World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Neuroscience
Taiwan
2026

D-Index & Metrics

Neuroscience

D-Index
58
Citations
11195
World Ranking
4189
National Ranking
4

Jen Chuen Hsieh publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jen Chuen Hsieh sits on this spectrum.

38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientists 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38 publications 887+

This scientist: 233 publications — 71st percentile

71% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

Jen Chuen Hsieh D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Jen Chuen Hsieh sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 58 D-Index — 57th percentile

57% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2026 - Research.com Neuroscience in Taiwan Leader Award
  • 2025 - Research.com Neuroscience in Taiwan Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Neuroscience in Taiwan Leader Award

Overview

Jen Chuen Hsieh is affiliated with National Yang Ming University in Taiwan, contributing to the fields of neuroscience and medicine through research spanning cognitive neuroscience, physiology, and public health. Their work addresses a range of topics including neuroscience and music perception, menstrual health and disorders, neural dynamics and brain function, and pain management.

Their publication record includes numerous articles in scientific journals. Recent papers feature studies such as "From "Aha!" to "Haha!" Using Humor to Cope with Negative Stimuli" published in 2020 in Cerebral Cortex, "Long-term musical training induces white matter plasticity in emotion and language networks" from 2022 in Human Brain Mapping, "Changes in resting-state functional connectivity in nonacute sciatica with acupuncture modulation: A preliminary study" appearing in Brain and Behavior in 2020, "Pros and cons in tinnitus brain: Enhancement of global connectivity for alpha and delta waves" published in Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry in 2021, and "Neuroprotective effect of Val variant of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on hippocampus is modulated by the severity of menstrual pain" published in NeuroImage Clinical in 2021.

Frequent coauthors include:

  • Li-Fen Chen
  • Ching-Ju Yang
  • Wei-Chi Li
  • Tzu-Yi Hong
  • Hsin-Yen Yu

Their work has been published notably in the following venues:

  • Frontiers in Neuroscience
  • Frontiers in Human Neuroscience
  • Human Brain Mapping
  • Scientific Reports
  • SLEEP

Their research topics include:

  • Neuroscience and Music Perception
  • Menstrual Health and Disorders
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Music Therapy and Health
  • Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Pain Mechanisms and Treatments

They have contributed extensively to the study of cognitive neuroscience, with 26 publications in that subfield, alongside work in experimental and cognitive psychology, social psychology, physiology, and public health-related areas. Their interdisciplinary approach integrates neuroscience with health and psychological perspectives.

Best Publications

  • Central representation of chronic ongoing neuropathic pain studied by positron emission tomography

    Jen Chuen Hsieh;Jen Chuen Hsieh;Måns Belfrage;Sharon Stone-Elander;Per Hansson

  • Central nervous pathway for acupuncture stimulation: localization of processing with functional MR imaging of the brain--preliminary experience.

    Ming-Ting Wu;Jen-Chuen Hsieh;Jing Xiong;Chien-Fang Yang;Chien-Fang Yang

  • Efficacy of prefrontal theta-burst stimulation in refractory depression: a randomized sham-controlled study

    Cheng Ta Li;Mu Hong Chen;Chi Hung Juan;Hsiang Hsuan Huang

  • Activation of the hypothalamus characterizes the acupuncture stimulation at the analgesic point in human: a positron emission tomography study.

    Jen Chuen Hsieh;Jen Chuen Hsieh;Chung Haow Tu;Chung Haow Tu;Fang Pey Chen;Fang Pey Chen;Min Chi Chen

  • Urge to scratch represented in the human cerebral cortex during itch

    Jen-Chuen Hsieh;O. Hagermark;M. Stahle-Backdahl;K. Ericson

  • Traumatic nociceptive pain activates the hypothalamus and the periaqueductal gray: a positron emission tomography study

    Jen Chuen Hsieh;Mona Ståhle-Bäckdahl;Östen Hägermark;Sharon Stone-Elander

  • Single-trial variability in event-related BOLD signals.

    Jeng Ren Duann;Jeng Ren Duann;Jeng Ren Duann;Tzyy Ping Jung;Tzyy Ping Jung;Wen Jui Kuo;Tzu Chen Yeh

  • Anticipatory coping of pain expressed in the human anterior cingulate cortex: a positron emission tomography study.

    Jen Chuen Hsieh;Sharon Stone-Elander;Martin Ingvar

  • Structural and cognitive deficits in remitting and non-remitting recurrent depression: a voxel-based morphometric study.

    Cheng Ta Li;Cheng Ta Li;Ching Po Lin;Kun Hsien Chou;I. Yun Chen

  • Right-lateralised central processing for pain of nitroglycerin-induced cluster headache.

    Jen-Chuen Hsieh;Jen-Chuen Hsieh;Jan Hannerz;Martin Ingvar

  • Is deck B a disadvantageous deck in the Iowa Gambling Task

    Ching Hung Lin;Yao Chu Chiu;Po Lei Lee;Po Lei Lee;Jen Chuen Hsieh;Jen Chuen Hsieh;Jen Chuen Hsieh

  • Brain morphological changes associated with cyclic menstrual pain

    Cheng-Hao Tu;David M. Niddam;David M. Niddam;Hsiang-Tai Chao;Li-Fen Chen;Li-Fen Chen

  • Orthographic and phonological processing of Chinese characters: an fMRI study.

    Wen Jui Kuo;Tzu Chen Yeh;Jun Ren Lee;Jun Ren Lee;Li Fen Chen

  • Cortico-striatal disconnection within the cingulo-opercular network in schizophrenia revealed by intrinsic functional connectivity analysis: a resting fMRI study.

    Pei Chi Tu;Jen Chuen Hsieh;Jen Chuen Hsieh;Cheng Ta Li;Cheng Ta Li;Ya Mai Bai;Ya Mai Bai

  • Frequency effects of Chinese character processing in the brain: An event-related fMRI study

    Wen-Jui Kuo;Tzu-Chen Yeh;Tzu-Chen Yeh;Chia-Ying Lee;Y.u-T.e Wu;Y.u-T.e Wu

  • Coexistence of attention-based facilitation and inhibition in the human cortex.

    Per H. Ghatan;Jen Chuen Hsieh;Karl Magnus Petersson;Sharon Stone-Elander

  • Music training improves pitch perception in prelingually deafened children with cochlear implants.

    Joshua Kuang-Chao Chen;Ann Yi Chiun Chuang;Catherine McMahon;Jen-Chuen Hsieh

  • Central modulation of pain evoked from myofascial trigger point

    David M. Niddam;Rai Chi Chan;Si Huei Lee;Tzu Chen Yeh

  • Gender differences in the human mirror system: a magnetoencephalography study.

    Ya Wei Cheng;Ovid J.L. Tzeng;Ovid J.L. Tzeng;Jean Decety;Toshiaki Imada

  • Abnormal cerebral metabolism during menstrual pain in primary dysmenorrhea.

    Cheng Hao Tu;David M. Niddam;David M. Niddam;Hsiang Tai Chao;Ren Shyan Liu

  • A left-lateralized network for reading Chinese words: A 3 T fMRI study

    Wen Jui Kuo;Tzu Chen Yeh;Jeng Ren Duann;Yu Te Wu

Frequent Co-Authors

Tzu Chen Yeh
Tzu Chen Yeh Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Yu-Te Wu
Yu-Te Wu National Yang Ming University
Cheng-Ta Li
Cheng-Ta Li Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Yung-Yang Lin
Yung-Yang Lin National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University
Ovid J.L. Tzeng
Ovid J.L. Tzeng Academia Sinica
Daisy L. Hung
Daisy L. Hung National Central University
Shou-Dong Lee
Shou-Dong Lee Taipei Veterans General Hospital
Martin Ingvar
Martin Ingvar Karolinska Institute
Jean Decety
Jean Decety University of Chicago
Chen-Jee Hong
Chen-Jee Hong Taipei Veterans General Hospital

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Best Scientists Citing Jen Chuen Hsieh

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles