22
2016 26
2017 17
2018 19
2019 25
2020 41
2021 47
2022 35
2023 43
2024 41
2025 33
2026 1
Total 595
Download as CSV

Carol A. Pollock publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol A. Pollock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 101–120 to 1,796+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 922. Most scientists, 922, have 341–360 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 461–480 publications, is where this scientist sits. 101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 610 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101–120 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 471 publications — 53rd percentile

53% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
101–120 5
121–140 26
141–160 73
161–180 155
181–200 230
201–220 363
221–240 487
241–260 545
261–280 722
281–300 768
301–320 834
321–340 895
341–360 922
361–380 838
381–400 861
401–420 918
421–440 806
441–460 771
461–480 751 471
481–500 713
501–520 617
521–540 610
541–560 537
561–580 504
581–600 509
601–620 396
621–640 386
641–660 371
661–680 340
681–700 336
701–720 307
721–740 259
741–760 230
761–780 228
781–800 217
801–820 204
821–840 186
841–860 177
861–880 155
881–900 139
901–920 145
921–940 116
941–960 133
961–980 91
981–1,000 96
1,001–1,020 77
1,021–1,040 70
1,041–1,060 63
1,061–1,080 77
1,081–1,100 49
1,101–1,120 54
1,121–1,140 49
1,141–1,160 51
1,161–1,180 35
1,181–1,200 39
1,201–1,220 26
1,221–1,240 37
1,241–1,260 36
1,261–1,280 27
1,281–1,300 32
1,301–1,320 28
1,321–1,340 17
1,341–1,360 30
1,361–1,380 28
1,381–1,400 17
1,401–1,420 21
1,421–1,440 15
1,441–1,460 12
1,461–1,480 12
1,481–1,500 18
1,501–1,520 14
1,521–1,540 17
1,541–1,560 15
1,561–1,580 6
1,581–1,600 2
1,601–1,620 12
1,621–1,640 11
1,641–1,660 8
1,661–1,680 5
1,681–1,700 5
1,701–1,720 10
1,721–1,740 12
1,741–1,760 14
1,761–1,780 6
1,781–1,795 5
1,796+ 100
Download as CSV

Carol A. Pollock D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Carol A. Pollock sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
250 500 750 1,000
Bar chart with 75 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 70–71 to 217+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 1,027. Most scientists, 1,027, have 82–83 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 90–91 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 399 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70–71 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 90 D-Index — 41st percentile

41% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Medicine scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 20,134 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
70–71 226
72–73 391
74–75 574
76–77 730
78–79 891
80–81 972
82–83 1,027
84–85 1,003
86–87 960
88–89 970
90–91 922 90
92–93 839
94–95 808
96–97 779
98–99 668
100–101 611
102–103 630
104–105 513
106–107 541
108–109 445
110–111 429
112–113 399
114–115 393
116–117 318
118–119 302
120–121 287
122–123 255
124–125 256
126–127 252
128–129 230
130–131 179
132–133 168
134–135 163
136–137 159
138–139 134
140–141 134
142–143 118
144–145 109
146–147 106
148–149 74
150–151 79
152–153 80
154–155 87
156–157 57
158–159 74
160–161 69
162–163 60
164–165 53
166–167 39
168–169 42
170–171 32
172–173 39
174–175 40
176–177 28
178–179 19
180–181 23
182–183 31
184–185 18
186–187 20
188–189 22
190–191 13
192–193 21
194–195 12
196–197 12
198–199 14
200–201 15
202–203 13
204–205 10
206–207 8
208–209 4
210–211 12
212–213 11
214–215 10
216 4
217+ 98
Download as CSV

Overview

Carol A. Pollock is affiliated with the University of Sydney in Australia. Their research primarily focuses on Medicine, with particular specialization in the subfields of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Nephrology, Molecular Biology, Surgery, and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine.

Their work covers a range of topics related to diabetes and kidney health management. These topics include:

  • Diabetes Treatment and Management
  • Chronic Kidney Disease and Diabetes
  • Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
  • Erythropoietin and Anemia Treatment
  • Pancreatic function and diabetes
  • Diabetes Management and Research
  • Potassium and Related Disorders

Carol A. Pollock has contributed to a number of scientific papers, with recent publications including:

  • Blood pressure and volume management in dialysis: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference, 2020, Kidney International
  • Sparsentan in patients with IgA nephropathy: a prespecified interim analysis from a randomised, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial, 2023, The Lancet
  • Renal, Cardiovascular, and Safety Outcomes of Canagliflozin by Baseline Kidney Function: A Secondary Analysis of the CREDENCE Randomized Trial, 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Early Change in Albuminuria with Canagliflozin Predicts Kidney and Cardiovascular Outcomes: A Post Hoc Analysis from the CREDENCE Trial, 2020, Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • The Role of the Gut Microbiome in Diabetes and Obesity-Related Kidney Disease, 2021, International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Frequent co-authors collaborating with Carol A. Pollock encompass:

  • Hiddo J.L. Heerspink
  • Meg Jardine
  • David C. Wheeler
  • Kenneth W. Mahaffey
  • Vlado Perkovic

Their work is often published in notable venues including:

  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
  • Kidney International Reports
  • Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation
  • Diabetes Obesity and Metabolism
  • International Journal of Molecular Sciences

Best Publications

  • Canagliflozin and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy

    Vlado Perkovic;Vlado Perkovic;Meg J. Jardine;Meg J. Jardine;Bruce Neal;Bruce Neal;Bruce Neal;Severine Bompoint

  • A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Early versus Late Initiation of Dialysis

    Bruce A Cooper;Pauline Branley;Liliana Bulfone;John F Collins

  • Global kidney health 2017 and beyond: a roadmap for closing gaps in care, research, and policy

    Adeera Levin;Marcello Tonelli;Joseph Bonventre;Josef Coresh

  • The influence of dialysis treatment modality on the decline of remaining renal function.

    Michael J. Lysaght;Edward F. Vonesh;Frank Gotch;Lloyd Ibels

  • Glucose handling by the kidney.

    Amanda Mather;Carol Pollock

  • Iron management in chronic kidney disease: conclusions from a “Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes” (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Iain C. Macdougall;Andreas J. Bircher;Kai Uwe Eckardt;Gregorio T. Obrador

  • Dialysis initiation, modality choice, access, and prescription: conclusions from a Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Controversies Conference

    Christopher T. Chan;Peter J. Blankestijn;Laura M. Dember;Maurizio Gallieni

  • Effects of SGLT2 Inhibition in Human Kidney Proximal Tubular Cells-Renoprotection in Diabetic Nephropathy?

    Usha Panchapakesan;Kate Pegg;Simon Gross;Muralikrishna Gangadharan Komala

  • Canagliflozin and Cardiovascular and Renal Outcomes in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Chronic Kidney Disease in Primary and Secondary Cardiovascular Prevention Groups Results From the Randomized CREDENCE Trial

    Kenneth W. Mahaffey;Meg J. Jardine;Meg J. Jardine;Severine Bompoint;Christopher P. Cannon

  • Developing a Set of Core Outcomes for Trials in Hemodialysis: An International Delphi Survey.

    Nicole Evangelidis;Nicole Evangelidis;Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Braden Manns;Brenda Hemmelgarn

  • Study rationale and design of ADVANCE: Action in diabetes and vascular disease - Preterax and diamicron MR controlled evaluation

    J. Chalmers;M. Cooper;E. Ferrannini;P. Glasziou

  • Guideline on targets for solute and fluid removal in adult patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis.

    Wai-Kei Lo;Joanne M. Bargman;John Burkart;Raymond T. Krediet

  • The Canagliflozin and Renal Endpoints in Diabetes with Established Nephropathy Clinical Evaluation (CREDENCE) Study Rationale, Design, and Baseline Characteristics.

    Meg J. Jardine;Meg J. Jardine;Kenneth W. Mahaffey;Bruce Neal;Rajiv Agarwal

  • Protein malnutrition and hypoalbuminemia as predictors of vascular events and mortality in ESRD

    Bruce A Cooper;Erik L Penne;Louise H Bartlett;Carol A Pollock

  • Validity of subjective global assessment as a nutritional marker in end-stage renal disease

    Bruce A. Cooper;Louise H. Bartlett;Alireza Aslani;Barry J. Allen

  • Erythropoiesis-stimulating agent hyporesponsiveness

    David W Johnson;Carol A Pollock;Iain C Macdougall

  • Intravenous amino acid therapy for kidney function in critically ill patients: a randomized controlled trial.

    Gordon S Doig;Gordon S Doig;Fiona Simpson;Rinaldo Bellomo;Philippa T Heighes

  • Establishing Core Outcome Domains in Hemodialysis: Report of the Standardized Outcomes in Nephrology–Hemodialysis (SONG-HD) Consensus Workshop

    Allison Tong;Allison Tong;Braden Manns;Brenda Hemmelgarn;David C. Wheeler

  • Intermittent high glucose enhances cell growth and collagen synthesis in cultured human tubulointerstitial cells.

    S. C. Jones;H. J. Saunders;W. Qi;C. A. Pollock

  • Developing a set of core outcomes for trials in haemodialysis: an international Delphi survey

    N. Evangelidis;A. Tong;B. Manns;B. Hemmelgarn

Frequent Co-Authors

David C. Wheeler
David C. Wheeler University College London
Jonathan C. Craig
Jonathan C. Craig Flinders University
Bruce Neal
Bruce Neal George Institute for Global Health
Allison Tong
Allison Tong University of Sydney
Vlado Perkovic
Vlado Perkovic George Institute for Global Health
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink
Hiddo J.L. Heerspink University of Groningen
David Harris
David Harris University of Sydney
Adeera Levin
Adeera Levin University of British Columbia
Carmel M. Hawley
Carmel M. Hawley University of Queensland
Richard E. Gilbert
Richard E. Gilbert St. Michael's Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For students exploring health careers beyond a traditional MD, many flexible and accessible online options are available. Nursing is one of the most popular paths, and there are easy nursing programs to get into for those seeking a quicker entry into the field. Certain schools even offer LPN programs where you can become a nurse without taking standardized entrance exams; learn more about choosing an lpn school without teas test.

If you’re interested in administrative roles, healthcare administration degrees can be completed online, often in an accelerated format. These programs prepare you for leadership positions within hospitals, clinics, and health organizations.

For those looking for non-clinical healthcare roles, reputable medical billing and coding schools with financial aid provide a pathway to fast-growing careers that support the healthcare industry behind the scenes.

Each of these online degree options offers flexibility, diverse career opportunities, and the potential to make a real impact in healthcare, even if you don’t take the traditional path to become a physician.

Best Scientists Citing Carol A. Pollock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles