World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Durelle T. Scott

Durelle T. Scott

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Environmental Sciences 38 8580 8233 3069 2852 148 6530

Durelle T. Scott publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Durelle T. Scott between 1998 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Durelle T. Scott published across 28 years, from 1998 to 2025, averaging 5.6 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2019. 7 of the 158 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1998 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2019. 1998: 1 publication 1999: 0 publications 2000: 0 publications 2001: 0 publications 2002: 2 publications 2003: 2 publications 2004: 3 publications 2005: 3 publications 2006: 2 publications 2007: 3 publications 2008: 2 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 6 publications 2011: 11 publications 2012: 6 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 9 publications 2015: 5 publications 2016: 10 publications 2017: 13 publications 2018: 12 publications 2019: 21 publications 2020: 10 publications 2021: 7 publications 2022: 9 publications 2023: 2 publications 2024: 4 publications 2025: 3 publications
1998 2025

158 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Durelle T. Scott: publications per year, 1998 to 2025
Year Publications
1998 1
1999 0
2000 0
2001 0
2002 2
2003 2
2004 3
2005 3
2006 2
2007 3
2008 2
2009 5
2010 6
2011 11
2012 6
2013 7
2014 9
2015 5
2016 10
2017 13
2018 12
2019 21
2020 10
2021 7
2022 9
2023 2
2024 4
2025 3
Total 158
Download as CSV

Durelle T. Scott publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Durelle T. Scott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 66 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 41–50 to 690+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 617. Most scientists, 617, have 121–130 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 141–150 publications, is where this scientist sits. 41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 282 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 26 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 19 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–689 publications: 4 scientists 690+ publications: 100 scientists
41–50 publications 690+

This scientist: 148 publications — 40th percentile

40% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 690 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
41–50 21
51–60 62
61–70 133
71–80 257
81–90 361
91–100 440
101–110 492
111–120 541
121–130 617
131–140 544
141–150 541 148
151–160 539
161–170 444
171–180 444
181–190 400
191–200 377
201–210 318
211–220 282
221–230 263
231–240 220
241–250 217
251–260 180
261–270 181
271–280 155
281–290 130
291–300 127
301–310 130
311–320 85
321–330 106
331–340 80
341–350 83
351–360 75
361–370 69
371–380 52
381–390 54
391–400 56
401–410 44
411–420 40
421–430 36
431–440 25
441–450 25
451–460 32
461–470 29
471–480 21
481–490 26
491–500 26
501–510 17
511–520 19
521–530 15
531–540 22
541–550 12
551–560 15
561–570 11
571–580 19
581–590 9
591–600 9
601–610 7
611–620 11
621–630 5
631–640 5
641–650 6
651–660 3
661–670 3
671–680 4
681–689 4
690+ 100
Download as CSV

Durelle T. Scott D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Durelle T. Scott sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30 to 126+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 348. Most scientists, 348, have 45 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 38 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 198 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 20 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125 D-Index: 9 scientists 126+ D-Index: 92 scientists
30 D-Index 126+

This scientist: 38 D-Index — 12th percentile

12% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 126 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Environmental Sciences scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,676 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30 12
31 26
32 51
33 88
34 123
35 163
36 206
37 267
38 265 38
39 275
40 321
41 343
42 305
43 336
44 330
45 348
46 291
47 275
48 272
49 273
50 263
51 232
52 266
53 217
54 198
55 177
56 202
57 204
58 166
59 177
60 166
61 152
62 143
63 150
64 124
65 119
66 120
67 118
68 82
69 98
70 94
71 105
72 74
73 84
74 70
75 67
76 78
77 60
78 59
79 52
80 47
81 38
82 48
83 42
84 42
85 43
86 29
87 37
88 29
89 30
90 34
91 20
92 22
93 17
94 19
95 24
96 21
97 20
98 24
99 17
100 17
101 21
102 25
103 18
104 26
105 20
106 15
107 10
108 13
109 15
110 12
111 8
112 7
113 9
114 6
115 12
116 7
117 8
118 3
119 5
120 7
121 2
122 4
123 8
124 7
125 9
126+ 92
Download as CSV

Overview

Durelle T. Scott is affiliated with Virginia Tech in the United States, focusing primarily on environmental science with an emphasis on water-related studies. Their research encompasses a broad array of topics within this domain, addressing issues related to hydrology, stormwater management, and nutrient dynamics in soils and water systems.

The main fields of study for Durelle T. Scott include Environmental Science, with significant work in subfields such as Water Science and Technology, Environmental Engineering, Environmental Chemistry, Global and Planetary Change, and Ecology. These areas reflect an interdisciplinary approach to understanding water resources and their interaction with environmental processes.

Key topics covered in their research are:

  • Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
  • Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
  • Soil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
  • Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Hydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
  • Groundwater flow and contamination studies

Durelle T. Scott has contributed multiple papers across several respected publication venues. Frequent publishing platforms include the JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association, The Science of The Total Environment, Scientific Reports, Journal of Cleaner Production, and Frontiers in Remote Sensing.

Some of Scott's recent papers are:

  • "The effects of land use characteristics on urban stormwater quality and watershed pollutant loads" (2021) published in The Science of The Total Environment
  • "Efficacy of a retention pond in treating stormwater nutrients and sediment" (2021) published in Journal of Cleaner Production
  • "A spectrum of preferential flow alters solute mobility in soils" (2022) published in Scientific Reports
  • "Drone-based water sampling and characterization of three freshwater harmful algal blooms in the United States" (2022) published in Frontiers in Remote Sensing
  • "What are the relevant sources and factors affecting event mean concentrations (EMCs) of nutrients and sediment in stormwater?" (2022) published in The Science of The Total Environment

Frequent collaborators in research projects include David J. Sample, Mohammad Nayeb Yazdi, Erin R. Hotchkiss, Robert Burgholzer, and Joseph Kleiner. Their joint work spans topics related to water resources, stormwater treatment, and environmental chemistry.

Best Publications

  • Quinone Moieties Act as Electron Acceptors in the Reduction of Humic Substances by Humics-Reducing Microorganisms

    Durelle T. Scott;Diane M. McKnight;Elizabeth L. Blunt-Harris;Sarah E. Kolesar

  • Glaciers as a source of ancient and labile organic matter to the marine environment

    Eran Hood;Jason Fellman;Jason Fellman;Robert G. M. Spencer;Robert G. M. Spencer;Peter J. Hernes

  • Hot Spots and Hot Moments in Riparian Zones: Potential for Improved Water Quality Management

    Philippe Vidon;Craig Allan;Douglas Burns;Tim P. Duval

  • Hyporheic zone denitrification: Controls on effective reaction depth and contribution to whole-stream mass balance

    Judson W. Harvey;John Karl Böhlke;Mary A. Voytek;Durelle Scott

  • Dissolved organic matter (DOM) concentration and quality in a forested mid-Atlantic watershed, USA

    Shreeram Inamdar;Nina Finger;Shatrughan Singh;Myron Mitchell

  • Anthropogenic aerosols as a source of ancient dissolved organic matter in glaciers

    Aron Stubbins;Eran Hood;Peter A. Raymond;George R. Aiken

  • Fluorescence characteristics and sources of dissolved organic matter for stream water during storm events in a forested mid‐Atlantic watershed

    Shreeram Inamdar;Shatrughan Singh;Sudarshan Dutta;Delphis Levia

  • Riverine organic matter and nutrients in southeast Alaska affected by glacial coverage

    Eran Hood;Durelle Scott

  • On the role of groundwater and soil texture in the regional water balance: An investigation of the Nebraska Sand Hills, USA

    Tiejun Wang;Erkan Istanbulluoglu;John D. Lenters;Durelle T. Scott

  • River network saturation concept: factors influencing the balance of biogeochemical supply and demand of river networks

    W. M. Wollheim;S. Bernal;D. A. Burns;Jonathan A. Czuba

  • How hydrologic connectivity regulates water quality in river corridors

    Judson Harvey;Jesus Gomez-Velez;Noah Schmadel;Durelle Scott

  • Transport and cycling of iron and hydrogen peroxide in a freshwater stream: Influence of organic acids

    Durelle T. Scott;Durelle T. Scott;Robert L. Runkel;Diane M. McKnight;Bettina M. Voelker

  • Stream temperature response to variable glacier coverage in coastal watersheds of Southeast Alaska

    Jason B. Fellman;Sonia Nagorski;Sanjay Pyare;Andrew W. Vermilyea

  • An evaluation of HSPF and SWMM for simulating streamflow regimes in an urban watershed

    Mohammad Nayeb Yazdi;Mehdi Ketabchy;David J. Sample;Durelle Scott

  • Temporal variation in end‐member chemistry and its influence on runoff mixing patterns in a forested, Piedmont catchment

    Sherman Inamdar;Gurbir Dhillon;Shatrughan Singh;Sudarshan Dutta

  • Thresholds of lake and reservoir connectivity in river networks control nitrogen removal.

    Noah M. Schmadel;Judson W. Harvey;Richard B. Alexander;Gregory E. Schwarz

  • Dominance of organic nitrogen from headwater streams to large rivers across the conterminous United States

    Durelle Scott;Durelle Scott;Judson Harvey;Richard Alexander;Gregory Schwarz

  • Redox processes controlling manganese fate and transport in a mountain stream.

    Durelle T. Scott;Diane M. Mcknight;Bettina M. Voelker;Duane C. Hrncir

  • Automated calibration of a stream solute transport model: implications for interpretation of biogeochemical parameters

    Durelle T. Scott;Michael N. Gooseff;Kenneth E. Bencala;Robert L. Runkel

  • Ground-based thermography of fluvial systems at low and high discharge reveals potential complex thermal heterogeneity driven by flow variation and bioroughness

    M. Bayani Cardenas;Judson W. Harvey;Aaron I. Packman;Durelle T. Scott

  • Quantifying spatiotemporal variation in headwater stream length using flow intermittency sensors

    Carrie K. Jensen;Kevin J. McGuire;Daniel L. McLaughlin;Durelle T. Scott

Frequent Co-Authors

Judson W. Harvey
Judson W. Harvey United States Geological Survey
Eran Hood
Eran Hood University of Alaska Southeast
Elizabeth W. Boyer
Elizabeth W. Boyer Pennsylvania State University
Richard B. Alexander
Richard B. Alexander United States Geological Survey
Jason B. Fellman
Jason B. Fellman University of Alaska Southeast
Robert G. M. Spencer
Robert G. M. Spencer Florida State University
Diane M. McKnight
Diane M. McKnight University of Colorado Boulder
Delphis F. Levia
Delphis F. Levia University of Delaware
Myron J. Mitchell
Myron J. Mitchell SUNY College of Environmental Science and Forestry
Harsh P. Bais
Harsh P. Bais University of Delaware

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in advancing their education in Environmental Sciences, exploring related online degrees can open up diverse career pathways. Many professionals seek programs such as the 1 year phd programs online no dissertation, which allow for accelerated doctoral studies without the lengthy dissertation process. These programs are ideal for working adults aiming to balance career and education.

Educators looking to transition into leadership roles may consider an online eds to edd bridge program. This path provides a seamless way to progress from a Master of Education (EdS) to a Doctor of Education (EdD), equipping graduates with skills to influence environmental policy and academic curriculum development.

For those passionate about social impact within environmental contexts, dsw online programs represent an affordable route to attain a Doctorate in Social Work. Graduates can work on community resilience, advocacy, and sustainable development projects.

Lastly, an affordable online general studies degree offers a flexible foundation for students seeking interdisciplinary knowledge that complements environmental science careers. This versatility is valuable in adapting to evolving job markets focused on sustainability and environmental stewardship.

Best Scientists Citing Durelle T. Scott

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles