World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Psychology 36 9384 8770 4968 4526 136 7910

Joy J. Geng publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Joy J. Geng between 2001 and 2025, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Joy J. Geng published across 25 years, from 2001 to 2025, averaging 7 papers a year. Output peaked at 21 publications in 2025. 36 of the 176 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
5 10 15 20
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 2001 to 2025. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 21. Peak 21 publications in 2025. 2001: 1 publication 2002: 1 publication 2003: 2 publications 2004: 1 publication 2005: 3 publications 2006: 4 publications 2007: 1 publication 2008: 0 publications 2009: 4 publications 2010: 7 publications 2011: 7 publications 2012: 5 publications 2013: 7 publications 2014: 10 publications 2015: 8 publications 2016: 6 publications 2017: 6 publications 2018: 10 publications 2019: 9 publications 2020: 12 publications 2021: 15 publications 2022: 11 publications 2023: 10 publications 2024: 15 publications 2025: 21 publications
2001 2025

176 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Joy J. Geng: publications per year, 2001 to 2025
Year Publications
2001 1
2002 1
2003 2
2004 1
2005 3
2006 4
2007 1
2008 0
2009 4
2010 7
2011 7
2012 5
2013 7
2014 10
2015 8
2016 6
2017 6
2018 10
2019 9
2020 12
2021 15
2022 11
2023 10
2024 15
2025 21
Total 176
Download as CSV

Joy J. Geng publication distribution in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Psychology in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joy J. Geng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 69 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 31–40 to 705+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 736. Most scientists, 736, have 101–110 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 131–140 publications, is where this scientist sits. 31–40 publications: 6 scientists 41–50 publications: 52 scientists 51–60 publications: 138 scientists 61–70 publications: 299 scientists 71–80 publications: 461 scientists 81–90 publications: 605 scientists 91–100 publications: 713 scientists 101–110 publications: 736 scientists 111–120 publications: 686 scientists 121–130 publications: 670 scientists 131–140 publications: 644 scientists 141–150 publications: 597 scientists 151–160 publications: 576 scientists 161–170 publications: 477 scientists 171–180 publications: 450 scientists 181–190 publications: 397 scientists 191–200 publications: 343 scientists 201–210 publications: 328 scientists 211–220 publications: 313 scientists 221–230 publications: 283 scientists 231–240 publications: 226 scientists 241–250 publications: 196 scientists 251–260 publications: 201 scientists 261–270 publications: 171 scientists 271–280 publications: 151 scientists 281–290 publications: 139 scientists 291–300 publications: 113 scientists 301–310 publications: 102 scientists 311–320 publications: 100 scientists 321–330 publications: 76 scientists 331–340 publications: 92 scientists 341–350 publications: 85 scientists 351–360 publications: 69 scientists 361–370 publications: 71 scientists 371–380 publications: 63 scientists 381–390 publications: 58 scientists 391–400 publications: 57 scientists 401–410 publications: 43 scientists 411–420 publications: 33 scientists 421–430 publications: 50 scientists 431–440 publications: 41 scientists 441–450 publications: 32 scientists 451–460 publications: 27 scientists 461–470 publications: 28 scientists 471–480 publications: 25 scientists 481–490 publications: 28 scientists 491–500 publications: 20 scientists 501–510 publications: 23 scientists 511–520 publications: 26 scientists 521–530 publications: 17 scientists 531–540 publications: 21 scientists 541–550 publications: 14 scientists 551–560 publications: 16 scientists 561–570 publications: 10 scientists 571–580 publications: 22 scientists 581–590 publications: 9 scientists 591–600 publications: 14 scientists 601–610 publications: 9 scientists 611–620 publications: 11 scientists 621–630 publications: 4 scientists 631–640 publications: 7 scientists 641–650 publications: 5 scientists 651–660 publications: 10 scientists 661–670 publications: 8 scientists 671–680 publications: 8 scientists 681–690 publications: 4 scientists 691–700 publications: 3 scientists 701–704 publications: 4 scientists 705+ publications: 100 scientists
31–40 publications 705+

This scientist: 136 publications — 42nd percentile

42% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 705 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
31–40 6
41–50 52
51–60 138
61–70 299
71–80 461
81–90 605
91–100 713
101–110 736
111–120 686
121–130 670
131–140 644 136
141–150 597
151–160 576
161–170 477
171–180 450
181–190 397
191–200 343
201–210 328
211–220 313
221–230 283
231–240 226
241–250 196
251–260 201
261–270 171
271–280 151
281–290 139
291–300 113
301–310 102
311–320 100
321–330 76
331–340 92
341–350 85
351–360 69
361–370 71
371–380 63
381–390 58
391–400 57
401–410 43
411–420 33
421–430 50
431–440 41
441–450 32
451–460 27
461–470 28
471–480 25
481–490 28
491–500 20
501–510 23
511–520 26
521–530 17
531–540 21
541–550 14
551–560 16
561–570 10
571–580 22
581–590 9
591–600 14
601–610 9
611–620 11
621–630 4
631–640 7
641–650 5
651–660 10
661–670 8
671–680 8
681–690 4
691–700 3
701–704 4
705+ 100
Download as CSV

Joy J. Geng D-index placement in Psychology in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Psychology scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Joy J. Geng sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 58 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 144+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 702. Most scientists, 702, have 32–33 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 36–37 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 398 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 702 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 671 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 659 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 641 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 671 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 617 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 558 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 495 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 487 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 445 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 390 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 408 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 345 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 325 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 321 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 248 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 290 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 218 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 219 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 215 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 183 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 169 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 132 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 137 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 120 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 112 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 86 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 101 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 83 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 77 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 70 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 78 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 58 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 53 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 57 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 48 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 53 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 46 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 24 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 35 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 27 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 32 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 31 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 22 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 16 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 24 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 18 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 11 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 19 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 10 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 16 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 10 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 12 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 8 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 5 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 12 scientists 144+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 144+

This scientist: 36 D-Index — 19th percentile

19% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 144 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Psychology scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 11,416 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 398
32–33 702
34–35 671
36–37 659 36
38–39 641
40–41 671
42–43 617
44–45 558
46–47 495
48–49 487
50–51 445
52–53 390
54–55 408
56–57 345
58–59 325
60–61 321
62–63 248
64–65 290
66–67 218
68–69 219
70–71 215
72–73 183
74–75 169
76–77 132
78–79 137
80–81 120
82–83 112
84–85 86
86–87 101
88–89 83
90–91 77
92–93 70
94–95 78
96–97 58
98–99 53
100–101 57
102–103 48
104–105 53
106–107 46
108–109 24
110–111 35
112–113 27
114–115 32
116–117 31
118–119 22
120–121 16
122–123 24
124–125 18
126–127 11
128–129 19
130–131 10
132–133 16
134–135 10
136–137 12
138–139 8
140–141 5
142–143 12
144+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2010 - Hellman Fellow

Overview

Joy J. Geng is affiliated with the University of California, Davis in the United States. Their research primarily focuses on the field of neuroscience, with a concentration in cognitive neuroscience. The scope of their work also includes computer vision and pattern recognition, experimental and cognitive psychology, sensory systems, and social psychology.

The scientist's research covers several main topics, including:

  • Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Visual perception and processing mechanisms
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Neural dynamics and brain function
  • Face Recognition and Perception
  • Multisensory perception and integration
  • EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces

Joy J. Geng has contributed to numerous publications in various venues. The most frequent publication venues include:

  • Journal of Vision
  • Attention Perception & Psychophysics
  • Memory & Cognition
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal

Recent papers authored or coauthored by Geng reflect a focus on attention, distraction, and visual search mechanisms. Notable recent works include:

  • "Ten simple rules to study distractor suppression," 2022, Progress in Neurobiology
  • "Good-enough attentional guidance," 2023, Trends in Cognitive Sciences
  • "Passive exposure attenuates distraction during visual search," 2020, Journal of Experimental Psychology General
  • "Attentional Guidance and Match Decisions Rely on Different Template Information During Visual Search," 2021, Psychological Science
  • "Changes in visual cortical processing attenuate singleton distraction during visual search," 2020, Cortex

The scientist has collaborated frequently with several researchers, including Zhiheng Zhou, Xinger Yu, Phillip Witkowski, Shea E. Duarte, and Bo-Yeong Won. These collaborations have contributed to the development of the research topics listed above.

Joy J. Geng has been recognized with an award, notably the Hellman Fellow designation in 2010.

Best Publications

  • Dorsal and Ventral Attention Systems Distinct Neural Circuits but Collaborative Roles

    Simone Vossel;Joy J. Geng;Gereon R. Fink

  • Parietal Cortex and Attention

    Marlene Behrmann;Joy J Geng;Sarah Shomstein

  • Oculomotor mechanisms activated by imagery and memory: eye movements to absent objects.

    Michael J. Spivey;Joy J. Geng

  • A critique of functional localisers.

    Karl J. Friston;Pia Rotshtein;Joy J. Geng;Philipp Sterzer

  • Re-evaluating the role of TPJ in attentional control: Contextual updating?

    Joy J. Geng;Simone Vossel;Simone Vossel

  • Spatial probability as an attentional cue in visual search

    Joy J. Geng;Joy J. Geng;Marlene Behrmann

  • A Common Neural Mechanism for Preventing and Terminating the Allocation of Attention

    Risa Sawaki;Joy J. Geng;Steven J. Luck

  • Probability Cuing of Target Location Facilitates Visual Search Implicitly in Normal Participants and Patients with Hemispatial Neglect

    Joy J. Geng;Marlene Behrmann

  • Attentional Mechanisms of Distractor Suppression

    Joy J. Geng

  • Role of Features and Second-order Spatial Relations in Face Discrimination, Face Recognition, and Individual Face Skills: Behavioral and Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data

    Pia Rotshtein;Joy J. Geng;Jon Driver;Raymond J. Dolan

  • Ten simple rules to study distractor suppression

    Unknown

  • Contextual Knowledge Configures Attentional Control Networks

    Nicholas E. DiQuattro;Joy J. Geng

  • Right temporoparietal junction activation by a salient contextual cue facilitates target discrimination.

    Joy J. Geng;George R. Mangun

  • Evidence for second-order singleton suppression based on probabilistic expectations.

    Bo-Yeong Won;Mary Kosoyan;Joy J Geng

  • Anterior intraparietal sulcus is sensitive to bottom-up attention driven by stimulus salience

    Joy J. Geng;George R. Mangun

  • The Role of Alpha Activity in Spatial and Feature-Based Attention.

    Rosanne M. van Diepen;Lee M. Miller;Ali Mazaheri;Joy J. Geng

  • Distractor ignoring: strategies, learning, and passive filtering.

    Joy J. Geng;Bo-Yeong Won;Nancy B. Carlisle

  • On-Line Attentional Selection From Competing Stimuli in Opposite Visual Fields: Effects on Human Visual Cortex and Control Processes

    Joy J. Geng;Evelyn Eger;Christian C. Ruff;Árni Kristjánsson

  • Attentional capture by a perceptually salient non-target facilitates target processing through inhibition and rapid rejection.

    Joy J. Geng;Nicholas E. DiQuattro

  • Distractor probability changes the shape of the attentional template.

    Joy J. Geng;Nicholas E. DiQuattro;Jonathan Helm

  • Pre-Stimulus Activity Predicts the Winner of Top-Down vs. Bottom-Up Attentional Selection

    Ali Mazaheri;Nicholas E. DiQuattro;Jesse Bengson;Joy J. Geng

Frequent Co-Authors

Steven J. Luck
Steven J. Luck University of California, Davis
Marlene Behrmann
Marlene Behrmann Carnegie Mellon University
Pia Rotshtein
Pia Rotshtein University of Birmingham
George R. Mangun
George R. Mangun University of California, Davis
Árni Kristjánsson
Árni Kristjánsson University of Iceland
Michael J. Minzenberg
Michael J. Minzenberg University of California, Los Angeles
James M. Gold
James M. Gold University of Maryland, Baltimore
Christian C. Ruff
Christian C. Ruff University of Zurich
David Soto
David Soto Basque Center on Cognition, Brain and Language
Ian A. Apperly
Ian A. Apperly University of Birmingham

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Pursuing a Psychology degree in the USA opens the door to varied career opportunities, especially in mental health counseling. Online psychology degrees now make it easier than ever to begin your journey toward these in-demand roles, with flexible learning for busy schedules.

However, requirements for mental health counselors differ depending on your location. For example, those planning to become a mental health counselor in Omaha must complete region-specific licensure steps. Similarly, mental health counselor requirements in Orlando focus on state-mandated education and supervised experience.

Each city or state may also set unique expectations. For instance, Philadelphia mental health counselor education requirements may include specific coursework or local certification. If you plan to work in Arizona, it's important to know about Phoenix mental health counselor certification requirements.

Researching your chosen destination’s expectations is crucial, and online degrees can be tailored to meet these diverse requirements, putting your career goals within reach.

Best Scientists Citing Joy J. Geng

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles