World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Patrick Le Callet

Patrick Le Callet

Award Badge
Computer Science
France
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Discipline name D-Index World Ranking Current World Ranking National Ranking Current National Ranking Publications Citations
Computer Science 54 4527 4398 89 88 435 12982

Patrick Le Callet publications per year

The chart shows the history of publications by Patrick Le Callet between 1996 and 2026, highlighting the no. of papers published in each year and offering an overview of the publication velocity of this scholar. Patrick Le Callet published across 31 years, from 1996 to 2026, averaging 17.9 papers a year. Output peaked at 44 publications in 2016. 29 of the 555 publications appeared in the last two years.

No. of publications
10 20 30 40
Bar chart. Horizontal axis: year, 1996 to 2026. Vertical axis: number of publications, 0 to 44. Peak 44 publications in 2016. 1996: 1 publication 1997: 0 publications 1998: 0 publications 1999: 1 publication 2000: 1 publication 2001: 0 publications 2002: 3 publications 2003: 6 publications 2004: 5 publications 2005: 5 publications 2006: 7 publications 2007: 13 publications 2008: 9 publications 2009: 17 publications 2010: 26 publications 2011: 17 publications 2012: 23 publications 2013: 28 publications 2014: 41 publications 2015: 35 publications 2016: 44 publications 2017: 28 publications 2018: 27 publications 2019: 31 publications 2020: 33 publications 2021: 39 publications 2022: 25 publications 2023: 35 publications 2024: 26 publications 2025: 23 publications 2026: 6 publications
1996 2026

555 publications in total across all disciplines

View publications per year as a table
Patrick Le Callet: publications per year, 1996 to 2026
Year Publications
1996 1
1997 0
1998 0
1999 1
2000 1
2001 0
2002 3
2003 6
2004 5
2005 5
2006 7
2007 13
2008 9
2009 17
2010 26
2011 17
2012 23
2013 28
2014 41
2015 35
2016 44
2017 28
2018 27
2019 31
2020 33
2021 39
2022 25
2023 35
2024 26
2025 23
2026 6
Total 555
Download as CSV

Patrick Le Callet publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Le Callet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600
Bar chart with 97 bars. Horizontal axis: publications, 32–41 to 991+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 609. Most scientists, 609, have 142–151 publications. The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more. The highlighted bar, 432–441 publications, is where this scientist sits. 32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32–41 publications 991+

This scientist: 435 publications — 90th percentile

90% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

View publications distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by publication count, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
Publications Scientists This scientist
32–41 7
42–51 22
52–61 82
62–71 134
72–81 249
82–91 324
92–101 421
102–111 420
112–121 497
122–131 544
132–141 555
142–151 609
152–161 559
162–171 534
172–181 556
182–191 583
192–201 519
202–211 508
212–221 490
222–231 437
232–241 423
242–251 408
252–261 377
262–271 301
272–281 335
282–291 320
292–301 293
302–311 250
312–321 238
322–331 206
332–341 209
342–351 208
352–361 162
362–371 176
372–381 127
382–391 158
392–401 128
402–411 104
412–421 94
422–431 99
432–441 83 435
442–451 108
452–461 73
462–471 77
472–481 69
482–491 84
492–501 62
502–511 54
512–521 57
522–531 51
532–541 51
542–551 32
552–561 38
562–571 28
572–581 43
582–591 33
592–601 41
602–611 32
612–621 28
622–631 25
632–641 27
642–651 17
652–661 20
662–671 17
672–681 15
682–691 14
692–701 21
702–711 13
712–721 12
722–731 19
732–741 14
742–751 12
752–761 10
762–771 10
772–781 11
782–791 10
792–801 11
802–811 8
812–821 8
822–831 7
832–841 11
842–851 10
852–861 5
862–871 9
872–881 4
882–891 6
892–901 3
902–911 6
912–921 3
922–931 2
932–941 2
942–951 2
952–961 3
962–971 3
972–981 3
982–990 5
991+ 100
Download as CSV

Patrick Le Callet D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Patrick Le Callet sits on this spectrum.

No. of scientists
200 400 600 800
Bar chart with 52 bars. Horizontal axis: D-Index, 30–31 to 131+. Vertical axis: number of scientists, 0 to 990. Most scientists, 990, have 36–37 D-Index. The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more. The highlighted bar, 54–55 D-Index, is where this scientist sits. 30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30–31 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 54 D-Index — 69th percentile

69% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

View D-Index distribution as a table
Number of Computer Science scientists by D-index, Research.com 2026 ranking edition. Based on 14,188 ranked scientists.
D-Index Scientists This scientist
30–31 879
32–33 983
34–35 918
36–37 990
38–39 968
40–41 907
42–43 821
44–45 763
46–47 689
48–49 543
50–51 543
52–53 518
54–55 500 54
56–57 458
58–59 400
60–61 337
62–63 308
64–65 292
66–67 249
68–69 213
70–71 192
72–73 189
74–75 165
76–77 139
78–79 119
80–81 121
82–83 113
84–85 88
86–87 87
88–89 75
90–91 69
92–93 57
94–95 46
96–97 38
98–99 34
100–101 36
102–103 27
104–105 37
106–107 18
108–109 31
110–111 19
112–113 16
114–115 12
116–117 20
118–119 15
120–121 5
122–123 20
124–125 8
126–127 5
128–129 7
130 3
131+ 98
Download as CSV

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award
  • 2022 - Research.com Computer Science in France Leader Award

Overview

Patrick Le Callet is affiliated with the University of Nantes in France and specializes in computer science, with a focus on image and video quality assessment and related fields. Their scholarly work spans multiple subfields including computer vision and pattern recognition, media technology, artificial intelligence, computer graphics and computer-aided design, as well as signal processing.

The main topics covered in their research include:

  • Image and Video Quality Assessment
  • Visual Attention and Saliency Detection
  • Image Enhancement Techniques
  • Advanced Image Fusion Techniques
  • Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
  • Video Coding and Compression Technologies
  • Advanced Vision and Imaging

Patrick Le Callet has contributed to numerous scientific publications, with frequent appearances in prominent venues such as:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)

Among recent papers associated with their work are:

  • "State-of-the-Art in 360° Video/Image Processing: Perception, Assessment and Compression" (2020), published in IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing
  • "Screen Content Quality Assessment: Overview, Benchmark, and Beyond" (2021), published in ACM Computing Surveys
  • "A Metric for Light Field Reconstruction, Compression, and Display Quality Evaluation" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • "UIF: An Objective Quality Assessment for Underwater Image Enhancement" (2022), published in IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • "Visual Quality of 3D Meshes With Diffuse Colors in Virtual Reality: Subjective and Objective Evaluation" (2020), published in IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics

They have collaborated frequently with several researchers, including:

  • Guangtao Zhai
  • Suiyi Ling
  • Ali Ak
  • Xiongkuo Min
  • Andréas Pastor

Best Publications

  • Qualinet White Paper on Definitions of Quality of Experience

    Kjell Brunnström;Sergio Ariel Beker;Katrien de Moor;Ann Dooms

  • Quality Assessment of Stereoscopic Images

    Alexandre Benoit;Patrick Le Callet;Patrizio Campisi;Romain Cousseau

  • Predicting visual fixations on video based on low-level visual features.

    Olivier Le Meur;Patrick Le Callet;Dominique Barba

  • Subjective quality assessment IRCCyN/IVC database

    Patrick Le Callet;Florent Autrusseau

  • State-of-the-Art in 360° Video/Image Processing: Perception, Assessment and Compression

    Mai Xu;Chen Li;Shanyi Zhang;Patrick Le Callet

  • HDR-VDP-2.2: a calibrated method for objective quality prediction of high-dynamic range and standard images

    Manish Narwaria;Rafal K. Mantiuk;Mattheiu Perreira Da Silva;Patrick Le Callet

  • Towards a New Quality Metric for 3-D Synthesized View Assessment

    Unknown

  • A Dataset of Head and Eye Movements for 360 Degree Images

    Yashas Rai;Jesús Gutiérrez;Patrick Le Callet

  • Saliency Detection for Stereoscopic Images

    Yuming Fang;Junle Wang;Manish Narwaria;Patrick Le Callet

  • A dataset of head and eye movements for 360° videos

    Erwan J. David;Jesús Gutiérrez;Antoine Coutrot;Matthieu Perreira Da Silva

  • Considering Temporal Variations of Spatial Visual Distortions in Video Quality Assessment

    Unknown

  • Objective image quality assessment of 3D synthesized views

    Federica Battisti;Emilie Bosc;Marco Carli;Patrick Le Callet

  • Objective quality assessment of color images based on a generic perceptual reduced reference

    Mathieu Carnec;Patrick Le Callet;Dominique Barba

  • NAMA3DS1-COSPAD1: Subjective video quality assessment database on coding conditions introducing freely available high quality 3D stereoscopic sequences

    Matthieu Urvoy;Marcus Barkowsky;Romain Cousseau;Yao Koudota

  • The Application of Visual Saliency Models in Objective Image Quality Assessment: A Statistical Evaluation

    Wei Zhang;Ali Borji;Zhou Wang;Patrick Le Callet

  • Stereoscopic images quality assessment

    Patrizio Campisi;Patrick Le Callet;Enrico Marini

  • A Metric for Light Field Reconstruction, Compression, and Display Quality Evaluation

    Xiongkuo Min;Jiantao Zhou;Guangtao Zhai;Patrick Le Callet

  • NEW REQUIREMENTS OF SUBJECTIVE VIDEO QUALITY ASSESSMENT METHODOLOGIES FOR 3DTV

    Wei Chen;Jérôme Fournier;Marcus Barkowsky;Patrick Le Callet

  • HDR-VQM

    Manish Narwaria;Matthieu Perreira Da Silva;Patrick Le Callet

  • Video quality assessment: From 2D to 3D — Challenges and future trends

    Quan Huynh-Thu;Patrick Le Callet;Marcus Barkowsky

  • Using disparity for quality assessment of stereoscopic images

    A. Benoit;P. Le Callet;P. Campisi;R. Cousseau

  • DIBR synthesized image quality assessment based on morphological wavelets

    Dragana Sandic-Stankovic;Dragan Kukolj;Patrick Le Callet

Frequent Co-Authors

Gene Cheung
Gene Cheung York University
Yuming Fang
Yuming Fang Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics
Guangtao Zhai
Guangtao Zhai Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Ke Gu
Ke Gu Beijing University of Technology
Weisi Lin
Weisi Lin Nanyang Technological University
Alexander Raake
Alexander Raake Ilmenau University of Technology
Patrizio Campisi
Patrizio Campisi Roma Tre University
Olivier Le Meur
Olivier Le Meur InterDigital (United States)
Touradj Ebrahimi
Touradj Ebrahimi École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne
Pascal Frossard
Pascal Frossard École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring Computer Science in the USA often opens doors to a range of interconnected fields and alternative careers. As technology evolves, many students look for flexible, online options. Choosing a 2-year computer science degree online can be a fast-track to entry-level tech jobs or advanced study.

Some learners are interested in green technology and sustainability. Careers involving jobs with elementary education and environmental science degree are growing, especially with schools and organizations focusing on environmental awareness.

For those with an interest in engineering, online options are expanding. Studying for an online environmental engineering degree science and engineering can provide new career prospects in a rapidly changing world. Mechanical engineering is also a strong choice, and many students are comparing mechanical engineering degree cost to find affordable, accredited programs.

By considering these related online degrees and pathways, you can tailor your studies to your career goals and interests—whether you want to work in tech, engineering, or education.

Best Scientists Citing Patrick Le Callet

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles