World's Best Scientists 2026 revealed!

D-Index & Metrics

Medicine

D-Index
74
Citations
23006
World Ranking
19342
National Ranking
653

Helen K. Reddel publication distribution in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the distribution of publications by all Research.com ranked scientists in the field of Medicine in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen K. Reddel sits on this spectrum.

101–120 publications: 5 scientists 121–140 publications: 26 scientists 141–160 publications: 73 scientists 161–180 publications: 155 scientists 181–200 publications: 230 scientists 201–220 publications: 363 scientists 221–240 publications: 487 scientists 241–260 publications: 545 scientists 261–280 publications: 722 scientists 281–300 publications: 768 scientists 301–320 publications: 834 scientists 321–340 publications: 895 scientists 341–360 publications: 922 scientists 361–380 publications: 838 scientists 381–400 publications: 861 scientists 401–420 publications: 918 scientists 421–440 publications: 806 scientists 441–460 publications: 771 scientists 461–480 publications: 751 scientists 481–500 publications: 713 scientists 501–520 publications: 617 scientists 521–540 publications: 611 scientists 541–560 publications: 537 scientists 561–580 publications: 504 scientists 581–600 publications: 509 scientists 601–620 publications: 396 scientists 621–640 publications: 386 scientists 641–660 publications: 371 scientists 661–680 publications: 340 scientists 681–700 publications: 336 scientists 701–720 publications: 307 scientists 721–740 publications: 259 scientists 741–760 publications: 230 scientists 761–780 publications: 228 scientists 781–800 publications: 217 scientists 801–820 publications: 204 scientists 821–840 publications: 186 scientists 841–860 publications: 177 scientists 861–880 publications: 155 scientists 881–900 publications: 139 scientists 901–920 publications: 145 scientists 921–940 publications: 116 scientists 941–960 publications: 133 scientists 961–980 publications: 91 scientists 981–1,000 publications: 96 scientists 1,001–1,020 publications: 77 scientists 1,021–1,040 publications: 70 scientists 1,041–1,060 publications: 63 scientists 1,061–1,080 publications: 77 scientists 1,081–1,100 publications: 49 scientists 1,101–1,120 publications: 54 scientists 1,121–1,140 publications: 49 scientists 1,141–1,160 publications: 51 scientists 1,161–1,180 publications: 35 scientists 1,181–1,200 publications: 39 scientists 1,201–1,220 publications: 26 scientists 1,221–1,240 publications: 37 scientists 1,241–1,260 publications: 36 scientists 1,261–1,280 publications: 27 scientists 1,281–1,300 publications: 32 scientists 1,301–1,320 publications: 28 scientists 1,321–1,340 publications: 17 scientists 1,341–1,360 publications: 30 scientists 1,361–1,380 publications: 28 scientists 1,381–1,400 publications: 17 scientists 1,401–1,420 publications: 21 scientists 1,421–1,440 publications: 15 scientists 1,441–1,460 publications: 12 scientists 1,461–1,480 publications: 12 scientists 1,481–1,500 publications: 18 scientists 1,501–1,520 publications: 14 scientists 1,521–1,540 publications: 17 scientists 1,541–1,560 publications: 15 scientists 1,561–1,580 publications: 6 scientists 1,581–1,600 publications: 2 scientists 1,601–1,620 publications: 12 scientists 1,621–1,640 publications: 11 scientists 1,641–1,660 publications: 8 scientists 1,661–1,680 publications: 5 scientists 1,681–1,700 publications: 5 scientists 1,701–1,720 publications: 10 scientists 1,721–1,740 publications: 12 scientists 1,741–1,760 publications: 14 scientists 1,761–1,780 publications: 6 scientists 1,781–1,795 publications: 5 scientists 1,796+ publications: 100 scientists
101 publications 1,796+

This scientist: 400 publications — 38th percentile

38% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 1,796 publications or more.

Helen K. Reddel D-index placement in Medicine in 2026

The chart shows the D-index (discipline H-index) distribution of Medicine scientists ranked by Research.com in 2026. The highlighted bar marks where Helen K. Reddel sits on this spectrum.

70–71 D-Index: 226 scientists 72–73 D-Index: 391 scientists 74–75 D-Index: 574 scientists 76–77 D-Index: 730 scientists 78–79 D-Index: 891 scientists 80–81 D-Index: 972 scientists 82–83 D-Index: 1,027 scientists 84–85 D-Index: 1,003 scientists 86–87 D-Index: 960 scientists 88–89 D-Index: 970 scientists 90–91 D-Index: 922 scientists 92–93 D-Index: 839 scientists 94–95 D-Index: 808 scientists 96–97 D-Index: 779 scientists 98–99 D-Index: 668 scientists 100–101 D-Index: 611 scientists 102–103 D-Index: 630 scientists 104–105 D-Index: 513 scientists 106–107 D-Index: 541 scientists 108–109 D-Index: 445 scientists 110–111 D-Index: 429 scientists 112–113 D-Index: 400 scientists 114–115 D-Index: 393 scientists 116–117 D-Index: 318 scientists 118–119 D-Index: 302 scientists 120–121 D-Index: 287 scientists 122–123 D-Index: 255 scientists 124–125 D-Index: 256 scientists 126–127 D-Index: 252 scientists 128–129 D-Index: 230 scientists 130–131 D-Index: 179 scientists 132–133 D-Index: 168 scientists 134–135 D-Index: 163 scientists 136–137 D-Index: 159 scientists 138–139 D-Index: 134 scientists 140–141 D-Index: 134 scientists 142–143 D-Index: 118 scientists 144–145 D-Index: 109 scientists 146–147 D-Index: 106 scientists 148–149 D-Index: 74 scientists 150–151 D-Index: 79 scientists 152–153 D-Index: 80 scientists 154–155 D-Index: 87 scientists 156–157 D-Index: 57 scientists 158–159 D-Index: 74 scientists 160–161 D-Index: 69 scientists 162–163 D-Index: 60 scientists 164–165 D-Index: 53 scientists 166–167 D-Index: 39 scientists 168–169 D-Index: 42 scientists 170–171 D-Index: 32 scientists 172–173 D-Index: 39 scientists 174–175 D-Index: 40 scientists 176–177 D-Index: 28 scientists 178–179 D-Index: 19 scientists 180–181 D-Index: 23 scientists 182–183 D-Index: 31 scientists 184–185 D-Index: 18 scientists 186–187 D-Index: 20 scientists 188–189 D-Index: 22 scientists 190–191 D-Index: 13 scientists 192–193 D-Index: 21 scientists 194–195 D-Index: 12 scientists 196–197 D-Index: 12 scientists 198–199 D-Index: 14 scientists 200–201 D-Index: 15 scientists 202–203 D-Index: 13 scientists 204–205 D-Index: 10 scientists 206–207 D-Index: 8 scientists 208–209 D-Index: 4 scientists 210–211 D-Index: 12 scientists 212–213 D-Index: 11 scientists 214–215 D-Index: 10 scientists 216 D-Index: 4 scientists 217+ D-Index: 98 scientists
70 D-Index 217+

This scientist: 74 D-Index — 4th percentile

4% of scientists in this discipline score the same or lower.

The last bar groups every scientist with 217 D-Index or more.

Overview

Helen K. Reddel is affiliated with the Woolcock Institute of Medical Research in Australia. Their research focuses primarily on pulmonary and respiratory medicine, with significant contributions to the understanding and treatment of asthma and other respiratory diseases.

Their work covers a range of topics including:

  • Asthma and respiratory diseases
  • Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) Research
  • Respiratory and Cough-Related Research
  • Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
  • Delphi Technique in Research
  • Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Climate Change and Health Impacts

Helen K. Reddel's subfields of study include:

  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
  • Physiology
  • Sociology and Political Science
  • Immunology and Allergy
  • Economics and Econometrics

They have published extensively in medicine, with a total of over 200 publications primarily in the field of medicine and related disciplines.

Frequent publication venues for their work include:

  • The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
  • European Respiratory Journal
  • American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
  • ERJ Open Research
  • Respirology

Frequent co-authors in their research collaborations include:

  • Richard Beasley
  • Alberto Papi
  • Guy B. Marks
  • Hana Müllerová
  • Eric D. Bateman

Among their recent notable papers are:

  • Global Initiative for Asthma Strategy 2021: executive summary and rationale for key changes, 2021, European Respiratory Journal
  • Improving lung health in low-income and middle-income countries: from challenges to solutions, 2021, The Lancet
  • Key recommendations for primary care from the 2022 Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) update, 2023, npj Primary Care Respiratory Medicine
  • Artificial Intelligence/Machine Learning in Respiratory Medicine and Potential Role in Asthma and COPD Diagnosis, 2021, The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology In Practice
  • Mepolizumab effectiveness and identification of super-responders in severe asthma, 2020, European Respiratory Journal

Best Publications

  • An official American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society statement: asthma control and exacerbations: standardizing endpoints for clinical asthma trials and clinical practice.

    Helen K. Reddel;D. Robin Taylor;Eric D. Bateman;Louis-Philippe Boulet

  • A summary of the new GINA strategy: a roadmap to asthma control.

    Helen K. Reddel;Eric D. Bateman;Allan Becker;Louis-Philippe Boulet

  • Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) Strategy 2021 – Executive summary and rationale for key changes

    Helen K. Reddel;Helen K. Reddel;Leonard B. Bacharier;Leonard B. Bacharier;Eric D. Bateman;Eric D. Bateman;Christopher E. Brightling;Christopher E. Brightling

  • A new perspective on concepts of asthma severity and control

    D. R. Taylor;E. D. Bateman;L.-P. Boulet;H. A. Boushey

  • Inhaled Combined Budesonide-Formoterol as Needed in Mild Asthma.

    Paul M O'Byrne;J Mark FitzGerald;Eric D Bateman;Peter J Barnes

  • As-Needed Budesonide–Formoterol versus Maintenance Budesonide in Mild Asthma

    Eric D Bateman;Helen K Reddel;Paul M O'Byrne;Peter J Barnes

  • Severe and Difficult-to-Treat Asthma in Adults.

    Elliot Israel;Helen K. Reddel

  • GINA 2019: a fundamental change in asthma management: Treatment of asthma with short-acting bronchodilators alone is no longer recommended for adults and adolescents

    Helen K Reddel;J Mark FitzGerald;Eric D Bateman;Leonard B Bacharier

  • Controlled Trial of Budesonide–Formoterol as Needed for Mild Asthma

    Richard Beasley;Mark Holliday;Helen K. Reddel;Irene Braithwaite

  • Overall asthma control: The relationship between current control and future risk

    Eric D. Bateman;Helen K. Reddel;Göran Eriksson;Göran Eriksson;Stefan Peterson

  • Differences between asthma exacerbations and poor asthma control

    Helen Reddel;Sandra Ware;Guy Marks;Cheryl Salome

  • Underdiagnosis and Overdiagnosis of Asthma.

    Shawn D. Aaron;Louis Philippe Boulet;Helen K. Reddel;Andrea S. Gershon

  • The effect of inhaled IFN-β on worsening of asthma symptoms caused by viral infections. A randomized trial.

    Ratko Djukanović;Tim Harrison;Sebastian L. Johnston;Flic Gabbay

  • Improving lung health in low-income and middle-income countries: from challenges to solutions

    Jamilah Meghji;Kevin Mortimer;Alvar Agusti;Alvar Agusti;Brian W Allwood

  • The Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA): 25 years later.

    Louis-Philippe Boulet;Helen K. Reddel;Eric Bateman;Søren Pedersen

  • Inhaler reminders improve adherence with controller treatment in primary care patients with asthma.

    Juliet M. Foster;Tim Usherwood;Lorraine Smith;Susan M. Sawyer

  • Budesonide-formoterol reliever therapy versus maintenance budesonide plus terbutaline reliever therapy in adults with mild to moderate asthma (PRACTICAL): a 52-week, open-label, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial

    Jo Hardy;Christina Baggott;James Fingleton;Helen K Reddel

  • Improved asthma outcomes with a simple inhaler technique intervention by community pharmacists.

    Iman A. Basheti;Helen K. Reddel;Carol L. Armour;Sinthia Z. Bosnic-Anticevich

  • Metered-Dose Inhaler Technique: The Effect of Two Educational Interventions Delivered in Community Pharmacy Over Time

    Sinthia Z Bosnic-Anticevich;Harun Sinha;Stephen So;Helen K Reddel

  • Optimal asthma control, starting with high doses of inhaled budesonide

    HK Reddel;CR Jenkins;GB Marks;SI Ware

Frequent Co-Authors

Guy B. Marks
Guy B. Marks University of New South Wales
Eric D. Bateman
Eric D. Bateman University of Cape Town
Richard Beasley
Richard Beasley Medical Research Institute of New Zealand
Paul M. O'Byrne
Paul M. O'Byrne McMaster University
Peter G. Gibson
Peter G. Gibson University of Newcastle Australia
John W. Upham
John W. Upham University of Queensland
Susan M Sawyer
Susan M Sawyer University of Melbourne
Mark Weatherall
Mark Weatherall University of Otago
Peter A. B. Wark
Peter A. B. Wark University of Newcastle Australia
David Price
David Price University of Aberdeen

If you think any of the details on this page are incorrect, let us know.

Report an issue

We appreciate your kind effort to assist us to improve this page, it would be helpful providing us with as much detail as possible in the text box below:

Related Online Degrees & Career Pathways

Advancing your medical or healthcare career doesn’t always require a traditional on-campus route. For nurses seeking to progress, there are flexible rn to np programs online that let working nurses move up to a nurse practitioner role. This option allows you to continue working while earning an advanced degree.

Those interested in nutrition and wellness can pursue an online bs in nutrition to learn about diet, health, and disease prevention, all from the comfort of home.

Healthcare administration is another promising pathway. Before choosing a program, it’s important to know how to evaluate healthcare administration degree programs to ensure accreditation and a solid career outlook.

If you’re already an RN, there are options to expand your credentials with rn to bsn no clinical hours programs—ideal for nurses who want to advance without the added burden of in-person clinicals.

Online degrees offer flexible, accredited paths to a variety of careers in medicine, healthcare leadership, and wellness—all designed for busy professionals looking to grow.

Best Scientists Citing Helen K. Reddel

Trending Scientists

Recently Published Articles