World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
82
Citations
33178
World Ranking
15909
National Ranking
8007

Stephen G. Pauker publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen G. Pauker sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 305 publications — 18th percentile

18% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Stephen G. Pauker D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Stephen G. Pauker sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 82 D-Index — 21st percentile

21% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 1997 - Member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM)
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians
  • Member of the Association of American Physicians

Overview

Stephen G. Pauker is affiliated with Tufts Medical Center in the United States. Their research contributions encompass various aspects of medical science, although specific details regarding their primary fields or subfields of study have not been provided.

Throughout their career, they have not been noted to have frequent co-authors, nor is there specific information about recurring publication venues for their work. Likewise, there is no data listing recent papers or book publications linked to their name.

Stephen G. Pauker has been recognized by several professional organizations. They became a member of the National Academy of Medicine (NAM) in 1997. Additionally, they hold membership in the Association of American Physicians, reflecting a role in prominent medical communities.

The absence of detailed records on publication output, research topics, fields of study, and collaborations limits a comprehensive overview of their scientific contributions beyond institutional affiliation and professional recognition.

Best Publications

  • Prevention of VTE in Nonsurgical Patients: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Yngve Falck-Ytter;Charles W. Francis;Norman A. Johanson;Catherine Curley

  • On the Elicitation of Preferences for Alternative Therapies

    Barbara J. McNeil;Stephen G. Pauker;Harold C. Sox;Amos Tversky

  • Prevention of VTE in Orthopedic Surgery Patients

    Yngve Falck-Ytter;Charles W. Francis;Norman A. Johanson;Catherine Curley

  • The threshold approach to clinical decision making.

    Stephen G. Pauker;Jerome P. Kassirer

  • The Markov Process in Medical Prognosis

    J.Robert Beck;Stephen G. Pauker

  • Diagnosis of DVT: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines

    Shannon M. Bates;Roman Jaeschke;Scott M. Stevens;Steven Goodacre

  • Speech and survival: tradeoffs between quality and quantity of life in laryngeal cancer.

    Barbara J. McNeil;Ralph Weichselbaum;Stephen G. Pauker

  • Fallacy of the five-year survival in lung cancer

    Barbara J. McNeil;Ralph Weichselbaum;Stephen G. Pauker

  • Categorical and probabilistic reasoning in medical diagnosis

    Peter Szolovits;Stephen G. Pauker

  • Therapeutic decision making: a cost-benefit analysis.

    Stephen G. Pauker;Jerome P. Kassirer

  • A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing coronary artery bypass graft with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty: one- to eight-year outcomes

    Stuart N Hoffman;John A TenBrook;Michael P Wolf;Stephen G Pauker

  • Towards the simulation of clinical cognition: Taking a present illness by computer

    Stephen G. Pauker;G.Anthony Gorry;Jerome P. Kassirer;William B. Schwartz

  • Antithrombotic Therapy in Valvular Heart Disease—Native and Prosthetic: The Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy

    Deeb N. Salem;Paul D. Stein;Amin Al-Ahmad;Henry I. Bussey

  • Screening for prostate cancer. A decision analytic view.

    Murray D. Krahn;John E. Mahoney;Mark H. Eckman;John Trachtenberg

  • Auranofin therapy and quality of life in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Results of a multicenter trial

    Claire Bombardier;James Ware;I.Jon Russell;Martin Larson

  • A convenient approximation of life expectancy (the “DEALE”): I. validation of the method

    J R Beck;J P Kassirer;S G Pauker

  • A convenient approximation of life expectancy (the “DEALE”): II. Use in medical decision-making

    J.Robert Beck;Stephen G. Pauker;Jonathan E. Gottlieb;Karen Klein

  • Estimates of the Cost-Effectiveness of a Single Course of Interferon-α2b in Patients with Histologically Mild Chronic Hepatitis C

    W G Bennett;Y Inoue;J R Beck;J B Wong

  • Decision analysis: a progress report.

    Jerome P. Kassirer;Alan J. Moskowitz;Joseph Lau;Stephen G. Pauker

  • Patient-specific decisions about hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women

    Nananda F. Col;Mark H. Eckman;Richard H. Karas;Stephen G. Pauker

Frequent Co-Authors

John B. Wong
John B. Wong Tufts University
Jerome P. Kassirer
Jerome P. Kassirer Tufts University
Barbara J. McNeil
Barbara J. McNeil Harvard University
Joseph Lau
Joseph Lau Chinese University of Hong Kong
Benjamin Djulbegovic
Benjamin Djulbegovic City Of Hope National Medical Center
Andrew S. Levey
Andrew S. Levey Tufts Medical Center
Richard H. Karas
Richard H. Karas Tufts University
Gordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt McMaster University
N.A. Mark Estes
N.A. Mark Estes Tufts Medical Center

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

The pathway to a medical career in the USA is diverse, with many online degree options and career advancements available. For nurses seeking to progress, asn to fnp programs provide a bridge from an Associate’s degree in Nursing to becoming a Family Nurse Practitioner. These programs are designed for working professionals and combine flexible schedules with clinical practice.

Those interested in promoting wellness through food science might consider online degrees in nutrition. These degrees open doors to careers in clinical nutrition, health education, and research, all of which are critical roles within healthcare.

For students leaning toward leadership and operations, accredited programs such as cahme accredited online healthcare administration programs offer rigorous preparation for administrative and executive roles within medical organizations.

Another popular choice among registered nurses is pursuing rn bsn online programs no clinicals, which allow RNs to earn a Bachelor of Science in Nursing entirely online, often without additional clinical requirements. These programs expand theoretical knowledge and career opportunities while offering maximum flexibility.

Best Scientists Citing Stephen G. Pauker

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles