World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Neuroscience 33 9447 8716 3993 3610 46 4791

Olayinka A. Dina publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Olayinka A. Dina between 1988 and 2024, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Olayinka A. Dina published across 37 years, from 1988 to 2024, averaging 1.3 papers a year. Output peaked at 7 publications in 2008. 1 of the 48 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
2 4 6
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1988 to 2024. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 7. Peak 7 publications in 2008. 1988: 1 publication 1989: 0 publications 1990: 0 publications 1991: 1 publication 1992: 0 publications 1993: 0 publications 1994: 0 publications 1995: 0 publications 1996: 0 publications 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 0 publications 2000: 1 publication 2001: 2 publications 2002: 1 publication 2003: 1 publication 2004: 2 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 5 publications 2008: 7 publications 2009: 5 publications 2010: 4 publications 2011: 2 publications 2012: 1 publication 2013: 0 publications 2014: 0 publications 2015: 0 publications 2016: 0 publications 2017: 0 publications 2018: 0 publications 2019: 0 publications 2020: 0 publications 2021: 5 publications 2022: 0 publications 2023: 0 publications 2024: 1 publication
1988 2024

48 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Olayinka A. Dina: publications per year, 1988 to 2024
Year Publications
1988 1
1989 0
1990 0
1991 1
1992 0
1993 0
1994 0
1995 0
1996 0
1997 0
1998 0
1999 0
2000 1
2001 2
2002 1
2003 1
2004 2
2005 5
2006 4
2007 5
2008 7
2009 5
2010 4
2011 2
2012 1
2013 0
2014 0
2015 0
2016 0
2017 0
2018 0
2019 0
2020 0
2021 5
2022 0
2023 0
2024 1
Total 48
Download as CSV

Olayinka A. Dina publication distribution in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Neuroscience in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olayinka A. Dina sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 86 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 38–47 to 887+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 539. Most scientists, 539, have 98–107 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 38–47 publications, is where this scientist sits. 38–47 publications: 18 scientists 48–57 publications: 79 scientists 58–67 publications: 193 scientists 68–77 publications: 323 scientists 78–87 publications: 406 scientists 88–97 publications: 452 scientists 98–107 publications: 539 scientists 108–117 publications: 505 scientists 118–127 publications: 522 scientists 128–137 publications: 469 scientists 138–147 publications: 456 scientists 148–157 publications: 459 scientists 158–167 publications: 397 scientists 168–177 publications: 383 scientists 178–187 publications: 350 scientists 188–197 publications: 302 scientists 198–207 publications: 306 scientists 208–217 publications: 262 scientists 218–227 publications: 242 scientists 228–237 publications: 220 scientists 238–247 publications: 203 scientists 248–257 publications: 174 scientists 258–267 publications: 176 scientists 268–277 publications: 175 scientists 278–287 publications: 125 scientists 288–297 publications: 116 scientists 298–307 publications: 127 scientists 308–317 publications: 128 scientists 318–327 publications: 99 scientists 328–337 publications: 89 scientists 338–347 publications: 78 scientists 348–357 publications: 96 scientists 358–367 publications: 66 scientists 368–377 publications: 59 scientists 378–387 publications: 65 scientists 388–397 publications: 54 scientists 398–407 publications: 48 scientists 408–417 publications: 49 scientists 418–427 publications: 34 scientists 428–437 publications: 31 scientists 438–447 publications: 30 scientists 448–457 publications: 31 scientists 458–467 publications: 36 scientists 468–477 publications: 40 scientists 478–487 publications: 35 scientists 488–497 publications: 30 scientists 498–507 publications: 23 scientists 508–517 publications: 26 scientists 518–527 publications: 20 scientists 528–537 publications: 23 scientists 538–547 publications: 20 scientists 548–557 publications: 20 scientists 558–567 publications: 17 scientists 568–577 publications: 14 scientists 578–587 publications: 20 scientists 588–597 publications: 20 scientists 598–607 publications: 19 scientists 608–617 publications: 18 scientists 618–627 publications: 17 scientists 628–637 publications: 11 scientists 638–647 publications: 11 scientists 648–657 publications: 11 scientists 658–667 publications: 8 scientists 668–677 publications: 7 scientists 678–687 publications: 11 scientists 688–697 publications: 10 scientists 698–707 publications: 4 scientists 708–717 publications: 6 scientists 718–727 publications: 5 scientists 728–737 publications: 5 scientists 738–747 publications: 9 scientists 748–757 publications: 9 scientists 758–767 publications: 3 scientists 768–777 publications: 7 scientists 778–787 publications: 7 scientists 788–797 publications: 6 scientists 798–807 publications: 2 scientists 808–817 publications: 2 scientists 818–827 publications: 7 scientists 828–837 publications: 0 scientists 838–847 publications: 9 scientists 848–857 publications: 3 scientists 858–867 publications: 1 scientist 868–877 publications: 3 scientists 878–886 publications: 6 scientists 887+ publications: 100 scientists
38–47 publications 887+

This scientist: 46 publications — 1st percentile

1% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 887 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
38–47 18 46
48–57 79
58–67 193
68–77 323
78–87 406
88–97 452
98–107 539
108–117 505
118–127 522
128–137 469
138–147 456
148–157 459
158–167 397
168–177 383
178–187 350
188–197 302
198–207 306
208–217 262
218–227 242
228–237 220
238–247 203
248–257 174
258–267 176
268–277 175
278–287 125
288–297 116
298–307 127
308–317 128
318–327 99
328–337 89
338–347 78
348–357 96
358–367 66
368–377 59
378–387 65
388–397 54
398–407 48
408–417 49
418–427 34
428–437 31
438–447 30
448–457 31
458–467 36
468–477 40
478–487 35
488–497 30
498–507 23
508–517 26
518–527 20
528–537 23
538–547 20
548–557 20
558–567 17
568–577 14
578–587 20
588–597 20
598–607 19
608–617 18
618–627 17
628–637 11
638–647 11
648–657 11
658–667 8
668–677 7
678–687 11
688–697 10
698–707 4
708–717 6
718–727 5
728–737 5
738–747 9
748–757 9
758–767 3
768–777 7
778–787 7
788–797 6
798–807 2
808–817 2
818–827 7
828–837 0
838–847 9
848–857 3
858–867 1
868–877 3
878–886 6
887+ 100
Download as CSV

Olayinka A. Dina D-index placement in Neuroscience in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Neuroscience scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Olayinka A. Dina sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
100 200 300 400 500
Bar chart with 68 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 163+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 512. Most scientists, 512, have 46–47 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 32–33 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 42 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 172 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 296 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 435 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 459 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 456 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 467 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 478 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 512 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 435 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 425 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 418 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 392 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 357 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 334 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 328 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 260 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 278 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 239 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 250 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 210 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 200 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 189 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 170 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 146 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 113 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 126 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 100 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 84 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 99 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 84 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 85 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 72 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 76 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 45 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 49 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 43 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 32 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 45 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 50 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 32 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 39 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 29 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 27 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 19 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 23 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 27 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 16 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 24 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 13 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 21 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 17 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 14 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 15 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 10 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 10 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 13 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 9 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 8 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 6 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 6 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 7 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 7 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 10 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 4 scientists 162 D-Index: 8 scientists 163+ D-Index: 100 scientists
30–31 D-Index 163+

This scientist: 33 D-Index — 2nd percentile

2% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 163 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Neuroscience scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 9,597 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 42
32–33 172 33
34–35 296
36–37 435
38–39 459
40–41 456
42–43 467
44–45 478
46–47 512
48–49 435
50–51 425
52–53 418
54–55 392
56–57 357
58–59 334
60–61 328
62–63 260
64–65 278
66–67 239
68–69 250
70–71 210
72–73 200
74–75 189
76–77 170
78–79 146
80–81 113
82–83 126
84–85 100
86–87 84
88–89 99
90–91 84
92–93 85
94–95 72
96–97 76
98–99 45
100–101 49
102–103 43
104–105 32
106–107 45
108–109 50
110–111 32
112–113 39
114–115 32
116–117 29
118–119 27
120–121 19
122–123 23
124–125 27
126–127 16
128–129 24
130–131 13
132–133 21
134–135 17
136–137 14
138–139 15
140–141 10
142–143 10
144–145 13
146–147 9
148–149 8
150–151 6
152–153 6
154–155 7
156–157 7
158–159 10
160–161 4
162 8
163+ 100
Download as CSV

Overview

Olayinka A. Dina is affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco in the United States. Their research spans multiple fields, focusing primarily on Medicine as well as Materials Science.

Their work covers several subfields, including:

  • Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
  • Materials Chemistry
  • Physiology

Key topics in their research include:

  • Lanthanide and Transition Metal Complexes
  • Medical Imaging Techniques and Applications
  • Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry and Applications
  • Nutrition and Health in Aging

Dina has contributed to the scientific literature with recent publications appearing in journals such as the Annals of Oncology. One identified paper is titled 1822P Incidence of cachexia and health resource use (HRU) in patients with breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, and prostate cancers, published in 2024.

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several co-authors, including:

  • Adebayo Laniyonu
  • Yanli Ouyang
  • Sunny Awe
  • S. Biade
  • Sally J. Hargus

Their work has appeared mainly in the Annals of Oncology, which is one of the frequent publication venues they have contributed to.

Best Publications

  • Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4 Is Essential in Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathic Pain in the Rat

    Nicole Alessandri-Haber;Olayinka A. Dina;Jenny J. Yeh;Carlos Amílcar Parada

  • Epac mediates a cAMP-to-PKC signaling in inflammatory pain: an isolectin B4(+) neuron-specific mechanism.

    Tim B Hucho;Olayinka A Dina;Jon D Levine

  • TRPC1 and TRPC6 channels cooperate with TRPV4 to mediate mechanical hyperalgesia and nociceptor sensitization.

    Nicole Alessandri-Haber;Olayinka A. Dina;Xiaoje Chen;Jon D. Levine

  • A Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4-Dependent Mechanism of Hyperalgesia Is Engaged by Concerted Action of Inflammatory Mediators

    Nicole Alessandri-Haber;Olayinka A Dina;Elizabeth K Joseph;David Reichling

  • TRPV4 mediates pain-related behavior induced by mild hypertonic stimuli in the presence of inflammatory mediator.

    Nicole Alessandri-Haber;Elizabeth Joseph;Olayinka A. Dina;Wolfgang Liedtke

  • Interaction of Transient Receptor Potential Vanilloid 4, Integrin, and Src Tyrosine Kinase in Mechanical Hyperalgesia

    Nicole Alessandri-Haber;Olayinka A. Dina;Elizabeth K. Joseph;David B. Reichling

  • Stress Induces a Switch of Intracellular Signaling in Sensory Neurons in a Model of Generalized Pain

    Sachia G. Khasar;Jennifer Burkham;Olayinka A. Dina;Adrienne S. Brown

  • Role of protein kinase Cepsilon and protein kinase A in a model of paclitaxel-induced painful peripheral neuropathy in the rat.

    O.A Dina;X Chen;D Reichling;J.D Levine

  • Role of interleukin-6 in chronic muscle hyperalgesic priming.

    Olayinka A. Dina;Paul G. Green;Jon D. Levine

  • Key role for the epsilon isoform of protein kinase C in painful alcoholic neuropathy in the rat.

    Olayinka A. Dina;Justine Barletta;Xiaojie Chen;Annick Mutero

  • Primary afferent nociceptor mechanisms mediating NGF-induced mechanical hyperalgesia.

    Misbah Malik-Hall;Olayinka A Dina;Jon D Levine

  • Role of the sensory neuron cytoskeleton in second messenger signaling for inflammatory pain.

    Olayinka A Dina;Gordon C McCarter;Catherine de Coupade;Jon D Levine

  • Integrin signaling in inflammatory and neuropathic pain in the rat

    Olayinka A. Dina;Carlos Amílcar Parada;Jenny Yeh;Xiaojie Chen

  • Estrogen controls PKCε‐dependent mechanical hyperalgesia through direct action on nociceptive neurons

    Tim B. Hucho;Olayinka A. Dina;Julia Kuhn;Jon D. Levine

  • Sound stress-induced long-term enhancement of mechanical hyperalgesia in rats is maintained by sympathoadrenal catecholamines.

    Sachia G. Khasar;Olayinka A. Dina;Paul G. Green;Jon D. Levine

  • Sex hormones regulate the contribution of PKCε and PKA signalling in inflammatory pain in the rat

    Olayinka A. Dina;K. O. Aley;William Isenberg;Robert O. Messing

  • Proinflammatory cytokines mediating burn-injury pain.

    Gretchen J. Summer;Edgar Alfonso Romero-Sandoval;Oliver Bogen;Olayinka A. Dina

  • GPR30 estrogen receptor agonists induce mechanical hyperalgesia in the rat

    Julia Kuhn;Olayinka A. Dina;Chandan Goswami;Vanessa Suckow

  • Ethanol withdrawal induces hyperalgesia mediated by PKCε

    Olayinka A. Dina;Robert O. Messing;Jon D. Levine

  • Primary afferent second messenger cascades interact with specific integrin subunits in producing inflammatory hyperalgesia.

    Olayinka A. Dina;Tim Hucho;Jenny Yeh;Misbah Malik-Hall

  • Alcohol‐induced stress in painful alcoholic neuropathy

    Olayinka A. Dina;Sachia G. Khasar;Nicole Alessandri-Haber;Paul G. Green

Frequent Co-Authors

Jon D. Levine
Jon D. Levine University of California, San Francisco
David B. Reichling
David B. Reichling University of California, San Francisco
Robert O. Messing
Robert O. Messing The University of Texas at Austin
Antonio Ferrer-Montiel
Antonio Ferrer-Montiel Miguel Hernandez University
Hans-Hilger Ropers
Hans-Hilger Ropers Max Planck Society
Christine Miaskowski
Christine Miaskowski University of California, San Francisco
Wolfgang LiedtkeRegeneron
Wolfgang LiedtkeRegeneron Regeneron (United States)

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

If you're exploring Neuroscience, several related online degrees can open doors to rewarding careers in mental health and behavioral sciences. Many students interested in the brain and behavior also consider accelerated psychology programs online for a faster track into roles in research, counseling, or clinical work.

For those passionate about human services, pursuing an accelerated social work degree can lead to impactful positions addressing mental health and community well-being. These programs are designed for flexibility and speed, helping you launch your career sooner.

If counseling is your goal, consider the cacrep accredited counseling programs for high-quality training recognized by employers nationwide. Alternatively, you can explore online masters counseling programs to deepen your understanding of psychological health and therapy, blending flexible study with professional preparation.

These online pathways allow you to blend your Neuroscience foundation with practical skills for diverse roles, from therapy and counseling to research and social advocacy.

Best Scientists Citing Olayinka A. Dina

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles