What is he best known for?
The fields of study he is best known for:
- Seismology
- Mathematical analysis
- Statistics
His scientific interests lie mostly in Seismology, Finite difference, Finite difference method, Mathematical analysis and Earthquake simulation.
His biological study spans a wide range of topics, including Shear, Structural basin and Kinematics.
His Finite difference research is multidisciplinary, incorporating elements of Attenuation and Fault.
His Finite difference method research is multidisciplinary, incorporating perspectives in Fracture mechanics, Power law and Boundary value problem.
His work on Numerical analysis as part of general Mathematical analysis study is frequently linked to Rate of convergence, Continuous wavelet transform and Representation, bridging the gap between disciplines.
His Earthquake simulation research includes elements of Petascale computing, Intraplate earthquake, Remotely triggered earthquakes, Echelon formation and Earthquake prediction.
His most cited work include:
- Three-dimensional simulation of spontaneous rupture: The effect of nonuniform prestress (377 citations)
- Dynamics of fault interaction: parallel strike‐slip faults (355 citations)
- The SCEC Southern California Reference Three-Dimensional Seismic Velocity Model Version 2 (235 citations)
What are the main themes of his work throughout his whole career to date?
Seismology, Ground motion, Finite difference, Amplitude and Seismic wave are his primary areas of study.
The various areas that he examines in his Seismology study include Mathematical model and Geophysics.
In his study, which falls under the umbrella issue of Ground motion, Earthquake simulation is strongly linked to San andreas fault.
His Finite difference study is concerned with the field of Mathematical analysis as a whole.
Steven M. Day has included themes like Attenuation, Mechanics, Computer simulation and Waveform in his Amplitude study.
In his study, Geometry is inextricably linked to Shear, which falls within the broad field of Earthquake rupture.
He most often published in these fields:
- Seismology (55.19%)
- Ground motion (18.18%)
- Finite difference (17.53%)
What were the highlights of his more recent work (between 2011-2021)?
- Seismology (55.19%)
- Ground motion (18.18%)
- Amplitude (17.53%)
In recent papers he was focusing on the following fields of study:
The scientist’s investigation covers issues in Seismology, Ground motion, Amplitude, Pulse and Mechanics.
He studies Fault which is a part of Seismology.
His work carried out in the field of Fault brings together such families of science as Kinematics and Rock mass classification.
His Ground motion research includes themes of Geodesy, Broadband, CUDA, Memory bandwidth and Earth structure.
His studies deal with areas such as Wave propagation and Fourier transform as well as Amplitude.
Steven M. Day combines subjects such as Frequency dependent attenuation and Tectonics with his study of Mechanics.
Between 2011 and 2021, his most popular works were:
- Rupture dynamics and ground motion from 3‐D rough‐fault simulations (107 citations)
- Expected seismic shaking in Los Angeles reduced by San Andreas fault zone plasticity (57 citations)
- Physics-based seismic hazard analysis on petascale heterogeneous supercomputers (48 citations)
In his most recent research, the most cited papers focused on:
- Mathematical analysis
- Seismology
- Statistics
His primary scientific interests are in Fault, Seismology, Structural basin, Geotechnical engineering and Amplitude.
His study in Fault is interdisciplinary in nature, drawing from both Sedimentary basin and Earthquake scenario.
Steven M. Day integrates Seismology with Excitation in his study.
His work deals with themes such as San andreas fault, Seismic gap and Drop, which intersect with Structural basin.
His Geotechnical engineering study combines topics in areas such as Kinematics and Surface rupture.
His Amplitude study integrates concerns from other disciplines, such as Transverse plane, Wave propagation, Surface wave and Earthquake rupture.
This overview was generated by a machine learning system which analysed the scientist’s
body of work. If you have any feedback, you can
contact us
here.
