World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
121
Citations
79307
World Ranking
3537
National Ranking
1947

John B. Wong publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Wong sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 523 publications — 62nd percentile

62% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

John B. Wong D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where John B. Wong sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 121 D-Index — 83rd percentile

83% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

John B. Wong is affiliated with Tufts University in the United States and has a research portfolio primarily centered in the field of Medicine, with a focus on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics, Oncology, and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine.

Their recent publications demonstrate involvement in cancer screening, tobacco cessation, diabetes prevention, and maternal health. Notable papers include:

  • Screening for Colorectal Cancer, 2021, JAMA
  • Screening for Lung Cancer, 2021, JAMA
  • Interventions for Tobacco Smoking Cessation in Adults, Including Pregnant Persons, 2021, JAMA
  • Screening for Prediabetes and Type 2 Diabetes, 2021, JAMA
  • Aspirin Use to Prevent Preeclampsia and Related Morbidity and Mortality, 2021, JAMA

Their frequent co-authors include Michael J. Barry, Katrina E Donahue, Esa M. Davis, James Stevermer, and Lori Pbert, each contributing substantially to collaborative research projects.

John B. Wong has published extensively in several venues, with the highest number of contributions appearing in:

  • JAMA (63 publications)
  • Current Developments in Nutrition (6 publications)
  • JAMA Network Open (4 publications)
  • Journal of the American Society of Nephrology (4 publications)
  • Value in Health (4 publications)

Their work addresses a variety of topics that intersect health systems, quality of life assessments, obesity and diet, healthcare costs and practices, food security in diverse populations, patient-provider communication, and palliative care.

  • Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
  • Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet
  • Nutritional Studies and Diet
  • Healthcare cost, quality, practices
  • Food Security and Health in Diverse Populations
  • Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues

This profile reflects a multidisciplinary approach within medical research, combining clinical focus areas with health economics and patient care methodologies.

Best Publications

  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs: 2016 update

    Josef S Smolen;Robert Landewé;Ferdinand C Breedveld;Maya Buch;Maya Buch

  • Update on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of chronic hepatitis B: AASLD 2018 hepatitis B guidance

    Norah A. Terrault;Anna S.F. Lok;Brian J. McMahon;Kyong Mi Chang

  • Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025.

    Russel Burge;Russel Burge;Bess Dawson-Hughes;Daniel H Solomon;John B Wong

  • Prevention and management of gastroesophageal varices and variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis.

    Guadalupe Garcia-Tsao;Arun J. Sanyal;Norman D. Grace;William D. Carey

  • Fracture Prevention With Vitamin D Supplementation: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari;Walter C. Willett;John B. Wong;Edward Giovannucci

  • Effect of Vitamin D on falls: a meta-analysis

    Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari;Bess Dawson-Hughes;Walter C. Willett;Hannes B. Staehelin

  • Fall prevention with supplemental and active forms of vitamin D: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

    Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari;B. Dawson-Hughes;Hannes B. Staehelin;John E. Orav

  • Decision Making in Health and Medicine: Integrating Evidence and Values

    M. G Myriam Hunink;Milton C. Weinstein;Eve Wittenberg;Michael F. Drummond

  • Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    US Preventive Services Task Force;Susan J Curry;Alex H Krist;Douglas K Owens;Douglas K Owens

  • Early virologic response to treatment with peginterferon alfa‐2b plus ribavirin in patients with chronic hepatitis C

    Gary L. Davis;John B. Wong;John G. McHutchison;Michael P. Manns

  • Prevention of Nonvertebral Fractures With Oral Vitamin D and Dose Dependency: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

    Heike A. Bischoff-Ferrari;Walter C. Willett;John B. Wong;Andreas E. Stuck

  • Model transparency and validation: a report of the ISPOR-SMDM Modeling Good Research Practices Task Force-7

    David M. Eddy;William Hollingworth;J. Jaime Caro;Joel Tsevat

  • Screening for Lung Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement.

    US Preventive Services Task Force;Alex H Krist;Karina W Davidson;Carol M Mangione

  • Effect of failed extubation on the outcome of mechanical ventilation

    Scott K. Epstein;Ronald L. Ciubotaru;John B. Wong

  • Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs.

    R. Scott Braithwaite;Nananda F. Col;John B. Wong

  • Hepatitis C Guidance 2018 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection

    Raymond T. Chung;Marc G. Ghany;Arthur Y. Kim;Kristen M. Marks

  • Estimating future hepatitis C morbidity, mortality, and costs in the United States.

    John B. Wong;Geraldine M. Mcquillan;John G. Mchutchison;Thierry Poynard

  • Comparative Effectiveness of Pharmacologic Interventions for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

    Raveendhara R. Bannuru;Christopher H. Schmid;David M. Kent;Elizaveta E. Vaysbrot

  • Meta-analysis: The Effect of Dietary Counseling for Weight Loss

    Michael L Dansinger;Athina Tatsioni;John B Wong;Mei Chung

  • EULAR recommendations for the management of rheumatoid arthritis with synthetic and biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs

    J. S. Smolen;R. Landewé;F. C. Breedveld;M. Dougados

Frequent Co-Authors

Stephen G. Pauker
Stephen G. Pauker Tufts Medical Center
Thomas A Trikalinos
Thomas A Trikalinos Brown University
Chyke A. Doubeni
Chyke A. Doubeni The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Alex H. Krist
Alex H. Krist Virginia Commonwealth University
Karina W. Davidson
Karina W. Davidson Feinstein Institute for Medical Research
Michael J. Barry
Michael J. Barry Harvard University
Aaron B. Caughey
Aaron B. Caughey Oregon Health & Science University
Carol M. Mangione
Carol M. Mangione University of California, Los Angeles
Melissa A. Simon
Melissa A. Simon Northwestern University
C. Seth Landefeld
C. Seth Landefeld University of Alabama at Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

For those interested in healthcare but looking for flexible study options, there are many affordable online degrees and career pathways beyond traditional medical school. Online programs in nursing offer robust training with the convenience of studying from home.

Aspiring nurse practitioners can benefit from the cheapest np programs online, which provide advanced clinical skills at a lower cost. Similarly, students can begin their nursing careers by exploring affordable nursing programs designed for flexibility and value.

Already an RN? You may consider advancing your credentials with the cheapest rn to bsn program online, enabling greater job opportunities and higher earning potential. For those interested in research or academic leadership, online nursing doctoral programs can open doors to a new level of expertise.

These online degrees help pave diverse career pathways in healthcare, whether you’re starting out or advancing your skills, providing accessible and affordable options to build a future in medicine.

Best Scientists Citing John B. Wong

Trending Scientists