World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!
Award Badge
Rising Stars
2025

D-Index & Metrics

Rising Stars

D-Index
44
Citations
7923
World Ranking
486
National Ranking
164

Computer Science

D-Index
48
Citations
10451
World Ranking
6133
National Ranking
810

Xiongkuo Min publication distribution in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Computer Science in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiongkuo Min sits on this spectrum.

32–41 publications: 7 scientists 42–51 publications: 22 scientists 52–61 publications: 82 scientists 62–71 publications: 134 scientists 72–81 publications: 249 scientists 82–91 publications: 324 scientists 92–101 publications: 421 scientists 102–111 publications: 420 scientists 112–121 publications: 497 scientists 122–131 publications: 544 scientists 132–141 publications: 555 scientists 142–151 publications: 609 scientists 152–161 publications: 559 scientists 162–171 publications: 534 scientists 172–181 publications: 556 scientists 182–191 publications: 583 scientists 192–201 publications: 519 scientists 202–211 publications: 508 scientists 212–221 publications: 490 scientists 222–231 publications: 437 scientists 232–241 publications: 423 scientists 242–251 publications: 408 scientists 252–261 publications: 377 scientists 262–271 publications: 301 scientists 272–281 publications: 335 scientists 282–291 publications: 320 scientists 292–301 publications: 293 scientists 302–311 publications: 250 scientists 312–321 publications: 238 scientists 322–331 publications: 206 scientists 332–341 publications: 209 scientists 342–351 publications: 208 scientists 352–361 publications: 162 scientists 362–371 publications: 176 scientists 372–381 publications: 127 scientists 382–391 publications: 158 scientists 392–401 publications: 128 scientists 402–411 publications: 104 scientists 412–421 publications: 94 scientists 422–431 publications: 99 scientists 432–441 publications: 83 scientists 442–451 publications: 108 scientists 452–461 publications: 73 scientists 462–471 publications: 77 scientists 472–481 publications: 69 scientists 482–491 publications: 84 scientists 492–501 publications: 62 scientists 502–511 publications: 54 scientists 512–521 publications: 57 scientists 522–531 publications: 51 scientists 532–541 publications: 51 scientists 542–551 publications: 32 scientists 552–561 publications: 38 scientists 562–571 publications: 28 scientists 572–581 publications: 43 scientists 582–591 publications: 33 scientists 592–601 publications: 41 scientists 602–611 publications: 32 scientists 612–621 publications: 28 scientists 622–631 publications: 25 scientists 632–641 publications: 27 scientists 642–651 publications: 17 scientists 652–661 publications: 20 scientists 662–671 publications: 17 scientists 672–681 publications: 15 scientists 682–691 publications: 14 scientists 692–701 publications: 21 scientists 702–711 publications: 13 scientists 712–721 publications: 12 scientists 722–731 publications: 19 scientists 732–741 publications: 14 scientists 742–751 publications: 12 scientists 752–761 publications: 10 scientists 762–771 publications: 10 scientists 772–781 publications: 11 scientists 782–791 publications: 10 scientists 792–801 publications: 11 scientists 802–811 publications: 8 scientists 812–821 publications: 8 scientists 822–831 publications: 7 scientists 832–841 publications: 11 scientists 842–851 publications: 10 scientists 852–861 publications: 5 scientists 862–871 publications: 9 scientists 872–881 publications: 4 scientists 882–891 publications: 6 scientists 892–901 publications: 3 scientists 902–911 publications: 6 scientists 912–921 publications: 3 scientists 922–931 publications: 2 scientists 932–941 publications: 2 scientists 942–951 publications: 2 scientists 952–961 publications: 3 scientists 962–971 publications: 3 scientists 972–981 publications: 3 scientists 982–990 publications: 5 scientists 991+ publications: 100 scientists
32 publications 991+

This scientist: 379 publications — 85th percentile

85% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 991 publications or more.

Xiongkuo Min D-index placement in Computer Science in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Computer Science scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Xiongkuo Min sits on this spectrum.

30–31 D-Index: 879 scientists 32–33 D-Index: 983 scientists 34–35 D-Index: 918 scientists 36–37 D-Index: 990 scientists 38–39 D-Index: 968 scientists 40–41 D-Index: 907 scientists 42–43 D-Index: 821 scientists 44–45 D-Index: 763 scientists 46–47 D-Index: 689 scientists 48–49 D-Index: 543 scientists 50–51 D-Index: 543 scientists 52–53 D-Index: 518 scientists 54–55 D-Index: 500 scientists 56–57 D-Index: 458 scientists 58–59 D-Index: 400 scientists 60–61 D-Index: 337 scientists 62–63 D-Index: 308 scientists 64–65 D-Index: 292 scientists 66–67 D-Index: 249 scientists 68–69 D-Index: 213 scientists 70–71 D-Index: 192 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 189 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 165 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 139 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 119 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 121 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 113 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 88 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 87 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 75 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 69 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 57 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 46 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 38 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 34 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 36 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 27 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 37 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 18 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 31 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 19 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 16 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 12 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 20 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 15 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 5 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 20 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 8 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 5 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 7 scientists 130 D-Index: 3 scientists 131+ D-Index: 98 scientists
30 D-Index 131+

This scientist: 48 D-Index — 58th percentile

58% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 131 D-Index or more.

Research.com Recognitions

  • 2025 - Research.com Rising Stars Award

Overview

Xiongkuo Min is a researcher affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University in China, specializing primarily in the field of Computer Science with a focus on subfields such as Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, Media Technology, Signal Processing, Computational Mechanics, and Cognitive Neuroscience.

Their main research topics include Image and Video Quality Assessment, Visual Attention and Saliency Detection, Advanced Image Fusion Techniques, Advanced Image Processing Techniques, Image Enhancement Techniques, Image and Signal Denoising Methods, and Advanced Vision and Imaging.

The recent scholarly output includes papers published between 2020 and 2022, notably:

  • Perceptual image quality assessment: a survey, 2020, Science China Information Sciences
  • Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio-Visual Signals, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • A Multimodal Saliency Model for Videos With High Audio-Visual Correspondence, 2020, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • Screen Content Quality Assessment: Overview, Benchmark, and Beyond, 2021, ACM Computing Surveys
  • A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videos, 2022, Proceedings of the 30th ACM International Conference on Multimedia

Frequent coauthors in their collaborative research include Guangtao Zhai, Zicheng Zhang, Wei Sun, Huiyu Duan, and Xiaohong Liu.

The venues where they commonly publish are:

  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems for Video Technology
  • IEEE Transactions on Image Processing
  • IEEE Transactions on Multimedia
  • ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications

Contributions to academic publishing also include a book titled Digital TV and Wireless Multimedia Communication, published by Springer Science+Business Media in 2021.

Best Publications

  • Perceptual image quality assessment: a survey

    Unknown

  • Blind Image Quality Estimation via Distortion Aggravation

    Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai;Ke Gu;Yutao Liu

  • Blind Quality Assessment Based on Pseudo-Reference Image

    Xiongkuo Min;Ke Gu;Guangtao Zhai;Jing Liu

  • Unified Blind Quality Assessment of Compressed Natural, Graphic, and Screen Content Images

    Xiongkuo Min;Kede Ma;Ke Gu;Guangtao Zhai

  • Study of Subjective and Objective Quality Assessment of Audio-Visual Signals

    Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai;Jiantao Zhou;Mylene C. Q. Farias

  • Objective Quality Evaluation of Dehazed Images

    Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai;Ke Gu;Xiaokang Yang

  • A Multimodal Saliency Model for Videos With High Audio-Visual Correspondence

    Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai;Jiantao Zhou;Xiao-Ping Zhang

  • A Deep Learning based No-reference Quality Assessment Model for UGC Videos

    Unknown

  • A Fast Reliable Image Quality Predictor by Fusing Micro- and Macro-Structures

    Ke Gu;Leida Li;Hong Lu;Xiongkuo Min

  • Quality Evaluation of Image Dehazing Methods Using Synthetic Hazy Images

    Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai;Ke Gu;Yucheng Zhu

  • MC360IQA: A Multi-channel CNN for Blind 360-Degree Image Quality Assessment

    Wei Sun;Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai;Ke Gu

  • Blind Quality Assessment for in-the-Wild Images via Hierarchical Feature Fusion and Iterative Mixed Database Training

    Unknown

  • Perceptual video quality assessment: a survey

    Unknown

  • No-Reference Quality Assessment for 3D Colored Point Cloud and Mesh Models

    Zicheng Zhang;Wei Sun;Xiongkuo Min;Tao Wang

  • Fixation Prediction through Multimodal Analysis

    Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai;Ke Gu;Xiaokang Yang

  • Perceptual Quality Assessment of Omnidirectional Images

    Huiyu Duan;Guangtao Zhai;Xiongkuo Min;Yucheng Zhu

  • A Metric for Light Field Reconstruction, Compression, and Display Quality Evaluation

    Xiongkuo Min;Jiantao Zhou;Guangtao Zhai;Patrick Le Callet

  • The prediction of head and eye movement for 360 degree images

    Yucheng Zhu;Guangtao Zhai;Xiongkuo Min

  • Evaluating Quality of Screen Content Images Via Structural Variation Analysis

    Ke Gu;Junfei Qiao;Xiongkuo Min;Guanghui Yue

  • AGIQA-3K: An Open Database for AI-Generated Image Quality Assessment

    Unknown

  • Saliency-induced reduced-reference quality index for natural scene and screen content images

    Xiongkuo Min;Ke Gu;Guangtao Zhai;Menghan Hu

  • A dataset of eye movements for the children with autism spectrum disorder

    Huiyu Duan;Guangtao Zhai;Xiongkuo Min;Zhaohui Che

  • Blurry Video Frame Interpolation

    Wang Shen;Wenbo Bao;Guangtao Zhai;Li Chen

  • MC360IQA: The Multi-Channel CNN for Blind 360-Degree Image Quality Assessment

    Wei Sun;Weike Luo;Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai

  • Fixation prediction through multimodal analysis

    Xiongkuo Min;Guangtao Zhai;Chunjia Hu;Ke Gu

Frequent Co-Authors

Guangtao Zhai
Guangtao Zhai Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Xiaokang Yang
Xiaokang Yang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Ke Gu
Ke Gu Beijing University of Technology
Jiantao Zhou
Jiantao Zhou University of Macau
Wenjun Zhang
Wenjun Zhang Shanghai Jiao Tong University
Guodong Guo
Guodong Guo West Virginia University
Ali Borji
Ali Borji Quintic AI
Siwei Ma
Siwei Ma Peking University
Xiao-Ping Zhang
Xiao-Ping Zhang University of Birmingham
Xiaolin Wu
Xiaolin Wu McMaster University

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Exploring online degree options can open up diverse career opportunities in Computer Science and related fields. Understanding the best degrees to pursue can help students match their interests and career goals while maximizing their employment prospects.

For those seeking further education with a manageable workload, there are various easiest masters degrees that combine flexibility with respected credentials. These programs are designed to support students balancing professional and personal commitments, providing a streamlined path to career advancement.

Cost is an important factor when considering advanced study. Numerous cheap doctorate degree online options allow learners to earn terminal degrees without incurring overwhelming debt. These programs are recognized by employers and can lead to senior roles in academia, industry, and research.

For education professionals aiming to progress quickly, accelerated doctoral programs in education online offer a fast-track route to leadership positions. These pathways combine rigorous study with reduced time to completion, supporting efficient professional growth.

Best Scientists Citing Xiongkuo Min

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles