World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
12268
World Ranking
11883
National Ranking
362

Richard Nock publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Nock sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 250 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Richard Nock D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Richard Nock sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Richard Nock is affiliated with the Australian National University in Australia and primarily works within the field of computer science. Their research extensively covers artificial intelligence, computer vision and pattern recognition, cognitive neuroscience, statistics and probability, as well as statistical and nonlinear physics.

Their scholarly output includes a significant focus on topics such as machine learning and data classification, machine learning and algorithms, adversarial robustness in machine learning, domain adaptation and few-shot learning, generative adversarial networks and image synthesis, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and human pose and action recognition.

Some of the recent publications attributed to Richard Nock include:

  • Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning (2020), published in Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
  • Adversarial Vulnerabilities of Human Decision-Making (2020), published in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • Manifold Learning Benefits GANs (2022), presented at the 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)
  • SMINT (2020), published in ACM Transactions on the Web
  • Generalised Lipschitz Regularisation Equals Distributional Robustness (2020), published on arXiv (Cornell University)

Frequent co-authors include:

  • Frank Nielsen
  • Ehsan Amid
  • Manfred K. Warmuth
  • Sanmi Koyejo
  • Piotr Koniusz

Richard Nock's research has been disseminated through various publication venues, with multiple papers appearing in:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • Foundations and Trends® in Machine Learning
  • 2022 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR)

Best Publications

  • Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning

    Peter Kairouz;H. Brendan McMahan;Brendan Avent;Aurélien Bellet

  • Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: A Loss Correction Approach

    Giorgio Patrini;Giorgio Patrini;Alessandro Rozza;Aditya Krishna Menon;Aditya Krishna Menon;Richard Nock;Richard Nock;Richard Nock

  • Advances and open problems in federated learning

    Peter Kairouz;H. Brendan McMahan;Brendan Avent;Aurélien Bellet

  • Statistical region merging

    R. Nock;F. Nielsen

  • Private federated learning on vertically partitioned data via entity resolution and additively homomorphic encryption.

    Stephen Hardy;Wilko Henecka;Hamish Ivey-Law;Richard Nock

  • Adaptive Subspaces for Few-Shot Learning

    Christian Simon;Piotr Koniusz;Richard Nock;Mehrtash Harandi

  • On weighting clustering

    R. Nock;F. Nielsen

  • Sided and Symmetrized Bregman Centroids

    F. Nielsen;R. Nock

  • A hybrid filter/wrapper approach of feature selection using information theory

    Marc Sebban;Richard Nock

  • Bregman Voronoi Diagrams

    Jean-Daniel Boissonnat;Frank Nielsen;Richard Nock

  • Learning and evaluation in the presence of class hierarchies: application to text categorization

    Svetlana Kiritchenko;Stan Matwin;Richard Nock;A. Fazel Famili

  • Bregman Voronoi Diagrams: Properties, Algorithms and Applications

    Jean-Daniel Boissonnat;Frank Nielsen;Richard Nock

  • A closed-form expression for the Sharma-Mittal entropy of exponential families

    Frank Nielsen;Richard Nock

  • On Bregman Voronoi diagrams

    Frank Nielsen;Jean-Daniel Boissonnat;Richard Nock

  • Almost) No Label No Cry

    Giorgio Patrini;Richard Nock;Tiberio Caetano;Paul Rivera

  • Entropies and cross-entropies of exponential families

    Frank Nielsen;Richard Nock

  • Entity Resolution and Federated Learning get a Federated Resolution.

    Richard Nock;Stephen Hardy;Wilko Henecka;Hamish Ivey-Law

  • Bregman Divergences and Surrogates for Learning

    R. Nock;F. Nielsen

  • Making Deep Neural Networks Robust to Label Noise: a Loss Correction Approach

    Giorgio Patrini;Giorgio Patrini;Alessandro Rozza;Aditya Menon;Aditya Menon;Richard Nock;Richard Nock;Richard Nock

  • Fitting the smallest enclosing bregman ball

    Richard Nock;Frank Nielsen

  • Loss factorization, weakly supervised learning and label noise robustness

    Giorgio Patrini;Frank Nielsen;Richard Nock;Marcello Carioni

  • Impact of learning set quality and size on decision tree performances.

    Marc Sebban;Richard Nock;Jean-Hugues Chauchat;Ricco Rakotomalala

  • A Real generalization of discrete AdaBoost

    Richard Nock;Frank Nielsen

Frequent Co-Authors

Frank Nielsen
Frank Nielsen Sony Computer Science Laboratories
Aditya Krishna Menon
Aditya Krishna Menon Google (United States)
Michel Barlaud
Michel Barlaud Université Côte d'Azur
Robert C. Williamson
Robert C. Williamson University of Tübingen
Peter Dayan
Peter Dayan Max Planck Institute for Biological Cybernetics
Jean-Daniel Boissonnat
Jean-Daniel Boissonnat Université Côte d'Azur
Shun-ichi Amari
Shun-ichi Amari RIKEN Center for Brain Science
Mehrtash Harandi
Mehrtash Harandi Monash University
Piotr Koniusz
Piotr Koniusz University of New South Wales

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degrees can open doors to a wide range of technology careers. Many students interested in computer science also consider programs such as data science, which can be started affordably. If you're curious, check out the data science learning path to understand cost-effective options available in the US.

For those who want a strong foundation in both hardware and software, an electrical engineering degree online admissions process can help you qualify for careers in systems design, robotics, and advanced electronics—often with flexible schedules.

Shorter programs are also available. Some tech-related easy licenses and certifications to get provide quick credentials that can lead to well-paid careers, even for those just starting out or seeking a career change.

Finally, if your goal is an advanced degree without spending years in school, several universities offer the quickest masters degree online, helping you graduate in less time and enter the job market sooner.

Best Scientists Citing Richard Nock

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles