World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Environmental Sciences
Mexico
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Environmental Sciences

D-Index
46
Citations
8973
World Ranking
6027
National Ranking
5

Francisco J. Cervantes publication distribution in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Environmental Sciences in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco J. Cervantes sits on this spectrum.

41–50 publications: 21 scientists 51–60 publications: 62 scientists 61–70 publications: 133 scientists 71–80 publications: 257 scientists 81–90 publications: 361 scientists 91–100 publications: 440 scientists 101–110 publications: 492 scientists 111–120 publications: 541 scientists 121–130 publications: 617 scientists 131–140 publications: 544 scientists 141–150 publications: 541 scientists 151–160 publications: 539 scientists 161–170 publications: 444 scientists 171–180 publications: 444 scientists 181–190 publications: 400 scientists 191–200 publications: 377 scientists 201–210 publications: 318 scientists 211–220 publications: 283 scientists 221–230 publications: 263 scientists 231–240 publications: 220 scientists 241–250 publications: 217 scientists 251–260 publications: 180 scientists 261–270 publications: 181 scientists 271–280 publications: 155 scientists 281–290 publications: 130 scientists 291–300 publications: 127 scientists 301–310 publications: 130 scientists 311–320 publications: 85 scientists 321–330 publications: 106 scientists 331–340 publications: 80 scientists 341–350 publications: 83 scientists 351–360 publications: 75 scientists 361–370 publications: 69 scientists 371–380 publications: 52 scientists 381–390 publications: 54 scientists 391–400 publications: 56 scientists 401–410 publications: 44 scientists 411–420 publications: 40 scientists 421–430 publications: 36 scientists 431–440 publications: 25 scientists 441–450 publications: 25 scientists 451–460 publications: 32 scientists 461–470 publications: 29 scientists 471–480 publications: 21 scientists 481–490 publications: 26 scientists 491–500 publications: 25 scientists 501–510 publications: 17 scientists 511–520 publications: 18 scientists 521–530 publications: 15 scientists 531–540 publications: 22 scientists 541–550 publications: 12 scientists 551–560 publications: 15 scientists 561–570 publications: 11 scientists 571–580 publications: 19 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 9 scientists 601–610 publications: 7 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 5 scientists 631–640 publications: 5 scientists 641–650 publications: 6 scientists 651–660 publications: 3 scientists 661–670 publications: 3 scientists 671–680 publications: 4 scientists 681–686 publications: 3 scientists 687+ publications: 100 scientists
41 publications 687+

This scientist: 141 publications — 37th percentile

37% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 687 publications or more.

Francisco J. Cervantes D-index placement in Environmental Sciences in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Environmental Sciences scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Francisco J. Cervantes sits on this spectrum.

30 D-Index: 12 scientists 31 D-Index: 26 scientists 32 D-Index: 51 scientists 33 D-Index: 88 scientists 34 D-Index: 123 scientists 35 D-Index: 163 scientists 36 D-Index: 206 scientists 37 D-Index: 267 scientists 38 D-Index: 265 scientists 39 D-Index: 275 scientists 40 D-Index: 321 scientists 41 D-Index: 343 scientists 42 D-Index: 305 scientists 43 D-Index: 336 scientists 44 D-Index: 330 scientists 45 D-Index: 348 scientists 46 D-Index: 291 scientists 47 D-Index: 275 scientists 48 D-Index: 272 scientists 49 D-Index: 273 scientists 50 D-Index: 263 scientists 51 D-Index: 232 scientists 52 D-Index: 266 scientists 53 D-Index: 217 scientists 54 D-Index: 199 scientists 55 D-Index: 177 scientists 56 D-Index: 202 scientists 57 D-Index: 204 scientists 58 D-Index: 166 scientists 59 D-Index: 177 scientists 60 D-Index: 166 scientists 61 D-Index: 152 scientists 62 D-Index: 143 scientists 63 D-Index: 150 scientists 64 D-Index: 124 scientists 65 D-Index: 119 scientists 66 D-Index: 120 scientists 67 D-Index: 118 scientists 68 D-Index: 82 scientists 69 D-Index: 98 scientists 70 D-Index: 94 scientists 71 D-Index: 105 scientists 72 D-Index: 74 scientists 73 D-Index: 84 scientists 74 D-Index: 70 scientists 75 D-Index: 67 scientists 76 D-Index: 78 scientists 77 D-Index: 60 scientists 78 D-Index: 59 scientists 79 D-Index: 52 scientists 80 D-Index: 47 scientists 81 D-Index: 38 scientists 82 D-Index: 48 scientists 83 D-Index: 42 scientists 84 D-Index: 42 scientists 85 D-Index: 43 scientists 86 D-Index: 29 scientists 87 D-Index: 37 scientists 88 D-Index: 29 scientists 89 D-Index: 30 scientists 90 D-Index: 34 scientists 91 D-Index: 20 scientists 92 D-Index: 22 scientists 93 D-Index: 17 scientists 94 D-Index: 19 scientists 95 D-Index: 24 scientists 96 D-Index: 21 scientists 97 D-Index: 20 scientists 98 D-Index: 24 scientists 99 D-Index: 17 scientists 100 D-Index: 17 scientists 101 D-Index: 21 scientists 102 D-Index: 25 scientists 103 D-Index: 18 scientists 104 D-Index: 26 scientists 105 D-Index: 19 scientists 106 D-Index: 15 scientists 107 D-Index: 10 scientists 108 D-Index: 13 scientists 109 D-Index: 15 scientists 110 D-Index: 12 scientists 111 D-Index: 8 scientists 112 D-Index: 7 scientists 113 D-Index: 9 scientists 114 D-Index: 6 scientists 115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116 D-Index: 7 scientists 117 D-Index: 8 scientists 118 D-Index: 3 scientists 119 D-Index: 5 scientists 120 D-Index: 7 scientists 121 D-Index: 2 scientists 122 D-Index: 4 scientists 123 D-Index: 8 scientists 124 D-Index: 7 scientists 125+ D-Index: 99 scientists
30 D-Index 125+

This scientist: 46 D-Index — 39th percentile

39% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 125 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Environmental Sciences in Mexico Leader Award

Overview

Francisco J. Cervantes is affiliated with the National Autonomous University of Mexico in Mexico. Their research primarily focuses on environmental science and engineering, with significant contributions to the subfields of water science and technology, environmental chemistry, pollution, biomedical engineering, and environmental engineering.

The scientist's research topics cover a range of areas, including:

  • Wastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
  • Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
  • Membrane Separation Technologies
  • Methane Hydrates and Related Phenomena
  • Anaerobic Digestion and Biogas Production
  • Water Treatment and Disinfection
  • Environmental remediation with nanomaterials

Frequent coauthors in their published work include Edgardo I. Valenzuela, J. Rene Rangel-Mendez, Virginia Hernández-Montoya, Miguel A. Montes-Morán, and Aurora M. Pat-Espadas.

Common publication venues where Francisco J. Cervantes has contributed multiple articles are:

  • Journal of Water Process Engineering
  • International Journal of Hydrogen Energy
  • Journal of Chemical Technology & Biotechnology
  • The Science of The Total Environment
  • Biodegradation

Significant recent papers authored or coauthored by Cervantes include:

  • The role of humic substances in mitigating greenhouse gases emissions: Current knowledge and research gaps (2020), The Science of The Total Environment
  • Humic Substances Mediate Anaerobic Methane Oxidation Linked to Nitrous Oxide Reduction in Wetland Sediments (2020), Frontiers in Microbiology
  • Global transcriptional analysis of Geobacter sulfurreducens under palladium reducing conditions reveals new key cytochromes involved (2020), Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology
  • Novel biotechnologies for nitrogen removal and their coupling with gas emissions abatement in wastewater treatment facilities (2021), The Science of The Total Environment
  • Improved methane production from anaerobic digestion of liquid and raw fractions of swine manure effluent using activated carbon (2020), Journal of Water Process Engineering

The body of work demonstrates an emphasis on processes related to greenhouse gas emissions mitigation, anaerobic digestion, biogas production, nitrogen removal, and microbial bioremediation. This aligns with their broader engagement in environmental science efforts to improve water treatment and pollution control technologies.

Best Publications

  • Review paper on current technologies for decolourisation of textile wastewaters: Perspectives for anaerobic biotechnology

    André B. dos Santos;Francisco J. Cervantes;Francisco J. Cervantes;Jules B. van Lier

  • Impact and application of electron shuttles on the redox (bio)transformation of contaminants: a review.

    Frank P. Van der Zee;Francisco J. Cervantes

  • Competition between methanogenesis and quinone respiration for ecologically important substrates in anaerobic consortia.

    Francisco J Cervantes;Sjirk van der Velde;Gatze Lettinga;Jim A Field

  • Reduction of humic substances by halorespiring, sulphate-reducing and methanogenic microorganisms

    Francisco J. Cervantes;Frank A. M. de Bok;Tuan Duong-Dac;Alfons J. M. Stams

  • Colour removal of dyes from synthetic and real textile wastewaters in one- and two-stage anaerobic systems.

    Paulo Igor M. Firmino;Marcos Erick R. da Silva;Francisco J. Cervantes;André B. dos Santos

  • Effect of different redox mediators during thermophilic azo dye reduction by anaerobic granular sludge and comparative study between mesophilic (30 °C) and thermophilic (55 °C) treatments for decolourisation of textile wastewaters

    André B dos Santos;Iemke A.E Bisschops;Francisco J Cervantes;Jules B van Lier

  • Anaerobic methane oxidation driven by microbial reduction of natural organic matter in a tropical wetland

    Edgardo I. Valenzuela;Alejandra Prieto-Davó;Nguyen E. López-Lozano;Alberto Hernández-Eligio

  • Enhancing the electron transfer capacity and subsequent color removal in bioreactors by applying thermophilic anaerobic treatment and redox mediators

    A.B. dos Santos;J. Traverse;F.J. Cervantes;J.B. van Lier

  • Role of quinones in the biodegradation of priority pollutants: a review

    J.A. Field;F.J. Cervantes;F.P. van der Zee;G. Lettinga

  • Anaerobic mineralization of toluene by enriched sediments with quinones and humus as terminal electron acceptors.

    Francisco J. Cervantes;Wouter Dijksma;Tuan Duong-Dac;Anna Ivanova

  • Humus-reducing microorganisms and their valuable contribution in environmental processes.

    Claudia M. Martinez;Luis H. Alvarez;Lourdes B. Celis;Francisco J. Cervantes

  • Enhanced decolourisation of acid orange 7 in a continuous UASB reactor with quinones as redox mediators.

    F.J. Cervantes;F.P. van der Zee;G. Lettinga;J.A. Field

  • Thermal modification of activated carbon surface chemistry improves its capacity as redox mediator for azo dye reduction

    Luciana Pereira;Ricardo Pereira;M. F. R. Pereira;F. P. Van der Zee

  • Effect of redox mediator, AQDS, on the decolourisation of a reactive azo dye containing triazine group in a thermophilic anaerobic EGSB reactor

    A.B dos Santos;F.J Cervantes;R.E Yaya-Beas;J.B van Lier

  • Electron shuttling mediated by humic substances fuels anaerobic methane oxidation and carbon burial in wetland sediments

    Edgardo I. Valenzuela;Karen A. Avendaño;Nagamani Balagurusamy;Sonia Arriaga

  • Nitrogen removal from wastewaters at low C/N ratios with ammonium and acetate as electron donors.

    Francisco J. Cervantes;David A. De la Rosa;Jorge Gómez

  • Azo dye reduction by thermophilic anaerobic granular sludge, and the impact of the redox mediator anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) on the reductive biochemical transformation

    A. B. dos Santos;F. J. Cervantes;J. B. van Lier

  • Anaerobic ammonium oxidation linked to sulfate and ferric iron reduction fuels nitrogen loss in marine sediments.

    E. Emilia Rios-Del Toro;Edgardo I. Valenzuela;Nguyen E. López-Lozano;M. Guadalupe Cortés-Martínez

  • Effects of different quinoid redox mediators on the removal of sulphide and nitrate via denitrification

    Clicerio Aranda-Tamaura;María Isabel Estrada-Alvarado;Anne-Claire Texier;Flor Cuervo

  • Graphene oxide as electron shuttle for increased redox conversion of contaminants under methanogenic and sulfate-reducing conditions.

    Alejandra Colunga;J. Rene Rangel-Mendez;Lourdes B. Celis;Francisco J. Cervantes

  • Quinones as terminal electron acceptors for anaerobic microbial oxidation of phenolic compounds.

    Francisco J. Cervantes;Sjirk van der Velde;Gatze Lettinga;Jim A. Field

Frequent Co-Authors

Jim A. Field
Jim A. Field University of Arizona
Elías Razo-Flores
Elías Razo-Flores Instituto Potosino de Investigación Científica y Tecnológica
J.B. van Lier
J.B. van Lier Delft University of Technology
Gatze Lettinga
Gatze Lettinga Wageningen University & Research
Cristóbal N. Aguilar
Cristóbal N. Aguilar Autonomous University of Coahuila
Alfons J. M. Stams
Alfons J. M. Stams Wageningen University & Research
Germán Buitrón
Germán Buitrón National Autonomous University of Mexico
Jatinder N. D. Gupta
Jatinder N. D. Gupta University of Alabama in Huntsville
Ricardo Tapia
Ricardo Tapia National Autonomous University of Mexico
Reyes Sierra-Alvarez
Reyes Sierra-Alvarez University of Arizona

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Studying Environmental Sciences in the USA opens up diverse career opportunities across various sectors, from conservation and sustainability to policy development. For those interested in expanding their expertise, pursuing advanced education such as online doctoral programs can be an effective path. Resources listing top schools with eds to edd programs provide valuable options for educators and researchers aiming to specialize in environmental education or leadership roles.

Additionally, professionals seeking to integrate social work with environmental advocacy might consider affordable choices in mental health and community welfare through online dsw programs in social work. These programs equip graduates to address social dimensions linked to environmental issues.

For undergraduates wanting a flexible and cost-effective foundation, pursuing an online general studies bachelor degree cheap can be a practical first step. This route allows students to tailor coursework while maintaining affordability, making it easier to pivot into environmental careers.

Finally, those new to higher education or seeking an accessible start might explore options listed in easiest bachelor's degree to get. These programs often emphasize flexibility and foundational skills critical for sustainable career growth.

Best Scientists Citing Francisco J. Cervantes

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles