World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 38 8729 8374 3115 2895 179 4270

Adam S. Ward publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Adam S. Ward between 2008 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Adam S. Ward published across 18 years, from 2008 to 2025, averaging 12.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 25 publications in 2016. 20 of the 227 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20 25
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2008 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 25. Peak 25 publications in 2016. 2008: 1 publication 2009: 1 publication 2010: 7 publications 2011: 6 publications 2012: 10 publications 2013: 12 publications 2014: 14 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 25 publications 2017: 15 publications 2018: 22 publications 2019: 22 publications 2020: 18 publications 2021: 10 publications 2022: 24 publications 2023: 12 publications 2024: 10 publications 2025: 10 publications
2008 2025

227 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Adam S. Ward: publications per year, 2008 to 2025
Year Publications
2008 1
2009 1
2010 7
2011 6
2012 10
2013 12
2014 14
2015 8
2016 25
2017 15
2018 22
2019 22
2020 18
2021 10
2022 24
2023 12
2024 10
2025 10
Total 227
Download as CSV

Adam S. Ward publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam S. Ward sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 171–180 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 179 publications — 56th percentile

56% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444 179
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Adam S. Ward D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Adam S. Ward sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265 38
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Adam S. Ward is affiliated with Oregon State University in the United States and specializes in Environmental Science, with a focus on Water Science and Technology, Ecology, Environmental Chemistry, Soil Science, and Environmental Engineering. Their research spans several key topics including Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies, Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics, Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes, Soil Erosion and Sediment Transport, Fish Ecology and Management Studies, Flood Risk Assessment and Management, and Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry.

Their recent publications reflect a consistent engagement with the dynamics of streams and rivers, water flow regimes, and the implications of hydrological data collection networks. Notable papers include:

  • Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network, 2022, Nature Sustainability
  • Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States, 2021, Environmental Research Letters
  • Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero-flow stream gage readings, 2020, Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water
  • Spatial Patterns and Drivers of Nonperennial Flow Regimes in the Contiguous United States, 2021, Geophysical Research Letters
  • What's in a Name? Patterns, Trends, and Suggestions for Defining Non-Perennial Rivers and Streams, 2020, Water

Adam S. Ward has collaborated frequently with several coauthors including Skuyler Herzog, Margaret Zimmer, Thibault Datry, Sarah E. Godsey, and Walter K. Dodds. These collaborations are consistent with interdisciplinary approaches to environmental and water science research.

Their work has been published extensively in venues relevant to hydrology and water resources, such as HydroShare Resources, Water Resources Research, Hydrological Processes, Frontiers in Water, and Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Water.

In addition to research articles, Adam S. Ward has contributed to book publications, notably a title titled "Innovations in Remote and Online Education by Hydrologic Scientists," published by Frontiers Media in 2022.

Best Publications

  • Assessing placement bias of the global river gauge network

    Unknown

  • Is the Hyporheic Zone Relevant beyond the Scientific Community

    Jörg Lewandowski;Jörg Lewandowski;Shai Arnon;Eddie Banks;Okke Batelaan

  • Weather whiplash in agricultural regions drives deterioration of water quality

    Terrance D. Loecke;Amy J. Burgin;Diego A. Riveros-Iregui;Adam S. Ward

  • Imaging hyporheic zone solute transport using electrical resistivity

    Adam S. Ward;Michael N. Gooseff;Kamini Singha

  • Hydrologic and geomorphic controls on hyporheic exchange during base flow recession in a headwater mountain stream

    Adam S. Ward;Adam S. Ward;Michael Fitzgerald;Michael N. Gooseff;Thomas J. Voltz

  • Pervasive changes in stream intermittency across the United States

    Samuel C Zipper;John C Hammond;Margaret Shanafield;Margaret Zimmer

  • The evolution and state of interdisciplinary hyporheic research

    Adam S. Ward

  • Identifiability of transient storage model parameters along a mountain stream

    C. Kelleher;T. Wagener;B. McGlynn;A. S. Ward

  • A field comparison of multiple techniques to quantify groundwater–surface-water interactions

    Ricardo González-Pinzón;Adam S. Ward;Christine E. Hatch;Adam N. Wlostowski

  • Simulation of dynamic expansion, contraction, and connectivity in a mountain stream network

    Adam S. Ward;Noah M. Schmadel;Noah M. Schmadel;Steven M. Wondzell

  • Zero or not? Causes and consequences of zero-flow stream gage readings.

    Margaret A. Zimmer;Kendra E. Kaiser;Joanna R. Blaszczak;Samuel C. Zipper

  • Spatial Patterns and Drivers of Nonperennial Flow Regimes in the Contiguous United States

    John C. Hammond;Margaret Zimmer;Margaret Shanafield;Kendra Kaiser

  • How can subsurface modifications to hydraulic conductivity be designed as stream restoration structures? Analysis of Vaux's conceptual models to enhance hyporheic exchange

    Adam S. Ward;Adam S. Ward;Michael N. Gooseff;Peggy A. Johnson

  • Dynamics of Surface-Water Connectivity in a Low-Gradient Meandering River Floodplain

    Jonathan A. Czuba;Scott R. David;Douglas A. Edmonds;Adam S. Ward

  • Variations in surface water-ground water interactions along a headwater mountain stream: Comparisons between transient storage and water balance analyses

    Adam S. Ward;Robert A. Payn;Michael N. Gooseff;Brian L. McGlynn

  • River ecosystem conceptual models and non‐perennial rivers: A critical review

    Daniel C. Allen;Thibault Datry;Kate S. Boersma;Michael T. Bogan

  • Critical transition in critical zone of intensively managed landscapes

    Praveen Kumar;Phong V.V. Le;Phong V.V. Le;A. N.Thanos Papanicolaou;Bruce L. Rhoads

  • What's in a Name? Patterns, Trends, and Suggestions for Defining Non-Perennial Rivers and Streams.

    Michelle H Busch;Katie H Costigan;Ken M Fritz;Thibault Datry

  • How does rapidly changing discharge during storm events affect transient storage and channel water balance in a headwater mountain stream

    Adam S. Ward;Michael N. Gooseff;Thomas J. Voltz;Michael Fitzgerald

  • Advancing our predictive understanding of river corridor exchange

    Adam S. Ward;Aaron I. Packman

  • Hyporheic exchange controlled by dynamic hydrologic boundary conditions

    Noah M. Schmadel;Adam S. Ward;Christopher S. Lowry;Jonathan M. Malzone

  • Antecedent moisture controls on stream nitrate flux in an agricultural watershed.

    Caroline A. Davis;Adam S. Ward;Adam S. Ward;Amy J. Burgin;Terrance D. Loecke

Frequent Co-Authors

Michael N. Gooseff
Michael N. Gooseff University of Colorado Boulder
Kamini Singha
Kamini Singha Colorado School of Mines
Stefan Krause
Stefan Krause University of Birmingham
Steven M. Wondzell
Steven M. Wondzell US Forest Service
David M. Hannah
David M. Hannah University of Birmingham
Thibault Datry
Thibault Datry Centre national de la recherche scientifique, CNRS
Eugènia Martí
Eugènia Martí Spanish National Research Council
Aaron I. Packman
Aaron I. Packman Northwestern University
Jan H. Fleckenstein
Jan H. Fleckenstein University of Bayreuth
Ciaran J. Harman
Ciaran J. Harman Johns Hopkins University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Environmental Sciences often involves considering various educational routes, including online degrees that offer flexibility and affordability. For those interested in advancing to higher leadership roles, eds to edd programs provide specialized training in education administration and policy, which can be valuable for environmental education professionals.

Additionally, students passionate about social justice and community impact may find the dsw programs online an excellent path to gain expertise in social work at an advanced level. This complements environmental careers by addressing social dimensions of environmental issues.

For those looking for a broader approach, enrolling in one of the best affordable online general studies degree programs offers interdisciplinary knowledge that can be tailored towards environmental topics. This path is ideal for learners seeking versatile qualifications.

Moreover, obtaining an online degree doesn’t have to be overwhelming. Many students find that pursuing the easiest bachelor's degree to get online provides an accessible way to enter the workforce quickly while still gaining essential skills applicable to environmental careers.

Best Scientists Citing Adam S. Ward

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles