World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Computer Science

D-Index
34
Citations
6097
World Ranking
12044
National Ranking
109

Peter Schelkens publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Schelkens sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 534 publications — 94th percentile

94% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Peter Schelkens D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Peter Schelkens sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 34 D-Index — 16th percentile

16% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Overview

Peter Schelkens is affiliated with the Vrije Universiteit Brussel in Belgium, where their research primarily focuses on computer science, engineering, and physics and astronomy. Their work spans multiple subfields including media technology, computer vision and pattern recognition, atomic and molecular physics and optics, human-computer interaction, and computer graphics and computer-aided design.

Their research topics cover advanced optical imaging technologies, digital holography and microscopy, advanced vision and imaging, image and video quality assessment, photorefractive and nonlinear optics, virtual reality applications and impacts, and computer graphics and visualization techniques.

Peter Schelkens has published extensively in notable venues such as Optics Express, Applied Optics, Digital Holography and 3-D Imaging 2022, SMPTE Motion Imaging Journal, and Applied Physics B. Some recent papers include:

  • Deep-Learning Computational Holography: A Review (2022, Frontiers in Photonics)
  • QUALINET White Paper on Definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx) (2020, arXiv [Cornell University])
  • Roadmap on computational methods in optical imaging and holography [invited] (2024, Applied Physics B)
  • Photorealistic computer generated holography with global illumination and path tracing (2021, Optics Letters)
  • Phase added sub-stereograms for accelerating computer generated holography (2020, Optics Express)

The scientist regularly collaborates with a number of coauthors including David Blinder, Tobias Birnbaum, Tomoyoshi Shimobaba, Tomoyoshi Ito, and Raees Kizhakkumkara Muhamad. Among these, the most frequent collaborator is David Blinder, with whom there are over 30 publications.

Best Publications

  • Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience

    Kjell Brunnström;Sergio Ariel Beker;Katrien de Moor;Ann Dooms

  • In-band motion compensated temporal filtering

    Yiannis Andreopoulos;Adrian Munteanu;Joeri Barbarien;Mihaela Van der Schaar

  • Wavelet coding of volumetric medical datasets

    P. Schelkens;A. Munteanu;J. Barbarien;M. Galca

  • JPEG Pleno: Toward an Efficient Representation of Visual Reality

    Touradj Ebrahimi;Siegfried Foessel;Fernando Pereira;Peter Schelkens

  • Wavelet based volumetric medical image compression

    Tim Bruylants;Adrian Munteanu;Peter Schelkens

  • The JPEG 2000 Suite

    Peter Schelkens;Athanassios Skodras;Touradj Ebrahimi

  • Signal processing challenges for digital holographic video display systems

    David Blinder;David Blinder;Ayyoub Ahar;Ayyoub Ahar;Stijn Bettens;Stijn Bettens;Tobias Birnbaum;Tobias Birnbaum

  • INTERNATIONAL ORGANISATION FOR STANDARDISATION ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION ISO/IEC JTC1/SC29/WG11 CODING OF MOVING PICTURES AND AUDIO

    Yiannis Andreopoulos;Adrian Munteanu;Mihaela van der Schaar;Jan Cornelis

  • Computer-generated holograms by multiple wavefront recording plane method with occlusion culling.

    Athanasia Symeonidou;David Blinder;Adrian Munteanu;Peter Schelkens

  • Method and system for subband encoding and decoding of an overcomplete representation of the data structure

    Geert Van der Auwera;Ioannis Andreopoulos;Adrian Munteanu;Peter Schelkens

  • Deep-Learning Computational Holography: A Review (Invited)

    Unknown

  • Optical and Digital Image Processing: Fundamentals and Applications

    Gabriel Cristobal;Peter Schelkens;Hugo Thienpont

  • JPEG 2000-based compression of fringe patterns for digital holographic microscopy

    David Blinder;Tim Bruylants;Heidi Ottevaere;Adrian Munteanu;Adrian Munteanu

  • Complete-to-overcomplete discrete wavelet transforms: theory and applications

    Y. Andreopoulos;A. Munteanu;G. Van der Auwera;J.P.H. Cornelis

  • Fully-scalable wavelet video coding using in-band motion compensated temporal filtering

    Y. Andreopoulos;M. van der Schaar;A. Munteanu;J. Barbarien

  • Complete-to-overcomplete discrete wavelet transforms for scalable video coding with MCTF

    Yiannis Andreopoulos;Mihaela van der Schaar;Adrian Munteanu;Joeri Barbarien

  • Objective and subjective evaluation of light field image compression algorithms

    Irene Viola;Martin Rerabek;Tim Bruylants;Peter Schelkens

  • Combined Wavelet-Domain and Motion-Compensated Video Denoising Based on Video Codec Motion Estimation Methods

    L. Jovanov;A. Pizurica;S. Schulte;P. Schelkens

  • Embedded multiple description scalar quantizers for progressive image transmission

    A.I. Gavrilescu;A. Munteanu;P. Schelkens;J. Cornelis

  • End-To-End Security for Video Distribution: The Combination of Encryption, Watermarking, and Video Adaptation

    A. Boho;G. Van Wallendael;A. Dooms;J. De Cock

  • Side-Information-Dependent Correlation Channel Estimation in Hash-Based Distributed Video Coding

    N. Deligiannis;J. Barbarien;M. Jacobs;A. Munteanu

  • QUALINET white paper on definitions of Immersive Media Experience (IMEx)

    Andrew Perkis;Christian Timmerer;Sabina Baraković;Jasmina Baraković Husić

Frequent Co-Authors

Yiannis Andreopoulos
Yiannis Andreopoulos University College London
Touradj Ebrahimi
Touradj Ebrahimi École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Mihaela van der Schaar
Mihaela van der Schaar University of Cambridge
Rik Van de Walle
Rik Van de Walle Ghent University
Tomoyoshi Shimobaba
Tomoyoshi Shimobaba Chiba University
Tomoyoshi Ito
Tomoyoshi Ito Chiba University
Aleksandra Pizurica
Aleksandra Pizurica Ghent University
Fernando Pereira
Fernando Pereira Instituto Superior Técnico
Frederic Dufaux
Frederic Dufaux CentraleSupélec
Osamu Watanabe
Osamu Watanabe Tokyo Institute of Technology

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring a career in Computer Science can open up a wide range of opportunities, both on-campus and online. There is a growing demand for professionals with advanced skills—that’s why many students consider masters degrees that are worth it for digital careers, with tech-focused programs offering strong employment prospects.

If you’re looking for a faster or more affordable way to start your journey, there are many 2 year online degrees available. These programs provide a solid introduction to computing and can help you enter the workforce quickly or transfer to a bachelor’s program.

Affordability is another key factor. Many students seek affordable online courses to manage their education costs while still gaining marketable skills. Flexible online programs can also accommodate full-time work and family commitments.

For those concerned about academic requirements, there are excellent college with low gpa options that offer high-quality education and a strong support system for students from diverse backgrounds.

Best Scientists Citing Peter Schelkens

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles